@incollection{FlachslandMarschinskiEdenhofer, author = {Flachsland, Christian and Marschinski, Robert and Edenhofer, Ottmar}, title = {Developing the international carbon market post-2012: Options and the cost of delay}, series = {Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptiveness}, booktitle = {Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptiveness}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {9780521180924}, language = {en} } @incollection{BiermannPattbergZelli, author = {Biermann, Frank and Pattberg, Philipp and Zelli, Fariborz}, title = {Global Climate Governance after 2012: Architecture, agency and adaptation}, series = {Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies}, booktitle = {Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {978-0521119412}, language = {en} } @techreport{KurbanTsitselikis, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Kurban, Dilek and Tsitselikis, Konstantinos}, title = {A Tale of Reciprocity: Minority Foundations in Greece and Turkey}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-17545}, pages = {40}, abstract = {The word most frequently uttered by Greece and Turkey with regard to their Muslim1 and non-Muslim minorities, respectively, is most probably 'reciprocity.' For more than half a century, in both countries, virtually all administrations,irrespective of their political leanings and ideological base, resorted to the good old 'reciprocity argument' to legitimize their laws, policies, and practices restricting the minority rights of Muslim and non-Muslim communities. Both states have for decades justified their policies on the basis of a theory that argues that Article 45 of the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne provided the legal basis for reciprocity. Deliberately distorting a crystal-clear provision, which simply confers parallel obligations on Greece and Turkey for the protection of the Muslim and non-Muslim minorities, respectively, both states have for decades held their own citizens hostage, pitting them against each other in the name of defeating the other in foreign policy. Disregarding the objections of international lawyers and institutions that the reciprocity principle does not apply to human rights treaties and that states cannot condition the protection of the fundamental rights of their citizens on the policies of other states, both Greece and Turkey have successfully manipulated their national public opinion into believing in the legitimacy of treating minorities as lesser citizens. This report analyzes the implications of reciprocity policies on the day-to-day lives of Muslim and non-Muslim minorities in Greece and Turkey, specifically their impact on the community foundations2 belonging to these minorities. With a specific focus on the property and self-management issues of Muslim and non-Muslim community foundations in Greece and Turkey, the report situates the issue in its historical context and trace the evolution of the 'community foundation issue' from Lausanne to the present day. Drawing similarities and differences between the laws, policies, and practices of Greek and Turkish states vis-{\`a}-vis their minority foundations, the report critically assesses the progress made to this day as well as identify the outstanding issues.}, language = {en} } @article{BaiocchiMinx, author = {Baiocchi, Giovanni and Minx, Jan C.}, title = {Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: A global perspective}, series = {Environmental Science \& Technology}, volume = {44}, journal = {Environmental Science \& Technology}, number = {4}, issn = {0013-936X}, doi = {10.1021/es902662h}, pages = {1177 -- 1184}, language = {en} } @article{WiedmannWoodMinx, author = {Wiedmann, Thomas and Wood, Richard and Minx, Jan C.}, title = {A carbon footprint time series of the UK-results from a multi-region input-output model}, series = {Economic Systems Research}, volume = {1}, journal = {Economic Systems Research}, number = {22}, issn = {0953-5314}, doi = {10.1080/09535311003612591}, pages = {19 -- 42}, language = {en} } @article{BaiocchiMinxHubacek, author = {Baiocchi, Giovanni and Minx, Jan C. and Hubacek, Klaus}, title = {The impact of social factors and consumer behavior on CO2 emissions in the UK: A panel regression based on input-output and geo-demographic consumer segmentation data}, series = {Journal of Industrial Ecology}, volume = {14}, journal = {Journal of Industrial Ecology}, pages = {50 -- 72}, language = {en} } @article{FengHubacekGuanetal., author = {Feng, Kuishuang and Hubacek, Klaus and Guan, Dabo and Minx, Jan C.}, title = {Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK}, series = {Environmental science \& technology}, volume = {44}, journal = {Environmental science \& technology}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1021/es902974g}, pages = {3670 -- 3676}, language = {en} } @article{PetersGuanHubaceketal., author = {Peters, G. P. and Guan, Dabo and Hubacek, K. and Minx, Jan C.}, title = {Effects of China's economic growth}, series = {Science}, volume = {328}, journal = {Science}, number = {5980}, doi = {10.1126/science.328.5980.824-b}, pages = {824 -- 825}, language = {en} } @techreport{CreutzigFlachslandMcGlynn, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Creutzig, Felix and Flachsland, Christian and McGlynn, Emily}, title = {CITIES: Car industry, road transport and an international emission trading scheme - policy options. A report commissioned by BMW}, language = {en} } @article{HurrelmannQuenzel, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Quenzel, Gudrun}, title = {Geschlecht und Schulerfolg: Ein soziales Stratifikationsmuster kehrt sich um}, series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialpsychologie und Soziologie}, volume = {62}, journal = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialpsychologie und Soziologie}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0023-2653}, doi = {10.1007/s11577-010-0091-4}, pages = {61 -- 91}, abstract = {In diesem Beitrag suchen wir nach m{\"o}glichen Gr{\"u}nden f{\"u}r die seit einigen Jahrzehnten abfallende schulische Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit der jungen M{\"a}nner. Hierzu analysieren wir die vorliegenden Studien und schlagen ein sozialisationstheoretisch fundiertes Erkl{\"a}rungsmodell vor, das die bisherigen Ans{\"a}tze aufnimmt und weiterf{\"u}hrt. Im Zentrum steht dabei das Konzept der „Entwicklungsaufgaben". Die zentrale These lautet: Die schlechte schulische Leistungsbilanz der jungen M{\"a}nner ist nicht alleine durch Faktoren zu erkl{\"a}ren, die sich auf ihr Zur{\"u}ckbleiben im Bildungssystem selbst und damit auf ihre mangelnde Auseinandersetzung mit der Entwicklungsaufgabe „Qualifikation" beziehen. Vielmehr kann sie nur dann erkl{\"a}rt werden, wenn auch die Probleme bei der Bew{\"a}ltigung der anderen f{\"u}r die junge Generation typischen Entwicklungsaufgaben „Bindung", „Regeneration" und „Partizipation" mit herangezogen werden. Diese Bew{\"a}ltigung gelingt, wie die ausgewerteten Untersuchungen zeigen, unter den heutigen Sozialisationsbedingungen den Sch{\"u}lerinnen besser als den Sch{\"u}lern. Damit tritt ein soziologisch sehr seltenes Ereignis ein, n{\"a}mlich die Umkehrung der Richtung einer seit Generationen etablierten sozialen Stratifikation. Nicht mehr junge M{\"a}nner, sondern junge Frauen erwerben die privilegierten Titel des Bildungssystems und damit die formal aussichtsreicheren Anwartschaften auf sp{\"a}teren beruflichen Status. Als Schlussfolgerung ergibt sich aus dieser Analyse, dass eine isolierte Verst{\"a}rkung der gezielten Leistungsf{\"o}rderung von m{\"a}nnlichen Sch{\"u}lern nur begrenzt zielf{\"u}hrend sein kann. Vielmehr l{\"a}sst sich das relative Leistungsdefizit von jungen M{\"a}nnern nur dann langfristig abbauen, wenn auch ihre Kompetenzdefizite in allen anderen Entwicklungsbereichen ausgeglichen werden, die wichtigen gesellschaftlichen Erwartungen einer individualisierten Leistungsgesellschaft entsprechen.}, language = {de} }