@incollection{Joerges, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {Was bleibt vom Projekt der Integration Europas durch Recht?}, series = {Kulturen des Rechts: Rechtstransfer und Pluralismus in globaler Perspektive}, booktitle = {Kulturen des Rechts: Rechtstransfer und Pluralismus in globaler Perspektive}, editor = {G{\"u}nther, Klaus and Kadelbach, Stefan}, publisher = {Campus}, address = {Frankfurt am Main [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-3593399812}, abstract = {Im Zentrum des Bandes stehen Austauschprozesse, Vermischungen sowie Konflikte zwischen verschiedenen Rechtskulturen. Dabei geht es um den Transfer von Rechtsordnungen, um lokale autonome Ordnungen in Bezug auf Ordnungen mit generellem Geltungsanspruch, um neue Formen der Hybridisierung in der wechselseitigen Rezeption von Rechtsgrunds{\"a}tzen oder um die Herausbildung transnationaler Rechtsordnungen und die Frage, ob diese sich als Prozesse der Konstitutionalisierung, der Durchsetzung universaler Rechtsprinzipien oder des Managements von Pluralit{\"a}t deuten lassen.}, language = {de} } @techreport{KaskFeller2021, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Kask, Maarja and Feller, Nils}, title = {Digital Education in Europe and the EU's role in upgrading it}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-3732}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-37323}, pages = {7}, year = {2021}, abstract = {A key political priority of Ursula von der Leyen's Commission is making Europe fit for the digital age. It promised to create playing rules for Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the first 100 days of its mandate. This urgency underlines the importance of digital transformation for the Commission. We have not seen the same sense of urgency regarding digital education, however. In this policy brief, Nils Feller and Maarja Kask explain why stronger EU engagement in digital education and upskilling is crucial not only for the Union's labour market but its overall competitiveness. They show where the Commission stands, what challenges it faces and how they can be addressed.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Obendiek, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Obendiek, Anke S.}, title = {Take back control? Digital sovereignty and a vision for Europe}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-3934}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39344}, pages = {15}, abstract = {Digital sovereignty has been the buzzword of recent policy debates on digitalization, regulatory policies, and geostrategic positioning in the EU. This policy brief suggests that while the lofty concept of digital overeignty is flawed, the debate points to a key weakness in digital policy: The EU's current approach lacks consistency and vision. The EU needs lasting guiding principles for its regulatory, economic, and normative digital future that form the baseline for any kind of digital decision-making. The EU's commitment to regulation needs to be backed up by heavy public investment. This should establish conditions that foster the development of digital infrastructure, innovation systems, and tools that reflect European values and human rights. Rather than trying to catch up by excluding the outside, the EU should play to its strengths and entrench its position as a normative champion on the global level.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Koenig, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Koenig, Nicole}, title = {The EU as an Autonomous Defense Actor}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-3935}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39359}, pages = {13}, abstract = {The defence angle of European strategic autonomy remains sensitive and contested. In this chapter of a report published by the Finnish Institute of International Relations (FIIA) Nicole Koenig reviews the EU's defence cooperation initiatives since 2016 and assesses progress along the political, institutional and material dimensions of strategic autonomy. She shows that divergent national strategic cultures and threat perceptions continue to stand in the way of political autonomy while progress on the institutional and material dimensions is gradual. The renewal of Atlanticism triggered by Biden's election and the pandemic's uncertain impact on defence spending and collaboration risk broadening the persisting gap between ambition and reality. The author calls upon the EU and its member states to strengthen all three dimensions of autonomy and provides guidance for the next steps.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Redeker, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Redeker, Nils}, title = {Go big or go home. How to make European industrial policy work}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-3927}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39279}, pages = {13}, abstract = {When it comes to industrial policy, the EU remains big in ambition but meager in substance. This is not surprising. With its renewed strategy, the EU Commission aims to follow the international trend towards more active industrial policy. However, it has to do so within a framework that was designed to discourage - indeed even prevent - the investment- centered policies at the heart of the current discussion. For the EU's industrial strategy to really have teeth, it needs new financial instruments, a stronger macroeconomic focus on growth and employment and better governance.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Schade, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Schade, Daniel}, title = {Crisis-proof Schengen and freedom of movement: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-3929}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39298}, pages = {18}, abstract = {The Covid-19 pandemic has restricted the freedom of travel on the European continent to an unprecedented degree. This included the reintroduction of border controls which were believed to be a thing of the past since the introduction of the Schengen Area. This policy paper explores how the uncoordinated way in which decisions on such estrictions are taken threatens the freedom of movement within the EU even beyond the pandemic. It then suggests how the rules of the Schengen Area can be reformed to ensure its proper functioning in the future.}, language = {en} } @techreport{MackGuttenberg, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Mack, Sebastian and Guttenberg, Lucas}, title = {After the German election: What's next in EU economic governance?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-42434}, pages = {6}, abstract = {The new German government will face a number of unresolved issues of varying urgency when it comes to EU economic governance. In the case of the fiscal rules, there is an urgent need for a decision on how to proceed after 2022. In the medium term, the future of EU finances and economic policy coordination is open; both have undergone drastic changes as a result of the Recovery Instrument. Last but not least, the new German government must decide whether and how to break the deadlock in negotiations on completing the banking union and breathe new life into the capital markets union.}, language = {en} } @techreport{GuttenbergNguyen, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Guttenberg, Lucas and Nguyen, Thu}, title = {Nach der Wahl: Wie weiter mit der Rechtstaatlichkeit in der EU?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-42457}, pages = {6}, abstract = {Der Rechtsstaat ist in vielen Mitgliedstaaten der EU unter Druck. Insbesondere Polen und Ungarn stellen durch eine immer systematischere Aush{\"o}hlung rechtsstaatlicher Prinzipien den Grundkonsens der EU als Rechtsgemeinschaft zur Disposition. Mit dem Urteil des polnischen Verfassungstribunals vom 7. Oktober 2021 erreichte diese Entwicklung ihren bisherigen H{\"o}hepunkt. Dieser Policy Brief erkl{\"a}rt die Hintergr{\"u}nde des Konflikts, zeigt Handlungsm{\"o}glichkeiten f{\"u}r die Europ{\"a}ische Kommission auf und erl{\"a}utert, welche Rolle die n{\"a}chste Bundesregierung bei der Wahrung der Rechtsstaatlichkeit in der EU spielen kann.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Bobić, author = {Bobić, Ana}, title = {Accountability Through Self-Governance in EU Economic Governance}, series = {Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union}, booktitle = {Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union}, editor = {Garben, Sacha and Govaere, Inge and Nemitz, Paul}, publisher = {Bloomsbury}, address = {London, UK}, isbn = {9781509933266}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-42322}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {149 -- 165}, language = {en} } @incollection{Bobić, author = {Bobić, Ana}, title = {(Re)Turning to Solidarity in EU Economic Governance: A Normative Proposal}, series = {Contesting Austerity: A Socio-Legal Inquiry Into Resistance to Austerity}, booktitle = {Contesting Austerity: A Socio-Legal Inquiry Into Resistance to Austerity}, editor = {Farahat, Anuscheh and Arzoz, Xabier}, publisher = {Bloomsbury Publishing}, address = {London, UK}, isbn = {9781509942824}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-42330}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {115 -- 134}, language = {en} }