<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>3785</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>9</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Autocratic Strategies and the European Court of Human Rights</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Convention on Human Rights Law Review</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1163/26663236-bja10015</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2666-3236</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2666-3228</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3786</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>158</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>176</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Edward Elgar</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">History as an Afterthought: The (Re)discovery of Article 18 in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The European Court of Human Rights: Current Challenges in Historical and Comparative Perspective</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9781839108334</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <editor>Helmut Philipp Aust</editor>
    <author>Kristina Hatas</author>
    <editor>Esra Demir-Gürsel</editor>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3787</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Migration and the European Convention on Human Rights</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Migration and the European Convention on Human Rights</parentTitle>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <editor>Başak Çalı</editor>
    <author>Ledi Bianku</author>
    <editor>Ledi Bianku</editor>
    <author>Iulia Motoc</author>
    <editor>Iulia Motoc</editor>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3788</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The European Court of Human Rights and Removal of Long-Term Migrants: Entrenched Statism with a Human Voice?</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Migration and the European Convention on Human Rights</parentTitle>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <editor>Başak Çalı</editor>
    <author>Stewart Cunningham</author>
    <editor>Ledi Bianku</editor>
    <editor>Iulia Motoc</editor>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3789</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-03-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Human Rights Organizations in Turkey</title>
    <abstract language="deu">This chapter analyzes the origins and the development of human rights organizations in Turkey since 1945. It first offers an overview of the limited number of elite organizations established between 1946 and 1974 and the initial skepticism toward human rights activism in the country in the 1960s and 1970s among grass-roots political movements. It then discusses the importance of two major events, the military coup in 1980 and the start of the armed conflict between the Turkish security forces and the PKK in 1984, for the development of human rights–based activism in the 1980s. The chapter then turns to the 1990s, characterized by the proliferation of human rights organizations and diversification of focus areas, ranging from LGBT rights to the rights of women to manifest their religion by wearing headscarves. It links these dynamics to the global rise of human rights activism in the 1990s and the subsequent appropriation of the human rights lexicon by a wide range of domestic social movements. The chapter moves forward with a discussion of the further proliferation of human rights organizations well into the 2000s as Turkey’s EU membership process boosted democratization and pluralism. The chapter ends with an assessment of the impact of the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi’s authoritarian turn on the transformative power and horizons of human rights organizations in the 2010s.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190064891.013.36</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <editor>Güneş Murat Tezcür</editor>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4489</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-08-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Regional protection</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Written by leading experts in the field, this compelling textbook explores the essentials of international human rights law, from foundational issues to substantive rights and systems of protection. A variety of perspectives bring this multifaceted and sometimes contentious subject to life, making International Human Rights Law the ideal companion for students of human rights.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Human Rights Law</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-0198860112</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://global.oup.com/academic/product/international-human-rights-law-9780198860112?lang=en&amp;cc=ca#</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Nadja Starke</submitter>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4748</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>8</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-02-09</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Affective partisan polarization and moral dilemmas during the COVID-19 pandemic</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Recent scholarship on affective polarization documents partisan animosity in people's everyday lives. But does partisan dislike go so far as to deny fundamental rights? We study this question through a moral dilemma that gained notoriety during the COVID-19 pandemic: triage decisions on the allocation of intensive medical care. Using a conjoint experiment in five countries we analyze the influence of patients’ partisanship next to commonly discussed factors determining access to intensive medical care. We find that while participants’ choices are consistent with a utilitarian heuristic, revealed partisanship influences decisions across most countries. Supporters of left or right political camps are more likely to withhold support from partisan opponents. Our findings offer comparative evidence on affective polarization in non-political contexts.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Political Science Research and Methods</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1017/psrm.2022.13</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Lukas F. Stoetzer</author>
    <submitter>Dayna Sadow</submitter>
    <author>Simon Munzert</author>
    <author>Will Lowe</author>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <author>Anita R. Gohdes</author>
    <author>Marc Helbling</author>
    <author>Rahsaan Maxwell</author>
    <author>Richard Traunmüller</author>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Data Science Lab</collection>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for International Security</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4948</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>156</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>162</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-05-09</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Present and the Future of Infringement Proceedings: Lessons learned from Kavala v Türkiye</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The Council of Europe is headed to its 4th Summit under the shadow, most likely, of the unimplemented infringement proceedings judgment in the case of Kavala v Turkey . The aim of this article is to investigate what this persistent non-implementation teaches us for the present as well as for the future reform of infringement proceedings monitoring. Strengthening this is of inestimable importance for the future credibility of the Council of Europe, as well as the authority of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in general. The lack of a clear strategy for handling non-implementation of infringement proceedings will have a dissuasive effect on the further use of such proceedings by the Committee of Ministers, it removes any teeth proceedings were ever intended to have. In this article I argue that the future of the effective monitoring of judgments resulting from infringement proceedings depends on: (a) the foreseeable proceduralisation of the mechanisms to exert pressure on non-implementing states; and (b) further judicialisation of the ECtHR’s handling of the remedies required to implement judgments resulting from infringement proceedings. In conclusion, I reflect on possible objections to this double call of proceduralisation and judicialisation as the basis of reform.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Human Rights Law Review</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Product/Human-Rights/European-Human-Rights-Law-Review/Journal/30791306</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Enforcement; European Court of Human Rights; Fines; Human rights; Judgments and orders; Penalties</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4933</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>19</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-04-28</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Continuity and change in human rights appropriation: The case of Turkey</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This article analyzes the political and legal dynamics of continuity and change in the appropriation of human rights in Turkey against the backdrop of growing authoritarian practices. Human rights appropriation in Turkey has traditionally focused on the interpretation of human rights favoring national security and secular sensibilities to determine who has human rights and to what extent. The recent decade is a case of continuity and change. While the secularist frame has been replaced by a religious frame defining authentic human rights holders as members of the “pious” Turkish Muslim family and society, the national security frame has remained a continuous source of human rights appropriation. The article first offers an account of the dynamics of old forms of human rights appropriation in Turkey. It then analyzes the new actors, strategies, and transnational dimensions of new forms of human rights (mis)appropriation.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Constitutional Law</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/icon/moad024</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <author>Esra Demir-Gürsel</author>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5065</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>157</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>177</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>14</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-09-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Exhausting domestic remedies or exhausting the rule of law? Revisiting the normative basis of procedural subsidiarity in the European Human Rights System</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In recent years, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights has seen a new normative turn in grounding subsidiarity when interpreting the substantive rights in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court has placed emphasis on subsidiarity considerations when the respondent state can demonstrate the democratic and rule of law pedigree of its rights-interfering actions. The Court’s interpretation of the procedural rule of the exhaustion of domestic remedies has not caught up with this new normative turn. This article argues for the ‘normative realignment’ thesis. Grounds for substantive subsidiarity are normatively defensible on democracy and rule of law considerations, and grounds for procedural subsidiarity can and should be more closely aligned with the same considerations.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Transnational Legal Theory</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1080/20414005.2023.2232601</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Alain Zysset</author>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>European Court of Human Rights, subsidiarity, exhaustion of domestic remedies, margin of appreciation, democracy and the rule of law</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5071</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-09-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Introduction: Secondary Rules of Primary Importance</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9780192869012</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Gábor Kajtár</author>
    <submitter>Terri Sullivan</submitter>
    <editor>Gábor Kajtár</editor>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <editor>Başak Çalı</editor>
    <author>Marko Milanovic</author>
    <editor>Marko Milanovic</editor>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5072</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-09-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Proving Bad Faith in International Law: Lessons from the Article 18 Case law of the European Court of Human Rights</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9780192869012</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Terri Sullivan</submitter>
    <editor>Gábor Kajtár</editor>
    <editor>Başak Çalı</editor>
    <editor>Marko Milanovic</editor>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5195</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>workingpaper</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-12-01</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Present and the Future of Infringement Proceedings: Lessons Learned from Kavala v. Türkiye</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The Council of Europe is headed to its fourth summit under the shadow, most likely, of the unimplemented infringement proceedings judgment in the case of Kavala v. Türkiye. The aim of this article is to investigate what this persistent non-implementation teaches us for the present as well as for the future reform of infringement proceedings monitoring. Strengthening this is of inestimable importance for the future credibility of the Council of Europe, as well as the authority of the European Court of Human Rights in general. The lack of a clear strategy for handling non-implementation of infringement proceedings will have a dissuasive effect on the further use of such proceedings by the Committee of Ministers, it removes any teeth proceedings were ever intended to have. In this article I argue that the future of the effective monitoring of judgments resulting from infringement proceedings depends on: a) the foreseeable proceduralisation of the mechanisms to exert pressure on non-implementing states and, b), further judicialisation of the ECtHR’s handling of the remedies required to implement judgments resulting from infringement proceedings. In conclusion, I reflect on possible objections to this double call of proceduralisation and judicialisation as the basis of reform.</abstract>
    <identifier type="doi">10.2139/ssrn.4424579</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Terri Sullivan</submitter>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5202</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>24</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-12-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Does the Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights Fit the Practical Conception of Human Rights?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This article investigates how the practice of European human rights, organised around the European Convention on Human Rights, can be brought into conversation with the practice conception of human rights advanced by Charles Beitz in the Idea of Human Rights. The article argues that this is a challenging task. Following Beitz’s construction of the human rights practice composed of (a) a global practice, (b) political discursive practice, (c) triggering a range of international action for corrective concern, (d) when states fail to protect urgent individual interests, the article identifies two main challenges: (1) the regional and legal-political character of the European human rights practice and (2) the lack of fit between the heuristic of urgency of individual interests and the European human rights practice. Having identified these challenges, however, I conclude that putting European human rights practice and the practice conception into a conversation reveals new knowledge at the intersection of moral and legal accounts of human rights. A closer engagement with the practice conception enables a better understanding of the key abstract features of European human rights practice. A closer engagement with this practice accentuates the normative case for making sense of predominantly legal and regional practices of human rights.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Human Rights Law Review</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/hrlr/ngad036</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>practice conception of human rights, Charles Beitz, regional practice, urgent individual interests, European Convention on Human Rights</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5395</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>321</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>340</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-04-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Global Constitutionalism and the Individual</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The Individual in International Law: History and Theory</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9780198898917</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-individual-in-international-law-9780198898917?cc=de&amp;lang=en&amp;#</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <editor>Anne Peters</editor>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <editor>Tom Sparks</editor>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5396</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1225</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1272</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-04-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level in Turkey</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level: Twenty Years On</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9789004377653</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1163/9789004377653_021</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <editor>Christof Heyns</editor>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <author>Betül Durmuş</author>
    <editor>Frans Jacobus Viljoen</editor>
    <author>İlayda Eskitaşçıoğlu</author>
    <editor>Rachel Murray</editor>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5397</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-04-26</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Human Rights Ideas, Law, and Institutions in Europe</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This chapter introduces the contribution of Europe to the development of human rights ideas, law, and institutions. In a spirit of ‘provincialising Europe’, it argues that Europe’s contributions to human rights are ambivalent and dynamic. The chapter first examines natural rights and rights of citizens as twin, but also potentially conflicting, developments in demarcating Europe’s contributions to human rights. Europe is historically a home of human rights ideas as well as strong critiques and double standards in the use of these ideas. The chapter then examines European contributions to the legalization of human rights with a focus on two institutional Europes: that of the Council of Europe and the European Union. Finally, the chapter reviews contemporary human rights debates, against the backdrop of authoritarianization in Europe on the one hand and demands for new human rights to tackle the climate crisis, and digitalization of modern societies on the other.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Europe</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">9780198865315</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198865315.013.8</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <editor>Anne van Aaken</editor>
    <submitter>Ubaida Ansari</submitter>
    <editor>Pierre d'Argent</editor>
    <editor>Lauri Mälksoo</editor>
    <editor>Johann Justus Vasel</editor>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>EU Law, International Law, Law</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="Faculty" number=""/>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5529</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>374</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>387</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>118</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Cambridge University Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-06-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Optimism in International Human Rights Law Scholarship</title>
    <abstract language="eng">As a field of practice, international human rights law (IHRL) is in constant motion. The four books under review explore the legal, political, and civic dynamics that continuously shape and reshape this vibrant area of law. In this Essay, I underscore two important trends in contemporary IHRL scholarship that these books highlight. First, these works share a strong emphasis on agency, understood as human action that makes a difference in the world, be it the agency of individuals, domestic civil society organizations, transnational organizations, or courts. Highlighting agency, rather than overarching political, economic, and social structures, in turn shifts the attention from human rights law and doctrine “in the books” to an understanding of human rights law as a purposive and dynamic practice.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">American Journal of International Law</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">0002-9300</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1017/ajil.2024.3</identifier>
    <note>Open Access publication is funded by the Hertie School Library</note>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_json">{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]],"date-time":"2024-05-01T00:30:57Z","timestamp":1714523457700},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,29]],"date-time":"2024-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714348800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":28,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am. j. int. law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"abstract":"&lt;jats:p&gt;As a field of practice, international human rights law (IHRL) is in constant motion. The four books under review explore the legal, political, and civic dynamics that continuously shape and reshape this vibrant area of law. In this Essay, I underscore two important trends in contemporary IHRL scholarship that these books highlight. First, these works share a strong emphasis on &lt;jats:italic&gt;agency&lt;\/jats:italic&gt;, understood as human action that makes a difference in the world, be it the agency of individuals, domestic civil society organizations, transnational organizations, or courts. Highlighting agency, rather than overarching political, economic, and social structures, in turn shifts the attention from human rights law and doctrine \u201cin the books\u201d to an understanding of human rights law as a purposive and dynamic practice.&lt;\/jats:p&gt;","DOI":"10.1017\/ajil.2024.3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,29]],"date-time":"2024-04-29T09:58:21Z","timestamp":1714384701000},"page":"374-387","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Optimism in International Human Rights Law Scholarship"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"118","author":[{"given":"Ba\u015fak","family":"\u00c7al\u0131","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,29]]},"container-title":["American Journal of International Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0002930024000034","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,30]],"date-time":"2024-04-30T07:45:54Z","timestamp":1714463154000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0002930024000034\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002930024000034"],"URL":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/ajil.2024.3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9300","2161-7953"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9300","type":"print"},{"value":"2161-7953","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}}}</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefLicence">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_import_origin">crossref</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doiImportPopulated">PersonAuthorFirstName_1,PersonAuthorLastName_1,PublisherName,TitleMain_1,Language,TitleAbstract_1,TitleParent_1,PageNumber,PageFirst,PageLast,Issue,Volume,PublishedYear,IdentifierIssn,Enrichmentopus_crossrefLicence</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">doi-import</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter> Whitney-Hirschmann</submitter>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Centre for Fundamental Rights</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <collection role="AY-23-24" number=""/>
    <collection role="OA_funding" number="">Open Access publication is funded by the Hertie School Library</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>6117</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>475</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>499</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>36</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2026-02-11</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Travaux Préparatoires and Progressive Treaty Interpretation: Article 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Article 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) has become a central provision employed by the European Court of Human Rights in response to authoritarian practices in Europe over the last decade. Notwithstanding its increased use, important disagreements persist regarding the interpretation of the provision. Analysing the provision’s ordinary meaning, the convention’s travaux préparatoires as a whole and the interpretation of the provision by majority and minority judges of the Court, this article identifies three competing normative models for specifying Article 18’s purpose. Whilst the text is open for Article 18 to address all forms of abuse of power – authoritarian or democratic – the travaux suggest a purpose of detecting emerging authoritarian practices. The majority on the Court’s bench, on the other hand, view Article 18 as a narrow tool to respond to predominant and pronounced authoritarian practices. These normative disagreements are also reflected in concurring and dissenting opinions annexed to Article 18 judgments, with some minority judges defending the narrow normative model and others advocating for a more progressive interpretation, not only on familiar grounds of evolutive interpretation but also because the convention’s history calls for progressive interpretation of this particular provision. Our findings complicate the well-established presumption that progressive interpretation of the convention comes about by treating it as a ‘living instrument’ at the expense of the drafters’ intent, highlighting the turn to ‘progressive originalism’ in the interpretation of Article 18 of the ECHR.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Journal of International Law</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1093/ejil/chaf029</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_json">x</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Joseph Finnerty</author>
    <submitter>Danielle Gottlieb</submitter>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>6115</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>394</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>425</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>47</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Project MUSE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2026-02-11</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A Tale of Disregard? Reception of the Jurisprudence of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities before the European Court of Human Rights</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The Convention on the Rights of Persons Disabilities (CRPD) was hailed as a transformative human rights treaty when it came into force in 2008. The CRPD not only promises the remediation of the under-protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in international human rights law, but it also aims to transform the deep and structural inequalities underpinning the governance of disability through law and policy. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD Committee) has adopted and extended this transformative ethos in its jurisprudence. In this article, we examine the reception of this jurisprudence by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and ask whether and how the CRPD Committee's interpretation of the CRPD has influenced the case law of the ECtHR. By focusing on the right to legal capacity, accessibility and reasonable accommodation, we demonstrate that the transformative jurisprudence of the CRPD Committee was met with visible disregard in Strasbourg. Our findings point to both the importance of specialized human rights treaties and jurisprudence in advancing the rights of historically discriminated groups and the challenges of judicially diffusing transformative protections for the rights of persons with disabilities into general human rights law.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Human Rights Quarterly</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1353/hrq.2025.a965925</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_json">x</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_crossrefDocumentType">journal-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Metadaten / metadata</licence>
    <author>Başak Çalı</author>
    <submitter>Danielle Gottlieb</submitter>
    <author>Alexandre Skander Galand</author>
    <collection role="HertieResearch" number="">Centre for Fundamental Rights</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hertie School</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
