@article{Woll, author = {Woll, Cornelia}, title = {Leading the Dance? Power and Political Resources of Business Lobbyists}, series = {Journal of Public Policy}, volume = {27}, journal = {Journal of Public Policy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1017/S0143814X07000633}, pages = {57 -- 78}, abstract = {Studies of lobbying try to determine the influence and power of non-governmental actors on public policy. Although influence is very difficult to measure empirically, many continue to push for better research design to solve the problem. Through case studies of business-government relations in the United States and the European Union, this article argues that the difficulties with power and influence concern not only their operationalisation, but they also reflect conceptual confusions. Trying to determine the 'winners' and 'losers' of a policy issue can be misleading, since power also structures apparently harmonious exchange relationships. The perceived success of business lobbying in the cases studied depended on the governments' receptiveness to their demands, which in turn depended on strategic advantages they saw for themselves in international negotiations. Even when business appears to lead the dance, it is more promising to look at resource distribution and the interdependence of both sides, instead of assuming the domination of business power over policy outcomes.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Woll, author = {Woll, Cornelia}, title = {Regulation}, series = {Encyclopedia of Governance II}, booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Governance II}, editor = {Bevir, Mark}, publisher = {SAGE}, address = {Thousand Oaks}, isbn = {978-1-4129-0579-4}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {813 -- 816}, language = {en} } @incollection{WollSanchezSalgado, author = {Woll, Cornelia and Sanchez Salgado, Rosa}, title = {L'europ{\´e}anisation et les acteurs non {\´e}tatiques}, series = {L'Europe en action. L'europ{\´e}anisation dans une perspective compar{\´e}e.}, booktitle = {L'Europe en action. L'europ{\´e}anisation dans une perspective compar{\´e}e.}, editor = {Palier, Bruno and Surel, Yves}, publisher = {L'Harmattan}, address = {Paris}, isbn = {9782296024113}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {145 -- 191}, language = {fr} } @incollection{Hustedt, author = {Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Kontakt durch Kontrakt? Ministerien und Agencies in D{\"a}nemark}, series = {Agencies in Westeuropa}, booktitle = {Agencies in Westeuropa}, editor = {Werner, Jann and D{\"o}hler, Marian}, publisher = {VS Publisher for Social Sciences}, isbn = {Print: 978-3-531-15422-0 / Online: 978-3-531-90560-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-531-90560-0_4}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {100 -- 137}, abstract = {Agencification in D{\"a}nemark" ist Thema vorliegenden Aufsatzes und soll eine neuere Entwicklung in der d{\"a}nischen Zentral Verwaltung in den Mittelpunkt r{\"u}cken.}, language = {de} } @incollection{StockmannJohnston, author = {Stockmann, Daniela and Johnston, A. Iain}, title = {Chinese Attitudes Toward the United States and Americans}, series = {Anti-Americanisms in World Politics}, booktitle = {Anti-Americanisms in World Politics}, editor = {Katzenstein, Peter J. and Keohane, Robert O.}, publisher = {Cornell University Press}, address = {Ithaca}, isbn = {978-0801473517}, pages = {195}, language = {en} } @article{CalıRodley, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak and Rodley, Nigel S.}, title = {Kosovo Revisited: Humanitarian Intervention on the Fault Lines of International Law}, series = {Human Rights Law Review}, volume = {7}, journal = {Human Rights Law Review}, number = {2}, issn = {1744-1021}, doi = {10.1093/hrlr/ngm003}, pages = {275 -- 297}, abstract = {The asserted doctrine of unilateral humanitarian intervention has given rise to considerable debate in international law. This article revisits the use of force in Kosovo to critically appraise this debate. The arguments for and against the doctrine are schematically compared and contrasted. Their differences are methodological, but underlying factors are relevant. These may include a conflict of values (notably, sovereignty versus human rights), but certainly involve deep disciplinary problems evidenced by confusing international legal terminology and, especially, the contradictions inherent in identifying and changing rules of general/customary international law. Three factors are considered as potentially helpful in bridging these fault lines: state practice (unavoidably), the stability of the international system and accountability. The latter two, at least, sit uncomfortably with unilateralism.}, language = {en} } @article{Calı, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak}, title = {Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions}, series = {Human Rights Quarterly}, volume = {29}, journal = {Human Rights Quarterly}, number = {1}, issn = {1085-794X}, doi = {10.1353/hrq.2007.0002}, pages = {251 -- 270}, abstract = {This article takes issue with the argument that human rights are not absolute and should be balanced in relation to competing communal aims. The balancing of qualified human rights is a key practice of the European Court of Human Rights and a great deal depends on a clear analysis of the ramifications of balancing for our understanding of human rights aims. The author does not seek to propose an alternative to balancing, but aims to show that it is not necessarily coherent with human rights principles or the kinds of functions international human rights institutions are thought to perform.}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierKatzLam, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Katz, Hagai and Lam, Marcus}, title = {Diffusion Models and Global Civil Society}, series = {Global Civil Society 2007/8: Communicative Power and Democracy}, booktitle = {Global Civil Society 2007/8: Communicative Power and Democracy}, publisher = {SAGE}, address = {London [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-1412948005}, pages = {245 -- 257}, abstract = {In its focus on the relationships between civil society activity across the political spectrum, communications and democratic change, Global Civil Society 2007/8 explores how activists and organisations are exploiting the effects of globalisation to create or expand spaces for debate and discussion, often using new forms of communications, even in closed regimes such as Burma, Iran and China. In addition to a focus on the civil society activity in illiberal regimes, this edition of the Yearbook examines the effectiveness of democracy promotion efforts by donor organisations and NGOs in transition countries, and how best to reinvigorate democracy in established democratic societies so that citizens can have a greater say in decisions that affect their lives. Global Civil Society 2007/8 is the seventh Yearbook in a series that has become the standard work on all aspects of contemporary global civil society for activists, practitioners, students and academics alike. It is essential reading for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the key actors, forms and manifestations of global civil society around the world today. The Global Civil Society Yearbook is a collaboration between LSE's Centre for the Study of Global Governance, UCLA's Center for Civil Society and for 2007/8 the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.(About the Book, Publishers Information)}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierDaly, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Daly, Siobhan}, title = {Combining roles and visions: patterns and implications}, series = {The politics of foundations : a comparative analysis}, booktitle = {The politics of foundations : a comparative analysis}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London [u.a.]}, pages = {59 -- 72}, language = {en} } @incollection{KatzAnheierLam, author = {Katz, Hagai and Anheier, Helmut K. and Lam, Marcus}, title = {Fuzzy sets approaches to the study of global civil society}, series = {Global Civil Society 2006/07}, booktitle = {Global Civil Society 2006/07}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-1-4129-3436-7}, pages = {186 -- 197}, language = {en} }