<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>5511</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>426</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>444</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3-4</issue>
    <volume>48</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Brill</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-06-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Responsive Judicial Review in Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Impeding Effects of Limited Standing and Formalism</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper is concerned with the question of whether constitutional systems that have adopted the centralised, “Kelsenian”, model of judicial review, which is prevalent in Eastern Europe, can engage in “responsive judicial review” (Dixon, 2023). It focuses on two features that can be associated with the constitutional courts created in this region after the end of communism, which, the paper argues, can significantly hamper their capacity to identify and counter democratic blockages. These are: (1) their limited standing rules that prioritise the access of political bodies to constitutional courts, and (2) the latter’s commitment to formalism, which can prevent judges from engaging with the structural and contextual issues that are causing a democratic blockage.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Review of Central and East European Law</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">0925-9880</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1163/15730352-bja10085</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_json">{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,27]],"date-time":"2024-01-27T00:07:41Z","timestamp":1706314061933},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Brill","issue":"3-4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Rev. Cent. East Eur. Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]]},"abstract":"&lt;jats:title&gt;Abstract&lt;\/jats:title&gt;\n&lt;jats:p&gt;This paper is concerned with the question of whether constitutional systems that have adopted the centralised, \u201cKelsenian\u201d, model of judicial review, which is prevalent in Eastern Europe, can engage in \u201cresponsive judicial review\u201d (Dixon, 2023). It focuses on two features that can be associated with the constitutional courts created in this region after the end of communism, which, the paper argues, can significantly hamper their capacity to identify and counter democratic blockages. These are: (1) their limited standing rules that prioritise the access of political bodies to constitutional courts, and (2) the latter\u2019s commitment to formalism, which can prevent judges from engaging with the structural and contextual issues that are causing a democratic blockage.&lt;\/jats:p&gt;","DOI":"10.1163\/15730352-bja10085","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,26]],"date-time":"2024-01-26T12:16:18Z","timestamp":1706271378000},"page":"426-444","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Responsive Judicial Review in Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Impeding Effects of Limited Standing and Formalism"],"prefix":"10.1163","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Ivo","family":"Gruev","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Postdoctoral Researcher, Centre for Fundamental Rights, https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/38962Hertie School, Berlin, Germany"}]}],"member":"50","container-title":["Review of Central and East European Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/journals\/rela\/48\/3-4\/article-p426_007.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/rela\/48\/3-4\/article-p426_007.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/rela\/48\/3-4\/article-p426_007.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,26]],"date-time":"2024-01-26T12:16:18Z","timestamp":1706271378000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/journals\/rela\/48\/3-4\/article-p426_007.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3-4"},"URL":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1163\/15730352-bja10085","relation":{},"ISSN":["0925-9880","1573-0352"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0925-9880","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0352","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]]}}}</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_import_origin">crossref</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doiImportPopulated">PersonAuthorFirstName_1,PersonAuthorLastName_1,PublisherName,TitleMain_1,TitleAbstract_1,TitleParent_1,PageNumber,PageFirst,PageLast,Issue,Volume,PublishedYear,IdentifierIssn</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">doi-import</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Ivo Gruev</author>
    <submitter> Whitney-Hirschmann</submitter>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Centre for Fundamental Rights</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
