@misc{HammerschmidVanderWalleAndrewsetal., author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and Van der Walle, Steven and Andrews, Rhys and Bezes, Philippe}, title = {Public Administration Reforms in Europe}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA}, isbn = {9781783475391}, pages = {294}, abstract = {Based on a survey of more than 6700 top civil servants in 17 European countries, this book explores the impacts of New Public Management (NPM)-style reforms in Europe from a uniquely comparative perspective. It examines and analyses empirical findings regarding the dynamics, major trends and tools of administrative reforms, with special focus on the diversity of top executives' perceptions about the effects of those reforms.}, language = {en} } @techreport{TrombleStorzStockmann, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Tromble, Bekah and Storz, Andreas and Stockmann, Daniela}, title = {We Don't Know What We Don't Know: When and How the Use of Twitter's Public APIs Biases Scientific Inference}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.3079927}, language = {en} } @book{RoemmeleFalkSilverman, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea and Falk, Svenja and Silverman, Michael}, title = {Digital Government: Leveraging Innovation to Improve Public Sector Performance and Outcomes for Citizens}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York/Heidelberg}, isbn = {9783319387932}, abstract = {This book focuses on the implementation of digital strategies in the public sectors in the US, Mexico, Brazil, India and Germany. The case studies presented examine different digital projects by looking at their impact as well as their alignment with their national governments' digital strategies. The contributors assess the current state of digital government, analyze the contribution of digital technologies in achieving outcomes for citizens, discuss ways to measure digitalization and address the question of how governments oversee the legal and regulatory obligations of information technology. The book argues that most countries formulate good strategies for digital government, but do not effectively prescribe and implement corresponding policies and programs. Showing specific programs that deliver results can help policy makers, knowledge specialists and public-sector researchers to develop best practices for future national strategies.}, language = {en} } @article{Stockmann, author = {Stockmann, Daniela}, title = {Towards Area-Smart Data Science: Critical Questions for Working with Big Data from China}, series = {Policy and Internet}, journal = {Policy and Internet}, number = {10(4)}, doi = {10.1002/poi3.192}, pages = {393 -- 414}, abstract = {While the Internet was created without much governmental oversight, states have gradually drawn territorial borders via Internet governance. China stands out as a promoter of such a territorial-based approach. China's separate Web infrastructure shapes data when information technologies capture traces of human behavior. As a result, area expertise can contribute to the substantive, methodological, and ethical debates surrounding big data. This article discusses how a number of critical questions that have been raised about big data more generally apply to the Chinese context: How does big data change our understanding of China? What are the limitations of big data from China? What is the context in which big data is generated in China? Who has access to big data and who knows the tools? How can big data from China be used in an ethical way? These questions are intended to spark conversations about best practices for collaboration between data scientists and China experts.}, language = {en} } @book{Stockmann, author = {Stockmann, Daniela}, title = {Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {9781107469624}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {358}, language = {en} } @incollection{StockmannLuo, author = {Stockmann, Daniela and Luo, Ting}, title = {Authoritarian Deliberation 2.0: Lurking and Discussing Politics in Chinese Social Media}, series = {Digital Media and Democratic Futures}, booktitle = {Digital Media and Democratic Futures}, editor = {Delli Carpini, Michael X.}, publisher = {University of Pennsylvania Press}, address = {Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA}, isbn = {9780812295894}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {169 -- 195}, language = {en} } @incollection{Stockmann, author = {Stockmann, Daniela}, title = {Media or Corporations? Social Media Governance between Public and Commercial Rationales}, series = {Advances in Corporate Governance: Comparative Perspectives}, booktitle = {Advances in Corporate Governance: Comparative Perspectives}, editor = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Baums, Theodor}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198866367}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {249 -- 268}, language = {en} } @article{StockmannLuoShen, author = {Stockmann, Daniela and Luo, Ting and Shen, Mingming}, title = {Designing authoritarian deliberation: how social media platforms influence political talk in China}, series = {Democratization}, volume = {27}, journal = {Democratization}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1080/13510347.2019.1679771}, pages = {243 -- 264}, abstract = {Discussion is often celebrated as a critical element of public opinion and political participation. Recently, scholars have suggested that the design and features of specific online platforms shape what is politically expressed online and how. Building on these findings and drawing on 112 semi-structured qualitative interviews with information technology experts and internet users, we explain how major Chinese social media platforms differ in structure and motivation. Drawing upon a nationwide representative survey and an online experiment, we find that platforms aiming to make users a source of information through public, information-centred communication, such as the Twitter-like Weibo, are more conducive to political expression; while platforms built to optimize building social connections through private, user-centred communication, such as WhatsApp and Facebook-like WeChat, tend to inhibit political expression. These technological design effects are stronger when users believe the authoritarian state tolerates discussion, but less important when political talk is sensitive. The findings contribute to the debate on the political consequences of the internet by specifying technological and political conditions.}, language = {en} } @techreport{GoldzweigWachingerStockmannetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Goldzweig, Rafael and Wachinger, Marie and Stockmann, Daniela and R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Beyond Regulation: Approaching the challenges of the new media environment}, series = {Dahrendorf Forum IV}, volume = {Working Paper No. 06}, journal = {Dahrendorf Forum IV}, pages = {19}, abstract = {The spread of false information and hate speech has increased with the rise of social media. This paper critically examines this phenomenon and the reactions of governments and major corporations in Europe. Policymakers have turned towards national regulation as a means to manage false information and hate speech. This article looks into the legislative frameworks on the issue in Germany, France, the UK, the Czech Republic, and Italy and compares them. In response to such regulatory pressure, tech companies have been changing aspects of their platforms to deal with this trend, for example through content moderation. We propose tentative alternatives to this current approach towards reinforcing boundaries for freedom of expression.}, language = {en} } @article{WorthamGaudlBryson, author = {Wortham, Robert H. and Gaudl, Swen E. and Bryson, Joanna}, title = {Instinct: A Biologically Inspired Reactive Planner for Intelligent Embedded Systems}, series = {Cognitive Systems Research}, volume = {57}, journal = {Cognitive Systems Research}, doi = {10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.016}, pages = {207 -- 215}, abstract = {The Instinct Planner is a new biologically inspired reactive planner, based on an established behaviour based robotics methodology and its reactive planner component—the POSH planner implementation. It includes several significant enhancements that facilitate plan design and runtime debugging. It has been specifically designed for low power processors and has a tiny memory footprint. Written in C++, it runs eciently on both Arduino(Atmel AVR) and Microsoft VC++ environments and has been deployed within a low cost maker robot to study AI Transparency. Plans may be authored using a variety of tools including a new visual design language, currently implemented using the Dia drawing package.}, language = {en} }