TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Herke, Max G. A1 - Kuntz, Benjamin A1 - Lampert, Thomas A1 - Loter, Katharina A1 - Moor, Irene A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Die Bedeutung intergenerationaler Bildungsmobilität für die Gesundheit und die Lebenszufriedenheit von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland JF - Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation Y1 - 2018 VL - 38 IS - 1 SP - 80 EP - 99 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Quenzel, Gudrun A1 - Rathmann, Katharina T1 - Bildungspolitik als Bestandteil moderner Wohlfahrtspolitik JF - Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation N2 - Das Bildungsniveau der Bevölkerung eines Landes wird in Wissenschaft und Politik zunehmend als Indikator für Kreativität und Produktivität wahrgenommen. Wie internationale Schulleistungsvergleiche (etwa PISA) demonstrieren, sind die Bildungserfolge eines Landes auf das gesamte, historisch gewachsene Arrangement der Wohlfahrtspolitik zurückzuführen. In diesem Beitrag wird die Typologie von Wohlfahrtspolitiken nach Esping-Andersen um Elemente der Bildungspolitik ergänzt und exemplarisch auf Deutschland als konservativem, die USA als liberalem und Schweden als sozialdemokratischem Wohlfahrtsregime angewandt. Im Vergleich zu den USA erreicht Deutschland zwar ein höheres Bildungsniveau, schneidet aber bei der Bildungsgleichheit schlechter ab. Im Vergleich zum "sozialdemokratischen" Schweden liegen in Deutschland sowohl die Bildungserträge als auch die Bildungsgleichheit niedriger. Diese Unterschiede werden auf die unterschiedliche Akzentuierung von sozialer Sicherungs- und Bildungspolitik und die damit verbundene Organisation des Bildungssystems zurückgeführt. Der Beitrag kommt zu dem Fazit, dass nur eine enge Verzahnung von sozialer Sicherungs- und Bildungspolitik den Bildungserfolg und damit die langfristige Wohlfahrt eines Landes sichert. KW - Bildungsniveau KW - Bildungsungleichheit KW - Wohlfahrtsregimes KW - internationale Schulleistungsvergleiche KW - PISA KW - Kombination von Bildungs- und Sozialpolitik Y1 - 2011 SN - 1436-1957 VL - 3 SP - 313 EP - 326 PB - Beltz Juventa CY - Weinheim [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Health inequalities and welfare state regimes: a research note JF - Journal of Public Health N2 - Aim Comparative research on health and health inequalities has recently begun implementing a welfare regime perspective. The aim of the study was to review the existing evidence for identifying the determinants of health and health inequalities in highly developed welfare states and to develop a theoretical model for future research approaches. Subject A welfare state regime typology is applied to comparatively analyse (1) the relationship between the level of economic prosperity in a society and its respective level of overall population health and (2) the nature of the corresponding relationship between economic inequalities and health inequalities in different groups of countries. Results Although the Social Democratic welfare states have a relatively equal distribution of material wealth as well as the highest levels of population health, they are not characterised by the smallest levels of health inequality. Rather, with respect to health equality, conservative countries seem to perform better than social democracies. We propose a comprehensive theoretical model that takes into account different factors on the structural (macro), organisational (meso) and individual (micro) level in order to contribute to a better understanding of this important challenge for public health policy and practice. Conclusion Future research will require an appropriate theoretical model with the potential to explain health and health inequalities in different types of welfare states. On the basis of this model, future research should test the hypothesis that in highly developed countries not only economic, but also social, cultural and lifestyle factors are important in determining health outcomes in different segments of the population. KW - Welfare state KW - Health inequalities KW - Economic inequalities KW - Social determinants of health KW - Scandinavian paradox KW - Health-sensitive public policy Y1 - 2011 UR - urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-216295 U6 - https://doi.org/http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-216295 SN - 1613-2238 VL - 19 IS - 1 SP - 3 EP - 13 PB - Springer CY - Berlin [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Ottová-Jordan, Veronika A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Makro-strukturelle Determinanten der Gesundheit und gesundheitlichen Ungleichheit von Jugendlichen in 27 Wohlfahrtsstaaten: Eine Mehrebenenanalyse JF - Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation N2 - Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Relevanz makro-struktureller Merkmale für die Gesundheit und sozioökonomische Ungleichheit in der Gesundheit von Jugendlichen in hochentwickelten Wohlfahrtsstaaten. Datenbasis ist die internationale "Health Behaviour in School-aged Child-ren (HBSC)"-Studie 2005/06. Sie umfasst 11- bis 15-jährige Jugendliche in 27 europäischen und nordamerikanischen Länder (n=134.632), die in fünf Wohlfahrtsstaatsregimes (sozialde-mokratisch, konservativ, liberal, süd- und osteuropäisch) zusammengefasst wurden. In hierar-chischen Regressionsmodellen wurden für die psychosomatische Beschwerdelast als gesund-heitliche Zielgrößee individuelle (familiärer Wohlstand) und makro-strukturelle Determinanten (Einkommensungleichheit, Ausgaben für das Gesundheitssystem, Regime-Dummies) unter Kontrolle des nationalen Wohlstands analysiert. Im liberalen Regime und damit in Ländern mit hoher Einkommensungleichheit fallen die Beschwerderate und sozioökonomische Un-gleichheiten in der Beschwerdelast am höchsten aus. Der gesellschaftliche Wohlstand und die Ausgaben für das Gesundheitssystem sind dagegen nicht mit den Beschwerden assoziiert KW - Subjektive Gesundheit KW - multiple Beschwerden KW - Jugendliche KW - sozioökonomischer Status KW - Wohlfahrtsstaatregime KW - makro-strukturelle Determinanten KW - HBSC Y1 - 2016 SN - 1436-1957 VL - 36 IS - 4 SP - 356 EP - 381 PB - Beltz Juventa ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Pförtner, Timo-Kolja A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Osorio, Ana M. A1 - Bosakova, Lucia A1 - Elgar, Frank J. A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - The great recession, youth unemployment and inequalities in psychological health complaints in adolescents: a multilevel study in 31 countries JF - International Journal of Public Health N2 - Objectives Little is known about the impact of recessions on young people’s socioeconomic inequalities in health. This study investigates the impact of the economic recession in terms of youth unemployment on socioeconomic inequalities in psychological health complaints among adolescents across Europe and North America. Methods Data from the WHO collaborative ‘Health Behaviour in School-aged Children’ (HBSC) study were collected in 2005/06 (N = 160,830) and 2009/10 (N = 166,590) in 31 European and North American countries. Logistic multilevel models were used to assess the contribution of youth unemployment in 2009/10 (enduring recession) and the change in youth unemployment (2005–2010) to adolescent psychological health complaints and socioeconomic inequalities in complaints in 2009/10. Results Youth unemployment during the recession is positively related to psychological health complaints, but not to inequalities in complaints. Changes in youth unemployment (2005–2010) were not associated with adolescents’ psychological health complaints, whereas greater inequalities in complaints were found in countries with greater increases in youth unemployment. Conclusions This study highlights the need to tackle the impact of increasing unemployment on adolescent health and health inequalities during economic recessions. KW - Subjective health KW - Health inequalities KW - Recession KW - Youth unemployment KW - Adolescence KW - Multilevel analysis Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0866-0 SN - 1661-8556 VL - 61 IS - 7 SP - 809 EP - 819 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Moor, Irene A1 - Kunst, Anton E. A1 - Dragano, Nico A1 - Pförtner, Timo-Kolja A1 - Elgar, Frank J. A1 - Kannas, Lasse A1 - Baška, Tibor A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Is educational differentiation associated with smoking and smoking inequalities in adolescence? A multilevel analysis across 27 European and North American countries JF - Sociology of Health & Illness N2 - This study aims to determine whether educational differentiation (i.e. early and long tracking to different school types) relate to socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent smoking. Data were collected from the WHO-Collaborative 'Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)' study 2005/2006, which included 48,025 15-year-old students (Nboys = 23,008, Ngirls = 25,017) from 27 European and North American countries. Socioeconomic position was measured using the HBSC family affluence scale. Educational differentiation was determined by the number of different school types, age of selection, and length of differentiated curriculum at the country-level. We used multilevel logistic regression to assess the association of daily smoking and early smoking initiation predicted by family affluence, educational differentiation, and their interactions. Socioeconomic inequalities in both smoking outcomes were larger in countries that are characterised by a lower degree of educational differentiation (e.g. Canada, Scandinavia and the United Kingdom) than in countries with higher levels of educational differentiation (e.g. Austria, Belgium, Hungary and The Netherlands). This study found that high educational differentiation does not relate to greater relative inequalities in smoking. Features of educational systems are important to consider as they are related to overall prevalence in smoking and smoking inequalities in adolescence. KW - HBSC KW - Adolescence KW - Educational differentiation KW - Multilevel analysis KW - Socioeconomic inequality KW - Socioeconomic status KW - Tobacco smoking Y1 - 2016 VL - 38 IS - 7 SP - 1005 EP - 1025 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Kickbusch, Julian T1 - Welfare and Education T2 - International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-0080970868 SP - 481 EP - 490 PB - Elsevier ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Herke, Max G. A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Perceived class climate and school-aged children’s life satisfaction: The role of the learning environment in classrooms JF - PLoS ONE N2 - The aim of this study is to examine the impact of class-level class climate on school-aged children’s life satisfaction. Data was derived from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) using sixth grade school-aged children (n = 4,764, 483 classes). Class climate includes indicators of teachers' care and monitoring, demands, interaction, autonomy, as well as school-aged children's attitudes towards schoolwork at the class- and individual-level. Results showed that individual perceived class climate in terms of teachers' care and monitoring and autonomy was positively related to life satisfaction, whereas school-related demands were related to lower life satisfaction. Besides teachers' care and monitoring at class-level, indicators of class climate were not associated with school-aged children’s life satisfaction, while the individual perceived class climate is more important for life satisfaction. Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-24735 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Vockert, Theres A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Gebhardt, Markus A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus T1 - Self-rated health and wellbeing among school-aged children with and without special educational needs: Differences between mainstream and special schools JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities N2 - BACKGROUND: Studies among students with special educational needs (SEN) in separate special schools (SSS) and mainstream schools (MS) are particularly applicable to educational attainment and social participation. However, indicators of health and wellbeing have rarely been considered. AIMS: This study investigates two related topics: first, health and wellbeing differences between students with SEN in special schools (SSS) and students without SEN in regular schools, and second, the rarely considered question whether health and wellbeing among students with SEN differ between school settings (i.e. MS vs. SSS). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Bivariate and multilevel analyses are applied with data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) with 5267 students (grade 7). OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: After having controlled for background characteristics, students in SSS report higher likelihoods of poor self-rated health compared to students in higher track schools. Self-rated health of students with SEN does not significantly differ between MS vs. SSS. For life satisfaction, students with SEN show higher likelihoods of low life satisfaction when attending MS. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Teachers in inclusive settings are encouraged to establish class work and teaching that support a real change from class placement to inclusive culture in order to suitably support students with SEN. KW - Inclusion; Life satisfaction; Multilevel modeling; NEPS; Self-rated health; Special educational needs Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.021 VL - 81 SP - 134 EP - 142 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Kiess, Wieland A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Is being a "small fish in a big pond" bad for students' psychosomatic health? A multilevel study on the role of class-level school performance? JF - BMC Public Health N2 - Background Features of schools and classes are closely related to students´ health and wellbeing. However, class composition (e.g. in terms of school performance) has rarely been examined in relation to students´ health and wellbeing. This study focuses on the so called Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect (BFLPE), by investigating whether the level of high-performing students in classroom is negatively associated with psychosomatic complaints of students who perceive themselves as poor performers. Methods Data were derived from the German sample of the WHO-Collaborative “Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)” study 2013/2014. The sample included 5226 11-, 13- and 15-year-old students. Individual perceived school performance (PSP) was included (very good/good vs. average/below average PSP) at the individual student-level. At the class-level, school performance in class was generated by aggregating the share (in percentage) of students who report a very good/good PSP to the class-level, indicating the percentage of students with good/very good PSP in classroom. Using multilevel regression models, the association between class-level school performance (in percentage of students with very good/good PSP) and individual psychosomatic complaints were analyzed, stratified by students´ individual PSP. Results Students who report average/below average PSP showed higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.75; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.52–2.03) compared to counterparts with very good/good PSP. The aggregated class-level PSP was not significantly associated with psychosomatic complaints. However, in line with the BFLPE, results further revealed that students with average/below average PSP, who attend classes with a higher percentage of students who report very good/good PSP, had higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.91; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.01–4.01) compared to classmates with very good/good PSP. Conclusions This study revealed that class composition in terms of PSP was differentially associated with students´ psychosomatic complaints, depending on their individual PSP. Findings highlight the vulnerability of students with poor PSP placed in classes with a higher percentage of students with good PSP. Results of this study therefore indicate a need for initiatives for low performing students from teachers and school staff in class. Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5977-5 VL - 18 IS - 1 SP - 1098 EP - 1113 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus T1 - Leistung und Wohlbefinden in der Schule: Herausforderung Inklusion N2 - Immer mehr Schulen stehen vor der Herausforderung, inklusive Strukturen zu etablieren, also Schülerinnen und Schüler mit besonderem pädagogischen Förderbedarf in den Regelbetrieb einzugliedern. Aus einer interdisziplinären Perspektive beleuchtet der Band nicht nur leistungsbezogene Aspekte der schulischen Inklusion von heterogenen und vulnerablen Schülergruppen, sondern erweitert die Debatte um Aspekte des Wohlbefindens, die eng mit der schulischen Leistung korrespondieren. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt außerdem auf der Belastung und dem Wohlbefinden von Lehrkräften sowie den Herausforderungen mit schulischer Heterogenität und Inklusion. KW - Gesundheit | Bildung | Erziehungswissenschaft | Soziologie | Schulentwicklung Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-3-7799-3859-0 PB - Beltz CY - Weinheim ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Welche Wohlfahrtspolitik fördert die Gesundheit?: Der ungeklärte Zusammenhang von ökonomischer und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit JF - Das Gesundheitswesen N2 - In allen hochentwickelten Ländern hat sich in den letzten 30 Jahren der Gesundheitsstatus der Bevölkerung deutlich verbessert. Ein wesentlicher Grund dafür ist die gestiegene wirtschaftliche Prosperität. Diese ist heute aber ungleicher verteilt als vor 3 Jahrzehnten. Die Unterschiede in der Verfügbarkeit materieller Ressourcen und die Diskrepanzen im sozioökonomischen Status hängen eng mit der Gesundheitslage der Bevölkerung zusammen. Ländervergleiche zeigen, dass eine auf ökonomische Gleichheit ausgerichtete Wohlfahrtspolitik, wie sie für die skandinavischen Länder typisch ist, mit relativ günstigen gesundheitlichen Indikatoren korreliert. Bisher ist allerdings nicht geklärt, wie ökonomische Ungleichheit und gesundheitliche Lage zusammenhängen. Als besonders unklar erweist sich in neueren Studien der Zusammenhang von ökonomischer und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit. In diesem Beitrag geben wir einen Überblick zu den vorliegenden länderübergreifenden Analysen. Diese zeigen, dass die skandinavischen Länder dank ihrer intensiv umverteilenden Wohlfahrtspolitik zwar das höchste Ausmaß von ökonomischer, aber nicht von gesundheitlicher Gleichheit erreichen. Wir entwickeln auf der Basis dieser überraschenden Erkenntnis Vorschläge für künftige empirische Untersuchungen. Die Vorschläge gehen von der Annahme aus, dass in wohlhabenden Gesellschaften mit hohem Reichtum nicht mehr nur materielle, sondern verstärkt immaterielle Lebensbedingungen über die Verteilung gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit entscheiden. Als entscheidender Parameter wird die Verfügbarkeit von gesundheitsfördernden, „salutogenen” Potenzialen und Kompetenzen des Selbstmanagement in benachteiligten Gruppen der Bevölkerung postuliert. KW - ökonomische Ungleichheit KW - gesundheitliche Ungleichheit KW - Wohlfahrtspolitik KW - Skandinavisches Gesundheitsparadoxon KW - Förderung salutogener Potenziale Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1265195 SN - 1439-4421 VL - 73 IS - 6 SP - 335 EP - 343 PB - Thieme CY - Stuttgart ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Richter, Matthias A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Nic Gabhainn, S. A1 - Zambon, A. A1 - Boyce, W. A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus T1 - Welfare state regimes, health and health inequalities in adolescence: A multilevel analysis in 32 countries JF - Sociology of Health and Illness N2 - Comparative research on health and health inequalities has recently started to establish a welfare regime perspective. The objective of this study was to determine whether different welfare regimes are associated with health and health inequalities among adolescents. Data were collected from the ‘Health Behaviour in School-aged Children’ study in 2006, including 11- to 15-year-old students from 32 countries (N = 141,091). Prevalence rates and multilevel logistic regression models were calculated for self-rated health (SRH) and health complaints. The results show that between 4 per cent and 7 per cent of the variation in both health outcomes is attributable to differences between countries. Compared to the Scandinavian regime, the Southern regime had lower odds ratios for SRH, while for health complaints the Southern and Eastern regime showed high odds ratios. The association between subjective health and welfare regime was largely unaffected by adjusting for individual socioeconomic position. After adjustment for the welfare regime typology, the country-level variations were reduced to 4.6 per cent for SRH and to 2.9 per cent for health complaints. Regarding cross-level interaction effects between welfare regimes and socioeconomic position, no clear regime-specific pattern was found. Consistent with research on adults this study shows that welfare regimes are important in explaining variations in adolescent health across countries. Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01433.x SN - 1467-9566 VL - 34 IS - 6 SP - 858 EP - 879 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Hoboken (NJ) [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Ottova, Veronika A1 - de Looze, Margarethe A1 - Levin, Kate A1 - Molcho, Michael A1 - Elgar, Frank A1 - Nic Gabhainn, Saoirse A1 - van Dijk, Jitse P. A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Macro-level determinants of young people’s subjective health and health inequalities: A multilevel analysis in 27 welfare states JF - Maturitas N2 - Objectives Cross-national studies have rarely focused on young people. The aim of this study is to investigate whether macro-level determinants are associated with health and socioeconomic inequalities in young people's health. Study design Data were collected from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in 2006, which included 11- to 15-year old adolescents from 27 European and North American countries (n = 134,632). This study includes national income, health expenditure, income inequality, and welfare regime dummy-variables as macro-level determinants, using hierarchical regression modelling. Main outcome measure Psychosomatic health complaints and socioeconomic inequalities in psychosomatic health complaints. Results Adolescents in countries with higher income inequality and with liberal welfare tradition were associated with more health complaints and a stronger relationship between socioeconomic status and macro-level determinants compared to adolescents from countries with lower income inequality or the Social Democratic regime. National income and health expenditure were not related to health complaints. Countries with higher national income, public health expenditure and income inequality showed stronger associations between socioeconomic status and psychosomatic health complaints. Conclusion Results showed that macro-level characteristics are relevant determinants of health and health inequalities in adolescence. KW - Macro-level determinants KW - Adolescents KW - Subjective health KW - Health inequality KW - HBSC Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.01.008 SN - 0378-5122 VL - 80 IS - 4 SP - 414 EP - 420 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Herke, Max A1 - Bilz, Ludwig A1 - Rimpelä, Arja A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Class-Level School Performance and Life Satisfaction: Differential Sensitivity for Low- and High-Performing School-Aged Children JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - This study investigates whether class-level school performance affects students’ life satisfaction and if there are differential effects for high- and low-performing students. Data were derived from the National Educational Panel Study, including n = 5196 students (49.6% girls), nested in 478 classes and 250 secondary schools. School performance in class was measured by aggregating individual grade point average in Mathematics and German. The study could not reveal the “big-fish-little-pond”-effect regarding students’ life satisfaction but found differential effects for high- vs. low performing students. There was no significant association for low-performing students attending classes with higher class-level performance However, low-performing students revealed the lowest life satisfaction. High-performing students placed in classes with higher average performance reported lower life satisfaction compared to high-performing students in classes with lower average performance. This study provides evidence for the impact of the learning environment in class on school-aged children’s life satisfaction, by highlighting the differential sensitivity of high-performing students when placed in classes with higher or lower average performance. KW - school performance; social comparison; life satisfaction; “big-fish-little-pond”-effect; multilevel analysis; National Educational Panel Study; Germany Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122750 VL - 15 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rathmann, Katharina A1 - Herke, Max A1 - Hurrelmann, Klaus A1 - Richter, Matthias T1 - Klassenklima, schulisches Wohlbefinden und Gesundheit von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des Nationalen Bildungspanels JF - Das Gesundheitswesen N2 - Ziel Ziel des Beitrags ist es, erstmalig mit den Daten des Nationalen Bildungspanels den Zusammenhang zwischen Merkmalen des Klassenklimas und des schulischen Wohlbefindens mit der selbstberichteten Gesundheit und krankheitsbedingten Schulfehltagen von Schülern in deutschen Regelschulen zu untersuchen. Methodik Datenbasis bildet das Nationale Bildungspanel (NEPS). Die Stichprobe umfasst (n=7348) Schüler der siebten Klassen in Regelschulen (Startkohorte 3, Welle 3, 2012). Merkmale des Klassenklimas umfassen Anforderungen, Kontrolle und Lernorientierung im Unterricht, Autonomie und Interaktion der Schüler sowie die Unterrichtsqualität, jeweils auf die Lehrkräfte in Deutsch bezogen. Das schulische Wohlbefinden wird über die Schulzufriedenheit sowie Hilflosigkeit in zentralen Schulfächern erfasst. Es werden sowohl bivariate Analysen als auch logistische Mehrebenenmodelle, unter Kontrolle von Alter, Geschlecht und besuchter Schulform, durchgeführt. Ergebnisse Die Ergebnisse der Mehrebenenmodelle zeigen, dass insbesondere Schüler mit einer höheren Schulzufriedenheit eine bessere Gesundheit und weniger krankheitsbedingte Fehltage berichten. Eine höhere Hilflosigkeit und Lernorientierung sind dagegen negativ mit beiden Zielgrößen assoziiert. Hauptschüler besitzen zudem ein erhöhtes Risiko krankheitsbedingter Fehltage im Vergleich zu Gymnasiasten. Schlussfolgerung Die Ergebnisse unterstreichen, dass insbesondere das schulische Wohlbefinden in Form der Schulzufriedenheit sowie der Hilflosigkeit in zentralen Schulfächern eng mit der subjektiven Gesundheit und krankheitsbedingten Fehltagen assoziiert ist. Maßnahmen zur Gesundheitsförderung sollten daher v. a. auf das schulische Wohlbefinden gerichtet werden sowie Schüler adressieren, die eine andere Schulform als das Gymnasium besuchen. KW - Gesundheit, Fehltage, Wohlbefinden, Schule, Klassenklima, Nationales Bildungspanel (NEPS), self-rated health, school absence, wellbeing, school, class climate, National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121886 SN - 0941-3790, 1439-4421 VL - 80 IS - 4 SP - 332 EP - 341 ER -