TY - JOUR A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Marschinski, Robert A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar T1 - Global Trading versus Linking: Architectures for international emissions trading JF - Energy Policy Y1 - 2009 VL - 37 SP - 1637 EP - 1647 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Brunner, Steffen T1 - Wer besitzt die Atmosphäre? Zur politischen Ökonomie des Klimwandels JF - Leviathan Y1 - 2011 VL - 39 IS - 2 SP - 201 EP - 221 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Brunner, Steffen A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar A1 - Creutzig, Felix T1 - Climate Policies for road transport revisited (II): Closing the policy gap with cap-and-trade JF - Energy Policy Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.053 SN - 1873-6777 VL - 39 IS - 4 SP - 2100 EP - 2110 PB - Elsevier CY - Mexico ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Marschinski, Robert A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar T1 - Developing the international carbon market post-2012: Options and the cost of delay T2 - Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptiveness Y1 - 2010 SN - 9780521180924 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Knopf, Brigitte A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar A1 - Kok, Marcel A1 - Lotze-Campen, Hermann A1 - Luderer, Gunnar A1 - Popp, Alexander A1 - van Vuuren, Detlef P. T1 - Managing the Low-Carbon Transition – From Model Results to Policies, Special Issue:‘The Economics of Low Stabilization’ JF - The Energy Journal N2 - Model analysis within the ADAM project has shown that achieving low greenhouse gas concentration levels, e.g. at 400ppm CO 2 -eq, is technologically feasible at costs of a few percent of GDP. However, models simplify the dynamics involved in implementing climate policy and the results depend on critical model assumptions such as global participation in climate policy and full availability of current and newly evolving technologies. The design of a low stabilization policy regime in the real world depends on factors that can only be partly covered by models. In this context, the paper reflects on limits of the integrated assessment models used to explore climate policy and addresses the issues of (i) how global participation might be achieved, (ii) which kind of options are available to induce deep GHG reductions inside and outside the energy sector, and (iii) which risks and which co-benefits of mitigation options are not assessed by the models. Y1 - 2010 UR - http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/hanapi/hanapi.php?profile=4dfs1q6ik%2BHI6trd2JLhy6XO1eGS3NLlldzU0trT4ZLZ19elxNzcp6jHspXmyNipz6WP&DestinationURL=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=EP59360746&site=eds-live SN - 0195-6574 VL - 31 IS - Special Issue 1 SP - 223 EP - 245 PB - IAEE - International Association for Energy Economics CY - Cleveland ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Hare, B. A1 - Stockwell, C. A1 - Oberthür, Sebastian T1 - The Architecture of the Global Climate Regime JF - Climate Policy N2 - This article argues that a legally binding, multilateral agreement is a necessary condition for achieving the highest levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions consistent with limiting warming to below either 2°C or below 1.5°C. Clear legally binding commitments within a multilaterally agreed process with strong legal and institutional characteristics are needed to give countries the confidence that their economic interests are being fairly and equally treated. Common accounting rules are needed for comparability of effort, and in order to protect environmental integrity, to demonstrate transparency, for effective monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) of emissions and actions, and to facilitate and support a strong international carbon market. Securing full implementation will depend, in part, on the strength of an agreement's compliance mechanism. The Copenhagen Accord, by itself, represents a quintessential ‘bottom-up’/‘pledge and review’ approach. It is open to interpretation whether the Accord can become a stepping stone on the way to strengthening the legally binding, multilateral framework to fight climate change, building on both the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol, or whether it will lead to the unravelling and fragmentation of all that has been built up to date. Legal architecture choices made in 2010 and beyond are likely to be determinative. KW - Climate negotiations KW - Climate regimes KW - Climate targets KW - COP-16 KW - International cooperation KW - Multilateralism KW - Post-Copenhagen Y1 - 2010 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0161 SN - 1752-7457 VL - 10 IS - 6 SP - 600 EP - 614 PB - Taylor & Francis CY - Abingdon ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Brunner, Steffen A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar T1 - Domestic Emissions Trading Systems T2 - The Economics of Climate Change in China: Towards a Low Carbon Economy Y1 - 2011 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Luderer, C. A1 - Steckel, G. A1 - Knopf, J. T1 - International Emissions: Trading and the Global Deal T2 - The Economics of Climate Change in China: Towards a Low Carbon Economy Y1 - 2011 SN - 978-1849711746 PB - Routledge CY - London ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Flachsland, Christian ED - Edenhofer, Ottmar ED - Pichs - Madruga, R. ED - Sokona, Y. T1 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change T2 - Climate Change 2014 Y1 - 2015 SN - 978-1107654815 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Knopf, B. A1 - Kowarsch, M. A1 - Flachsland, Christian T1 - The 2°C reconsidered T2 - Climate Change, Justice, and Sustainability: Linking Climate and Development Policy Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-9400799028 SP - 121 EP - 137 PB - Springer CY - München ER -