<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>3650</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>327</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>344</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>42</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-11-03</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Economic and fiscal policy coordination after the crisis: is the European Semester promoting more or less state intervention?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The European Union (EU) – and its Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in particular – is often criticized as a predominantly market-oriented project. We analyse to what extent such claims can be substantiated by focusing on one key aspect of the EU’s post-crisis framework for economic governance: the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) that the EU has been issuing annually since 2011. Based on an original dataset, we analyse more than 1300 CSRs, which show that the EU does not push uniformly for less state intervention. Rather, the CSRs tend to suggest fiscal restraint and less protection for labour market insiders, while simultaneously promoting measures that benefit vulnerable groups in society. During the second decade of EMU, CSRs have gradually become more permissive of higher public spending and more in favour of worker protection, while the share of recommendations advocating more social protection has stagnated at a high level.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of European Integration</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1080/07036337.2020.1730356</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1477-2280</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Jörg Haas</author>
    <submitter>Louisa Finke</submitter>
    <author>Valerie D'Erman</author>
    <author>Daniel Schulz</author>
    <author>Amy Verdun</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Country-specific recommendations</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>economic governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>economic and monetary union</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>European Semester</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>fiscal policy coordination</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Jacques Delors Centre</collection>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Publications PhD Researchers</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
