@incollection{Calı, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak}, title = {Regional protection}, series = {International Human Rights Law}, booktitle = {International Human Rights Law}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, isbn = {978-0198860112}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {Written by leading experts in the field, this compelling textbook explores the essentials of international human rights law, from foundational issues to substantive rights and systems of protection. A variety of perspectives bring this multifaceted and sometimes contentious subject to life, making International Human Rights Law the ideal companion for students of human rights.}, language = {en} } @incollection{vandenBrink, author = {van den Brink, Martijn}, title = {The relationship between national and EU citizenship: What is it and what should it be?}, series = {Research Handbook on European Union Citizenship Law and Policy. Navigating Challenges and Crises.}, booktitle = {Research Handbook on European Union Citizenship Law and Policy. Navigating Challenges and Crises.}, editor = {Daniel, Thym and Dora, Kostakopoulou}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {978 1 78897 289 5}, doi = {10.4337/9781788972901}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {100 -- 114}, abstract = {In this chapter, Martijn van den Brink discusses two questions: what is the relationship between national and EU citizenship legally speaking, and what should it be normatively speaking? While often conflated, these questions must be considered independently of each other. He argues first that EU law is not even capable of justifying the very minimal restrictions CJEU case law has imposed on the authority of Member States to determine the rules on the acquisition and loss of national citizenship. It certainly cannot justify more far-reaching restrictions such as outlawing investor citizenship or allowing UK nationals to retain their EU citizenship. Normatively speaking, however, Martijn van den Brink makes the case for giving the EU greater influence over the conditions relating to the loss and acquisition of national and EU citizenship, in particular to ensure that third-country nationals with social ties to their society of residence have a credible path to citizenship.}, language = {en} } @incollection{DawsonJachtenfuchs, author = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Autonomy without Collapse? Towards a Better European Union.}, series = {Autonomy without Collapse in a Better European Union}, booktitle = {Autonomy without Collapse in a Better European Union}, editor = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780192897541}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {3 -- 20}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hustedt, author = {Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Ministerial advisory systems and politics}, series = {Handbook on the Politics of Public Administration}, booktitle = {Handbook on the Politics of Public Administration}, editor = {Ladner, Andreas and Sager, Fritz}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109447.00015}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {93 -- 101}, abstract = {Ministerial advisors are by now established actors at the apex of ministerial departments in many countries around the globe. They advanced to close and often the most intimate advisors to government ministers and other executive politicians and are often the only actors in the ministries allowed to provide political advice. Also, they are often closely involved in the coordination of government coalition politics alongside party-political lines and coordinate between the ministry and the party headquarter. While they, in general, fulfil a much more political role (compared to civil servants), their role and working conditions vary. The chapter looks into different types of ministerial advisory systems, their institutionalization, working dynamics and in particular their role as political advisors. And even though ministerial advisors have received considerable attention by public administration scholars for around two decades, their position has not been accounted for in general public administration or policy process theory. The chapter revises the current literature on the emergence and role of advisors in theoretical, conceptual and empirical regards to provide a state-of-the-art overview of variation in ministerial advisory systems.}, language = {en} } @incollection{MartillSus, author = {Martill, Benjamin and Sus, Monika}, title = {Growing Apart Together? Brexit and the Dynamics of Differentiated Disintegration in Security and Defense}, series = {The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union}, booktitle = {The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union}, editor = {Leruth, Benjamin and G{\"a}nzle, Stefan and Trondal, Jarle}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, isbn = {9780429054136}, doi = {10.4324/9780429054136-47}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {696 -- 711}, abstract = {Brexit initially raised the prospect of new forms of external differentiation in the European Union (EU), should the United Kingdom continue to participate in a number of the Union's policy areas. Security and defence was one area where agreement on the terms of UK participation was more likely, given the clear interests of both sides in the development of a close partnership in this area. But agreement has been so difficult to reach, and the final Brexit deal makes no mention of collaboration in foreign, security and defence policy. We argue that the key to understanding this puzzle lies in understanding the politics of differentiated disintegration, of which Brexit is the prime example, and the distinction between strategic and political interests. While strategic interests constitute a driver for external differentiation, the political interests arising from the withdrawal process make it difficult to reach an agreement. Divorcing strategic cooperation from the short-term politics of negotiations is the first step to overcoming the stalemate, and this chapter presents several ways this can be achieved. By perceiving Brexit as a case of differentiated disintegration, this chapter accounts for the significant constraints associated with external differentiation as a mode of integration in the EU.}, language = {en} } @incollection{GrafLohse, author = {Graf, Lukas and Lohse, Anna Prisca}, title = {Analyzing Vocational Education and Training Systems through the Lens of Political Science.}, series = {Internationales Handbuch der Berufsbildung. Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung - Ergebnisse und Perspektiven aus Theorie und Empirie. Jubil{\"a}umsausgabe des Internationalen Handbuchs der Berufsbildung.}, volume = {56}, booktitle = {Internationales Handbuch der Berufsbildung. Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung - Ergebnisse und Perspektiven aus Theorie und Empirie. Jubil{\"a}umsausgabe des Internationalen Handbuchs der Berufsbildung.}, editor = {Grollmann, Philipp and Frommberger, Dietmar and Deißinger, Thomas and Lauterbach, Uwe and Pilz, Matthias and Schr{\"o}der, Thomas and Sp{\"o}ttl, Georg}, publisher = {Verlag Barbara Budrich}, address = {Leverkusen}, isbn = {978-3-8474-2676-9, 978-3-96208-334-2}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {123 -- 141}, abstract = {Seit 1995 werden im Internationalen Handbuch der Berufsbildung (IHBB) wissenschaftliche L{\"a}nderstudien zu den weltweiten Berufsbildungssystemen publiziert. Das IHBB ist ein Standardwerk f{\"u}r diejenigen, die sich f{\"u}r die Berufsbildung in anderen L{\"a}ndern interessieren. Dieser Jubil{\"a}umsband zum 25-j{\"a}hrigen Bestehen des IHBB stellt aktuelle Befunde zu unterschiedlichen Themen und Fragestellungen aus der Vergleichenden Berufsbildungsforschung vor. Die Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung zielt darauf ab, Merkmale und Prinzipien der Berufsbildung in verschiedenen nationalen und kulturellen Kontexten zu beschreiben, zu verstehen und zu erkl{\"a}ren. Deutlich st{\"a}rker als die allgemeine oder hochschulische Bildung ist die Berufsbildung aus internationaler Perspektive von großen Unterschieden gepr{\"a}gt. Doch zugleich kann die Annahme formuliert werden, dass sich die Merkmale und Prinzipien der Berufsbildung im Zuge der wachsenden Globalisierung, Internationalisierung und Europ{\"a}isierung tendenziell ann{\"a}hern - wie in anderen gesellschaftlichen Teilsystemen auch. Der Blick auf die Berufsbildung erfolgt aus diversen wissenschaftlichen Perspektiven, aus Erziehungs- und Berufsbildungswissenschaft, Politikwissenschaft, Soziologie und Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Mit dieser Auswahl wird einem inter- und multidisziplin{\"a}ren Verst{\"a}ndnis Vergleichender Berufsbildungsforschung Rechnung getragen. Der vorliegende Sammelband schließt damit den Kreis zu den Beitr{\"a}gen zu Methoden und Theorien des Vergleichs aus der Anfangszeit des Handbuchs.}, language = {en} } @incollection{KajtarCalıMilanovic, author = {Kajt{\´a}r, G{\´a}bor and {\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak and Milanovic, Marko}, title = {Introduction: Secondary Rules of Primary Importance}, series = {Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, booktitle = {Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, editor = {Kajt{\´a}r, G{\´a}bor and {\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak and Milanovic, Marko}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, isbn = {9780192869012}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {en} } @incollection{Calı, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak}, title = {Proving Bad Faith in International Law: Lessons from the Article 18 Case law of the European Court of Human Rights}, series = {Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, booktitle = {Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law: Attribution, Causality, Evidence, and Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals}, editor = {Kajt{\´a}r, G{\´a}bor and {\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak and Milanovic, Marko}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, isbn = {9780192869012}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {en} } @incollection{BuenderRathertMair, author = {B{\"u}nder, Tobias and Rathert, Nikolas and Mair, Johanna}, title = {Understanding firm- and field-level change toward sustainable development: insights from the pharmaceutical industry and access to medicines, 1960‒2020}, series = {Handbook on the Business of Sustainability}, booktitle = {Handbook on the Business of Sustainability}, editor = {George, Gerard and Haas, Martine and Joshi, Havovi and McGahan, Anita and Tracey, Paul}, publisher = {Edward Elgar}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {9781839105333}, doi = {10.4337/9781839105340.00025}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {300 -- 319}, abstract = {Insufficient access to medicines is a persistent global problem that affects billions of people in low- and middle-income countries. In this chapter, we use access to medicines as a case to understand how business can become instrumental in making progress on persistent and global problems we associate with sustainable development. We examine the emergence and evolution of access to medicines as a mandate for the pharmaceutical industry to contribute to sustainable development. More specifically, we trace the historical developments of corporate social initiatives in the industry and revisit existing research on access to medicines in management and related fields. We then introduce three distinct analytical perspectives - field emergence and change, firm heterogeneity, organizational processes - to examine access to medicine, expose managerial challenges and offer a research agenda that helps to advance research on access to medicines and, more generally, on corporate efforts to address pressing global problems subsumed under the Sustainable Development Goals.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Abels, author = {Abels, Christoph M.}, title = {Am dunkelsten ist die Nacht vor der Dämmerung: Globale Anstrengungen im Kampf gegen Klimawandel und Terrorismus}, series = {Polis180: Europa- und Aussenpolitik 2030: Sechs Szenarien}, booktitle = {Polis180: Europa- und Aussenpolitik 2030: Sechs Szenarien}, publisher = {Polis180 e.V.}, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {25 -- 29}, abstract = {Das vorliegende Szenario kombiniert zwei f{\"u}r die Sicherheitspolitik relevante Dimensionen: Der Kampf gegen Klimawandel und Terrorismus. Aufbauend auf den j{\"u}ngsten Ereignissen in S{\"u}deuropa und Afghanistan entwerfen wir ein Szenario, in dem dramatische Geschehnisse erfolgreichen Bem{\"u}hungen vorweggehen - erst der Schock weiterer Niederlagen an beiden Fronten (z.B. die Folgen eines verheerenden Waldbrandes rund um Athen) f{\"u}hrt dazu, dass die internationale Gemeinschaft zu Handeln beginnt und letztlich ambitionierte Maßnahmen ergreift, um beiden Bedrohungen erfolgreich zu begegnen. Die entscheidenden Meilensteine dieses Szenarios werden dabei in Schlagzeilen und kurzen Nachrichten dargestellt. Zum Abschluss werden zwei Handlungsempfehlungen formuliert: Eine F{\"o}rderung von Solarstrom-Pilotprojekten in Nordafrika und der Sahelzone sowie eine Evaluation bestehender Anti-Terror-Strategien vor dem Hintergrund holistischer Pr{\"a}ventionskonzepte.}, language = {de} }