TY - RPRT A1 - Dawson, Mark T1 - New Governance in the EU after the Euro Crisis: Retired or Re-born? T2 - EUI Working Papers AEL 2015/01 N2 - This working paper discusses the future of the EU’s ‘new governance’ paradigm, as a particular category of the EU’s legal acts in light of developments in EU economic governance following the Euro crisis. [...] KW - New Governance KW - Euro Crisis KW - EU Economic Governance KW - Open Coordination KW - Experimentalism Y1 - 2015 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-23350 SN - ISSN 1831-4066 PB - Academy of European Law / European University Institute ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Augenstein, Daniel T1 - After Brexit: Time for a Further De-coupling of National and European Citizenship? JF - Verfassungsblog Y1 - 2016 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-20999 UR - http://verfassungsblog.de/brexit-decoupling-european-national-citizenship U6 - https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20160714-114950 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Bobić, Ana T1 - Quantitative easing at the Court of Justice – Doing whatever it takes to save the euro: Weiss and Others JF - Common Market Law Review Y1 - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-30368 UR - http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2019097 SN - 0165-0750 N1 - This is a post-peer-review version of an article published in Common Market Law Review. The final authenticated version is available online at http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2019097 VL - 56 IS - 4 SP - 1005 EP - 1040 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dawson, Mark ED - Mendes, Joana T1 - How Can EU Law Contain Economic Discretion? T2 - EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law Y1 - 2019 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-29889 SN - 9780198826668 N1 - This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an contribution published in: J. Mendes (ed.) EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law (Oxford University Press, 2019). SP - 64 EP - 84 PB - Oxford University Press ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Muir, Elise T1 - Hungary and the Indirect Protection of EU Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law JF - German Law Journal Y1 - 2013 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-2971 SN - 2071-8322 VL - 14 IS - 10 SP - 1959 EP - 1979 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dawson, Mark T1 - Re-generating Europe through Human Rights? Proceduralism in European Human Rights Law JF - German Law Journal Y1 - 2013 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-5169 SN - 2071-8322 VL - 14 IS - 5 SP - 651 EP - 672 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bobić, Ana A1 - Dawson, Mark T1 - Making sense of the “incomprehensible”: The PSPP Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court JF - Common Market Law Review Y1 - 2020 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-36925 UR - https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/57.6/COLA2020774 VL - 57 IS - 6 SP - 1953 EP - 1998 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dawson, Mark A1 - Maricut-Akbik, Adina T1 - Accountability in the EU's para-regulatory state: The case of the Economic and Monetary Union JF - Regulation & Governance N2 - This article revisits Majone's famous argument about accountability in the regulatory state in reference to the European Union's (EU) Economic and Monetary Union. We show that the EU has entered the stage of a “para-regulatory state” marked by increasing EU regulation in areas linked to core state powers. Despite the redistributive and politicized nature of these policy areas, the EU's “para-regulatory state” has continued to rely on its regulatory model of accountability, focused on decisionmaking processes, and interest mediation. In line with Majone, we describe the model as procedural and contrast it to substantive accountability – which is necessary when regulation has clear redistributive implications. Using two case studies from fiscal policy and monetary affairs, we illustrate the predominance of procedural accountability as exercised by the European Parliament and EU Courts. We complement the empirical analysis with a normative discussion of how substantive accountability could potentially be rendered in both fields. Y1 - 2021 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-42704 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12442 SP - 1 EP - 16 ER -