TY - JOUR A1 - Haas, Jörg A1 - D'Erman, Valerie A1 - Schulz, Daniel A1 - Verdun, Amy T1 - Economic and fiscal policy coordination after the crisis: is the European Semester promoting more or less state intervention? JF - Journal of European Integration N2 - The European Union (EU) – and its Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in particular – is often criticized as a predominantly market-oriented project. We analyse to what extent such claims can be substantiated by focusing on one key aspect of the EU’s post-crisis framework for economic governance: the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) that the EU has been issuing annually since 2011. Based on an original dataset, we analyse more than 1300 CSRs, which show that the EU does not push uniformly for less state intervention. Rather, the CSRs tend to suggest fiscal restraint and less protection for labour market insiders, while simultaneously promoting measures that benefit vulnerable groups in society. During the second decade of EMU, CSRs have gradually become more permissive of higher public spending and more in favour of worker protection, while the share of recommendations advocating more social protection has stagnated at a high level. KW - Country-specific recommendations KW - economic governance KW - economic and monetary union KW - European Semester KW - fiscal policy coordination Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1730356 SN - 1477-2280 VL - 42 IS - 3 SP - 327 EP - 344 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Haas, Jörg A1 - D'Erman, Valerie A1 - Schulz, Daniel F. A1 - Verdun, Amy T1 - Measuring Economic Reform Recommendations under the European Semester: ‘One Size Fits All’ or Tailoring to Member States? JF - Journal of Contemporary European Research N2 - In 2010 the European Semester was created to better coordinate fiscal and economic policies within Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. The Semester aims to tackle economic imbalances by giving European Union (EU) member states country-specific recommendations (CSRs) regarding their public budgets as well as their wider economic and social policies with a view to enabling better policy coordination among Euro Area member states. In this article we develop a method to assess the way in which the CSRs have been addressing coordination and offer a systematic analysis of the way they have been formulated. We offer a way to code CSRs as well as one to analyse progress evaluations. Furthermore, we seek to use our results to address one of the reoccurring questions in the literature: whether the EU is pursuing a ‘one size fits all’ approach to economic policy making in the Euro Area? The findings indicate that different types of market economies and welfare states – different ‘varieties of capitalism’ – among the Euro Area members obtain different recommendations regarding different policy areas. KW - Economic governance KW - European Semester KW - Policy area KW - Varieties of capitalism Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v15i2.999 SN - 1815-347X IS - 15(2) SP - 194 EP - 211 ER -