<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>5361</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>73</pageNumber>
    <edition>No. 35</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-03-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper studies a key element of discrimination, namely when stereotypes translate into discriminatory actions. Using a hiring experiment, we rule out taste-based discrimination by design and test for the presence of two types of belief-based gender discrimination. We document evidence of explicit discriminators—individuals who are willing to discriminate even when their hiring choices are highly revealing of their gender-biased beliefs. Crucially, we also identify implicit discriminators—individuals who do not discriminate against women when taking a discriminatory action is highly revealing of their biased beliefs, but do discriminate against women when their biased motive is obscured. Our analysis highlights the central role played by features of the choice environment in determining whether and how discrimination will manifest. We conclude by discussing the implications for policy design.</abstract>
    <identifier type="url">https://berlinschoolofeconomics.de/insights/discussion-papers</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.48462/opus4-5361</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-53610</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Kai Barron</author>
    <submitter>Terri Sullivan</submitter>
    <author>Ruth K. Ditlmann</author>
    <author>Stefan Gehrig</author>
    <author>Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch</author>
    <series>
      <title>Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers</title>
      <number>35</number>
    </series>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">BerlinSchoolOfEcon_Discussion_Papers</collection>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/5361/BSoE_DP_0035.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5359</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>73</pageNumber>
    <edition>No. 35</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper studies a key element of discrimination, namely when stereotypes translate into discriminatory actions. Using a hiring experiment, we rule out taste-based discrimination by design and test for the presence of two types of belief-based gender discrimination. We document evidence of explicit discriminators—individuals who are willing to discriminate even when their hiring choices are highly revealing of their gender-biased beliefs. Crucially, we also identify implicit discriminators—individuals who do not discriminate against women when taking a discriminatory action is highly revealing of their biased beliefs, but do discriminate against women when their biased motive is obscured. Our analysis highlights the central role played by features of the choice environment in determining whether and how discrimination will manifest. We conclude by discussing the implications for policy design.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.48462/opus4-5359</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://berlinschoolofeconomics.de/insights/discussion-papers</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-53592</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://doi.org/10.48462/opus4-5361</identifier>
    <note>This document has been replaced due to an error on the cover page. The new document is available at the following link: https://doi.org/10.48462/opus4-5361</note>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch</author>
    <submitter>Dimitri Perepelkin</submitter>
    <author>Kai Barron</author>
    <author>Ruth K. Ditlmann</author>
    <author>Stefan Gehrig</author>
    <series>
      <title>Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers</title>
      <number>35</number>
    </series>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">BerlinSchoolOfEcon_Discussion_Papers</collection>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5401</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-04-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper studies a key element of discrimination, namely, when stereotypes translate into discriminatory actions. Using a hiring experiment, we rule out taste-based discrimination by design and test for the presence of two types of belief-based gender discrimination. We document evidence of explicit discriminators—individuals who are willing to discriminate even when their hiring choices are highly revealing of their gender-biased beliefs. Crucially, we also identify implicit discriminators—individuals who do not discriminate against women when taking a discriminatory action is highly revealing of their biased beliefs, but do discriminate against women when their biased motive is obscured. Our analysis highlights the central role played by features of the choice environment in determining whether and how discrimination will manifest. We conclude by discussing the implications for policy design.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Management Science</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1287/mnsc.2022.01229</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">0025-1909 (print)</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Kai Barron</author>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <author>Ruth K. Ditlmann</author>
    <author>Stefan Gehrig</author>
    <author>Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>discrimination, hiring decisions, gender, beliefs, experiment, aversive sexism</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
