@article{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {Constitutional Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures in the European Union: Prospects and Limits}, series = {European Public Law}, volume = {19}, journal = {European Public Law}, number = {2}, publisher = {Kluwer Law International}, address = {Den Haag}, issn = {1354-3725}, pages = {369 -- 396}, abstract = {The concept of 'constitutional dialogue' has become a focal point of US and Canadian public law scholarship. This concept sees judicial review not as a check on majority preferences but instead as part of a deliberation between the legislative and judicial branches over how constitutional commitments and general political objectives can be integrated. This article will explore the prospects and limits of developing the dialogue concept in the context of the present-day European Union (EU). The article will present a two-part argument: While the EU's political and legal diversity make the idea of a 'shared responsibility' for constitutional interpretation between judges and policy-makers normatively attractive, the existing institutional structure of the Union limits the incentives necessary for legal and political actors to constitutionally engage.}, language = {en} } @misc{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity? : The European Integration of Core State Powers.}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {278}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Alles ganz normal! Eine institutionelle Analyse der Euro-Krise}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, volume = {20}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, number = {1}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0946-7165}, doi = {10.5771/0946-7165-2013-1-75}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4173}, pages = {75 -- 88}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EU als Dauerreformprojekt : Politische Ordnungsmodelle und ihre Implikationen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {1430-6387}, doi = {10.5771/1430-6387-2013-3-437}, pages = {437 -- 444}, language = {de} } @misc{JoergesFalke, author = {Joerges, Christian and Falke, Josef}, title = {Handelsliberalisierung und Sozialregulierung in transnationalen Konstellationen}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-1088-1}, pages = {455}, abstract = {Das Buch untersucht vergleichend f{\"u}r den europ{\"a}ischen Binnenmarkt und den internationalen Handel die Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen der Liberalisierung des Handels und seiner Regulierung zum Zwecke des Arbeits-, Gesundheits- und Umweltschutzes an den Beispielen Produkt- und Lebensmittelsicherheit in der EU, Telekommunikations- und Gesundheitsdienstleistungen, Verminderung von CO2-Emissionen von Pkw, Arbeits- und Sozialstandards im internationalen Handel, private Standards zum Schutz {\"o}ffentlicher G{\"u}ter im Welthandel. Als normativer Maßstab f{\"u}r die empirische Politikwissenschaft dient das Konzept der „Sozialregulierungsf{\"a}higkeit". F{\"u}r die rechtliche Kontrolle der externen Effekte staatlichen Handelns, der transnationalen Verwaltungskooperationen und der Aufgabenverlagerungen auf private Akteure wird das Konzept eines dreidimensionalen Kollisionsrechts entwickelt. Mit Beitr{\"a}gen von: Olga Batura, Henning Deters, Josef Falke, Carola Glinski, Thorsten H{\"u}ller, Christian Joerges und Markus Krajewski}, language = {de} } @incollection{DawsonMuir, author = {Dawson, Mark and Muir, Elise}, title = {Enforcing Fundamental Rights in the European Union After the Treaty of Lisbon: What can the Roma case tell us?}, series = {European Roma Integration Efforts: A Snapshot}, booktitle = {European Roma Integration Efforts: A Snapshot}, publisher = {VUB Press}, address = {Br{\"u}ssel}, isbn = {9789057181573}, pages = {99 -- 127}, abstract = {With contributions from scholars in a range of different disciplines, this book reflects upon the achievements and failures to date of integration efforts aimed at Europe's Romani populations. The snapshots provided examine a variety of integration efforts at different levels and involving a range of institutional actors. In doing so, they offer a comprehensive introduction to aspects of human rights and integration within the European Union as well as crucial insights as to the current state of affairs in Europe as policy makers reflect on the current direction of initiatives to combat Romani exclusion.(About the Book)}, language = {en} } @incollection{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {Soft Law and the Rule of Law in the European Union: Revision or Redundancy}, series = {Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Trans-national Social Field}, booktitle = {Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Trans-national Social Field}, publisher = {Hart}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, isbn = {9781849463782}, pages = {221 -- 242}, abstract = {While scholarly writing has dealt with the role of law in the process of European integration, so far it has shed little light on the lawyers and communities of lawyers involved in that process. Law has been one of the most thoroughly investigated aspects of the European integration process, and EU law has become a well-established academic discipline, with the emergence more recently of an impressive body of legal and political science literature on 'European law in context'. Yet this field has been dominated by an essentially judicial narrative, focused on the role of the European courts, underestimating in the process the multifaceted roles lawyers and law play in the EU polity, notably the roles they play beyond the litigation arena. This volume seeks to promote a deeper understanding of European law as a social and political phenomenon, presenting a more complete view of the European legal field by looking beyond the courts, and at the same time broadening the scholarly horizon by exploring the ways in which European law is actually made. To do this it describes the roles of the great variety of actors who stand behind legal norms and decisions, bringing together perspectives from various disciplines (law, political science, political sociology and history), to offer a global multi-disciplinary reassessment of the role of 'law' and 'lawyers' in the European integration process. (About the Book)}, language = {en} } @incollection{DawsonMuirdeWitte, author = {Dawson, Mark and Muir, Elise and de Witte, Bruno}, title = {The European Court as a Political Actor}, series = {Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice}, booktitle = {Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham [u.a.]}, isbn = {9780857939395}, pages = {1 -- 11}, abstract = {This book delves into the rationale, components of, and responses to accusations of judicial activism at the European Court of Justice. Detailed chapters from academics, practitioners and stakeholders bring diverse perspectives on a range of factors - from access rules to institutional design and to substantive functions - influencing the European Court's political role. Each of the contributing authors invites the reader to approach the debate on the role of the Court in terms of a constantly evolving set of interactions between the EU judiciary, the European and national political spheres, as well as a multitude of other actors vested in competing legitimacy claims. The book questions the political role of the Court as much as it stresses the opportunities - and corresponding responsibilities - that the Court's case law offers to independent observers, political institutions and civil society organisations. Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice will appeal to researchers and graduate students as well as to EU and national officials. (About the Book)}, language = {en} } @incollection{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {The Political Face of Judicial Activism: Europe's Law-Politics Imbalance}, series = {Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice}, booktitle = {Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham [u.a.]}, isbn = {9780857939395}, pages = {11 -- 32}, abstract = {This book delves into the rationale, components of, and responses to accusations of judicial activism at the European Court of Justice. Detailed chapters from academics, practitioners and stakeholders bring diverse perspectives on a range of factors - from access rules to institutional design and to substantive functions - influencing the European Court's political role. Each of the contributing authors invites the reader to approach the debate on the role of the Court in terms of a constantly evolving set of interactions between the EU judiciary, the European and national political spheres, as well as a multitude of other actors vested in competing legitimacy claims. The book questions the political role of the Court as much as it stresses the opportunities - and corresponding responsibilities - that the Court's case law offers to independent observers, political institutions and civil society organisations. Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice will appeal to researchers and graduate students as well as to EU and national officials. (About the Book)}, language = {en} } @book{HurrelmannRichter, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Gesundheits- und Medizinsoziologie : eine Einf{\"u}hrung in sozialwissenschaftliche Gesundheitsforschung}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-3-7799-2605-4}, pages = {255}, abstract = {In diesem Band werden sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien vorgestellt, die sich mit Gesundheit und Krankheit besch{\"a}ftigen. Die Theorien konzentrieren sich auf die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Belastung, Bew{\"a}ltigung und Gesundheit. Aus ihnen lassen sich Strategien ableiten, um das f{\"u}r die Gesundheit relevante Verhalten, die entscheidenden Umweltbedingungen und die Strukturen des Gesundheitssystems zu beeinflussen.}, language = {de} } @misc{Hurrelmann, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus}, title = {Jugend, Vorsorge, Finanzen: Herausforderung oder {\"U}berforderung}, series = {Jugend, Vorsorge, Finanzen (MetallRente Studie)}, journal = {Jugend, Vorsorge, Finanzen (MetallRente Studie)}, editor = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Karch, Heribert}, edition = {2010}, publisher = {Campus}, address = {Frankfurt a.M. [u.a.]}, isbn = {9783593393285}, pages = {378}, abstract = {Was erwarten junge Menschen von ihrer finanziellen Zukunft? Wie strategisch denken und f{\"u}hlen sie? Spielt Lebensplanung eine angemessene Rolle in ihrem Leben? Welche Erwartungen und Forderungen haben junge Leute, wenn es um ihre Altersvorsorge geht, und wie informieren sie sich? Passen die gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen und die Vorsorgel{\"o}sungen der Anbieter zu ihrer Lebensrealit{\"a}t? Antworten gibt die vorliegende von MetallRente beauftragte Studie. Sie ist die bisher systematischste und umfassendste Untersuchung zum Thema "Jugend, Vorsorge und Finanzen". Unter der Leitung des bekannten Jugendforschers Klaus Hurrelmann wurde sie von TNS Infratest Sozialforschung durchgef{\"u}hrt. Erg{\"a}nzt wird sie durch einen Beitrag von Heribert Karch. Er entwickelt aus den Ergebnissen der Studie Vorschl{\"a}ge f{\"u}r die weitere Debatte um Strategien der betrieblichen Altersversorgung.}, language = {de} } @periodical{JoergesGuibboni2013, author = {Joerges, Christian and Guibboni, Stefano}, title = {Recht und Politik in der Krise Europas}, series = {Deutsch-Italienische Studien (Studi Italo-Tedeschi)}, volume = {6}, journal = {Deutsch-Italienische Studien (Studi Italo-Tedeschi)}, publisher = {ZERP (Zentrum f{\"u}r europ{\"a}ische Rechtspolitik)}, address = {Bremen}, pages = {23}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Although international police cooperation is not a new phenomenon and despite its relevance for the monopoly of force, studies applying a political science or international relations (IR) perspective are scarce. Through a 'competition of claims', this article reviews and organizes current literature on cooperation in internal security to highlight crucial points of entry for IR- and political science approaches. While both claims argue along the lines of functionalist regime theory, the 'informality claim' stresses state's interest to uphold autonomy and their accordant preference for informal cooperation. In contrast, the 'institutionalization claim' underscores the willingness of states to create formal and strong institutions as they promise efficiency gains in light of transborder problems. By focusing on central issues in police cooperation (terrorism, drugs, money laundering, organized crime)this review highlights that internal security can become a prospering field for IR- and political science theorizing.}, language = {de} } @article{Hammerschmid, author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard}, title = {Zusammenarbeit und Koordination als neues Leitbild der Verwaltungsmodernisierung}, series = {Public Governance: Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliches Management}, volume = {10}, journal = {Public Governance: Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}ffentliches Management}, number = {3}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r den {\"o}ffentlichen Sektor}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1866-4431}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-6591}, pages = {19 -- 20}, abstract = {Stetig neue Anforderungen an die Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit und gleichzeitig steigender Kostendruck sind bereits seit Jahrzehnten die zentralen Herausforderungen {\"o}ffentlicher Verwaltungen und Ausl{\"o}ser von Ver{\"a}nderungen. Im Hinblick auf Erfolg versprechende L{\"o}sungen und Maßnahmen zeichnet sich dabei in den letzten Jahren allerdings eine interessante Schwerpunktverschiebung ab: bei den derzeitigen Reformdiskussionen in Europa stehen vor allem die Verbesserung sowie neue Formen der Zusammenarbeit und Koordination im Vordergrund. Zwei aktuelle Studien best{\"a}tigen hierbei einen klaren Handlungsbedarf in Deutschland.}, language = {de} } @article{HammerschmidVandeWalleŠtimacetal., author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and Van de Walle, Steven and Štimac, Vid and Oprisor, Anca}, title = {How do top public sector executives rate reforms?}, series = {Public}, volume = {29}, journal = {Public}, editor = {ESADE's Institute of Public Management (IDGP),}, abstract = {Recent decades have seen a range of public sector reforms, focusing on diverse aspects. Some of these reforms have had a structural dimension and include privatisation, downsizing and outsourcing, while others have focused on aspects such as improving access and transparency, collaboration, and innovation. This contribution explores how public sector executives rate administrative reforms in their country on a number of dimensions. It presents preliminary findings from an academic survey among 3,173 top public sector executives in 10 European countries.}, language = {en} } @article{AnheierLeat, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Leat, Diana}, title = {Philanthropic Foundations: What Rationales?}, series = {Social Research: An International Quarterly}, volume = {80}, journal = {Social Research: An International Quarterly}, number = {2}, publisher = {Johns Hopkins University Press}, address = {Baltimore}, issn = {0037-783X}, pages = {449 -- 472}, abstract = {Foundations are among the oldest existing institutions. They have existed, in various forms, across many cultures throughout history, and have been experiencing a veritable renaissance over the last two decades, both in the United States and elsewhere. What are the rationales for foundations in modern societies, and what propels their growth in scale and scope in the early 21st century? Posing fundamental questions, the present essay, written in the form of theses and counter-theses, assesses various reasons for the continued existence and relevance of foundations by pulling in perspectives from the US, Britain and Germany. The questions posed assume policy relevance as the present foundation boom takes place in an era of reduced state capacity to respond to public problems, and changes in the democratic fabric of society.}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierList, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and List, Regina}, title = {Governance: Issues and Frameworks}, series = {Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance}, booktitle = {Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance}, publisher = {Oxford Univ.Press}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-0199674930}, pages = {3 -- 21}, abstract = {Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed-and continue to change-as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches-old and new-on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This collection-the first in a series of annual editions-seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", i.e. the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets (the focus of this edition), health care, security, or migration, and across local, national and international levels. Researchers at The Hertie School of Governance (Berlin, Germany) and other experts examine the current state of governance challenges and innovations from a variety of inter-disciplinary perspectives. This edition features a special set of chapters on the challenges of financial and fiscal governance, the tradeoffs faced by governance actors, and the new arrangements that have emerged or are required to not only address the ongoing crisis but also ensure greater stability into the future. This special section is complemented by chapters introducing basic concepts and models; exploring other global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lackluster responses to them and highlighting the need for responsible sovereignty; conceptualizing governance innovation and introducing key examples; and assessing existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting and applying governance-related information}, language = {en} } @article{HammerschmidAshworthFerlieetal., author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and Ashworth, Rachel and Ferlie, Ewan and Moon, M. Jae and Reay, Trish}, title = {Theorizing Contemporary Public Management: International and Comparative Perspectives}, series = {BJM - British Journal of Management (Special Issue)}, volume = {24}, journal = {BJM - British Journal of Management (Special Issue)}, number = {S1}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, issn = {1467-8551}, doi = {10.1111/1467-8551.12035}, pages = {1 -- 17}, abstract = {Ten years ago, the British Journal of Management devoted a special issue to public sector management. The issue identified a series of characteristics associated with public management research, most notably a strong organizational behaviour orientation, a qualitative bent and a predominant healthcare and UK focus. That special issue voiced a 'call to arms' for public management researchers to speak more directly to management research, elucidate a more nuanced account of public management reform, adopt a more explicit theoretical basis and become more internationally comparative. This paper provides a comment on progress against these objectives. We find that public management research has become more diverse, often characterized by an international focus and a wide range of methodological approaches. The paper echoes concerns regarding an increasingly one-way relationship with general management studies but highlights a more reciprocal connection with organization studies. In doing so, we emphasize three sections of organization scholarship in particular - sociological institutionalism, Foucauldianism and theories of identity. We demonstrate that engagement with these perspectives has improved our understanding of public service reforms and provided opportunities for theoretical contributions beyond the field of public management. The paper concludes with reflections on future public management research.}, language = {en} } @article{HammerschmidvandeWalleStimac, author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and van de Walle, Steven and Stimac, Vid}, title = {Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey}, series = {Public Money \& Management}, volume = {33}, journal = {Public Money \& Management}, number = {4}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London [u.a.]}, doi = {10.1080/09540962.2013.799803}, pages = {261 -- 268}, abstract = {This paper analyses how public managers use performance information. A sample of over 3,100 high-level public sector executives from six European countries, provided evidence of significant country variations. Considerable variations were also found in patterns of use in different policy fields; and performance indicators were not used as often in central government as in local and regional government. Implementation of performance management instruments in an organization had a strong effect on the actual use of performance information.}, language = {en} } @misc{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance}, publisher = {Oxford Univ.Press}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-0-19-967493-0}, pages = {320}, abstract = {Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed-and continue to change-as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches-old and new-on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This collection-the first in a series of annual editions-seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", i.e. the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets (the focus of this edition), health care, security, or migration, and across local, national and international levels. Researchers at The Hertie School of Governance (Berlin, Germany) and other experts examine the current state of governance challenges and innovations from a variety of inter-disciplinary perspectives. This edition features a special set of chapters on the challenges of financial and fiscal governance, the tradeoffs faced by governance actors, and the new arrangements that have emerged or are required to not only address the ongoing crisis but also ensure greater stability into the future. This special section is complemented by chapters introducing basic concepts and models; exploring other global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lackluster responses to them and highlighting the need for responsible sovereignty; conceptualizing governance innovation and introducing key examples; and assessing existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting and applying governance-related information.}, language = {en} } @misc{HertieSchoolofGovernanceAnheier, author = {Hertie School of Governance, and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {The Governance Report 2013}, publisher = {Oxford Univ.Press}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-0-19-967442-8}, pages = {176}, abstract = {his Report is about the state of governance. Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed — and continue to change — as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches — old and new — on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This Report — the first in a series of annual editions produced by the Hertie School of Governance — seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", that is, the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets, health care, security, or migration, and across local, national, and international levels. Following an introduction that offers a framework of basic concepts and models, The Governance Report 2013 then goes on to explore a number of global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lacklustre responses and highlight the need for responsible sovereignty; examine in depth the challenges of financial and fiscal governance with a focus on the trade-offs and ways to address them; analyse key governance innovations and their potential for success; and assess existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting, and applying governance-related information. The findings lead to a set of concrete proposals on the way ahead.}, language = {en} }