<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>1666</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>16</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Construction of a publication database of the scientific journal "Demography": how to identify author’s gender and field of publication</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This Technical Report describes a database that has been established for the research project “Gendered authorship and demographic research – An analysis of 50 years of Demography”. In this project, we have investigated whether gender determines field of publication. Our analysis was based on all papers published in “Demography” which is the flagship journal of the Population of America Association (PAA) and currently celebrates its 50th anniversary. We scrutinized all issues of „Demography” and compiled information on title, topic as well as gender of all authors. This Technical Report describes how we set up the resulting database. The Report is accompanied by the respective database (in STATA-format, version 13.0). (Keywords: Demography, gender, publication)</abstract>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Valeria Nieberg</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Katharina Wolf</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1668</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>143</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>162</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford Univ. Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford [u.a.]</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Demographic Change and Welfare State Restructuring</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The problem-solving capacity of the modern state: governance challenges and administrative capacities</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-0-19-871636-5</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Kai Wegrich</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>A. Rasner</author>
    <editor>Martin Lodge</editor>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1669</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>106</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>165</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Hoffmann und Campe</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Hamburg</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2014-11-04</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Identitäten und Lebensgefühl der Berlinerinnen und Berliner</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Kaum eine andere deutsche Stadt hat mehr Höhen und Tiefen erlebt als Berlin. Mit dem Fall der Mauer und der Wiedervereinigung eröffneten sich ungeahnte Perspektiven und Möglichkeiten. Hat Berlin die Chancen genutzt? Wie steht die Stadt heute in wirtschaftlicher, sozialer und politischer Hinsicht da? Wie sehen die Berliner ihre Stadt? Wie zufrieden sind sie mit Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, mit dem Leben in der Stadt, in ihrem Kiez? Welche Herausforderungen stellen sich für die Berliner Regierung und Verwaltung? Mit dem einzigartigen Typus einer vertiefenden Stadtstudie liefert die von der Gemeinnützigen Hertie-Stiftung herausgegebene Studie unter der Leitung von Helmut K. Anheier und Klaus Hurrelmann repräsentative Daten über die Lebenswelten in der deutschen Hauptstadt 25 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall. Wissenschaftlich fundiert, aktuell und auf höchst lesbare Weise.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Die Hauptstädter - Berlin 25 Jahre nach dem Mauerfall: Die Hertie Berlin Studie 2014</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3455503395</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Helmut K. Anheier</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <editor>Klaus Hurrelmann</editor>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1670</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>345</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>373</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Fachmedien</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2014-10-18</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Sozialstruktur und Lebensform</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Der Beitrag beschreibt die Grundzüge des sozialstrukturellen Wandels der Lebensformen in Deutschland. Zunächst werden Konzepte und theoretische Ansätze zur Erklärung von Lebensformen und familialen Verhaltensweisen skizziert. Anschließend werden Strukturen und Wandel der Lebens- und Familienformen in Ost- und Westdeutschland nach 1990 auf der Grundlage des Mikrozensus und des deutschen Beziehungs- und Familienpanels (pairfam) empirisch untersucht. Dargestellt werden die altersspezifische Verteilung der Lebensformen, der Wandel der Familienformen von Frauen und Männern seit den 1990er Jahren sowie bildungsspezifische Entwicklungen. Weiterhin beleuchtet der Artikel an den Beispielen des Übergangs zur Mutterschaft und der nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft die kohortenspezifi sche Lebenslaufdynamik von Familienformen. Schließlich wird mit Stieff amilien ein in der empirischen Forschung bislang wenig untersuchter Aspekt der Differenzierung der Familienformen aufgegriffen.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Handbuch Familiensoziologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-02275-4</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>» Sociology of Familiy, Youth and Aging</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1672</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>287</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>316</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>31</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Netherlands</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Welfare state context, female labour-market attachment and childbearing in Germany and Denmark</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study investigates the role of female labour-market attachment and earnings in childbearing progressions in two very different European contexts. By applying event-history techniques to German and Danish register data during 1981–2001, we demonstrate how female earnings relate to first, second and third birth propensities. Our study shows that female earnings are positively associated with first birth fertility in Denmark, while this is not the case in West Germany. We interpret our findings based on the fact that Danish social context and policy encourage women to establish themselves in the labour market before becoming mothers, while the German institutional context during the 1980s and 1990s was not geared towards encouraging maternal employment. For higher-order births, the results are less clearcut. For Denmark we find a slightly positive correlation between female earnings and second-birth fertility, while the association is somewhat negative for third-order births. In Germany, women tend to leave the labour market when becoming mothers. Non-employed mothers have elevated second and, in particular, third-birth rates. For the group of mothers who are employed, we find only a weak association between their earnings and higher-order fertility.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Population Research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s12546-014-9135-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1835-9469</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-16723</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Gunnar Andersson</author>
    <author>Tatjana Mika</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Female employment</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Welfare state context</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Register data</value>
    </subject>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/1672/Welfare state context, female labour-market attachment and childbearing in Germany and Denmark.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1673</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>735</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>741</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Data bases and statistical systems: demography</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This article deals with the availability of large-scale data for demographic analysis. The main sources of data that demographers work with are censuses data, microcensus data, population registers, other administrative data, survey data, and big data. Data of this kind can be used to generate demographic rates and study demographic processes, such as family formation, marriage, divorce, residential mobility, and death. The advantages and pitfalls of different types of data are summarized.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-0-08-097086-8</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.41013-5</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>James Wright</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>F.J. Willekens</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Data processing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Statistical information</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Administrative data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Big data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Births</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Deaths</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Demographic rates</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Demography</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Marriages</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Migration</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Population registers</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Residential moves</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Survey data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Vital events</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Vital statistics</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1674</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>19</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>38</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Ferdinand Schöningh</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paderborn</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Die Geburten- und Familienentwicklung in Deutschland</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Die Deutschen werden älter, bunter und weniger. Auf das Älter- und Bunterwerden darf man sich freuen. Das Wenigerwerden dagegen setzt das Wirtschafts- und Sozialsystem verschiedenen dramatischen Verwerfungen, Spannungen und Verteilungskämpfen aus, die es in der deutschen Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte bisher in diesem Umfang noch nicht gab. Aber diese Gefahren werden bislang von der deutschen Politik, von den Medien und von der Öffentlichkeit nach Kräften ignoriert. Führende Wissenschaftler mit internationalem Renommee rücken aus unterschiedlicher Perspektive diese drohenden Verwerfungen in ein dringend nötiges Rampenlicht. Als größtes Manko wird die Diskrepanz zwischen dem Ausmaß des Problems und seiner Wahrnehmung in Öffentlichkeit und Politik diagnostiziert. Der Appell der Beiträger und Herausgeber zielt darauf ab, schon jetzt mit dem Abfedern der sich aufbauenden Spannungen zu beginnen und nicht weiter wie gehabt mit Scheuklappen und Volldampf auf eine demografische Implosions-Katastrophe zuzusteuern.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Die demografische Zeitbombe: Fakten und Folgen des Geburtendefizits</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-506-78348-6</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.single-generation.de/bevoelkerungsstatistik/michaela_kreyenfeld_die_geburten-_und_Familienentwicklung%20in%20Deutschland.htm</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Franz-Xaver Kaufmann</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <editor>Walter Krämer</editor>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1675</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Berlin</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Ereignisanalyse (und andere Stichwörter der Ereignisdatenanalyse)</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Dieses Lexikon ist ein interdisziplinäres Nachschlagewerk mit fast 2.000 Stichworten aus den Bereichen Methodologie, qualitative und quantitative Methoden sowie Statistik. Forschungspraktische Themen werden ebenso behandelt wie die Grundlagen der empirischen Sozialforschung. Die Methoden in den Einzeldisziplinen werden in Langartikeln systematisch präsentiert. Über 100 MethodikerInnen aus der Soziologie, der Politikwissenschaft, den Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaften, der Geschichtswissenschaft, der Ethnologie und Kulturanthropologie, der Sozialpsychologie, den Erziehungswissenschaften, den Gesundheitswissenschaften sowie der Sozial- und Kulturgeographie haben zu dem Lexikon beigetragen. Es dient für Studium und Forschung, aber auch für die Praxis in sozialwissenschaftlichen Berufsfeldern als Wissensgrundlage.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Methoden-Lexikon für die Sozialwissenschaften</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">ISBN 978-3-531-16629-2</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Rainer Walke</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1676</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>59</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>80</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S1</issue>
    <volume>67</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Fachmedien</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2015-09-21</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Economic uncertainty and fertility</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Sociologists and demographers have long been interested in the role of economic uncertainty in family behavior. Despite the prevailing "bourgeois conviction" that economic uncertainty discourages people from having children, the empirical evidence on this issue is mixed. In this paper, I summarize the recent empirical evidence, and discuss the potential limitations of previous investigations. Among the possible shortcomings of these studies is that many relied exclusively on unemployment as an operational definition of labor market uncertainty. Subjective indicators of economic uncertainty, which measure the individual’s perception of his or her economic situation more directly, often were not available to researchers. Moreover, few of these studies explored group-specific differences in behavior. In this paper, we seek to overcome some of the limitations of these earlier analyses. Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we study the role of perceived economic uncertainty in transitions to first and higher order births for the period 1990-2013. In addition, we examine how different population subgroups (stratified by education, parity, and age) respond to economic uncertainty.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s11577-015-0325-6</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1861-891X</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-16760</identifier>
    <note>This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11577-015-0325-6</note>
    <licence>Metadaten (öffentlich), post-print</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Family</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Unemployment</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Economic uncertainty</value>
    </subject>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/1676/Kreyenfeld_Uncertainty_AuthorsPostPrint.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1678</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>9</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S1</issue>
    <volume>67</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Fachmedien</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2015-09-21</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">"The study of population offers something for everyone": Forschung zu Fertilität, Migration und Mortalität an der Schnittstelle von Demografie und Soziologie</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Obwohl es zahlreiche inhaltliche Schnittstellen zwischen Gegenstandsbereichen der Soziologie und der Demografie gibt, hat sich in Deutschland bislang keine Bevölkerungssoziologie, im Sinne einer in den USA schon früh institutionalisierten „Social Demography“, etablieren können. In diesem einleitenden Beitrag des vorliegenden Sonderhefts der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie zeigen wir zunächst die Anknüpfungspunkte beider Disziplinen auf. Anschließend stellen wir die konzeptionelle und inhaltliche Struktur des Heftes vor: Auf Untersuchungen zu den drei klassischen demografischen Kernbereichen „Fertilität und Partnerschaft“ (Teil I), „Migration und Mobilität“ (Teil II) sowie „Mortalität und Morbidität“ (Teil III) folgen Beiträge zum Verhältnis von „Wohlfahrtsstaat und demografischen Wandel“ (Teil IV) sowie zur aktuellen Forschung im Bereich der „Soziologie und Biodemografie“ (Teil V).</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">0023-2653</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s11577-015-0315-8</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Karsten Hank</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Demografie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Soziologie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bevölkerungssoziologie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Soziale Demografie</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1679</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>3</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>18</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Fachmedien</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2014-09-06</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Gegenstandsbereich der Bevölkerungssoziologie</title>
    <abstract language="deu">In diesem Beitrag stellen wir die Entwicklung der Bevölkerungssoziologie in Deutschland dar. Aufbauend auf den klassischen Arbeiten von Süßmilch wurde die Bevölkerungssoziologie in Deutschland bis zur Nachkriegszeit vor allem durch die Arbeiten von Nationalökonomen wie Brentano, Mombert und Mackenroth geprägt. Die zunehmende Verfügbarkeit von Mikrodaten hat zu einer Neuorientierung der Bevölkerungssoziologie beigetragen, in der statt einer ganzheitlichen Betrachtungsweise des „Bevölkerungsgeschehens“ die Analyse spezifischer demographischer Übergänge in den Vordergrund rückte. Vor allem die Lebenslaufforschung hat sich seit den 1980er-Jahren als theoretisches Konzept an der Schnittmenge von demographischer und soziologischer Forschung hervorgetan. Neuere Entwicklungen verweisen auf methodische und theoretische Herausforderungen bei der Untersuchung des Zweiten Demographischen Übergangs. Eine „verstehende“ Bevölkerungssoziologie, die gesellschaftliche Bewältigungsprozesse des demographischen Wandels in den Vordergrund rückt, weist dabei ein methodisch und theoretisch noch nicht ausgeschöpftes Analyse- und Interventionspotential auf.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Yasemin Niephaus</author>
    <author>Reinhold Sackmann</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Alterung  – Bewältigung  – Bevölkerungssoziologie  – Demographie  – Fertilität  – Migration  – Mortalität</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1680</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>21</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>28</issue>
    <volume>2015</volume>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>Stockholm University</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stockholm</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fertility after separation: second births in higher order unions in Germany</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper uses recent data from the German family panel (pairfam) to examine the fertility behavior after separation. More specifically, we focus on the transition to the second child and compare the behavior of respondents in ongoing partnerships (couples who are still partnered with the mother/father of their first child) with those who have experienced family dissolution after the first birth. The investigation reveals strong gender differences in postseparation fertility behavior. We also find large regional differences. Eastern Germans had much lower second birth rates than western Germans. However, they were more prone than western Germans to have their second child with a parent who was not the father or the mother of their firstborn child. This result is in line with descriptive findings on the diversity of family structures in eastern Germany.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">FamiliesAndSocieties working paper series 28</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.familiesandsocieties.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/WP28KreyenfeldHeintzMartin2015.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Valerie Heintz-Martin</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Birth spacing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Divorce</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Separation</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1682</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>303</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>325</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer VS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Lebens- und Familienformen</title>
    <abstract language="deu">In diesem Band präsentieren die Herausgebenden das Forschungsgebiet der Bevölkerungssoziologie. Mit unterschiedlichen Fragestellungen der Bevölkerungssoziologie befasste Autoren und Autorinnen tragen durch ihre Beiträge dazu bei. Nach einem ausführlichen Überblick über die in der Bevölkerungssoziologie gängigen Themen, Theorien und Daten werden die Bereiche Fertilität, Familie und Lebensformen, Migration und Mobilität sowie Mortalität, Morbidität und Pflege vorgestellt. Abschließend folgt eine Erörterung des gesellschaftlichen Umgangs mit demographischem Wandel. &#13;
&#13;
Damit richtet sich das Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie an ein breites Publikum, das Studierende, Wissenschaftler und Wissenschaftlerinnen, Politiker und Politikerinnen wie auch die interessierte Öffentlichkeit umfasst.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">ISBN 978-3-658-01409-4</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Yasemin Niephaus</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
    <editor>Michaela Kreyenfeld</editor>
    <author>Valerie Heintz-Martin</author>
    <editor>Reinhold Sackmann</editor>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany Fertility</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1683</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Hoboken, NJ</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Maternal and paternal employment across the life course</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This essay provides a condensed summary of major findings in trends in maternal and paternal employment patterns. Key theoretical concepts (such as cultural approaches, welfare state approaches, preference theory, economic approaches, and life course theory) are briefly summarized. The increase in maternal employment rates in most European countries, and the extent to which this increase has been related to growth in part-time and marginal employment, are also discussed. In studying the dynamics of the employment behavior of mothers, empirical researchers have mainly looked at the amount of time it takes for women to return to work after childbirth. While these studies often capture only a snapshot of the life course—namely, the period between childbirth and labor market reentry—new approaches (so-called sequence analyses) that map the lifetime employment patterns of women have been developed. The analysis of the employment patterns of fathers is an emerging field of research as well. However, little is known so far about how fatherhood affects men's lifetime employment patterns, and how paternal employment varies in different cultural and social policy contexts.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: an interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">eISBN 978-1-118-90077-2</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1697</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>14</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-14</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fertility assessment with the Own-Children Method: a validation with data from the German Mikrozensus</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The German Mikrozensus is a data set that is frequently used to study fertility behavior. With its large sample size, the dataset also offers the opportunity to investigate childbearing among population subgroups, such as particular migrant groups. Because birth histories are not surveyed in the Mikrozensus, scholars have frequently employed the Own-Children Method (OCM) to generate fertility schedules from this data. The OCM draws on information on the number and ages of the co-residential children in order to estimate the fertility schedule of women. It is clear that this method leads to an underestimation of fertility, because children do not necessarily live with their biological mother. It is also clear that the bias is stronger for older women, because children may have left parental home. In the past, it was not possible to assess the bias. With the Mikrozensus 2008, we are able to validate the OCM by relying on respondent’s own report on the total number of children. We furthermore examine whether the OCM leads to worse estimates for migrants and non-migrants. The results show that the OCM provides reasonable fertility estimates for women in western Germany up to age 40, irrespective of migrant background. For eastern Germany, there is a stronger bias at later ages than in western Germany. This relates to the early age at childbirth in this region and the more diverse family structures.</abstract>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany, fertility, migration, own children data</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>814</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>59</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>73</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>21</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2014-09-01</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2014-09-01</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus: Evidence from Denmark and Germany</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Studies that have investigated the role of unemployment in childbearing decisions have often shown no or only barely significant results. We argue that many of these “non-findings” may be attributed to a neglect of group-specific differences in behavior. In this study, we examine how the association of unemployment and fertility varies by socio-demographic subgroups using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) and from Danish population registers. We find that male unemployment is related to a postponement of first and second childbearing in both countries. The role of female unemployment is less clear at these two parities. Both male and female unemployment is positively correlated with third birth risks. More importantly, our results show that there are strong educational gradients in the unemployment and fertility nexus, and that the relationship between unemployment and fertility varies by socioeconomic group. Fertility tends to be lower during periods of unemployment among highly educated women and men, but not among their less educated counterparts.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Advances in Life Course Research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1040-2608</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.007</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-8148</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Gunnar Andersson</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/814/Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus Evidence from Denmark and Germany.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>817</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <volume>2014</volume>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>Universität Stockholm</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stockholm</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2014-03-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">State-of-the-art report: Changes in the life course</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The dynamics of family formation and disruption have changed in contemporary societies. This report contains a comprehensive literature overview of state-of-the-art knowledge about the dynamics of the development of family constellations and non-standard families.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">FamiliesAndSocieties: Working Papers Series</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.familiesandsocieties.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/WP6PailheMortelmansEtal2014.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor> FamiliesandSocieties</editor>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Ariane Pailhé</author>
    <author>Dimitri Mortelsmans</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>819</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>600</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>Springer VS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-11-11</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Auf dem Stand der Forschung präsentiert die fachlich ausgewiesene Herausgeberschaft das Forschungsgebiet der Bevölkerungssoziologie. In vier großen Themenblöcken vermessen die Autoren den Stand der Forschung: Nach einer ausführlichen Überblick über die Themen, Theorien und Daten dieses Themas beschäftigen sich die Autoren mit den Fragen nach Fertilität und Familie, Migration und Mobilität sowie der Frage nach Mortalität und Pflege. Der Band richtet sich an alle, die sich mit Fragen der Bevölkerungssoziologie beschäftigen und einen schnellen Einstieg in den Stand der Forschung benötigen. (Verlagstext)</abstract>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-01409-4</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Yasemin Niephaus</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Reinhold Sackmann</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>» Bevölkerungsstruktur - Fertilität - Geburtenentwicklung - Migration - Sozialstruktur</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>881</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2011</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>453</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>472</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>37</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley-Blackwell</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Hoboken [u.a.]</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2014-10-29</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Has East Germany overtaken West Germany? : Recent trends in order-specific fertility</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Some 20 years after reunification, the contrast between East and West Germany offers a natural experiment for studying the degree of persistence of Communist-era family patterns, the effects of economic change, and fertility postponement. After reunification, period fertility rates plummeted in the former East Germany to record low levels. Since the mid-1990s, however, period fertility rates have been rising in East Germany, in contrast to the nearly constant rates seen in the West. By 2008, the TFR of East Germany had overtaken that of the West. We explore why fertility in East Germany is higher than in West Germany, despite unfavorable economic circumstances in the East. We address this and related questions by (a) presenting an account of the persisting East/West differences in attitudes toward and constraints on childbearing, (b) conducting an order-specific fertility analysis of recent fertility trends, and (c) projecting completed fertility for the recent East and west German cohorts. In addition to using the Human Fertility Database, perinatal statistics allow us to calculate a tempo-corrected TFR for East and West Germany.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Population and Development Review</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00430.x</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1728-4457</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Joshua R. Goldstein</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>866</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2012</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>327</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>Budrich</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Opladen [u.a.]</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2014-10-27</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2012-12-18</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Familie und Partnerschaft in Ost- und Westdeutschland : ähnlich und doch immer noch anders</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Zeitschrift für Familienforschung (Sonderheft 9)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3847400417</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1437-2940</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Johannes Huinink</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Heike Trappe</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>872</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2011</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>139</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>23</volume>
    <type>periodical</type>
    <publisherName>Budrich</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Leverkusen [u.a.]</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2014-10-28</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Dynamics of Stepfamilies in Cross-National Perspective</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Zahl und Bedeutung von Stieffamilien sind in Europa in den letzten Jahren gestiegen. Dem geringen Niederschlag dieser Tendenz in der Forschung trägt das vorliegende Themenheft Rechnung. Der wesentliche Unterschied zwischen der heutigen und der historischen Stieffamilie liegt in dem Umstand, dass das zweite biologische Elternteil heute in der Regel noch am Leben ist. Stieffamilien sind eine sehr komplexe Größe, und es gibt vielerlei Wege in die Stieffamilie hinein. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden hier Beiträge vorgelegt, die Evolution und Entwicklung von Stieffamilien aus einer dynamischen Perspektive beschreiben. Der Beitrag gibt einen thematischen Überblick über diese Beiträge. (ICE)</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Zeitschrift für Familienforschung (ZfF)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1437-2940</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-8727</identifier>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Nicole Brünner</submitter>
    <author>Valerie Martin</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/872/Stepfamilies.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2323</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>933</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>959</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>54</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-06-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2017-06-05</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Job Displacement and First Birth Over the Business Cycle</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In this article, we investigate the impact of job displacement on women’s first-birth rates as well as the variation in this effect over the business cycle. We use mass layoffs to estimate the causal effects of involuntary job loss on fertility in the short and medium term, up to five years after displacement. Our analysis is based on rich administrative data from Germany, with an observation period spanning more than 20 years. We apply inverse probability weighting (IPW) to flexibly control for the observed differences between women who were and were not displaced. To account for the differences in the composition of the women who were displaced in a downturn and the women who were displaced in an upswing, we use a double weighting estimator. Results show that the extent to which job displacement has adverse effects on fertility depends on the business cycle. The first-birth rates were much lower for women who were displaced in an economic downturn than for those who lost a job in an economic upturn. This result cannot be explained by changes in the observed characteristics of the displaced women over the business cycle.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Demography</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s13524-017-0580-4</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1533-7790</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">0070-3370</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-23234</identifier>
    <author>Barbara Hofmann</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Arne Uhlendorff</author>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Political Economy | Cluster</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2323/JobDisplacementandFirstBirth.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2388</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst>53</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>69</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>37</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-09-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Un enfant ou un emploi ? Dilemme des Allemandes de l’Est et de l’Ouest</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In East Germany, childlessness was below 10 percent before reunification, while West Germany witnessed a steady and substantial increase in the proportion of childless women, with proportions reaching over 20 percent. This paper describes these divergent developments based on micro-census data. We examine the social policy contexts that shaped women’s work and family patterns before reunification. Moreover, we discuss more recent trends and policy reforms, in particular the expansion of childcare and the parental leave benefit reform of 2007. Although family and employment patterns have become similar in eastern and western Germany, distinct behavioral patterns have prevailed. Even today, childlessness is more common in western than in eastern Germany. Furthermore, East German women regularly work full-time, while maternal full-time employment is only gradually increasing in the western parts of Germany.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Travail, Genre et Sociétés</parentTitle>
    <additionalTitle language="eng">Childlessness and women’s work trends in East and West Germany</additionalTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3917/tgs.037.0053</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.cairn-int.info/abstract-E_TGS_037_0053--childlessness-and-women-s-work-trends-in.htm</identifier>
    <note>The English version of the document is available online at:&#13;
https://www.cairn-int.info/abstract-E_TGS_037_0053--childlessness-and-women-s-work-trends-in.htm</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1960</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>439</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>55</issue>
    <volume>55</volume>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-01-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Social Demography - Forschung an der Schnittstelle von Soziologie und Demographie</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Das Buch versammelt einschlägige Beiträge im Bereich „Social Demography“, der Schnittstelle von soziologischer und demographischer Forschung. In den Einzelbeiträgen&#13;
wird die Bedeutung klassischer soziologischer Konzepte, wie des Lebenslaufs, des Generationenzusammenhangs und der sozialen Ungleichheit für demographische Prozesse, vor allem der Fertilität, der Migration und der Mortalität herausgearbeitet.&#13;
Darüber hinaus beinhaltet der Band aktuelle Studien im Bereich soziobiologischer Forschung wie auch zur gesamtgesellschaftlichen Bedeutung demographischer&#13;
Entwicklungen für moderne Wohlfahrtsstaaten.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-11490-9</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Michaela Kreyenfeld</submitter>
    <author>Karsten Hank</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1961</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>14</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>humanfertility.org</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-01-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-01-20</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Human Fertility Database Documentation: Germany</title>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.humanfertility.org/Docs/DEUTNP/DEUTNPcom.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Michaela Kreyenfeld</editor>
    <submitter>Michaela Kreyenfeld</submitter>
    <author>Olga Pötzsch</author>
    <author>Karolin Kubisch</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1962</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>13</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Rostock</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-01-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fertility assessment with the Own-Children Method: a validation with data from the German Mikrozensus</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The German Mikrozensus is a data set that is frequently used to study fertility behavior. With its large sample size, the dataset also offers the opportunity to investigate childbearing among population subgroups, such as particular migrant groups. Because birth histories are not surveyed in the Mikrozensus, scholars have frequently employed the Own-Children Method (OCM) to generate fertility schedules from this data. The OCM draws on information on the number and ages of the co-residential children in order to estimate the fertility schedule of women. It is clear that this method leads to an underestimation of fertility, because children do not necessarily live with their biological mother. It is also clear that the bias is stronger for older women, because children may have left parental home. In the past, it was not possible to assess the bias. With the Mikrozensus 2008, we are able to validate the OCM by relying on respondent’s own report on the total number of children. We furthermore examine whether the OCM leads to worse estimates for migrants and non-migrants. The results show that the OCM provides reasonable fertility estimates for women in western Germany up to age 40, irrespective of migrant background. For eastern Germany, there is a stronger bias at later ages than in western Germany. This relates to the early age at childbirth in this region and the more diverse family structures.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">MPIDR Technical Report TR-2015-003</parentTitle>
    <note>Free online Access / Freier online Zugriff: &#13;
&#13;
http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/technicalreports/tr-2015-003.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Michaela Kreyenfeld</submitter>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany, fertility, migration, own children data</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1981</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>15</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-03-02</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Guidelines for linking contextual factors and survey data: an application with data from the German Family Panel (pairfam)</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Geo-coded survey data are a prerequisite for any analysis that examines the impact of contextual factors on individual-level outcomes. The local unit may be districts, municipalities, or blocks of houses. However, regional identifiers are sensitive information and including them in a scientific-use-file of a survey may violate data protection regulations. This Technical Report demonstrates how analyses with geo-coded data from the German Family Panel (pairfam) may be conducted. The procedure that we suggest has been tailored for pairfam, but it is applicable to other data sets as well.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">MPIDR Technical Report TR-2015-005</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/technicalreports/tr-2015-005.pdf</identifier>
    <note>Free online Access / Freier online Zugriff: http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/technicalreports/tr-2015-005.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Tom Hensel</author>
    <author>Rainer Walke</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Data Processing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Data Privacy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Geo-Coded Data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information Privacy</value>
    </subject>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2078</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1169</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1184</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-07-22</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-07-11</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Gendered Authorship and Demographic Research – An Analysis of 50 Years of Demography</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Demography, the official journal of the Population Association of America, has been given the highest rating among demographic journals by the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Our aim here is to investigate the development of research subfields and female authorship in Demography over the last 50 years. We find that female authorship in Demography has risen considerably since the 1980s and that currently a woman is about as likely as a man to be the sole or the first author of a paper published in the journal. However, we find some differences by subfield. Women seem to be overrepresented in the “family and household” research subfield but underrepresented in the “mortality and health” and “data and methods” categories.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Demography</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s13524-016-0482-x</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
    <author>Katharina Wolf</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2087</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1169</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1184</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-09-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-07-11</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Gendered Authorship and Demographic Research – An Analysis of 50 Years of Demography</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Demography, the official journal of the Population Association of America, has been given the highest rating among demographic journals by the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Our aim here is to investigate the development of research subfields and female authorship in Demography over the last 50 years. We find that female authorship in Demography has risen considerably since the 1980s and that currently a woman is about as likely as a man to be the sole or the first author of a paper published in the journal. However, we find some differences by subfield. Women seem to be overrepresented in the “family and household” research subfield but underrepresented in the “mortality and health” and “data and methods” categories.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Demography</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s13524-016-0482-x</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1533-7790</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-20875</identifier>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Katharina Wolf</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Demography</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Publication practices</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Female authorship</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gender</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bibliometrics</value>
    </subject>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2087/GenderedAuthorship.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2089</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>30</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>42</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>March 2016</issue>
    <volume>27</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-09-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Reliability of union histories in social science surveys: Blurred memory, deliberate misreporting, or true tales?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper examines the reliability of biographical information gathered retrospectively. It draws on data from the German Family Panel (pairfam), which collected information on the partnership status at first birth using two different strategies. The first strategy was to collect partnership and fertility histories separately in an event history calendar. The second strategy was to ask the respondents directly about their partnership status at first childbirth. We find that in almost 20 percent of the cases, the information collected using the two different strategies did not correspond. The dissolution of a partnership and having a complex partnership biography are strong predictors for discrepancies in the information gathered through the two different strategies. We conclude by discussing the factors that lead to the different outcomes produced by each of the two methods, and the implications of these discrepancies for the study of partnership and fertility behavior in general.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Advances in Life Course Research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1040-2608</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-20899</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.alcr.2015.11.001</identifier>
    <note>This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Advances in Life Course Research.</note>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Sonja Bastin</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2089/Kreyenfeld_Bastin_AuthorsPostPrint.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2019</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>204</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>206</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-25</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Kinderlosigkeit</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Neue Zeitschrift für Familienrecht</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2198-2333</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2020</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>1100</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1102</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>23</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-25</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Wandel der Familienformen</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Neue Zeitschrift für Familienrecht</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2198-2333</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Konietzka Dirk</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2023</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>107</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>128</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>VS Verl.</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-27</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-03-05</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Soziale Ungleichheit und Kinderbetreuung – Eine Analyse der sozialen und ökonomischen Determinanten der Nutzung von Kinderbetreuungseinrichtungen</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Ähnlich wie in anderen europäischen Ländern wird die institutionelle Kinderbetreuung in Deutschland in erster Linie über ein öffentliches Angebot bereitgestellt. Private Kindertageseinrichtungen, wie es sie in markt-liberalen Ländern gibt, stellen weiterhin eine Ausnahmeerscheinung dar. Ein Spezifikum der deutschen Situation ist darüber hinaus die besondere Bedeutung freier Träger (wie Kirchen und Wohlfahrtsverbände) für die Organisation und Bereitstellung von Plätzen in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Ausgangspunkt der folgenden Überlegungen ist die Hypothese, dass mit der Organisation der institutionellen Kinderbetreuung spezifische Formen sozialer Ausschlussprozesse verbunden sind.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Bildung als Privileg. Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-11951-5 (Print)</identifier>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-11952-2 (Online)</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-658-11952-2_4</identifier>
    <note>Available as print in your Hertie Library.&#13;
&#13;
Als Druckversion in der Hertie Bibliothek verfügbar.</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2135</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>505</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>534</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>35</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-08-26</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fertility progression in Germany : An analysis using flexible nonparametric cure survival models</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Objective: This paper uses data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) to study the transition to second and third births. In particular, we seek to distinguish the factors that determine the timing of fertility from the factors that influence ultimate parity progression.&#13;
&#13;
Methods: We employ cure survival models, a technique commonly used in epidemiological studies and in the statistical literature but only rarely applied to fertility research.&#13;
&#13;
Results: We find that education has a different impact on the timing and the ultimate probability of having a second and a third birth. Furthermore, we show that the shape of the fertility schedule for the total population differs from that of ‘susceptible women’ (i.e., those who have a second or a third child).&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions: Standard event history models conflate timing and quantum effects. Our approach overcomes this shortcoming. It estimates separate parameters for the hazard rate of having a next child for the ‘susceptible population’ and the ultimate probability of having another child for the entire population at risk.&#13;
&#13;
Contribution: We go beyond standard cure survival models, also known as split population models, used in fertility research by specifying a flexible non-parametric model using Bayesian P-splines for the latent distribution (related to the timing of an extra birth) instead of a parametric model. Our approach is, so far, limited to time-constant covariates, but can be extended to include time-varying covariates as well.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Demographic Research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.18</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21352</identifier>
    <author>Vincent Bremhorst</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <author>Philippe Lambert</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>cure survival models</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>parity progression</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>quantum</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>timing</value>
    </subject>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2135/FertilityProgressionGermany.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2136</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>4</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>15</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Erwerbsbeteiligung von Müttern und Vätern in Ost- und Westdeutschland : Strukturstarre oder Trendwende</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Archiv für Wissenschaft und Praxis der sozialen Arbeit</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">0340 - 3564</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Esther Geisler</author>
    <author>Heike Trappe</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2137</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>XI, 370</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Springer International Publishing</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Cham</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This open access book provides an overview of childlessness throughout Europe. It offers a collection of papers written by leading demographers and sociologists that examine contexts, causes, and consequences of childlessness in countries throughout the region.The book features data from all over Europe. It specifically highlights patterns of childlessness in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Finland, Sweden, Austria and Switzerland. An additional chapter on childlessness in the United States puts the European experience in perspective. The book offers readers such insights as the determinants of lifelong childlessness, whether governments can and should counteract increasing childlessness, how the phenomenon differs across social strata and the role economic uncertainties play. In addition, the book also examines life course dynamics and biographical patterns, assisted reproduction as well as the consequences of childlessness. Childlessness has been increasing rapidly in most European countries in recent decades. This book offers readers expert analysis into this issue from leading experts in the field of family behavior. From causes to consequences, it explores the many facets of childlessness throughout Europe to present a comprehensive portrait of this important demographic and sociological trend.</abstract>
    <subTitle language="deu">Contexts, Causes, and Consequences</subTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-319-44665-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21378</identifier>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <editor>Michaela Kreyenfeld</editor>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
    <editor>Dirk Konietzka</editor>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2137/ChildlessnessInEurope.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2138</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>109</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>126</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer VS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Familiengründung und Migration : Aussiedlerinnen und türkischstämmige Migrantinnen im Vergleich</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Die transformative Macht der Demografie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-13166-1</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-658-13166-1</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <editor>Tilman Mayer</editor>
    <author>Sandra Krapf</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2140</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>97</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>114</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer International Publishing</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Cham</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Childlessness in East and West Germany : Long-Term Trends and Social Disparities</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This chapter provides an overview of the long-term trends in childlessness in East and West Germany. Based on vital statistics, census, and micro-census data we show that for the East German cohorts born in 1940–1964 the share who have remained childless has stalled at around 10 %. For the same cohorts in West Germany, we find that the share who are childless has increased from 10 % to about 20 %. We furthermore describe socio-economic disparities in the childlessness levels of West German birth cohorts based on our analysis of data from the German Family Panel (pairfam). We find that higher levels of female education are associated with higher levels of childlessness, but that differences by education have narrowed among women of recent birth cohorts. For men, we find a clear negative gradient in childlessness, as less educated men are more likely to be childless than their better educated counterparts. Finally, having a turbulent partnership history is shown to be associated with a high probability of remaining childless.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Childlessness in Europe : Contexts, Causes, and Consequences</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-319-44665-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_5</identifier>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-319-44667-7</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-44667-7</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21405</identifier>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Dirk Konietzka</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2140/ChildlessnessInEuropeCh_5.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2141</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>235</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>251</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer International Publishing</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Cham</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fertility Ideals of Women and Men Across the Life Course</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper explores the stability of women’s and men’s fertility preferences across the life course. The data come from the first six waves of the German Family Panel (pairfam), which span the period from 2008/2009 until 2013/2014. In our analysis, fertility preferences are measured using the following question: “Under ideal circumstances, how many children would you like to have?” The average number cited by both women and men is 2.2. With rising age, this number declines modestly. Relying on fixed-effects modelling, we find that neither partnership status nor economic circumstances have any causal effect on fertility preferences. However, as the number of children a respondent has increases, his or her ideal number of children is also likely to grow. Thus, fertility ideals appear to undergo changes over time, and are adjusted in line with the size of the respondent’s own family.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Childlessness in Europe : Contexts, Causes, and Consequences</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-319-44665-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_11</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21415</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <editor>Michaela Kreyenfeld</editor>
    <author>Anne-Kristin Kuhnt</author>
    <editor>Dirk Konietzka</editor>
    <author>Heike Trappe</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2141/ChildlessnessInEuropeCh_11.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2134</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>175</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>204</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>41</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-01-31</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-08-31</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The register-based census in Germany : Historical context and relevance for population research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In 2011, Germany carried out its first census after a 20-year break. In light of the United Nations’ recommendations that countries initiate a population census at least every 10 years, the census was long overdue. Moreover, demographers had for some time been demanding a new enumeration that would enable them to place the calculation of demographic indicators on a reliable basis. With the 2011 census, Germany not only met the demand for a current population census, but also broke new ground by using a register-based approach. Unlike the Scandinavian countries, which have a long tradition of performing register-based data analyses, the linking of administrative data in Germany is restricted by the country’s legal framework. Thus, the 2011 census was an ambitious project. After contextualising the 2011 census historically, we discuss in this contribution the census’ relevance for generating central demographic data. Specifically, we compare the updated population estimates of the 1987 census to the results of the 2011 census in order to identify possible systematic sources of error that distort demographic indicators and analyses.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Comparative Population Studies</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1869-8999</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12765/CPoS-2016-08en</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-21340</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Rembrandt Scholz</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Michaela Kreyenfeld</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Demographic indicators</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Register data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Census</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Political Economy | Cluster</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/2134/RegisterbasedCensus2016.pdf</file>
  </doc>
</export-example>
