@incollection{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {The Economy and Chancellor Approval in Germany: A Cautionary Tale about Data Vintages and Measurement}, series = {Economics and Politics Revisited: Executive Approval and the New Calculus of Support}, booktitle = {Economics and Politics Revisited: Executive Approval and the New Calculus of Support}, editor = {Hellwig, Timothy and Singer, Matthew}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, isbn = {9780192871664}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Das Problem mit der Philantropie}, series = {Gutes tun oder es besser lassen? Philanthropie zwischen Kritik und Anerkennung}, booktitle = {Gutes tun oder es besser lassen? Philanthropie zwischen Kritik und Anerkennung}, editor = {von Schnurbein, Georg}, publisher = {Christoph Merian Verlag}, address = {Basel}, isbn = {978-3-03969-012-1}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {37 -- 50}, language = {de} } @incollection{RoemmeleDarius, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea and Darius, Philipp}, title = {KI und datengesteuerte Kampagnen: Eine Diskussion der Rolle generativer KI im politischen Wahlkampf}, series = {Informationsfl{\"u}sse, Wahlen und Demokratie: Festschrift f{\"u}r R{\"u}diger Schmitt-Beck}, volume = {Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung. Band 35}, booktitle = {Informationsfl{\"u}sse, Wahlen und Demokratie: Festschrift f{\"u}r R{\"u}diger Schmitt-Beck}, editor = {Faas, Thorsten and Huber, Sascha and Krewel, Mona and Roßteutscher, Sigrid}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH \& Co. KG}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {9783756008001}, doi = {10.5771/9783748915553}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {199 -- 211}, language = {de} } @incollection{Bunde, author = {Bunde, Tobias}, title = {Social constructivism}, series = {Research Handbook on NATO}, booktitle = {Research Handbook on NATO}, editor = {Mayer, Sebastian}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing Limited}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {9781839103384}, doi = {10.4337/9781839103391.00014}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {69 -- 83}, abstract = {From a social constructivist perspective, NATO is not just another alliance or security institution, but the institutional embodiment of the transatlantic security community, which is based on a collective identity of liberal democracies. This collective identity serves as the main explanatory factor for social constructivist research dealing with NATO's creation, its specific institutional design and its unique culture of consultation. It also helps understand NATO's persistence after the end of the Cold War, its enlargement and its (liberal) out-of-area operations and missions in the post-Cold War period. Constructivism has become one of the key theoretical approaches in NATO research, offering a broader view of the Alliance and accounting for empirical anomalies that competitors fail to explain. Still, constructivist research has arguably not yet reached its full potential and could offer additional insights into NATO's past, presence and future. These lacunae are addressed in the chapter.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {Introduction: The Accountability Impasse of the EU's New Economic Governance}, series = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, booktitle = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, editor = {Dawson, Mark}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, doi = {10.1017/9781009228800.001}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {1 -- 16}, abstract = {This chapter serves as the general introduction to the volume. It discusses two major impasses plaguing EMU in the 2020s: the first, a clash between politicization of EMU decisions, on the one hand, and an institutional structure designed to reject political conflict, on the other; the second, a scholarly impasse between those analysing EMU accountability comparatively and those doing so through EMU specific standards. The chapter briefly introduces the core concepts used in the volume as a means of overcoming this impasse: the distinction between procedural and substantive accountability as well as the normative goods framework developed in Chapter 1. It finally provides an overview of the structure and content of the volume, concluding with a plea to focus scholarly attention on EMUs substantive accountability deficits.}, language = {en} } @incollection{AkbikDawson, author = {Akbik, Adina and Dawson, Mark}, title = {From Procedural to Substantive Accountability in EMU Governance}, series = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, booktitle = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, editor = {Dawson, Mark}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, doi = {10.1017/9781009228800.003}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {19 -- 44}, abstract = {This chapter provides the volumes general conceptual framework. It begins by addressing why new approaches to accountability are needed, arguing that accountability literature has reached a stalemate as a result of an impasse between deductive and inductive approaches to accountability in the EU. It then argues that overcoming the stalemate requires developing a generalised framework of what accountability is for, deriving four accountability goods to be used in subsequent chapters. The chapter argues that each of the goods can be delivered in procedural or substantive ways, focusing either on the process by which decisions are made or the substantive worth of decisions themselves. The chapter concludes by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of both varieties of accountability before mapping out how the concepts will be applied across policy fields and institutions in subsequent chapters.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Akbik, author = {Akbik, Adina}, title = {The Economic Dialogues with the Eurogroup: Substantive Accountability Claimed, but Unmet}, series = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, booktitle = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, editor = {Dawson, Mark}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, doi = {10.1017/9781009228800.010}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {154 -- 176}, abstract = {As the most powerful executive actor in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), the Eurogroup has faced continuous demands to improve its accountability record since the euro crisis. One reform introduced to meet these demands were the Economic Dialogue - a regular exchange of views between the European Parliament and the President of the Eurogroup designed to 'ensure greater transparency and accountability' in the EMU. This chapter investigates the practical functioning of the Economic Dialogues with the Eurogroup between 2013 and the 2019 European Parliament elections. Applying the theoretical framework of the introduction, the purpose is to examine the extent to which the Parliament focuses on procedural or substantive accountability when questioning the Eurogroup President. Moreover, the chapter investigates the reasoning of parliamentary questions in line with the four accountability goods identified at the outset (openness, non-arbitrariness, effectiveness, and publicness). The findings show that Members of the European Parliament are eager to question the extent to which Eurogroup decisions are substantively open and effective, and to a lesser extent whether they are arbitrary or protect EU interests more generally. The analysis is based on fourteen transcripts of Economic Dialogues with the Eurogroup President, which took place between 2013 and 2019.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Bobić, author = {Bobić, Ana}, title = {Constructive Constitutional Conflict as an Accountability Device in Monetary Policy}, series = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, booktitle = {Substantive Accountability in Europe's New Economic Governance}, editor = {Dawson, Mark}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, doi = {10.1017/9781009228800.012}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {197 -- 316}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierRau, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Rau, Sandra}, title = {Time-Limited Foundations: Comparative Perspectives from Europe}, series = {Giving in Time: Temporal Considerations in Philanthropy}, booktitle = {Giving in Time: Temporal Considerations in Philanthropy}, editor = {Madoff, Ray and Soskis, Benjamin}, publisher = {Rowman \& Littlefield Publishers}, address = {Lanham, Maryland}, isbn = {978-1-5381-3176-3}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {177 -- 195}, language = {en} } @incollection{SherwoodLemayCostello, author = {Sherwood, Angela and Lemay, Isabelle and Costello, Cathryn}, title = {IOM's Immigration Detention Practices and Policies: Human Rights, Positive Obligations and Humanitarian Duties}, series = {IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion}, booktitle = {IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion}, editor = {Bradley, Megan and Costello, Cathryn and Sherwood, Angela}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, isbn = {9781009184175}, doi = {10.1017/9781009184175.016}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {360 -- 396}, abstract = {This chapter analyses IOM's practices and policies on immigration detention from the 1990s to date, spanning a period of significant change in its approaches to detention. The chapter first distills pertinent international human rights law (IHRL) on migration-related detention, and then examines IOM's normative statements concerning detention. It shows that while IOM generally emphasises international legal standards, it also tends to stress states' 'prerogative' to detain, frame alternatives to detention (ATDs) as a desirable option rather than a legal obligation, and weave an operational role for itself, notably through assisted voluntary returns (AVRs). The chapter then interrogates IOM's involvement in detention through four case studies. These reveal not only IOM's changing role regarding detention, but its enduring part in a global system whereby powerful states and regions seek to contain protection seekers 'elsewhere.' The chapter concludes that, without constitutional and institutional change to ensure it meets its positive human rights obligations, and deeper critical reflection on its humanitarian duties, IOM's practice risks expanding and legitimating detention.}, language = {en} }