@incollection{HasselvonVerschuer, author = {Hassel, Anke and von Verschuer, Sophia}, title = {Das Paradox der europ{\"a}ischen Mitbestimmung}, series = {Strategische Personalarbeit in der Transformation: Partizipation und Mitbestimmung f{\"u}r ein erfolgreiches HRM}, booktitle = {Strategische Personalarbeit in der Transformation: Partizipation und Mitbestimmung f{\"u}r ein erfolgreiches HRM}, editor = {Gr{\"o}bel, Rainer and Dransfeld-Haase, Inga}, publisher = {Bund-Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt}, isbn = {978-3-7663-7156-0}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {757 -- 772}, abstract = {Die Personalarbeit hat sich stark ver{\"a}ndert. Pr{\"a}gend sind der demografische Wandel, neue Werte in der Arbeitswelt und technologische Transformationen, die Unternehmen, Personalabteilungen und Mitbestimmungsakteure herausfordern. Eine konstruktive Zusammenarbeit zwischen Personal- und Mitbestimmungsverantwortlichen ist - so die Botschaft dieses Buchs - der Schl{\"u}ssel f{\"u}r gute und breit akzeptierte L{\"o}sungen. Wissenschaftliche Analysen und Praxisbeispiele zeigen, dass Mitbestimmung auf Augenh{\"o}he die Zufriedenheit der Besch{\"a}ftigten erh{\"o}ht und zu einer besseren wirtschaftlichen, sozialen und {\"o}kologischen Nachhaltigkeit f{\"u}hrt. Dieses Buch er{\"o}ffnet durch seinen Dreiklang aus Wissenschaft, Arbeitgeber- und Arbeitnehmersicht neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r die strategische Personalarbeit. Die praktischen Empfehlungen greifen dabei auf betriebliche Beispiele zur{\"u}ck, in denen Personalverantwortliche und Akteure der Mitbestimmung {\"u}ber H{\"u}rden und Erfolge im beruflichen Alltag berichten. Leserinnen und Leser gewinnen so wertvolle Denkanst{\"o}ße und erhalten Gestaltungsimpulse f{\"u}r das weite Feld von Personalarbeit und Mitbestimmung.}, language = {de} } @incollection{HasselSchroeder, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schr{\"o}der, Wolfgang}, title = {Gewerkschaftliche Mitgliederpolitik vor neuen Herausforderungen}, series = {Innovation im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Neue Ideen f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Politik. Festschrift f{\"u}r Josef Schmid (Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik, Bd.24)}, volume = {24}, booktitle = {Innovation im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Neue Ideen f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Politik. Festschrift f{\"u}r Josef Schmid (Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik, Bd.24)}, editor = {Buhr, Daniel and Frankenberger, Rolf and Schroeder, Wolfgang and Zolleis, Udo}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-8134-8}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {99 -- 122}, language = {de} } @incollection{DempseyMcBrideHaatajaetal., author = {Dempsey, Mark and McBride, Keegan and Haataja, Meeri and Bryson, Joanna}, title = {Transnational Digital Governance and Its Impact on Artificial Intelligence}, series = {The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance}, booktitle = {The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780197579329}, doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.16}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {The rapid pace of technological advancement and innovation has put existing governance and regulatory mechanisms to the test. There is a clear need for new and innovative regulatory mechanisms that enable governments to successfully manage the integration of digital technologies into our societies, and to ensure that such integration occurs in a sustainable, beneficial, and just manner. Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as one of the most debated of such innovations. What exactly is it, how should it be built and deployed, how can it be used, and how should it be regulated? Yet across the period of this debate, AI is becoming widely used and addressed within existing, evolving, and bespoke regulatory contexts. The present chapter explores the extant governance of AI and, in particular, what is arguably the most successful AI regulatory approach to date, that of the European Union. The chapter explores core definitional concepts, shared understandings, values, and approaches currently in play. It argues that not only are the Union's regulations locally effective, but, due to the so-called "Brussels effect," regulatory initiatives within the European Union also have a much broader global impact. As such, they warrant close consideration.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Wer organisiert die Zivilgesellschaft?}, series = {Community Organizing}, booktitle = {Community Organizing}, editor = {Meier, Tobias and Penta, Leo and Richter, Andreas}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-6804-7}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {104 -- 111}, language = {de} } @incollection{GrafPowell, author = {Graf, Lukas and Powell, Justin J.W.}, title = {The Origins and Contemporary Development of Work-based Higher Education in Germany: Lessons for Anglophone Countries?}, series = {Equity and Access to High Skills through Higher Vocational Education}, booktitle = {Equity and Access to High Skills through Higher Vocational Education}, editor = {Knight, Elizabeth and Bathmaker, Ann-Marie and Moodie, Gavin and Orr, Kevin and Webb, Susan and Wheelahan, Leesa}, publisher = {Palgrave}, address = {London}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-84502-5_7}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {125 -- 144}, abstract = {Higher education is typically viewed as offering the most assured pathways to secure careers and low unemployment rates. Yet, increasingly some groups, not least higher education graduates and their families paying ever-higher tuition fees, question the taken-for-granted contributions higher education makes to individuals and society. While participation rates have climbed worldwide, higher education systems continue to produce winners and losers. In the face of such challenges globally, which alternatives exist? A prominent possibility, pioneered in Germany, is 'dual study' programmes. These programmes fully integrate phases of higher education study and paid work in firms, illustrating how employer interests and investments are (re)shaping advanced skill formation. Co-developed and co-financed by employers, they could ameliorate the global trend towards saddling students with ever-higher education costs and student debt. Grounded in neo-institutional analysis, expert interviews, and document analysis, we analyse the genesis and rapid expansion of dual study programmes, emphasizing the role of employer interests and highlighting distributional conflicts in the new politics of advanced skill formation. Furthermore, we discuss lessons other countries might glean from a new form of work-based higher education in Germany. Reference: Graf, L./Powell, J.J.W. (2022) The Origins and Contemporary Development of Work-based Higher Education in Germany: Lessons for Anglophone Countries? In: Knight, E./Bathmaker, A-M./Moodie, G./Orr, K./Webb, S./Wheelahan, L. (Eds.) Equity and Access to High Skills through Higher Vocational Education. London, Palgrave, 125-144.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Calı, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak}, title = {UN treaty body views: a distinct pathway to UN human rights treaty impact?}, series = {A Life Interrupted: Essays in honour of the lives and legacies of Christof Heyns}, booktitle = {A Life Interrupted: Essays in honour of the lives and legacies of Christof Heyns}, publisher = {Pretoria University Law Press (PULP)}, address = {Pretoria}, isbn = {9781991213143}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {443 -- 459}, language = {en} } @incollection{CalıTurkut, author = {{\c{C}}al{\i}, Ba{\c{s}}ak and Turkut, Emre}, title = {Turkey: Pandemic Governance and Executive Aggrandisement}, series = {Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic}, booktitle = {Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic}, publisher = {Routledge}, isbn = {9781032078854}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic not only ravaged human bodies but also had profound and possibly enduring effects on the health of political and legal systems, economies and societies. Almost overnight, governments imposed the severest restrictions in modern times on rights and freedoms, elections, parliaments and courts. Legal and political institutions struggled to adapt, creating a catalyst for democratic decline and catastrophic increases in poverty and inequality. This handbook analyses the global pandemic response through five themes: governance and democracy; human rights; the rule of law; science, public trust and decision making; and states of emergency and exception. Containing 12 thematic commentaries and 25 chapters on countries of diverse size, wealth and experience of COVID-19, it represents the combined effort of more than 50 contributors, including leading scholars and rising voices in the fields of constitutional, international, public health, human rights and comparative law, as well as political science, and science and technology studies. Taking stock after the onset of global emergency, this book provides essential analysis for politicians, policy-makers, jurists, civil society organisations, academics, students and practitioners at both national and international level on the best, and most concerning, practices adopted in response to COVID-19 - and key insights into how states and multilateral institutions should reform, adapt and prepare for future emergencies.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Sprache und Kommunikation in der Politik}, series = {Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft}, booktitle = {Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Wien}, doi = {10.1515/9783110774306-004}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {35 -- 40}, abstract = {Kommunikation zwischen Regierenden und Regierten ist eine notwendige Bedingung f{\"u}r repr{\"a}sentative Demokratien. B{\"u}rgerinnen und B{\"u}rger m{\"u}ssen wissen, wof{\"u}r Parteien und Kandidaten stehen. Gleichzeitig m{\"u}ssen diese {\"u}ber Interessen und Bed{\"u}rfnisse der Bev{\"o}lkerung informiert sein. Kurzum: ohne Kommunikation funktioniert repr{\"a}sentative Demokratie nicht. Politik und politische Kommunikation sind f{\"u}r die allermeisten von uns aber nicht unmittelbar, sondern nur mittelbar erfahrbar - hier spielen die Medien als „Fenster zur Welt" eine zentrale Rolle. In aller K{\"u}rze werden wir uns der Bedeutung der medialen Ver{\"a}nderung (Radio, Fernsehen, Internet, soziale Medien) f{\"u}r die politische Kommunikation n{\"a}hern. Hierum geht es in einem ersten Teil meines Beitrags. Daran anschließend, im zweiten Teil: Streit! Die politische Auseinandersetzung als Herzst{\"u}ck der Demokratie und besondere Form der Kommunikation. Hart in der Sache, anst{\"a}ndig im Ton um die beste politische L{\"o}sung ringen - so der Idealfall. Doch wo findet diese Auseinandersetzung statt? Im dritten Teil des Beitrags wird das Konzept der {\"O}ffentlichkeit genauer beleuchtet. Vor wenigen Jahrzehnten unterhielt man sich {\"u}ber dieselbe Sendung, die man am Abend davor gesehen hatte - das „rituelle Zusammensein der Nation". Heute leben wir in geteilten und getrennten {\"O}ffentlichkeiten. Filterbubbles, Echokammern. Welche Auswirkungen lassen sich daraus f{\"u}r die demokratische Debatte und die politische Kommunikation ableiten? Im vierten Abschnitt widmet sich der Beitrag großen Fragen, ohne abschließende Antworten zu liefern: Braucht es Regulierung? Kann Kommunikation {\"u}berhaupt reguliert werden? Und von wem?}, language = {de} } @incollection{Auz, author = {Auz, Juan}, title = {Two Reputed Allies: Reconciling Climate Justice and Litigation in the Global South}, series = {Litigating the Climate Emergency: How Human Rights, Courts, and Legal Mobilization Can Bolster Climate Action}, booktitle = {Litigating the Climate Emergency: How Human Rights, Courts, and Legal Mobilization Can Bolster Climate Action}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, isbn = {9781009106214}, doi = {10.1017/9781009106214.009}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {145 -- 156}, abstract = {Climate litigation in the Global South is a novel and increasingly prominent phenomenon that prompted a first wave of scholarly work examining and systematizing its main features. Despite the rigour that these academic accounts apply to assessing the main legal arguments of both litigants and courts, they fail to address the possible tensions between climate justice and the consequences of a domestic court decision in developing nations that did not substantially contribute to the climate crisis. This piece aims to fill that gap by using case law from the Global South to examine challenges around remedies, which will underscore the tensions between climate justice and litigation. Thereafter, this piece, drawing from international norms, advocates for the recognition of a duty of international cooperation, which can inform future courts' orders in climate cases in both the Global North and the Global South. This normative exercise provides the basis to reconcile climate litigation in the Global South with climate justice, two reputed allies.}, language = {en} } @incollection{BobićDawson, author = {Bobić, Ana and Dawson, Mark}, title = {How can law contribute to accountability in EU monetary policy?}, series = {The Cambridge Handbook on European Monetary, Economic and Financial Market Integration}, booktitle = {The Cambridge Handbook on European Monetary, Economic and Financial Market Integration}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {en} }