@techreport{HirthSchlecht, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hirth, Lion and Schlecht, Ingmar}, title = {Redispatch Markets in Zonal Electricity Markets: Inc-Dec Gaming as a Consequence of Inconsistent Power Market Design (not Market Power)}, series = {EconStor}, journal = {EconStor}, publisher = {ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics}, language = {en} } @article{WieseSchlechtBunkeetal., author = {Wiese, Frauke and Schlecht, Ingmar and Bunke, Wolf-Dieter and Gerbaulet, Clemens and Hirth, Lion and Jahn, Martin and Kunz, Friedrich and Lorenz, Casimir and M{\"u}hlenpfordt, Jonathan and Reimann, Juliane and Schill, Wolf-Peter}, title = {Open Power System Data - Frictionless data for electricity system modelling}, series = {Applied Energy}, volume = {236}, journal = {Applied Energy}, doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.097}, pages = {409}, abstract = {The quality of electricity system modelling heavily depends on the input data used. Although a lot of data is publicly available, it is often dispersed, tedious to process and partly contains errors. We argue that a central provision of input data for modelling has the character of a public good: it reduces overall societal costs for quantitative energy research as redundant work is avoided, and it improves transparency and reproducibility in electricity system modelling. This paper describes the Open Power System Data platform that aims at realising the efficiency and quality gains of centralised data provision by collecting, checking, processing, aggregating, documenting and publishing data required by most modellers. We conclude that the platform can provide substantial benefits to energy system analysis by raising efficiency of data pre-processing, providing a method for making data pre-processing for energy system modelling traceable, flexible and reproducible and improving the quality of original data published by data providers.}, language = {en} } @article{SchlechtMaurerHirth, author = {Schlecht, Ingmar and Maurer, Christoph and Hirth, Lion}, title = {Financial contracts for differences: The problems with conventional CfDs in electricity markets and how forward contracts can help solve them}, series = {Energy Policy}, volume = {186}, journal = {Energy Policy}, doi = {10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113981}, abstract = {Contracts for differences are widely seen as a cornerstone of Europe's future electricity market design. This paper is about designing such contracts. We identify the dispatch and investment distortions that conventional CfDs cause, the patches used to overcome these shortcomings, and the problems these fixes introduce. We then propose an alternative contract we call "financial" CfD. This hybrid between conventional CfDs and forward contracts mitigates revenue risk to a substantial degree while providing undistorted incentives. Like conventional CfDs, it is long-term and tailored to technology-specific (wind, solar, nuclear) generation patterns but, like forwards, decouples payments from actual generation. The proposed contract mitigates volume risk and avoids margin calls by accepting physical assets as collateral.}, language = {en} }