TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Genschel, Philipp T1 - How the European Union Constrains the State : Multilevel Governance of Taxation JF - European Journal of Political Research N2 - This article challenges the common assumption that the European Union (EU) has little power over taxation. Based on a comprehensive analysis of EU tax legislation and European Court of Justice (ECJ) tax jurisprudence from 1958 to 2007, the article shows that the EU exerts considerable regulatory control over the Member States' taxing power and imposes tighter constraints on Member State taxes than the American federal government imposes on American state taxation. These findings contradict the standard account of the EU as a regulatory polity that specialises in apolitical issues of market creation and leaves control of highly politicised core functions of government (defence, taxation, social security, education, etc.) to the Member States; despite strong treaty safeguards, national tax autonomy is undermined by EU regulation. Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01939.x SN - 0304-4130 N1 - Available as print and e-publication in your Hertie Library. Als Druckversion und elektronische Ausgabe in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. VL - 50 IS - 3 SP - 293 EP - 314 PB - Blackwell CY - Oxford ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Die internationale Regulierung des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols in der Europäischen Union T2 - Wozu Staat? Governance in Räumen begrenzter und konsolidierter begrenzter Staatlichkeit N2 - Aufbauend auf den Arbeiten der Bremer und Berliner Sonderforschungsbereiche fragt der Band, was der Staat in Räumen konsolidierter und begrenzter Staatlichkeit zu effektiver und legitimer Governance beiträgt: Welche Governance-Leistungen erbringt er in den Politikfeldern Sicherheit, Gesundheit, Umwelt und Finanzmärkte? Welche Governance-Beiträge kommen von nicht-staatlichen Akteuren? Welche Beziehungs- und Konfliktmuster dominieren? Der Band zeigt, erstens, dass der Staat in keinem der untersuchten Fälle das Governance-Monopol hält, sondern immer auch nicht-staatliche Akteure Governance-Funktionen ausüben. Zweitens finden wir ausgeprägte Unterschiede zwischen den Räumen: Während sich in Räumen konsolidierter Staatlichkeit tendenziell eine vom Staat moderierte Arbeitsteilung mit nicht-staatlichen Governance-Akteuren einstellt, ist das Verhältnis in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit durch Konkurrenz und fehlende Hierarchie gekennzeichnet. Drittens unterscheidet sich das Zusammenspiel staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure kaum zwischen Politikfeldern. Die Analyse mündet in der Unterscheidung von vier idealtypischen Governance-Konstellationen staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure. (Angabe zum Buch) Y1 - 2011 SN - 978-3-8329-6971-4 N1 - Available as print and e-publication in your Hertie Library. Als Druckversion und elektronische Ausgabe in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. SP - 35 EP - 53 PB - Nomos Verl.-Ges. CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - The Monopoly of Legitimate Force : Denationalization, or Business as Usual? JF - European Review N2 - As Max Weber and many others in his tradition have argued, the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force is the core of the modern state. What counts here is not the frequency of the actual use of force but the fact that only the state has the legitimate right to use such force. The military and the police are the most concrete expressions of this monopoly. In recent decades, the use of the military and the police has been subject to external challenges – ‘globalization’ – and new ideas about police and military intervention. Although at an operational level the state retains full control over the actions of the police and military, the conditions for their use are increasingly shaped by institutionalized legitimating ideas. Y1 - 2005 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000189 SN - 1062-7987 VL - 13 IS - Sonderheft 1 SP - 37 EP - 52 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Regieren jenseits der Staatlichkeit T2 - Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland N2 - Das Werk legt eine Bestandsaufnahme der Leistungsfähigkeit der politikwissenschaftlichen Teildisziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen (IB) vor. Es wird gefragt, inwieweit im deutschsprachigen Raum eigenständige Forschungsakzente entwickelt wurden, zu welchen Erträgen diese geführt haben und inwieweit das Fachgebiet in der Lage ist, die realen Veränderungen konzeptionell und theoretisch so zu erfassen, dass sich daraus ein besseres Verständnis der sich noch immer entfaltenden Umbruchsprozesse ergibt. Es zeigt sich, dass sich so etwas wie die »neuen« IB entwickelt haben. Im Vordergrund der Analyse stehen Prozesse wie Verrechtlichung, Sozialisierung und Globalisierung und weniger Strukturen wie Machtverteilung, Abhängigkeit oder Interdependenz. Führende AutorInnen stellen die »neuen« IB vor und reflektieren diese kritisch. Der Band ist unverzichtbar für die wissenschaftliche Selbstreflexion im Fach und bietet für Studierende einen perfekten Einstieg in gegenwärtige Debatten. Der Band enthält Beiträge von: Michael Zürn, Peter Mayer, Thomas Risse, Antje Wiener, Christopher Daase, Harald Müller, Detlef F. Sprinz, Joachim Betz, Sebastian Harnisch, Martin List und Bernhard Zangl, Frank Schimmelfennig, Philipp Genschel, Christoph Scherrer, Markus Jachtenfuchs, Andreas Nölke, Mathias Albert, Klaus Dieter Wolf und Gunther Hellmann. (Angabe zum Buch) Y1 - 2003 SN - 978-3-8329-0320-6 N1 - Available as print in your Hertie Library. Als Druckversioin in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. SP - 495 EP - 518 PB - Nomos Verl.-Ges. CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Deepening and Widening Integration Theory JF - Journal of European Public Policy N2 - Theories of European integration have traditionally been inwardoriented and presented difficulties in coping with the issue of whether the EU constitutes only a single case. Theoretically oriented research on enlargement offers the possibility of helping us to arrive at generalizable knowledge. However, traditional dichotomies of scientific discourse tend to favour the mutual ignorance of empirical facts and prevent the establishment of better theories and cumulative knowledge. KW - Constructivism KW - Enlargement KW - Integration Theory KW - Rationalism Y1 - 2002 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210152475 SN - 1466-4429 N1 - Available as e-publication in your Hertie Library. Als elektronische Ausgabe in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. VL - 9 IS - 4 SP - 650 EP - 657 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - The Governance Approach to European Integration JF - Journal of Common Market Studies N2 - This article argues that the study of European integration is divided into two distinct approaches: classical integration theory for which the shape of the Euro-polity is the dependent variable; and the governance approach for which it is the independent variable. An historical and conceptual overview of the approach focuses on the efficiency side of governance and excludes issues of democracy and legitimacy. From a sociology of knowledge perspective, the first part traces the roots of the present discussion back to three bodies of literature, namely studies on Europeanization, regulatory policy-making and network concepts. The second part presents the achievements of the approach: putting EU studies in a comparative perspective, directing attention towards democratic governance and bypassing old dichotomies on the future of the nation-state. The final section evaluates present shortcomings, most notably a bias toward problem-solving, the proliferation of case studies and the lack of a coherent theoretical perspective. Y1 - 2001 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00287 SN - 1468-5965 N1 - Available as e-publication in your Hertie Library. Als elektronische Ausgabe in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. VL - 39 IS - 2 SP - 245 EP - 264 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Diez, Thomas A1 - Jung, Sabine T1 - Which Europe? : Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order JF - European Journal of International Relations N2 - Conflicts over the shape of the European Union are usually modelled as conflicts of interests. This article argues that the development of a polity depends not only on interests but also on normative ideas about a legitimate political order (`polity-ideas'). These polity-ideas are extremely stable over time and resistant to change because they are linked to the identity and basic normative orientations of the actors involved. The article has four parts: (1) a theoretical argument how to link ideas and polity development in the EU, (2) a methodological discussion containing four ideal-typical polity-ideas about the EU, (3) a comparative analysis of the development of these ideas in France, Germany and the United Kingdom from 1950 to 1995, and (4) a summary of the empirical findings and a discussion of areas of research for which the theoretical approach and the empirical results presented here might be useful. Y1 - 1998 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004004002 SN - 1354-0661 VL - 4 IS - 4 SP - 409 EP - 445 PB - Sage CY - London [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Theoretical Perspectives on European Governance JF - European Law Journal N2 - The paper reviews some theories of social science which could contribute to the development of a concept of European governance going beyond traditional notions, such as federal states' or ‘international organisation’. The theoretical argument is based on the culturalist version of neo-institutionalism, which stresses the role of ideas in the functioning and transformation of a political order. It is claimed that both globalisation and functional differentiation transform existing nation-states and shape the emerging European polity. European governance is characterised as poly-centric and non-hierarchical. Finally, different approaches to the legitimation of such a polity are discussed. The paper comes to the conclusion that the emergence of a European political order is part of a process which could require a rethinking of basic social scientific concepts. Y1 - 1995 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00010.x SN - 1468-0386 VL - 1 IS - 2 SP - 115 EP - 133 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Oxford [u.a.] ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Ideen und internationale Beziehungen JF - Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen Y1 - 1995 UR - https://www.jstor.org/stable/40843784 VL - 2 IS - 2 SP - 417 EP - 442 PB - Nomos Verl.-Ges. CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Gehring, Thomas T1 - Liability for Transboundary Environmental Damage : Towards a General Liability Regime? JF - European Journal of International Law N2 - Since 1980, the International Law Commission (ILQ has been engaged in drafting a comprehensive convention on liability for damage arising out of acts not prohibited by international law. During its work, the TLC has increasingly focused on transboundary environmental damage. Thus, the project may have considerable impact on the further development of this area of international law. This article analyzes the bask concepts of the project which have emerged so far. It assesses the political feasibility of the project in the light of the current state of international law concerning liability for environmental damage, given that a number of specific ultra-hazardous activities are already regulated by multilateral liability regimes. It concludes that the international community has increasingly accepted the obligation to regulate liability issues, which has improved the chances for victims to mount successful claims. However, this does not mean that states were prepared to compensate for transboundary environmental damage. Y1 - 1993 UR - http://www.ejil.org/article.php?article=1228&issue=67 SN - 0938-5428 N1 - Free online access: http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/4/1/1228.pdf Freier online Zugriff: http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/4/1/1228.pdf VL - 4 IS - 1 SP - 92 EP - 106 PB - Oxford Univ.Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Die Konstruktion Europas. Verfassungsideen und institutionelle Entwicklung N2 - Ist der Verlauf der europäischen Integration nur von materiellen Interessen bestimmt oder spielen auch Ideen eine Rolle? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage wird zunächst eine konstruktivistische Theorie der Bildung staatlicher Präferenzen entwickelt. Der zweite Teil bietet eine methodisch reflektierte, systematisch vergleichende Untersuchung europapolitischer Vorstellungen ("Verfassungsideen") in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien seit 1950. Der dritte Teil analysiert ihre politische Wirksamkeit anhand der Verhandlungen zum Amsterdamer Vertrag. Ergebnis ist, daß in Bereichen, wo objektive Interessenlagen unklar sind, Ideen auch in zwischenstaatlichen Verfassungskonferenzen eine wesentliche Rolle spielen. Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-7890-7906-5 N1 - Available as print in your Hertie Library. Als Druckversion in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. PB - Nomos-Verl.-Ges. CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - International Policy-Making as a Learning Process? : The European Union and the Greenhouse Effect Y1 - 1996 SN - 978-1859721735 N1 - Available as print in your Hertie Library. Als Druckversion in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar. PB - Avebury CY - Aldershot [u.a.] ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Gehring, Thomas T1 - Haftung und Umwelt : Interessenkonflikte im internationalen Weltraum-, Atom- und Seerecht. N2 - Multilaterale Regelungen zur Haftung für Umweltschäden im Weltraum-, Atom- und Seerecht sind nicht nur statische Völkerrechtsnormen, sondern auch Produkte eines Prozesses der Interessendurchsetzung. Dieser dynamische Rechtserzeugungsprozeß wird mittels eines interdisziplinären Ansatzes untersucht, der die politischen Grundlagen des Völkerrechts unterstreicht. Bislang übernehmen Staaten nur dann völkerrechtliche Haftpflicht, wenn dies zur Durchsetzung eigener Interessen dient (Raumfahrt,Atomenergie). Im Regelfall versuchen sie dagegen, die risikoschaffende Industrie zur Haftung heranzuziehen. Sie haben dafür wegweisende Modelle entwickelt (Ölhaftungsfonds). Diese Untersuchung des Entstehungsprozesses der wichtigsten Umwelthaftungskonventionen bildet schließlich die Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Vorhabens der ILC zur Haftung für Schäden durch völkerrechtlich nicht verbotene Aktivitäten. Y1 - 1988 SN - 978-3-631-40341-9 PB - Peter Lang CY - Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] ER - TY - EDBOOK A1 - Chalmers, Damian A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Joerges, Christian T1 - Adjusting to European Diversity : The End of the Eurocrats' Dream? Y1 - 2016 SN - 978-1-107-10718-2 PB - Cambridge Univ. Press. CY - Cambridge ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flonk, Danielle A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Obendiek, Anke S. T1 - Authority conflicts in internet governance: Liberals vs. sovereigntists? JF - Global Constitutionalism N2 - We analyse conflicts over norms and institutions in internet governance. In this emerging field, dispute settlement is less institutionalised and conflicts take place at a foundational level. Internet governance features two competing spheres of authority characterised by fundamentally diverging social purposes: A more consolidated liberal sphere emphasises a limited role of the state, private and multistakeholder governance and freedom of speech. A sovereigntist challenger sphere emphasises state control, intergovernmentalism and push against the preponderance of Western institutions and private actors. We trace the activation and evolution of conflict between these spheres with regard to norms and institutions in four instances: the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12), the fifth session of the United Nations Group of Governmental Experts (UNGGE) and the Budapest Convention of the Council of Europe. We observe intense norm collisions, and strategic attempts at competitive regime creation and regime shifting towards intergovernmental structures by the sovereigntist sphere. Despite these aggressive attempts at creating new institutions and norms, the existing internet governance order is still in place. Hence, authority conflicts in global internet governance do not necessarily lead to fragmentation. KW - contested multilateralism KW - internet governance KW - norm collisions KW - sovereignty Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381720000167 SN - 2045-3817 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 364 EP - 386 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bremer, Björn A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Juncker's Curse? Identity, Interest, and Public Support for the Integration of Core State Powers† JF - JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies N2 - Abstract In this study we analysed the patterns and covariates of public support for the European integration of core state powers based on an original new survey. We found considerable variation across integration instruments, member states and policy issues. Horizontal transfers are supported more than vertical capacity building; member states from the EU's South‐East are more supportive than states from the North‐West; and support increases from debt relief to unemployment assistance, sharing the burdens of refugees, and military defence to disaster aid. Identity is a strong and fairly consistent predictor for individual variations in support. The association with respondents’ interest is less consistent, but can be quite strong with respect to specific policy issues such as debt and unemployment. Overall, support for the integration of core state powers is higher and more variable than expected. This suggests there is considerable room for political agency rather than a general constraining dissensus. KW - - KW - capacity KW - core state powers KW - European integration; identity KW - interests KW - public opinion Y1 - 2020 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-36077 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12980 SN - 1468-5965 VL - 58 IS - 1 SP - 56 EP - 75 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Freudlsperger, Christian A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - A member state like any other? Germany and the European integration of core state powers JF - Journal of European Integration N2 - The EU has integrated core state powers in a largely unsustainable manner. Why is this? In this introduction to a special issue on Germany, we take an in-depth look at national preference-formation. We trace the impact of state elites, as emphasised by functionalist theories, and mass publics and political parties, as stressed by postfunctionalism. We find that across policy fields and with striking continuity over time, Germany acts as a normal member state. The country prefers the regulation of national capacities over the creation of European capacities, and (increasingly) the intergovernmental rather than supranational control of those capacities. Only in existential crises, Germany supports European capacity-building under intergovernmental control. This leads to unstable integration but is not an indicator of hegemonic dominance. Crucial from both a practical and theoretical perspective, there exists no major gap between state elites and political parties or public opinion on German preferences. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877695 SN - Print ISSN: 0703-6337, Online ISSN: 1477-2280 VL - 43 IS - 2 SP - 117 EP - 135 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Capacity-Building and the New Intergovernmentalism JF - JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13755 VL - 63 IS - S1 SP - 65 EP - 76 ER - TY - EDBOOK A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus ED - Dawson, Mark ED - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Autonomy without collapse in a Better European Union N2 - The European Union's history exhibits numerous episodes in which Member States have sought to re-enforce their national autonomy in the face of deepening integration. Efforts to re-gain autonomy, however, are often accompanied by legitimate concerns that autonomy will lead to dis-integration or will have wider destructive consequences. The EU thus faces a dilemma. Calls for autonomy cannot all be dismissed as mere populist rhetoric or national egoism but instead represent a legitimate questioning of the degree of uniformity that EU law and politics presently carry. At the same time, the fear that greater autonomy may carry dis-integrative effects is also legitimate -uniformity is not an accidental by-product of the EU's construction but intrinsically related to its policy goals. Giving too much room for autonomy might create an opportunity structure for the loss of collective goods, deficits in problem-solving, and perhaps even to self-destruction. The EU requires autonomy, but in doing so, it must also avoid collapse. Can it achieve it, and if so, how? Autonomy without Collapse is devoted to exploring innovative answers to this question. It draws together scholars in law and political science interested in exploring how to overcome the central dilemma of preserving sustainable yet real autonomy in the future European Union. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/autonomy-without-collapse-in-a-better-european-union-9780192897541?cc=de&lang=en&# SN - 9780192897541 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus ED - Dawson, Mark ED - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Autonomy without Collapse? Towards a Better European Union. T2 - Autonomy without Collapse in a Better European Union Y1 - 2022 UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/autonomy-without-collapse-in-a-better-european-union-9780192897541?cc=de&lang=en&# SN - 9780192897541 SP - 3 EP - 20 PB - Oxford University Press CY - Oxford ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Freudlsperger, Christian A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Wendepunkt Corona-Krise? Deutsche Präferenzen zur europäischen Integration staatlicher Kerngewalten seit Maastricht JF - integration N2 - Did the Covid-19 crisis prompt a turn in German EU policy? Investigating the long-term development of German preferences on the European integration of core state powers, we find striking continuity. German governments persistently seek to minimise their costs from and maximise their control over integration. Consequently, they back supranational capacity-building primarily as a last resort in existential systemic crises. The Corona recovery fund, which is temporary and placed under intergovernmental control, is in line with this general long-term preference and does little to alleviate the structural flaws of the Euro area. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2021-2-81 VL - 44 IS - 2 SP - 81 EP - 96 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - Postfunctionalism reversed: solidarity and rebordering during the COVID-19 pandemic JF - Journal of European Public Policy N2 - Postfunctionalism posits a tradeoff between the functional scale of governance and the territorial scope of community: functional scale is large and transnational for efficiency reasons; community is small-scale and (sub-)national for reasons of social trust and collective identification. COVID-19 has turned this tradeoff upside down: it has shrunk functional scale to the (sub-)national level in the name of security, while lifting expectations of community to the grand transnational scale in the name of solidarity. This reversal of scales has resulted in a rapid rebordering of the Single Market and the Schengen area on the one hand, and a significant debordering of fiscal risk and burden sharing on the other. We reconstruct the evolution of this double-movement from January to August 2020, contrast it to historical trends in the scale-community tradeoff of European integration, and discuss implications for postfunctionalist theory. Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1881588 SN - Print ISSN: 1350-1763, Online ISSN: 1466-4429 VL - 28 IS - 3 SP - 350 EP - 369 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Migliorati, Marta T1 - Differentiated integration as symbolic politics? Constitutional differentiation and policy reintegration in core state powers JF - European Union Politics N2 - What are the policy consequences of constitutional differentiation in core state powers? We argue that the most important consequence is not necessarily the exclusion of the constitutional outs from the policies of the ins, but their reintegration by different means. The outs often have strong functional and political incentives to re-join the policies they opted out from, and the ins have good reasons to help them back in. We develop a theoretical framework that derives the incentives for reintegration from the costs of a policy exclusion. We use a novel dataset of reintegration opportunities to map trends and patterns of reintegration across policy fields and member states. We analyze selected cases of reintegration to probe the plausibility of our theoretical argument. KW - Core state powers differentiated integration KW - European Union symbolic politics Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221128291 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Migliorati, Marta A1 - Loschert, Franziska T1 - Differentiated integration and core state powers: the EU budget and Justice and Home Affairs N2 - This paper studies two areas of Core State Powers (CSP), i.e. the EU budget and Justice and Home Affairs. The two cases have the aim to reconstruct how Differentiated Integration (DI) has developed over time in these two specific domains. While the aim is the same for both cases, the way the cases are structured is substantially different. This is due to various reasons. First, the politics of the EU budget go back to the early days of the EU, while JHA is a post-Maastricht feature. This implies that the budget case study concentrates on a much longer time span. Second, DI in the budget interests several member states, while in JHA it is a phenomenon circumscribed to fewer members. Finally, the politics of the budget are decided through intergovernmental negotiations, while JHA is a rather supranationalised policy that relies a lot on secondary legislation and EU executive bodies such as EU agencies. Y1 - 2022 ET - Working Paper, EUI RSC, 2022/47, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Migliorati, Marta T1 - Report on the expanded EUDIFF 1 dataset N2 - This report provides a general overview of the dataset under construction for WP5, EUDIFF-RES, focusing on differentiated integration in core state powers (CSP) in the European Union (EU). The report explains the rationale behind the data collection and provides an outline of the information gathered so far. The aim of the report is to make the dataset easily accessible to anyone who wishes to utlise it for further research. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74577 ET - EUI RSC; 2022/40; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)  ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Migliorati, Marta T1 - Report on the expansion of the EUDIFF 1 dataset N2 - The present report makes an overview of the progresses made so far in Work Package 5. At this initial stage, the main aim was to develop a new coding for core state powers in EU legislation. Such coding serves the purpose of expanding EUDIFF1 through new information on core state powers integration. The report is structured as follows: after a brief introduction, Section I presents a tripartite categorization of core state powers modes of integration. Section II tests the plausibility of the proposed categorisations through an empirical analysis that explores primary legislation from 1952 to 2016. Section III discusses the possibility of a more fine-grained distinction. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74573 ET - EUI RSC; 2022/38; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)  ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Migliorati, Marta T1 - Report on patterns of variation in DI across areas of core state power and instruments of integration N2 - The paper summarises different patterns of differentiation and reintegration in core state powers during the post-Maastricht period, based on the EUDIFF-RES dataset. Moreover, it offers a theoretical framework able to explain the observed variation. The framework is further tested by means of short empirical illustrations taken from different policy areas. Overall, the EUDIFF-RES dataset substantially contributes to our understanding of CSP differentiated integration by revealing that the behaviour of states vis-a-vis core state powers varies greatly according to the kind of resource, as well as the costs and opportunities attached to it. Y1 - 2022 UR - https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74574 ET - Working Paper, EUI RSC, 2022/39, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)  ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus T1 - The security state in Europe: regulatory or positive? JF - Journal of European Public Policy N2 - We challenge Kruck and Weiss’ argument about the regulatory security state on two counts. First, we contest the notion that the regulatory state is a viable alternative to the positive security state. While regulation and epistemic authority are increasingly important means of security provision, they remain critically dependent power resources and political authority that only the positive state provides. The regulatory security state is premised on the positive state and unviable without it. Second, the rise of the regulatory security state over the past three decades reflects highly specific historical conditions rather than a general trend. These conditions include unusually low geopolitical tensions in Europe and the strong regulatory bias of EU integration. Concepts matter: The wider the notion of security, the more relevant the regulatory security state becomes. It is an important reality but the war in Ukraine reminds us of the enduring centrality of the positive state. Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174580 SP - 1447 EP - 1457 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flonk, Daniëlle A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Obendiek, Anke T1 - Controlling internet content in the EU: towards digital sovereignty JF - Journal of European Public Policy N2 - We analyse the rhetoric and reality of EU digital sovereignty by looking at content control. The control of online content is central to sovereignty because it relates to fundamental freedoms and democratic competition. Our main data source is the unique International Organizations in Global Internet Governance (IO-GIG) dataset which contains internet policy output documents across international institutions and issue areas between 1995 and 2021. By assessing policy output, we show structural trends in content control output in volume, bindingness, and orientation. By analysing policy discourse, we show the evolution of frames on content control over time. We find evidence for a comprehensive but still ongoing trend towards digital sovereignty in policy output and a shift from prioritising free access to the public order in discourse. Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2309179 N1 - Open Access publication is funded by the Hertie School Library VL - 31 IS - 8 SP - 2316 EP - 2342 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Genschel, Philipp A1 - Jachtenfuchs, Markus A1 - Migliorati, Marta T1 - Nur Symbolpolitik? Differenzierung und Reintegration staatlicher Kerngewalten JF - integration N2 - Constitutional differentiation is often assumed to match perfectly with reality. We argue, however, that this is often not the case in core state powers. Constitutional differentiation often does not lead to the exclusion of the non-integrated member states (“outs”) from the policies of the integrated member states (“ins”) but to their reintegration by different means. We present a cost-benefit-model which argues that both “outs” and “ins” often have strong functional and political incentives to seek reintegration after an earlier decision for differentiation because the costs of exclusion are too high. We use a novel dataset of reintegration opportunities to map trends and patterns of reintegration across policy fields, reintegration instruments and member states in core state powers. We conclude by arguing that reintegration is a frequent but fragile phenomenon through which “ins” and “outs” cope with the costs of exclusion. Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2023-2-146 VL - 46 IS - 2 SP - 146 EP - 161 ER -