@article{MinxCreutzigAgostonetal., author = {Minx, Jan C. and Creutzig, Felix and Agoston, Peter and al., et.}, title = {Urban infrastructure choices structure climate solutions}, series = {Nature Climate Change}, volume = {6}, journal = {Nature Climate Change}, issn = {1758-678X}, doi = {10.1038/nclimate3169}, pages = {1054 -- 1056}, abstract = {Cities are becoming increasingly important in combatting climate change, but their overall role in global solution pathways remains unclear. Here we suggest structuring urban climate solutions along the use of existing and newly built infrastructures, providing estimates of the mitigation potential.}, language = {en} } @article{KowarschFlachslandMinxetal., author = {Kowarsch, Martin and Flachsland, Christian and Minx, Jan C. and et al.,}, title = {A road map for global environmental assessments}, series = {Nature Climate Change}, volume = {7}, journal = {Nature Climate Change}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, issn = {1758-678X}, doi = {10.1038/nclimate3307}, pages = {379 -- 382}, abstract = {Increasing demand for solution-oriented environmental assessments brings significant opportunities and challenges at the science-policy-society interface. Solution-oriented assessments should enable inclusive deliberative learning processes about policy alternatives and their practical consequences.}, language = {en} } @article{HaesslerDitlmannal, author = {H{\"a}ssler, Tabea and Ditlmann, Ruth K. and al, et}, title = {Needs Satisfaction in Intergroup Contact: A Multinational Study of Pathways Toward Social Change}, series = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes}, journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes}, issn = {0022-3514}, doi = {10.31234/osf.io/f9mwv}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39717}, abstract = {What role does intergroup contact play in promoting support for social change toward greater social equality? Drawing on the needs-based model of reconciliation, we theorized that when inequality between groups is perceived as illegitimate, disadvantaged group members will experience a need for empowerment and advantaged group members a need for acceptance. When intergroup contact satisfies each group's needs, it should result in more mutual support for social change. Using four sets of survey data collected through the Zurich Intergroup Project in 23 countries, we tested several preregistered predictions, derived from the above reasoning, across a large variety of operationalizations. Two studies of disadvantaged groups (Ns = 689 ethnic minority members in Study 1 and 3,382 sexual/gender minorities in Study 2) support the hypothesis that, after accounting for the effects of intergroup contact and perceived illegitimacy, satisfying the need for empowerment (but not acceptance) during contact is positively related to support for social change. Two studies with advantaged groups (Ns = 2,937 ethnic majority members in Study 3 and 4,203 cis-heterosexual individuals in Study 4) showed that, after accounting for illegitimacy and intergroup contact, satisfying the need for acceptance (but also empowerment) is positively related to support for social change. Overall, findings suggest that intergroup contact is compatible with efforts to promote social change when group-specific needs are met. Thus, to encourage support for social change among both disadvantaged and advantaged group members, it is essential that, besides promoting mutual acceptance, intergroup contact interventions also give voice to and empower members of disadvantaged groups.}, language = {en} } @techreport{WollAlemannoBradfordetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Woll, Cornelia and Alemanno, Alberto and Bradford, Anu and et al.,}, title = {European Strategic Autonomy in 2020}, volume = {10}, pages = {28}, abstract = {When Ursula von der Leyen spoke about a "Geopolitical Commission" when she took office in 2019, the disruption brought about by the year 2020 could not quite be predicted. Faced with the world's upheavals, caught up in between Sino-American rivalry, it is essential to assess and question the Union's position in the world and its perspectives for the future. At the heart of this endeavour is a debate on the meaning of European strategic autonomy. As part of the Groupe d'{\´e}tudes g{\´e}opolitiques' publications, following a major interview with the French President and a long analysis written by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, we have asked some twenty scholars, observers and experts from multiple horizons, nationalities and fields of expertise to position themselves on a scale from 0 ("the EU has become less strategically autonomous") to 5 ("the EU has become more strategically autonomous"), explaining their mark with a short text}, language = {en} } @misc{MunzertJankinetal, author = {Munzert, Simon and Jankin, Slava and et al.,}, title = {The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future}, series = {The Lancet}, journal = {The Lancet}, edition = {10311}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6}, pages = {1619 -- 1662}, abstract = {The Lancet Countdown is an international collaboration that independently monitors the health consequences of a changing climate. Publishing updated, new, and improved indicators each year, the Lancet Countdown represents the consensus of leading researchers from 43 academic institutions and UN agencies. The 44 indicators of this report expose an unabated rise in the health impacts of climate change and the current health consequences of the delayed and inconsistent response of countries around the globe—providing a clear imperative for accelerated action that puts the health of people and planet above all else. The 2021 report coincides with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26), at which countries are facing pressure to realise the ambition of the Paris Agreement to keep the global average temperature rise to 1·5°C and to mobilise the financial resources required for all countries to have an effective climate response. These negotiations unfold in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic—a global health crisis that has claimed millions of lives, affected livelihoods and communities around the globe, and exposed deep fissures and inequities in the world's capacity to cope with, and respond to, health emergencies. Yet, in its response to both crises, the world is faced with an unprecedented opportunity to ensure a healthy future for all.}, language = {en} } @article{KostkaPolzinFulaietal., author = {Kostka, Genia and Polzin, Christine and Fulai, Sheng and et al.,}, title = {Is the concept of a green economy a useful way of framing policy discussions and policymaking to promote sustainable development?}, series = {Natural Resources Forum: A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal}, volume = {35}, journal = {Natural Resources Forum: A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken (NJ) [u.a.]}, issn = {1477-8947}, doi = {10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01347.x}, pages = {72}, abstract = {Contribution for the "Viewpoint" section of the journal. In the Viewpoints section, academics, practitioners and experts share their perspectives on policy questions relevant to sustainable development.}, language = {en} } @article{JankinWattsAmannetal., author = {Jankin, Slava and Watts, Nick and Amann, Markus and et al.,}, title = {The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come}, series = {The Lancet}, volume = {392}, journal = {The Lancet}, number = {10163}, issn = {0140-6736}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32594-7}, pages = {2479 -- 2514}, abstract = {The Lancet Countdown: tracking progress on health and climate change was established to provide an independent, global monitoring system dedicated to tracking the health dimensions of the impacts of, and the response to, climate change. The Lancet Countdown tracks indicators across five domains: climate change impacts, exposures, and vulnerability; adaptation, planning, and resilience for health; mitigation actions and health co-benefits; finance and economics; and public and political engagement. This report is the product of a collaboration of 27 leading academic institutions, the UN, and intergovernmental agencies from every continent. The report draws on world-class expertise from climate scientists, ecologists, mathematicians, geographers, engineers, energy, food, livestock, and transport experts, economists, social and political scientists, public health professionals, and doctors. The Lancet Countdown's work builds on decades of research in this field, and was first proposed in the 2015 Lancet Commission on health and climate change,1 which documented the human impacts of climate change and provided ten global recommendations to respond to this public health emergency and secure the public health benefits available.}, language = {en} } @article{StefanHirthSchlechtetal, author = {Stefan, Pfenninger and Hirth, Lion and Schlecht, et. al., Ingmar}, title = {Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned}, series = {Energy Strategy Reviews}, volume = {19}, journal = {Energy Strategy Reviews}, doi = {10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002}, pages = {63 -- 71}, abstract = {The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.}, language = {en} } @article{MunzertJankinal, author = {Munzert, Simon and Jankin, Slava and al., et}, title = {The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate}, series = {The Lancet}, volume = {394}, journal = {The Lancet}, number = {10211}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6}, pages = {1836 -- 1878}, abstract = {The Lancet Countdown is an international, multidisciplinary collaboration, dedicated to monitoring the evolving health profile of climate change, and providing an independent assessment of the delivery of commitments made by governments worldwide under the Paris Agreement.}, language = {en} } @incollection{EnderleinPisaniFerryZettelmeyeretal., author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Pisani-Ferry, Jean and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin and et al.,}, title = {Euro area architecture: What reforms are still needed, and why}, series = {Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate}, booktitle = {Risk Sharing Plus Market Discipline: A New Paradigm for Euro Area Reform? A Debate}, publisher = {CEPR Policy Portal}, isbn = {978-1-912179-21-3}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {236 -- 242}, abstract = {The publication in 2017 of joint proposals for reforming the euro area by a group of seven French and seven German economists triggered a considerable debate on Vox. This volume offers a selection of the contributions to this debate together with a summary of the original proposal.}, language = {en} }