TY - BOOK A1 - Bach, Tobias A1 - Fleischer, Julia A1 - Hustedt, Thurid T1 - Organisation und Steuerung zentralstaatlicher Behörden. Agenturen im westeuropäischen Vergleich N2 - Organisation und Steuerung nachgeordneter Behörden – mittlerweile auch Agenturen genannt – zählen in der internationalen Verwaltungsforschung wie auch der Verwaltungspraxis seit einigen Jahren zu den vieldiskutierten Themen. Dieser Band resümiert die neueren Forschungserkenntnisse zu nachgeordneten Behörden in Deutschland, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden und Schweden. Die AutorInnen diskutieren zentrale Argumente der Reformdebatten sowie die Errichtung, das institutionelle Design und die Aufgaben dieser Behörden. Rechtstraditionen, Politikstile sowie aufgabenspezifische Merkmale liefern wichtige Erklärungsbeiträge für die Entwicklung und Position nachgeordneter Behörden in diesen Ländern. Ebenso wird ergebnisorientierte Steuerung über Leistungsvereinbarungen, Leistungsindikatoren und Berichtswesen in den Untersuchungsländern unterschiedlich umgesetzt. Im Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass auch in Deutschland erste Schritte sichtbar werden, sich vorsichtig einer »neuen Steuerung« zu nähern. Der internationale Vergleich bietet zahlreiche Anhaltspunkte, welche Probleme und Möglichkeiten mit der Organisation und Steuerung moderner Behörden verbunden sein können. Y1 - 2010 SN - 978-3-8360-7234-2 PB - Edition Sigma CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg ED - Byrkjeflot, Haldor ED - Engelstad, Fredrick T1 - From Neutral Competence to Competent Neutrality? Revisiting Neutral Competence as the Core Normative Foundation of the Western Bureaucracy BT - Comparative Perspectives T2 - Bureaucracy in Transition Y1 - 2018 SN - 9781787432840 SP - 69 EP - 88 PB - Emerald CY - Bingley ET - Comparative Social Research (Yearbook Series) 33 (2018) ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hustedt, Thurid ED - Veit, Sylvia ED - Reichard, Christoph ED - Wewer, Göttrik T1 - Verwaltung und der Umgang mit Krisen und Katastrophen T2 - Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-3-658-21563-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21571-2_17-1 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hustedt, Thurid T1 - Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias? JF - Policy Studies N2 - Research on policy advisory systems has rapidly proliferated over the last decade and now focuses on advisory system change dynamics. Yet, empirical studies predominantly focus on the study of policy advisory systems in Westminster systems and it is those studies upon which theorization relies. This paper argues that this Westminster-prevalence resulted in a Westminster-bias of our understanding of policy advisory systems and directs attention to more abstract or general analytical dimensions that may be relevant for the comparative study of policy advisory systems and research on advice systems in transitional and developing countries. Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Radtke, Ina ED - Bogumil, Jörg ED - Kuhlmann, Sabine ED - Proeller, Isabella T1 - Die Flüchtlingskrise als Herausforderung für die interministerielle Koordination in den Bundesländern – das Fallbeispiel Rheinland-Pfalz T2 - Verwaltungshandeln in der Flüchtlingskrise Y1 - 2019 SN - 9783848755271 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845296500-49 SP - 49 EP - 64 PB - Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Trein, Phillipp ED - Klenk, Tanja ED - Nullmeier, Frank ED - Wewer, Göttrik T1 - Koordination und Integration im E-Government T2 - Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung N2 - Der föderale Staatsaufbau und die konsensorientierten Institutionen des deutschen Regierungssystems schaffen einen hohen Koordinationsbedarf und erschweren die Integration neuer Technologien und Politiken in bestehende Strukturen. Dies zeigt sich auch beim E-Government, also der Digitalisierung der Verwaltung. Besonders die föderale Organisation von Verwaltungszuständigkeiten verkompliziert die Koordination beim E-Government, während beispielsweise im Gesundheitsbereich die konsensorientierten Institutionen die Einführung technischer Innovationen verlangsamen. Gewisse Fortschritte Deutschlands sind im internationalen Vergleich gleichwohl zu erkennen. Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-3-658-23669-4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_53-1 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Randma-Liiv, Tiina A1 - Savi, Riin ED - Bouckaert, Geert ED - Jann, Werner T1 - Public Administration and Disciplines T2 - European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward N2 - The public sector in our society has over the past two decades undergone substantial changes, as has the academic field studying Public Administration (PA). In the next twenty years major shifts are further expected to occur in the way futures are anticipated and different cultures are integrated. Practice will be handled in a relevant way, and more disciplines will be engaging in the field of Public Administration. The prominent scholars contributing to this book put forward research strategies and focus on priorities in the field of Public Administration. The volume will also give guidance on how to redesign teaching programmes in the field. This book will provide useful insights to compare and contrast European PA with PA in Europe, and with developments in other parts of the world. Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-94-6166-307-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvv417th.11 SP - 129 EP - 146 PB - Leuven University Press CY - Leuven ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rackwitz, Maike A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Hammerschmid, Gerhard T1 - Digital transformation: From hierarchy to network-based collaboration? The case of the German “Online Access Act”. JF - dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management N2 - To unlock the full potential of ICT-related public sector innovation and digital transformation, governments must embrace collaborative working structures and leadership, is commonly argued. However, little is known about the dynamics of such collaborations in contexts of hierarchy, silo cultures, and procedural accountability. A widely voiced but empirically insufficiently substantiated claim is that bringing cross-cutting digital endeavours forward requires more lateral, network-based approaches to governance beyond traditional Weberian ideals. We test this claim by shedding light on three distinct challenges (complexity, risk, and power imbalance) encountered when implementing the specific collaborative case of the German Online Access Act (OAA) and by examining how they have been addressed in institutional design and leadership. Our analysis, which combines desk research and semi-structured expert interviews, reveals that flexible, horizontal approaches are on the rise. Taking a closer look, however, vertical coordination continues to serve as complementary means to problem-solving capability. KW - Digitalisation, intergovernmental collaboration, Online Access Act, leadership, institutional design Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.05 VL - 14 IS - 1 SP - 101 EP - 120 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Hammerschmid, Gerhard A1 - Hustedt, Thurid T1 - Querwechsler als Impulsgeber für die Verwaltung von morgen Y1 - 2020 UR - https://www.hertie-school.org/fileadmin/2_Research/2_Research_directory/Research_Centres/Centre_for_Digital_Governance/Papers/Studie_Querwechsler_Hammerschmid_Hustedt_2020.pdf ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Trein, Phillip A1 - Biesbroek, Robbert A1 - Bolognesi, Thomas A1 - Cejudo, Guillermo M. A1 - Duffy, Robert A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Meyer, Iris T1 - Policy Coordination and Integration: A Research Agenda JF - Public Administration Review N2 - Coordinating and integrating different policies and public sector organizations is a major challenge for practitioners and a continuing topic of interest for researchers. We argue that existing research on this topic needs reorientation to provide better insights for practice and theory of policymaking as well as policy implementation. We offer four suggestions on how future research could advance: (1) combining existing conceptual and epistemological approaches more systematically; (2) complementing case studies and surveys with large-N analyses and novel research tools and methods; (3) more systematic analysis of the causal mechanisms in policy coordination and integration; (4) more thorough study of the real-world impact of policy coordination and integration. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180 SN - 1540-6210 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hustedt, Thurid A1 - Seyfried, Markus T1 - Inside the EU Commission: Evidence on the perceived relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy-Making JF - JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies N2 - This article studies the perception of the EU Commission's Secretariat General in policy‐making. Recently, research on EU institutions devotes increasing attention to analyzing structures and procedures of decision‐making in EU institutions, most notably the EU Commission. Conventionally, the EU Commission is portrayed as a fragmented organization, divided along the lines of staff nationality, sectoral responsibilities and cabinets and General Directorates (DGs). The Secretariat General has long been viewed a weak actor that is hardly able or motivated to steer internal decision‐making. However, recent research indicates a changing role of the Secretariat General as a pro‐active broker and last arbiter. This article studies how the Secretariat General is perceived by the DGs in policy coordination and argues that this perception depends on the pattern of political authority, bureaucratic roles and the relevance and the alternatives prevailing in the policy field. The article is based on data from a survey among Commission officials. KW - EU Commission, Secretariat General, co‐ordination, centralization, climate policies Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12605 SN - 1468-5965 VL - 56 IS - 2 SP - 368 EP - 384 ER -