@article{WegrichDoehler, author = {Wegrich, Kai and D{\"o}hler, Marian}, title = {Regulierung als Konzept und Instrument moderner Staatst{\"a}tigkeit}, series = {dms: Der moderne Staat}, volume = {3}, journal = {dms: Der moderne Staat}, number = {1}, publisher = {Budrich}, address = {Leverkusen}, issn = {1865-7192}, pages = {31 -- 52}, abstract = {Unter „Regulierung" versteht man prim{\"a}r staatliche Eingriffe, die im {\"o}ffentlichen Interesse sowohl Marktversagen korrigieren wie auch zivilisatorische Risiken mindern sollen. Der Begriff ist ein Import aus dem angels{\"a}chsischen Sprachraum und hat sich vor allem durch die EU auch in der bundesdeutschen Politik ausgebreitet. Gleichwohl gibt es hierzulande noch kein einheitliches Begriffsverst{\"a}ndnis. Regulierung wird nicht nur in verschiedenen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen mit unterschiedlichem Bedeutungsgehalt gef{\"u}llt, sondern ist auch in der politischen Praxis ein ausdeutungsf{\"a}higes Konzept. Der Aufsatz nimmt die so entstandenen Unklarheiten zum Anlass, um die verschiedenen Teildiskurse {\"u}ber Regulierung sowie die spezifisch deutsche Rezeption des Begriffes nachzuzeichnen. Die zentrale These lautet, dass Unterschiede nicht einfach „wegdefiniert" werden k{\"o}nnen, sondern eine verwirrungsfreie Verwendung des Regulierungsbegriffs nur dann m{\"o}glich ist, wenn der jeweilige analytische oder auch praktische Verwendungskontext reflektiert und transparent gemacht wird.}, language = {de} } @article{WegrichLodgeMcElroy, author = {Wegrich, Kai and Lodge, Martin and McElroy, Gail}, title = {Dodgy kebabs everywhere? : Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change}, series = {Public Administration}, volume = {88}, journal = {Public Administration}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1467-9299}, doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01811.x}, pages = {247 -- 266}, abstract = {In the study of risk regulation, grid-group cultural theory has attracted considerable interest. There has, however, been a lack of a systematic interest in its claims and in methodological issues. In this article, we present five claims that are drawn from cultural theory and assess them in the light of failure in meat inspections in Germany. These claims are assessed through the analysis of argumentation as recorded in newspapers. In the light of its empirical findings, this article argues that the claims and methodology employed offer a promising avenue for further work to investigate the usefulness of this particular theoretical approach.}, language = {en} } @book{Wegrich, author = {Wegrich, Kai}, title = {Das Leitbild "Better Regulation" : Ziele, Instrumente, Wirkungsweise}, publisher = {Ed. Sigma}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-8360-7238-0}, pages = {97}, language = {de} } @incollection{Wegrich, author = {Wegrich, Kai}, title = {Post-New Public Management}, series = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, booktitle = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, edition = {4. Aufl.}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3531175461}, pages = {90 -- 98}, language = {de} } @incollection{JannWegrich, author = {Jann, Werner and Wegrich, Kai}, title = {Governance und Verwaltungspolitik: Leitbilder und Reformkonzepte}, series = {Governance. Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen}, booktitle = {Governance. Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen}, editor = {Benz, Arthur and Dose, Nicolai}, publisher = {VS Verlag f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {9783531173320}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {175 -- 200}, language = {de} } @article{LodgeWegrichMcElroy, author = {Lodge, Martin and Wegrich, Kai and McElroy, Gail}, title = {Dodgy kebabs everywhere? Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change}, series = {Public Administration}, volume = {88}, journal = {Public Administration}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01811.x}, pages = {247 -- 266}, abstract = {In the study of risk regulation, grid-group cultural theory has attracted considerable interest. There has, however, been a lack of a systematic interest in its claims and in methodological issues. In this article, we present five claims that are drawn from cultural theory and assess them in the light of failure in meat inspections in Germany. These claims are assessed through the analysis of argumentation as recorded in newspapers. In the light of its empirical findings, this article argues that the claims and methodology employed offer a promising avenue for further work to investigate the usefulness of this particular theoretical approach.}, language = {en} }