<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>1264</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2012</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>68</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>Notre Europe</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-05-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Completing the Euro : A roadmap towards fiscal union in Europe ; Report of the “Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa Group</title>
    <identifier type="url">http://enderlein.eu/TPS_GROUP_REPORT.pdf</identifier>
    <note>Free online Access / Freier online Zugriff:  http://enderlein.eu/TPS_GROUP_REPORT.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Henrik Enderlein</author>
    <submitter>Christopher Cosler</submitter>
    <author>Peter Bofinger</author>
    <author>Jean-Claude Piris</author>
    <author>Paul de Grauwe</author>
    <author>Maria Joao Rodrigues</author>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <author>Andrés Sapir</author>
    <author>Antonio Vitorino</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1685</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2015-10-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">"Reforms and Investment and Growth: An Agenda for France, Germany and Europe". Report to the French Minister for the Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs and to the German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy.</title>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Henrik Enderlein</author>
    <submitter>Christopher Cosler</submitter>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2271</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2012</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>spa</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>169</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Antoni Bosch</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Barcelona</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="spa">El Despertar de los Demonios : La crisis del euro y cómo salir de ella</title>
    <additionalTitle language="fra">Le réveil des démons : La crise de l'euro et comment nous en sortir</additionalTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-84-95348-84-5</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2272</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>130</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Rapport 2016 du comité de suivi du Crédit d'impôt pour la compétitivité et l'emploi</title>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.strategie.gouv.fr/sites/strategie.gouv.fr/files/atoms/files/rapport_cice2016_28095016_ok.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <editor> France Stratégie</editor>
    <author>Fabrice Lenglart</author>
    <author>Amandine Brun-Schammé</author>
    <author>Rozenn Desplatz</author>
    <author>Antoine Naboulet</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2273</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>115</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Rapport 2014 du Comité de suivi du CICE</title>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <editor> France Stratégie</editor>
    <author>Antoine Naboulet</author>
    <author>Claire Bernard</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2232</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>272</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Fayard</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-11-02</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">À qui la faute?</title>
    <abstract language="fra">Le 15 septembre 2008, les dirigeants américains laissent la banque d'affaires Lehman Brothers faire faillite et déclenchent une panique financière. Pourquoi cette méprise ? Début 2011, la zone euro fait le choix de l'austérité budgétaire. La fragile reprise européenne est cassée net. Pourquoi cet égarement ? Depuis plus de trente ans, la France ne parvient pas à réduire son chômage alors que bien d'autres l'ont fait. Pourquoi cette impuissance ? Économiquement et socialement, ces erreurs ont été extrêmement coûteuses. Elles sont pour beaucoup dans le discrédit dont souffrent aujourd'hui les gouvernants. En politique économique, il y a bien des manières de faire fausse route. À qui la faute ? démonte les mécanismes de l'erreur. Il montre comment des dirigeants bien intentionnés peuvent prendre des décisions catastrophiques. Il met au jour les logiques qui les conduisent à la défaillance ou à l'échec. Et il formule des propositions pour des décisions mieux conçues et mieux exécutées.</abstract>
    <subTitle language="fra">Comment éviter les erreurs économiques</subTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-2213701691</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Selma Mahfouz</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2233</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>312</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>La Documentation française</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2016-10-01</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">2017-2027</title>
    <abstract language="fra">L’élection présidentielle n’a pas pour seul objet de désigner un dirigeant à la tête du pays. Le débat qui la précède est aussi, pour les Français, l’occasion de définir les questions essentielles qui se posent à la nation, d’identifier les options en présence et d’opérer leurs propres choix sur les directions à donner aux politiques publiques. France Stratégie a retenu plusieurs enjeux qui devront être au cœur des prochains débats : comment lutter contre le changement climatique ? Comment réduire la dette et restaurer notre compétitivité ? Quels leviers pour l’emploi ? Quelles réformes pour l’éducation ? Pour la fiscalité ? Comment tirer parti du numérique ? Comment garantir l’équité entre générations et l’équilibre entre métropoles et zones rurales ? Sur chaque thème, il s’agit d’offrir au lecteur un diagnostic étayé de la situation, un exposé des enjeux et un inventaire des options envisageables. Car toutes ces questions appellent des choix, de la part des candidats comme des électeurs. &#13;
Voir plus loin, voir plus clair : cet effort de réflexion constitue une étape nécessaire si on veut qu’en 2017 le choix citoyen, la volonté politique et l’action publique soient à la hauteur des défis qui attendent le pays pour la décennie à venir.</abstract>
    <subTitle language="fra">Enjeux pour une décennie</subTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-2-11-145120-9</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <editor> France Stratégie</editor>
    <author>Fabrice Lenglart</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2266</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2012</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>795</pageNumber>
    <edition>3. ed.</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>De Boeck</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Bruxelles</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2012-10-23</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Politique économique</title>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-2804170905</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <author>Benoît Coeuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2269</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>ita</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>780</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Il Mulino</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Bologna</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="ita">Politica economica</title>
    <additionalTitle language="fra">Politique économique</additionalTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-88-15-25208-1</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <author>Benoît Coeuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2270</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2013</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>249</pageNumber>
    <edition>Nouvelle éd., revue et augmentée</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Pluriel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-04-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Le Réveil des Démons: la crise de l’euro et comment nous en sortir</title>
    <abstract language="fra">On croyait les démons assagis : à la faveur de la crise financière de 2008, les Etats avaient repris le dessus sur les marchés financiers et les politiques économiques savaient répondre et conjurer la dépression. Mais la tempête qui a ébranlé la zone euro entre 2009 et 2012, au départ crise banale dans une petite économie périphérique, la Grèce, a gagné un pays après l’autre et a menacé d’emporter tout l’édifice monétaire européen. Dans ce brillant essai, Jean Pisani-Ferry retrace les étapes de la crise et analyse les solutions adoptées. Si l’Europe a fait preuve d’un remarquable sens de la survie, elle souffre aujourd’hui d’une dangereuse absence de communauté de projets.</abstract>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-2818503126</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Lena Klein</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2552</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>87</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>104</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-08-28</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Is Global Governance passé?</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The Governance Report 2018</parentTitle>
    <note>ISBN 9780198821496</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2561</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2010</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>728</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Economic Policy</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Written by four recognized experts with senior experience in research and government, this text is the first comprehensive survival kit for students and practitioners of economic policy. It is set to become an indispensable resource for everyone involved or interested in modern economic policy. Academic scholars willing to engage in policy discussions and students at graduate or advanced undergraduate levels will find it an essential bridge to the policy world.&#13;
&#13;
 What makes the book unique is that it combines like no other, facts-based analysis, state-of-the art theories and models, and insights from first-hand policy experience at national and international levels. The book has grown out of ten years of experience teaching economic policy at the graduate level. It provides an intellectually coherent framework to understand the potentialities and limits of economic policy. It addresses positive dimensions (how do policies impact on modern economies?), normative dimensions (what should policymakers aim to achieve and against what should their action be judged?) and political-economy constraints (which are the limits and obstacles to public intervention?). It fills an important gap by reconciling in each major policy area stylized facts of recent economic history, key questions faced by contemporary policymakers, and essential lessons from theory which are captured and explained in a clear, concise, and self-contained way. &#13;
&#13;
 All major areas of domestic and international policymaking are covered: fiscal policy, monetary policy, international finance and exchange-rate policy, tax policy, and long-term growth policies. The book concludes with a special chapter on the lessons of the financial crisis. &#13;
&#13;
 The authors are intellectually non-partisan and they draw examples from various countries and experiences; from emerging markets to developing economies, shedding light when necessary on local specificities such as European Union rules and instruments. Economic Policy: Theory and Practice is the essential guide to economic policy in the new post-crisis context.</abstract>
    <subTitle language="eng">Theory and Practice</subTitle>
    <note>ISBN 9780195322736&#13;
&#13;
Please note:&#13;
Economic Policy, with Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Benoît Coeuré et Pierre Jacquet, 2010. New revised and expanded edition, forthcoming Oxford University Press 2018. Chinese edition, 2015. Greek edition, in preparation.</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <author>Benoît Coeuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2562</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>680</pageNumber>
    <edition>4e édition</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>De Boeck Supérieur</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Louvain-la-Neuve</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2017-12-08</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Politique économique</title>
    <abstract language="fra">Les crises ont profondément transformé la politique économique. La tempête financière de 2008, la Grande Récession qui a suivi, les déboires de la zone euro, le niveau très faible de l inflation, le ralentissement de la croissance, la hausse des dettes publiques et l augmentation des inégalités ont ébranlé les certitudes passées et appellent de nouvelles réponses. Parce qu il réunit, dans un seul volume, les principaux enseignements théoriques et l analyse des débats actuels, "Politique économique" s est imposé depuis plus de dix ans comme la référence pour comprendre les politiques économiques d'aujourdhui. Cette quatrième édition a été entièrement refondue pour prendre en compte les derniers développements et débats sur la politique économique. Elle propose notamment un nouveau chapitre consacré à l instabilité financière et aux politiques susceptibles d y répondre.</abstract>
    <note>ISBN 978-2807301627</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <author>Benoît Coeuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2563</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2011</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>360</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>Bruegel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Brüssel</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">An Ocean Apart? Comparing Transatlantic Responses to the Financial Crisis</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Has the EU-US relationship become a sideshow or is it still central to the global economy? Conﬂicting signals have been sent out since the outbreak of the global crisis. The creation of the G20 and its designation as ‘the premier forum for international cooperation’ suggest that attention and priorities have moved away from the traditional G7 focus on the transatlantic economy. But most of the key policy debates of the last two years have retained a characteristically transatlantic ﬂavour. This applies to the controversy about the pace of consolidation which resulted in an open US-German rift at the Toronto summit in June 2010; to the discussion on the new bank capital ratios which again was essentially a Euro-American aﬀair; and to the broader conversation on the priorities of ﬁnancial regulatory reform, for which the big action agendas have been the US Dodd-Frank Act and the European endorsement of a blueprint for coordinated supervision and a single European macroprudential body. True, other issues – the global rebalanc-ing, or the creation of global ﬁnancial safety nets – have had a distinctive G20 scope. But at least a fair share of the international debate has been transatlantic. There are reasons for this state of aﬀairs. To start with, what is known as the global crisis has been ﬁrst and foremost a transatlantic crisis. As discussed in several contributions in this volume, the wake of the crisis ﬁnancial integration through portfolio diversiﬁcation essentially remained an EU-US phenomenon. Accordingly the subsequent ﬁnancial turmoil primarily aﬀected the European and American ﬁnancial systems, and other economies indirectly only, through trade or capital outﬂows. It is therefore natural to see the same two regions take the lead in setting the agenda for ﬁnancial reform. Second, the problems they are facing in the aftermath of the shock – the travails of deleveraging, unemployment, the need for unconventional policy responses, the lowering of the growth potential, the rise of public debt, political pressures for protection – are largely common. Third, while they are not the main contributors to world growth, the EU and the US still constitute the bulk of the global economy, and what happens to them matters considerably for all.&#13;
The US and the EU however are not responding to the same shock in the same way and this is what makes the comparison interesting. It is telling that the sovereign debt crises developed in Europe in the ﬁrst half of 2010 and triggered a move towards consolidation while the US ﬁscal situation is by most standards worse than the aggregate European situation. It is telling also that the priorities of ﬁnancial reform have not been the same. Clearly neither the policy space nor the policy traditions are identical and this portends signiﬁcant divergence across the Atlantic. How far this divergence will go and whether policymakers on the two continents will disagree or agree to disagree is one of the key questions for the future of the global economy in the years to come.&#13;
All this justiﬁes a revival of the transatlantic economic conversation. The joint Banca d’Italia-Bruegel-Peterson Institute conference, held in Rome on 10-11 September 2009 with the support of the European Commission, aimed to contribute to the conversation through research and policy discussions. We hope that the papers collected in this volume will help foster a fact-based, analytically sound discussion.</abstract>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-9-078910-19-0</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/110310_An_ocean_apart.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Adam Posen</author>
    <author>Fabrizio Saccomanni</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2564</id>
    <completedYear>2010</completedYear>
    <publishedYear>2010</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst>9</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>18</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>248</pageNumber>
    <edition>96</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>Association d'économie financière</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Arcueil, France</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">L'euro en 2019</title>
    <abstract language="fra">Dans ce numéro, la Revue propose de réfléchir au futur de la monnaie unique. De grands décideurs et des experts renommés ont été invités à répondre à la question suivante : « Quelles sont selon vous les évolutions les plus susceptibles d'influencer et, le cas échéant, de transformer la zone euro et son fonctionnement dans les dix années à venir ? ». L'ensemble des contributions est donc orienté vers l'avenir plutôt que vers l'évaluation des résultats du passé.&#13;
L'euro est considéré comme un succès, mais le bilan de l'UEM est plus controversé. Les auteurs nous livrent une réflexion sans complaisance qui met en valeur les défis de la prochaine décennie :&#13;
- si l'euro a bravement traversé la tempête de la crise financière et économique, des réparations et des aménagements s'imposent ;&#13;
- les outils de gestion macroéconomique de la zone euro doivent être plus efficaces ;&#13;
- il faut achever la construction du marché unique ;&#13;
- la stratégie d'élargissement doit être clarifiée ;&#13;
- le rôle international de l'euro va devoir être discuté dans un contexte marqué par les déséquilibres globaux et la contestation de la domination du dollar ;&#13;
- les Européens devront choisir de renforcer leurs institutions politiques s'ils tiennent à l'engrenage entre union monétaire et union politique.&#13;
Les différents enjeux sont clairement exprimés par les auteurs et il en résulte que si les dix premières années ont parfois été mouvementées, les dix prochaines ne le seront sans doute pas moins.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Revue d’Economie Financière. L'euro en 2019</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2010_num_96_1_5367</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Pierre Jaillet</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2565</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2009</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>226</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>PETERSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Washington, Brussels</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Euro at Ten: The Next Global Currency?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Over the first ten years of its existence, the euro has proved to be more than a powerful symbol of collective identity. It has provided price stability to previously inflation-prone countries; it has offered a shelter against currency crises; and it has by and large been conducive to budgetary discipline. The eurozone has attracted five new members in addition to the initial eleven, and many countries in Europe wish to adopt it. The euro has also been successful internationally. Even though research presented in this volume confirms that it has not rivaled the dollar’s world currency status, it has certainly become a strong regional currency in Europe and the Mediterranean region. Some countries in the region have de facto adopted it, several peg to it, and many have become at least partially euroized.&#13;
&#13;
However, the euro’s impressive first decade is likely to be followed by a much more difficult period. The present financial crisis is posing at least two important challenges: real economic adjustment within the euro area and maintenance of fiscal and financial stability without a central government authority capable of taking appropriate financial and fiscal decisions in difficult times. The papers and remarks in this volume demonstrate that the euro has proved to be attractive as a fair weather currency for countries and investors well beyond its borders. But it remains to be seen whether it is equipped to also succeed as a stormy weather currency.</abstract>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-0-88132-430-3</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/Euro_at_Ten_June_4.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Adam S. Posen</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2566</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2005</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>136</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Flammarion</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2018-09-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2005-03-22</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">L'Europe déclassée ?</title>
    <abstract language="fra">La thèse du déclassement économique de l'Europe face à une Amérique vigoureuse et une Asie ascendante est incontestablement devenue l'opinion dominante du débat sur l'Europe. Elle trouve un écho particulier en France où l'industrie intellectuelle du déclin rejoint subtilement un euroscepticisme de bon aloi. L'Europe, déjà pas souhaitable en soi, n'est de surcroît pas nécessaire puisqu'elle ne garantit pas une marche vers le progrès. À cela, les partisans du fédéralisme économique opposent l'idée que plus d'Europe serait la solution mécanique au problème. Mais cette réponse est trop stéréotypée pour être convaincante. La contrainte européenne peut aussi être source de déresponsabilisation nationale, comme on peut le voir, par exemple, sur le plan budgétaire. En fait, tout porte à penser qu'il n'existe pas de réponse simple à des enjeux complexes. Pour clarifier ce débat, trois économistes de renom risquent chacun un point de vue. Stimulantes et toujours étayées, les conclusions de leurs analyses surprendront le lecteur.</abstract>
    <note>ISBN 9782082105033</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2004</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Economic Policy</title>
    <subTitle language="deu">New revised and expanded edition&#13;
&#13;
Chinese edition 2015. Greek edition in preparation</subTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <author>Benoît Coeuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2005</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Fayard</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Quelle France dans dix ans?</title>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2006</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Euro Crisis and its Aftermath</title>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2007</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>Remnin University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Beijing</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Euro Crisis and its Aftermath. Chinese Edition</title>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2008</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Janvier</issue>
    <volume>2016</volume>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>Commission nationale d’évaluation des politiques d’innovation</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Quinze ans de politiques d'innovation en France</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">France Stratégie</parentTitle>
    <note>http://www.strategie.gouv.fr/sites/strategie.gouv.fr/files/atoms/files/fs_rapport_cnepi_21012016.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2009</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Septembre</issue>
    <volume>2015</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Comité de suivi du CICE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Comité de suivi du crédit d’impôt pour la compétitivité et l’emploi. Rapport 2015</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">France Stratégie</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2011</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Septembre</issue>
    <volume>2014</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Rapport du Comité de suivi du Crédit d'impôt pour la compétitivité et l'emploi. Rapport 2014</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">France Stratégie</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2012</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Juin</issue>
    <volume>2014</volume>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Quelle France dans dix ans? Les chantiers de la décennie? Rapport au Président de la République</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">France Stratégie</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2013</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>62</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>84</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Oxford</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Rebalancing the governance of the euro area</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Beyond the crisis</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <editor>Mark Dawson</editor>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
    <editor>Henrik Enderlein</editor>
    <editor>Christian Jörges</editor>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2014</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>185</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>192</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>European Central Bank</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Frankfurt</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Central bank advocacy of structural reform: why and how?</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Inflation and Unemployment in Europe, proceedings of the ECB Forum on Central Banking</parentTitle>
    <note>http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecbforumoncentralbanking2015en.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2015</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Impôt et cotisation: quel financement pour la protection sociale?</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Actes du colloque 2014 du Conseil d'État</parentTitle>
    <note>http://www.strategie.gouv.fr/sites/strategie.gouv.fr/files/atoms/files/intervention-cloture-2014-06-27.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2016</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst>56</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>76</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>12</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Edition Esprit</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Paris</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">L'action collective face au changement climatique</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Esprit</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2017</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst>9</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>13</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Numéro spécial</issue>
    <volume>2014</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Quelles politiques structurelles pour l'Europe?</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Problèmes économiques</parentTitle>
    <note>http://mailing.fpul-lyon.org/jeco/pb_eco_jeco2014.pdf</note>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2018</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst>132</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>138</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>181</issue>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <type>contributiontoperiodical</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2016-04-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">La nouvelle question productive</title>
    <parentTitle language="fra">Le Débat</parentTitle>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Amanda Slater</submitter>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2862</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Euro area reform: An anatomy of the debate</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">CEPR Policy Insight No. 95</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/201809_Eurodebate_CEPR_PolicyInsight_95.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2863</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>12</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">One size does not fit all: European integration by differentiation</title>
    <abstract language="eng">THE ISSUE&#13;
Reforming the governance of the European Union has become urgent for three reasons: to better deal with politically-sensitive topics, to manage greater external challenges mand because future EU enlargement will increase the diversity of the bloc’s membership. The answer to disagreement typically has been qualified majority voting, but on sensitive topics, the EU has increasingly moved to unanimity and heavy European Council involvement, which has often not delivered results. The alternative answer has been a Europe of multiple speeds of integration with one shared goal for all, increasing political tensions. A different approach is now needed to move Europe forward.&#13;
POLICY CHALLENGE&#13;
Two options would be a Europe of concentric circles and a Europe of ‘clubs’, but the former would cement tensions between the inner and the outer circles, while the latter would lead to unclear structures and an end to cohesion. However, a governance model could combine the two approaches. The model would be based on a strong ‘bare-bones EU’ formed by the single market, trade and accompanying policies, the European institutions, treaties, rule of law and a commitment to fundamental EU values. Three policy areas would be completely moved into ‘clubs’ while remaining based on the bare-bones legal and institutional structure: economic and monetary union; Schengen and asylum policy; and foreign and security policy and neighbourhood policy. Club membership would be optional but once in, countries would have to accept the rules and there would be high hurdles to leaving. Finally, a ring of friends would surround the bare-bones EU, based on very close economic relationships and some multilateral discussion elements, but no formal votes.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Policy Brief</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PB-2018_03_final3.pdf</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Maria Demertzis</author>
    <author>André Sapir</author>
    <author>Thomas Wieser</author>
    <author>Guntram Wolff</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2864</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Should we give up on global governance?</title>
    <abstract language="deu">The high point of global governance was reached in the mid-1990s around the creation of the World Trade Organisation. It was hoped that globalisation would be buttressed by a system of global rules and a network of specialised global institutions. Two decades later these hopes have been dashed by a series of global governance setbacks, the rise of economic nationalism and the dramatic change of attitude of the United States administration. From trade to the environment, a retreat from multilateralism is observable. The 2008 elevation of the G20 to leaders’ level was an exception to this trend. But the G20 is no more than a political steering body.&#13;
&#13;
The reasons for this retreat partially arise from political developments in individual countries. But such factors hide a series specific roadblocks to global governance: the growing number and diversity of countries involved; the mounting rivalry between the US and China; doubts about globalisation and the distribution of the associated benefits; the obsolescence of global rules and institutions; imbalances within the global governance regime; and increased complexity.&#13;
&#13;
What, then, should be the way forward? The demand for global governance has not diminished, but support for binding multilateral arrangements has. There is a need for alternative governance technologies that better accommodate the diversity of players, provide for more flexibility and rely less on compulsion. From competition to financial regulation, such arrangements have been developed in a series of fields already. They are often hailed as providing a solution to the governance conundrum. But their effectiveness should be assessed critically. Can they overcome the free-rider curse and enforcement problems? Usual game theory suggests not. Not all games are similar, however, and some collective action problems can be tackled without recourse to coercion.&#13;
&#13;
Against this background, multilateralists hesitate over the choice of a strategy. One option would be to seek to preserve the existing order to the greatest extent possible. Its downside is that it does not address the underlying problems. An alternative option is to try to redesign international arrangements, putting the emphasis on flexibility and voluntary participation. Its downside is that it risks overlooking the intrinsic problems of international or global collective action. A potentially more promising approach would be to define the minimum conditions that the multilateral framework must fulfil to provide a strong-enough basis for flexible, variable-geometry and possibly informal arrangements.&#13;
&#13;
In the end, we should neither cultivate the nostalgia of yesterday’s order nor invest our hopes in ineffective international cooperation. The narrow path ahead is to establish a sufficient, critical multilateral base for flexible arrangements and to equip policymakers with a precise toolkit for determining, on a field-by-field basis, the minimum requirements for effective collective action.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Bruegel Policy Contribution 17</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/PC-17-2018.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2865</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Reconciling risk sharing with market discipline: A constructive approach to Eurozone reform</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">CEPR Policy Insight No. 91</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://cepr.org/active/publications/policy_insights/viewpi.php?pino=91</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Markus Brunnermeier</author>
    <author>Henrik Enderlein</author>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <author>Emmanuel Farhi</author>
    <author>Marcel Fratzscher</author>
    <author>Clemens Fuest</author>
    <author>Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas</author>
    <author>Philippe Martin</author>
    <author>Hélène Rey</author>
    <author>Isabel Schnabel</author>
    <author>Nicolas Véron</author>
    <author>Béatrice Weder di Mauro</author>
    <author>Jéromin Zettelmeyer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>banking union, capital markets, European governance, eurozone governance, finance &amp; financial regulation, fiscal policy, monetary union, Sovereign debt</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Jacques Delors Centre</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2866</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>27</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>222</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>European University Institute</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Florence</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Euro area reform: Reflections on an initiative</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Institutions and the Crisis</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.2870/421536</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <editor>Franklin Allen</editor>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <editor>Elena Carletti</editor>
    <editor>Mitu Gulati</editor>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2977</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>CEPR</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>London</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-06-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate</title>
    <identifier type="url">https://voxeu.org/content/risk-sharing-plus-market-discipline-new-paradigm-euro-area-reform-debate</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jeromin Zettelmeyer</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2979</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>fra</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>680</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>deboeck supérieur</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Louvain-la-Neuve</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-06-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="fra">Politique économique</title>
    <abstract language="fra">Clair, rigoureux et complet : la référence indispensable pour comprendre la politique économique.&#13;
&#13;
Les crises ont profondément transformé la politique économique. La tempête fi nancière de 2008, la Grande Récession qui a suivi, les déboires de la zone euro, le niveau très faible de l’inflation, le ralentissement de la croissance, la hausse des dettes publiques et l’augmentation des inégalités ont ébranlé les certitudes passées et appellent de nouvelles réponses.&#13;
&#13;
Des chapitres oubliés de la théorie économique ont été relus et des instruments nouveaux ont été mis en place.&#13;
&#13;
Les questions qui se posent sont plus pressantes que jamais. Dans quelles circonstances la politique budgétaire est-elle efficace pour combattre une récession ? Quelles sont les limites de l’endettement public ? Que peut la politique monétaire lorsque l’inflation est voisine de zéro ? Comment contrôler la finance ? Quelles politiques faut-il mener ensemble, et lesquelles faut-il conduire séparément ? Comment taxer le capital ? Comment stimuler l’emploi ? Comment changer la qualité de la croissance ?&#13;
&#13;
Parce qu’il réunit, dans un seul volume, les principaux enseignements théoriques et l’analyse des débats actuels, Politique économique s’est imposé depuis plus de dix ans comme la référence pour comprendre les politiques économiques d’aujourd’hui. Cette quatrième édition a été entièrement refondue pour prendre en compte les derniers développements et débats sur la politique économique. Elle propose notamment un nouveau chapitre consacré à l’instabilité fi nancière et aux politiques susceptibles d’y répondre.&#13;
&#13;
L’ouvrage s’adresse à un public large : étudiants en licence ou master d’économie, de gestion ou de sciences politiques, candidats aux concours administratifs, praticiens et observateurs de la politique économique, acteurs de la vie économique.</abstract>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-2-8073-0162-7</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Agnès Bénassy-Quéré</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Benoît Cœuré</author>
    <author>Pierre Jacquet</author>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <author>Alexandra Roulet</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2980</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-06-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Redefining Europe's Sovereignty</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Executive summary&#13;
Europeans like to believe the European Union has the collective economic size and capacity to determine its own economic destiny. But the behaviour of others global powers is increasingly calling this ability into question. China and the United States, especially, do not separate economic interests from geopolitical interests in the same way the EU does. They are increasingly using economic connections, from cyberspace to financial links, to gain geopolitical advantage or to serve geopolitical goals. Europe’s economic sovereignty is at stake.&#13;
The problem for Europe is real but manageable. This Policy Contribution examines the specific problems that China and the US pose for European economic sovereignty, and considers how the EU and its member states can better protect European economic sovereignty in a range of areas, including state aid to domestic industries, competition policy, investment screening, export controls, the international role of the euro, the role of European development banks, the European payments infrastructure and the global governance system. In each area, we recommend ways to improve the EU’s capacity to wield economic power, without advocating increased protectionism or a retreat from globalisation.&#13;
We make recommendations on how to adapt the EU and national policy systems to better integrate economic and geopolitical considerations. The next European Commission should develop an economic sovereignty strategy to boost Europe’s research and scientific base, protect assets critical to national security from foreign interference, enforce a level playing field in domestic and international competition, and strengthen European monetary and financial autonomy.&#13;
To guide the implementation of this strategy, an economic sovereignty committee should be established that will seek to integrate economic and security considerations within the European Commission. But the answer to this problem does not lie only in Brussels. We recommend a flexible implementation strategy that connects with member-state policy debates and makes use of ‘mini-lateral’ groups of member states.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Bruegel Policy Contribution</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://bruegel.org/2019/06/redefining-europes-economic-sovereignty/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Mark Leonard</author>
    <author>Elena Ribakova</author>
    <author>Guntram Wolff</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2981</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>3</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>24</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-06-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Can economic multilateralism survive?</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Economic Affairs</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1111/ecaf.12331</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3314</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>171</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>173</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>EUI</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Florence</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Governance of Trade, Finance and Macroeconomic Cooperation: A Historical Perspective since the 1970s</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Global Governance: Demise or Transformation? Progress report on the Transformation of Global Gove</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-92-9084-788-5</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.2870/310247</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Emmanuel Mourlon-Druol</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>George Papaconstantinou</author>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3315</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>187</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>198</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>EUI</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Florence</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Collective action in a fragmented world</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Global Governance: Demise or Transformation? Progress report on the Transformation of Global Governance Project 2018-2019</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-92-9084-788-5</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.2870/310247</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3316</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>8</pageNumber>
    <edition>5</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Collective action in a fragmented world</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Bruegel Policy Brief</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Bruegel_Policy_Brief-2019_05_1.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3317</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>3</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>24</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Can economic multilateralism survive?</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Economic Affairs</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1111/ecaf.12331</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3319</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>75</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>98</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <volume>61</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Securing Europe’s Economic Sovereignty</title>
    <abstract language="eng">To protect European economic independence, the EU needs to better integrate economic policy and geopolitics.&#13;
&#13;
Europeans like to believe that the European Union has the collective economic size and capacity to determine Europe’s economic destiny. They think the EU can determine its own rules for economic life, negotiate on an equal footing with partner economies, and even set economic standards and regulations for the rest of the world. But perhaps the EU has been lucky so far. Perhaps its apparent economic independence was always the result of the fortuitous absence of geopolitical interference. Perhaps it could only flourish under the benevolent aegis of a real superpower. Perhaps, in other words, its independence only endured because no serious power was willing to challenge it, and because the United States was willing to protect it. Now the behaviour of other powers is increasingly calling Europe’s economic sovereignty into question. China and the US, in particular, do not separate economic interests from geopolitical interests in the same way that the EU does. They are increasingly using economic connections, from cyberspace to financial links, to serve geopolitical goals. Europe’s economic sovereignty is now at stake.&#13;
&#13;
Until recently, the EU took for granted that the global system provided a functional framework for international economic relations, which could be regarded as separate from the sphere of geopolitics. Of course, the economic rules of the road were determined by power relations that arose in the wake of the Second World War. But in the years that followed, even the US largely followed them. The economic and geopolitical spheres often overlapped, particularly during the Cold War. But the US regarded the economic integration of ‘Western’ countries as conducive to the strength of the free world, and it stood by this principle even after the Soviet Union ceased to exist. The EU’s very construction reflected this disposition: most international economic powers were given to EU-level bodies, and most security and foreign-policy instruments were left to individual member states. Accordingly, the EU was able to conduct an international economic policy that was reasonably insulated from geopolitical concerns.&#13;
&#13;
This separation of the economic was always fragile. It now looks hopelessly outdated. The US and China have fundamentally different relationships with Europe, but neither separates economics from geopolitics. In general, national-security issues are gaining prominence everywhere, as is the relationship between economics and national security. Economic connections, from cyberspace to financial links, are becoming the primary areas of great-power competition and are at risk of being weaponised.1 Increasingly, the US and China follow neither the letter nor the spirit of the rules in their relationships with the EU and its member states. In the US case, its decision to make full use of the centrality of its currency and its financial system to enforce secondary sanctions against Iran was a major shock to European partners. Washington’s abandonment of core principles of the global multilateral trading system and withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change were also disruptive. As for China, the EU now accepts that Beijing is behaving as ‘an economic competitor in the pursuit of technological leadership, and a systemic rival promoting alternative models of governance’.2&#13;
&#13;
It is essential that Europeans respond to this challenge. The collective capacity of EU countries working together to preserve their economic independence underpins the value of European integration to European citizens. That value is further bolstered by the EU’s ability to participate in defining the rules of the game for the global economy – what Germans call Handlungsfähigkeit and the French call Europe puissance. The challenge for Europe is substantial but manageable. The EU and its member states should adopt an economic-sovereignty agenda to protect European economic independence through a variety of tools ranging from competition policy to the international role of the euro. To do so, the EU needs to better integrate economic policy and geopolitics.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Survival - Global Politics and Strategy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1080/00396338.2019.1662148</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Mark Leonard</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <author>Elina Ribakova</author>
    <author>Jeremy Shapiro</author>
    <author>Guntram Wolff</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3322</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>15</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The threats to the European Union’s Economic Sovereignty</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Economics used to play a limited role in foreign policy, which was about wars, conflicts and human disasters – and how to avoid them. But neither China nor the United States now separates economics from geopolitics. The competition between them is simultaneously an economic competition and a security competition. This is a threat to the multilateral system the European Union has relied on for nearly seven decades and to the EU’s separation of external economic relationships from geopolitics. You and your Commission colleagues must redefine for the EU its concept of economic sovereignty and the instruments it needs to defend and promote it.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Bruegel Policy Brief</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/High-rep-memo.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Guntram Wolff</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3324</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>ita</language>
    <pageFirst>126</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>131</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>85</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="ita">I nuovi imperialismi</title>
    <parentTitle language="ita">Aspenia</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia/numero/la-politica-dellalgoritmo</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3325</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>15</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A big leap forward : Institutions and policies for a viable euro area</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) reform is critical for a viableEuro area but is taking place against a backdrop of political constraints. As a contribution to this on-going discussion, this paper situates the reform debate in the context of the main lessons from the Euro crisis and the current economic and political cycle, and discusses the different elements of the reform agenda. The focus is on the main critical reform and institutional issues which remain as stumbling blocks.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">EUI Policy Papers</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://tgg.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2019/03/A-Big-Leap-Forward-Institutions-and-Policies-for-a-Viable-Euro-Area.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>George Papaconstantinou</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3299</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookeditorship</type>
    <publisherName>CEPR</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The publication in 2017 of joint proposals for reforming the euro area by a group of seven French and seven German economists triggered a considerable debate on Vox. This volume offers a selection of the contributions to this debate together with a summary of the original proposal.</abstract>
    <identifier type="url">https://voxeu.org/content/risk-sharing-plus-market-discipline-new-paradigm-euro-area-reform-debate</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jeromin Zettelmeyer</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3300</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Introduction</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://voxeu.org/content/risk-sharing-plus-market-discipline-new-paradigm-euro-area-reform-debate</identifier>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jeromin Zettelmeyer</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3301</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName>CEPR</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Could the 7+7 reportís proposals destabilise the euro? A response to Guido Tabellini</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://voxeu.org/content/risk-sharing-plus-market-discipline-new-paradigm-euro-area-reform-debate</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <author>Jeromin Zettelmeyer</author>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3302</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>CEPR</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-24</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">30 Euro area reform: An anatomy of the debate</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate</parentTitle>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jean Pisani-Ferry</author>
    <submitter>Angelika Behlen</submitter>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
