TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Is there no hope for Turkish democracy? N2 - The results of the June 7 general elections prompted many to wonder whether a new democratic era had begun in Turkey. The historic results allowed ushered a pro-Kurdish political party into Parliament for the first time and brought an end to the 13 years of single-party government of the Justice and Development Party. But the result did not in reality give much cause for optimism since the four political parties in Parliament failed to form a coalition, enabling President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to call another election for November 1, 2015. This contribution argues that by virtue of its regular and free elections, representative institutions and competitive political parties, Turkey has for too long been mislabelled as a democracy despite its constitutional and legal authoritarianism. Whatever the outcome of the repeat elections, Turkey will remain in the “‘grey zone’ between open autocracy and liberal democracy” if it continues without structural change. KW - Democracy in Turkey Y1 - 2015 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17478 UR - http://europesworld.org/2015/10/19/hope-turkish-democracy/#.VjICPk01i70 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - June 7 elections in Turkey: A breakthrough in the long road to democracy N2 - The results of June 7 general elections drastically changed the course of politics in Turkey. AKP’s 13 years of single-party rule has come to an end, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ambitions to change the country’s regime for a presidential system have failed and Turkey is facing a coalition government for the first time in nearly fifteen years. As for the near future, there remain significant uncertainties. The clock for the maximum 45-days period allowed for the formation of a government will start ticking as soon as the Parliament elects its new President during the last week of June. For the sake of democracy, societal peace and stability, the ideal outcome would be a government formed by the AKP and the CHP. The prospects of such a grand coalition, however, depend largely on the democratic maturity of the political leaders on all fronts. In light of Turkey’s political history and culture, that remains a big if… Y1 - 2015 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17485 UR - http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/a-breakthrough-in-the-long-road-to-democracy/ ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Report on Measures to Combat Discrimination: Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, Country Report Turkey: 2013 N2 - The report, drafted for the European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (on the grounds of race or ethnic origin, age, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation), is part of a study into measures to combat discrimination in the EU Member States and candidate countries, funded by the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity – PROGRESS (2007-2013). The report provides an overview of Turkey's implementation of the EU anti-discrimination Directives up to 1 January 2014 and follows up on earlier reports drafted by the author for the same project. KW - Anti-discrimination in Turkey Y1 - 2014 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17492 UR - http://www.equalitylaw.eu/country/turkey ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Report on Measures to Combat Discrimination: Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, Country Report Turkey: 2012 N2 - The report, drafted for the European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (on the grounds of race or ethnic origin, age, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation), is part of a study into measures to combat discrimination in the EU Member States and candidate countries, funded by the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity – PROGRESS. The report provides an overview of Turkey's implementation of the EU anti-discrimination Directives up to 1 January 2013 and precedes and follows earlier reports drafted by the author for the same project. KW - Anti-discrimination in Turkey Y1 - 2013 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17505 UR - http://www.migpolgroup.com/portfolio/country-reports-measures-combat-discrimination-2012/ ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Report on Measures to Combat Discrimination: Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, Country Report Turkey: 2011 N2 - The report was drafted for the European Network of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field (on the grounds of race or ethnic origin, age, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation)and produced as part of a study into measures to combat discrimination in the EU Member States and candidate countries, funded by the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity – PROGRESS. The report provides an overview of the state of transposition and implementation of the EU anti-discrimination Directives in each country up to 1 January 2012 and precedes other annual reports by the same author. KW - Anti-discrimination in Turkey Y1 - 2012 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17515 UR - http://www.migpolgroup.com/public/docs/2011%20-TR-%20Country%20Report%20LN_final.pdf ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek A1 - Sozeri, Ceren T1 - Does media policy promote media freedom and independence? The case of Turkey N2 - The report aims to analyze and explain the actors and processes of media policy making in Turkey; the substance and implementation of such policies; the legal framework governing media content; the ownership structure of the media; the working conditions of journalists; and the emerging social efforts to combat discrimination and hate speech in the media. IT argues that the prospects for media independence and freedom in Turkey appear extremely weak. In a sector driven by corporate interests, nepotism and clientelist relations, the media owners do not have the incentive to provide truthful and critical news coverage. The historical weakness of trade unions in Turkey, the high level of unemployment among journalists, the high turnover rate in the sector and the deep divisions among journalists due to ideological differences make it very difficult for media employees to engage in a unified struggle against their employers. The lack of a strong pro-democracy social movement, the ideological conservatism of the judiciary, the institutional weakness of the parliament and the lack of democracy within political parties render the government –and future governments– too powerful vis-à-vis the society and the media. On the other hand, the inability and the unwillingness of the media to regulate itself, as well as the authoritarian and punitive nature of state regulation, has mobilized the civil society to monitor the media’s compliance with universal principles and professional ethical codes and to combat discrimination and hate speech in the media. KW - Media policies in Turkey Y1 - 2011 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17525 UR - http://www.mediadem.eliamep.gr/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Turkey.pdf ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek A1 - Elmas, Esra T1 - Communicating Democracy - Democratizing Communication: Media in Turkey: Legislation, Policies, Actors N2 - This report is an attempt to understand the relationship between media and democracy in Turkey. Towards that end, it situates the media in its political and historical context. It argues that Turkey’s media structure falls under the “Mediterranean or Polarised Pluralistic Model” developed by Hallin and Mancini due to the very low level of newspaper circulation, the tradition of advocacy journalism, the structure of media ownership, the absence of an autonomous profession immune to pressure from politicians, interest groups, state institutions, the army and the judiciary and the extremely low level of unionization in the media which leads to high levels of labour exploitation. The report argues that despite relative progress achieved in the EU accession process, Turkey continues to fall far below the goal of harmonizing its legal framework with the EU’s acquis communitaire, mainly due to the prevalent political culture and the historical origins of state-media relations in Turkey. KW - Media and democracy in Turkey Y1 - 2011 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17535 UR - http://www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/c8745407-b54f-417f-8056-3618db1b31ee/MEDYA-1-ENG.pdf ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek A1 - Tsitselikis, Konstantinos T1 - A Tale of Reciprocity: Minority Foundations in Greece and Turkey N2 - The word most frequently uttered by Greece and Turkey with regard to their Muslim1 and non-Muslim minorities, respectively, is most probably ‘reciprocity.’ For more than half a century, in both countries, virtually all administrations,irrespective of their political leanings and ideological base, resorted to the good old ‘reciprocity argument’ to legitimize their laws, policies, and practices restricting the minority rights of Muslim and non-Muslim communities. Both states have for decades justified their policies on the basis of a theory that argues that Article 45 of the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne provided the legal basis for reciprocity. Deliberately distorting a crystal-clear provision, which simply confers parallel obligations on Greece and Turkey for the protection of the Muslim and non-Muslim minorities, respectively, both states have for decades held their own citizens hostage, pitting them against each other in the name of defeating the other in foreign policy. Disregarding the objections of international lawyers and institutions that the reciprocity principle does not apply to human rights treaties and that states cannot condition the protection of the fundamental rights of their citizens on the policies of other states, both Greece and Turkey have successfully manipulated their national public opinion into believing in the legitimacy of treating minorities as lesser citizens. This report analyzes the implications of reciprocity policies on the day-to-day lives of Muslim and non-Muslim minorities in Greece and Turkey, specifically their impact on the community foundations2 belonging to these minorities. With a specific focus on the property and self-management issues of Muslim and non-Muslim community foundations in Greece and Turkey, the report situates the issue in its historical context and trace the evolution of the ‘community foundation issue’ from Lausanne to the present day. Drawing similarities and differences between the laws, policies, and practices of Greek and Turkish states vis-à-vis their minority foundations, the report critically assesses the progress made to this day as well as identify the outstanding issues. KW - Minority policies in Turkey and Greece Y1 - 2010 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17545 UR - http://www.tesev.org.tr/assets/publications/file/vakiflar-tr-grc-ing.pdf ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Kein schmutziger Deal mit Erdogan JF - Die ZEIT N2 - Die Türkei bietet syrischen Flüchtlingen keinen wirklichen Schutz. Sie kann deshalb auch kein Partner der EU bei der Abriegelung ihrer Grenzen sein. Y1 - 2016 N1 - Free online Access / Freier online Zugriff: http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2015-11/tuerkei-eu-fluechtlinge-kein-schmutziger-deal PB - Die ZEIT ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Forsaking Individual Justice: The Implications of the ECtHR’s Pilot Judgment Procedure for Victims of Gross and Systematic Violations JF - Human Rights Law Review N2 - The Council of Europe's enlargement rendered reforming the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) inevitable. The post-1998 reforms aimed at transforming the ECtHR into a quasi- constitutional court and enhancing its efficiency. This article is concerned with one such reform, ‘the pilot judgment mechanism’, and contests the desirability of its application to gross and systematic violations. The article discusses why, contrary to opposing claims, the ECtHR’s judgment in Doğan and Others v Turkey concerning the forced eviction of Kurdish civilians by the Turkish military is a pilot judgment. It then shows why this matters, based on the Court’s İçyer decision which found a compensation law the Turkish government adopted in response to Doğan and Others to be an effective domestic remedy and rejected 800-1,500 pending cases. Based on empirical research on the implementation of this law, the article argues that in applying the pilot judgment to the Kurdish cases, the ECtHR reduced the notion of ‘effective remedy’ to compensation, overlooking the victims’ demands for truth and justice, and enabled Turkey to continue to commit gross violations with impunity. It concludes that while pilot-judgments might be effective in handling repetitive cases arising from systemic legal problems in post-communist contexts, they should not be applied to conflict or post-conflict cases where the underlying problems are deeply-rooted ethno-political disputes. KW - Pilot judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights Y1 - 2016 SN - 1461-7781 N1 - full text PDF: http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/ngw032? ijkey=iVVvldwv4JufdzC&keytype=ref VL - 16 IS - 4 SP - 731 EP - 769 PB - Oxford Journals ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Merkel's Deal with Turkey JF - Dahrendorf Blog N2 - The Syrian refugees deal between the EU and Turkey, brokered by Chancellor Angela Merkel during her October 2015 visit to Turkey, was politically and morally contentious from the start. It has become all the more critical after the Paris attacks. Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Europa verrät im Umgang mit Erdoğan seine Werte JF - Die Zeit KW - EU-Turkey refugee deal Y1 - 2016 UR - http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2016-05/tuerkei-recep-tayyip-erdogan-europa-umgang/komplettansicht ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - In dealing with Turkey’s Erdogan, the EU betrays its core values JF - Hertie School Research Blog N2 - Turkey's president Erdogan allows Kurdish villages to be razed and ousts opposition members of Parliament, while the EU turns a blind eye, compromising its core values. KW - EU-Turkey refugee deal KW - Turkey-EU relations KW - Kurdish question Y1 - 2016 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-20535 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek A1 - Sozeri, Ceren T1 - Caught in the Wheels of Power BT - The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey N2 - Research on media independence and freedom of press in any country, particularly in Turkey, requires more than an analysis of the regulatory framework. It is the political and ideological factors that lie behind the anti-democratic and repressive laws, rather than the content and implementation of these laws that can explain why and under which circumstances an independent and free media fails to emerge in a given country. This report is an attempt to understand the legal, political and economic constraints on media freedom and independence in Turkey through a historical lens KW - Media independence KW - Media policies KW - Turkey Y1 - 2012 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21163 PB - TESEV Yayinlari CY - Istanbul ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Europa verrät im Umgang mit Erdoğan seine Werte JF - Zeit Online N2 - Die EU darf nicht länger zum Krieg der Türkei gegen die Kurden im eigenen Land schweigen. Und auch nicht zur Umwandlung des Landes in einen autokratischen Staat. KW - Kurden KW - Türkei Y1 - 2016 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21174 UR - http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2016-05/tuerkei-recep-tayyip-erdogan-europa-umgang ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - Country report : Non-Discrimination Turkey N2 - The report, drafted for European Equality Law Network (the European network of legal experts in gender equality and non-discrimination), is part of a study into measures to combat discrimination in the EU Member States and candidate countries, funded by the European Commission Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers. The report provides an overview of Turkey's implementation of the EU anti-discrimination Directives up to 31 December 2015 and follows up on earlier reports drafted by the author for the same project. KW - Anti-discrimination in Turkey Y1 - 2016 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21284 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kurban, Dilek T1 - The EU has a choice – suspend Turkey’s accession process JF - Hertie School Research Blog N2 - As post-coup purges erode democracy, the EU must take a stand, Dilek Kurban says in an interview. KW - Turkey-EU relations Y1 - 2016 UR - https://www.hertie-school.org/en/debate/allcontent/detail/content/the-eu-has-a-choice-suspend-turkeys-accession-process/ N1 - Blog entry ER -