@article{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {A L{\"a}nder-based forecast of the 2017 German Bundestag Election}, series = {Political Science \& Politics}, volume = {50}, journal = {Political Science \& Politics}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1049-0965}, doi = {10.1017/S1049096517000427}, pages = {689 -- 692}, language = {en} } @article{KayserWlezien, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Wlezien, Christopher}, title = {Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote}, series = {European Journal of Political Research}, volume = {50}, journal = {European Journal of Political Research}, number = {May 2011}, edition = {3}, publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons}, doi = {10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01934.x}, pages = {365 -- 394}, language = {en} } @incollection{KayserStanig, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Stanig, Piero}, title = {Governance Indicators: Some Proposals}, series = {Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance}, booktitle = {Governance Challenges and Innovations: Financial and Fiscal Governance}, editor = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780199674930}, doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674930.001.0001}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {189 -- 220}, language = {en} } @article{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {A far-right party just won seats in three German state parliaments. Here's why.}, series = {The Washington Post}, journal = {The Washington Post}, language = {en} } @article{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {Voters seem to respond to the "reported" rather than to the "real" economy}, series = {Democratic Audit UK (London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Public Policy Group) \& Homepage of the Hertie School of Governance}, journal = {Democratic Audit UK (London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Public Policy Group) \& Homepage of the Hertie School of Governance}, language = {en} } @article{Kayser, author = {Kayser, Mark A.}, title = {Partisan Waves: International Business Cycles and Electoral Choice}, series = {American Journal of Political Science}, volume = {53}, journal = {American Journal of Political Science}, number = {October 2009}, edition = {4}, publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons}, doi = {10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00410.x}, pages = {950 -- 970}, language = {en} } @article{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {A Benchmarking Forecasting the 2013 Election - the Post-Mortem Analysis}, series = {EU Political Economy Bulletin}, journal = {EU Political Economy Bulletin}, number = {Winter 2014}, edition = {17}, publisher = {European Union Studies Association, EU Political Economy Interest Section}, address = {Pittsburgh}, pages = {9 -- 12}, language = {en} } @article{KayserLeininger, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Leininger, Arndt}, title = {A Benchmarking Forecast of the 2013 Bundestag Election}, language = {en} } @article{KayserWegrich, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Wegrich, Kai}, title = {Von Unis Gnaden: Ein Deutsches Status Symbol}, series = {The European Magazine}, journal = {The European Magazine}, publisher = {Weimer Media Group}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, language = {de} } @article{KayserPeress, author = {Kayser, Mark A. and Peress, Michael}, title = {Benchmarking across Borders: An Update and Response}, series = {British Journal of Political Science}, volume = {X}, journal = {British Journal of Political Science}, doi = {10.1017/S0007123418000625}, pages = {1 -- 4}, abstract = {Arel-Bundock, Blais and Dassonneville (2018, ABD hereafter) offer an unusual critique of our 12 article, Benchmarking across Borders. They find no methodological flaws, produce identical 13 empirical results and concede that their proposed specification (Model 5) is mathematically 14 identical to that used in Kayser and Peress (2012, KP hereafter). ABD make two claims: (1) that 15 their preferred specification is an innovation that improves interpretation and (2) that the 16 empirical evidence presented in KP does not support benchmarking. The first is unpersuasive 17 and the second depends on a selective reading of the evidence. We address these issues below and 18 update the individual-level dataset from KP to increase statistical power, finding additional 19 evidence of benchmarking.}, language = {en} }