@techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschel2009, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {The Fiscal Anatomy of a Regulatory Polity : Tax Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EU}, number = {43}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4580}, pages = {28}, year = {2009}, abstract = {The paper analyzes the common assumption that the EU has little power over taxation. We find that the EU's own taxing power is indeed narrowly circumscribed: Its revenues have evolved from rather supranational beginnings in the 1950s towards an increasingly intergovernmental system. Based on a comprehe nsive analysis of EU tax legislation and ECJ tax jurisprudence from 1958 to 2007, we show that at the same time, the EU exerts considerable regulatory control over the member states' taxing power and imposes tighter constraints on member state taxes than the US federal government imposes on state taxation. These findings contradict the standard account of the EU as a regulatory polity which specializes in apolitical issues of market creation and leaves political issues to the member states: Despite strong safeguards, the EU massively regulates the highly salient issue of member state taxation.}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The European Community and the Protection of the Zone Layer}, series = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {28}, journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/j.1468-5965.1990.tb00367.x}, pages = {261 -- 277}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EG-Umweltpolitik nach dem vierten Aktionsprogramm}, series = {Ars Aequi}, volume = {39}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, publisher = {Tjeenk Willink}, address = {Zwolle}, issn = {0004-2870}, pages = {493 -- 498}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The Institutional Framework of the EU}, series = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, booktitle = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, publisher = {Elgar}, address = {Cheltenham [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-1-84980-629-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4376}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {203 -- 213}, abstract = {The Handbook provides an authoritative overview of the MLG literature. . . it has the potential to be widely used as a source of reference. The book is systematically structured, and most chapters are of high quality. . .' Achim Hurrelmann, Environment and Planning C 'The editors have produced an authoritative and comprehensive guide to multi-level governance. The book ranges across the domestic context, supraregionalism and global governance all filtered through a sophisticated analytical framework and attention to policy detail. There is no better place to go than this book for a guide to the topic. An outstanding accomplishment.' David Held, London School of Economics, UK Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors an international group of highly renowned scholars report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsHerschingerKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {International Policing : Embedding the Monopoly of Force}, series = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, booktitle = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4388}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {477 -- 486}, abstract = {The Handbook provides an authoritative overview of the MLG literature. . . it has the potential to be widely used as a source of reference. The book is systematically structured, and most chapters are of high quality. . .' Achim Hurrelmann, Environment and Planning C 'The editors have produced an authoritative and comprehensive guide to multi-level governance. The book ranges across the domestic context, supraregionalism and global governance all filtered through a sophisticated analytical framework and attention to policy detail. There is no better place to go than this book for a guide to the topic. An outstanding accomplishment.' David Held, London School of Economics, UK Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors an international group of highly renowned scholars report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsFriedrichsHerschingeretal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Friedrichs, J{\"o}rg and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Policing Among Nations: Internationalizing the Monopoly of Force}, number = {28}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4597}, pages = {29}, abstract = {International cooperation in the field of policing is linked to the definitional core of the state, the monopoly of the legitimate use of force (Max Weber). Whereas international cooperation in other fields has been widely analyzed, there is no systematic measure of the development and intensity of international police cooperation over time. The paper disaggregates the monopoly of force into three components (legitimation, methods and authorization) and analyzes how international police coop eration in Western Europe has developed since the 1960s and how strongly it impinges upon state sovereignty. Whereas in the 1960s, most international institutions in the field were only weak, the state monopoly of the legitimate use of force has been embedded, pooled or even delegated since the 1990s. Even in its core activity, the Western European state has become part of a multi-level system of governance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Germany and Relaunching Europe}, series = {The Strategic Triangle : France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe}, booktitle = {The Strategic Triangle : France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe}, publisher = {J. Hopkins Univ. Press,}, address = {Baltimore}, isbn = {978-0-8018-8564-8}, pages = {309 -- 324}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Das Gewaltmonopol : Denationalisierung oder Fortbestand?}, series = {Transformationen des Staates}, booktitle = {Transformationen des Staates}, publisher = {Suhrkamp}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, isbn = {978-3-518-41743-0}, pages = {69 -- 91}, abstract = {Reform, Zur{\"u}ckdr{\"a}ngung, Abschaffung, Aufl{\"o}sung - wie geht es weiter mit dem Staat? Wie ist es um seine demokratische Legitimation, die Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Zukunft bestellt? Kann er seine klassischen Aufgaben, Sicherheit im Innern und nach außen, Garantie sozialer Gerechtigkeit, noch erf{\"u}llen? Diese Fragen machen deutlich: Angelegenheiten des angeblich b{\"u}rgerfernen Staates treffen in das Zentrum des Alltags des einzelnen. Von A wie Abfall bis Z wie Zulassung von Fahrzeugen, von {\"a}ußerer Sicherheit und Krieg {\"u}ber Verbrechensbek{\"a}mpfung und Terrorabwehr zu Nahverkehr und Autobahn und Verbraucher- oder Umweltschutz - der Staat gilt als all- und endverantwortlich. In seinem »Goldenen Zeitalter« in den sechziger Jahren des 20.Jahrhunderts vermochte er diese Aufgaben als souver{\"a}ner Nationalstaat mit unangetasteter Legitimit{\"a}t zu bew{\"a}ltigen. Das ist heute nicht mehr der Fall. Es entsteht zwar weder ein Weltstaat, noch wird das Gewaltmonopol zum Privateigentum. Aber der Staat zerfasert un{\"u}bersehbar: Einzelne Funktionen werden an internationale Organisationen abgegeben, wieder andere an Unternehmen. Die Diagnose der Gegenwart und eine empirisch fundierte Prognose der Zukunft des Staates sind das Anliegen der neun Untersuchungen, die zu der Schlußfolgerung gelangen: Wir werden eine Vielzahl von einschneidenden Transformationen erleben, und es stellt sich die Frage, ob man den Staat der Zukunft {\"u}berhaupt noch Staat nennen kann. (Inhaltsangabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Institutionelle Struktur und Governance in der EU}, series = {Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (PVS - Sonderheft 41)}, booktitle = {Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (PVS - Sonderheft 41)}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-531-91066-6}, pages = {600}, abstract = {Der Begriff Governance ist ein Erfolgsbegriff und zwar nicht nur in der Politikwissenschaft, sondern auch in anderen Disziplinen, selbst in der eher begriffskonservativen Rechtswissenschaft. Der Preis dieses Erfolges ist die Uneindeutigkeit des Governancebegriffs, was die Governance-Forschung dazu zwingt, sich {\"u}ber die Begriffsverwendung von Governance zu verst{\"a}ndigen und die Verwendungskontexte des Governancebegriffs analytisch sorgf{\"a}ltig auszudifferenzieren. Zu beidem will dieses PVS-Sonderheft einen weiterf{\"u}hrenden Beitrag leisten. In den Beitr{\"a}gen der Herausgeber und im ersten Teil des Bandes geht es um erste Konturen einer Theorie von Governance und die Pr{\"a}zisierung des Governancebegriffs. Der Abgrenzung und Sch{\"a}rfung des Governancebegriffs dienen ferner die Beitr{\"a}ge, die sich mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis zum historisch so dominanten Organisationsprinzip der Hierarchie auseinandersetzen. Mit dem Teil „Governance und Recht" wird gezielt ein multidisziplin{\"a}rer Dialog {\"u}ber das Governance-Konzept er{\"o}ffnet, und zwar in der Hoffnung, daraus gerade f{\"u}r ein Verst{\"a}ndnis von Governance als Koordination von Akteurshandeln in Regelungsstrukturen zu lernen. Die den Governanceebenen gewidmeten Teile - von „National" zu „Transnational" Governance - besch{\"a}ftigen sich mit unterschiedlichen Governance-Kontexten und unterschiedlichen Governance-Modi wie etwa Netzwerken und Public Private Partnerships. Sinn des Bandes ist also weniger eine Bestandsaufnahme der Governance-Forschung, sondern eine Verortung von Governancestrukturen und Governanceprozessen vor dem Hintergrund sich wandelnder Staatlichkeit. (Inhaltsangabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Entparlamentarisierung ; Denationalisierung ; Europ{\"a}isierung ; Intergouvernementalismus ; Komitologie (Lexika-Eintr{\"a}ge)}, series = {Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {1}, booktitle = {Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft}, edition = {3}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {3-406-51126-0}, pages = {567}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The European Union as a Polity (II)}, series = {Handbook of European Union Politics}, booktitle = {Handbook of European Union Politics}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London [u.a.]}, isbn = {9781412908757}, pages = {159 -- 173}, language = {en} } @misc{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity? : The European Integration of Core State Powers.}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {278}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Alles ganz normal! Eine institutionelle Analyse der Euro-Krise}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, volume = {20}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, number = {1}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0946-7165}, doi = {10.5771/0946-7165-2013-1-75}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4173}, pages = {75 -- 88}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EU als Dauerreformprojekt : Politische Ordnungsmodelle und ihre Implikationen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {1430-6387}, doi = {10.5771/1430-6387-2013-3-437}, pages = {437 -- 444}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {The European Integration of Core State Powers. Patterns and Causes}, series = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, booktitle = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {249 -- 270}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Beyond Market Integration. Analysing the European Integration of Core State Powers}, series = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, booktitle = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {1 -- 23}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsHerschingerKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Scratching the Heart of the Artichoke? : How International Institutions and the European Union Constrain the State Monopoly of Force.}, series = {European Political Science Review}, volume = {3}, journal = {European Political Science Review}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1862-2860}, doi = {10.1017/S175577391100004X}, pages = {445 -- 468}, abstract = {In recent years, a growing literature has argued that European Union (EU) member states have undergone a profound transformation caused by international institutions and by the EU, in particular. However, the state core - the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force, embodied by the police - seemed to remain intact. The literature has argued that in this area, international institutions are weak, and cooperation has remained informal and intergovernmental. We take issue with these claims and evaluate the strength of international institutions in two core areas of policing (terrorism and drugs) over time. We find that in terms of decision-making, precision, and adjudication, international institutions have become considerably stronger over time. Even when international institutions remain intergovernmental they strongly regulate how EU member states exercise their monopoly of force. Member states are even further constrained because adjudication is delegated to the European Court of Justice. Thus, even the state core is undergoing a significant transformation.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsGenschel2010, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {How the European Union Constrains the State : Multilevel Governance of Taxation}, series = {European Journal of Political Research}, volume = {50}, journal = {European Journal of Political Research}, number = {3}, publisher = {Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0304-4130}, doi = {10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01939.x}, pages = {293 -- 314}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This article challenges the common assumption that the European Union (EU) has little power over taxation. Based on a comprehensive analysis of EU tax legislation and European Court of Justice (ECJ) tax jurisprudence from 1958 to 2007, the article shows that the EU exerts considerable regulatory control over the Member States' taxing power and imposes tighter constraints on Member State taxes than the American federal government imposes on American state taxation. These findings contradict the standard account of the EU as a regulatory polity that specialises in apolitical issues of market creation and leaves control of highly politicised core functions of government (defence, taxation, social security, education, etc.) to the Member States; despite strong treaty safeguards, national tax autonomy is undermined by EU regulation.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die internationale Regulierung des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, series = {Wozu Staat? Governance in R{\"a}umen begrenzter und konsolidierter begrenzter Staatlichkeit}, booktitle = {Wozu Staat? Governance in R{\"a}umen begrenzter und konsolidierter begrenzter Staatlichkeit}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6971-4}, pages = {35 -- 53}, abstract = {Aufbauend auf den Arbeiten der Bremer und Berliner Sonderforschungsbereiche fragt der Band, was der Staat in R{\"a}umen konsolidierter und begrenzter Staatlichkeit zu effektiver und legitimer Governance beitr{\"a}gt: Welche Governance-Leistungen erbringt er in den Politikfeldern Sicherheit, Gesundheit, Umwelt und Finanzm{\"a}rkte? Welche Governance-Beitr{\"a}ge kommen von nicht-staatlichen Akteuren? Welche Beziehungs- und Konfliktmuster dominieren? Der Band zeigt, erstens, dass der Staat in keinem der untersuchten F{\"a}lle das Governance-Monopol h{\"a}lt, sondern immer auch nicht-staatliche Akteure Governance-Funktionen aus{\"u}ben. Zweitens finden wir ausgepr{\"a}gte Unterschiede zwischen den R{\"a}umen: W{\"a}hrend sich in R{\"a}umen konsolidierter Staatlichkeit tendenziell eine vom Staat moderierte Arbeitsteilung mit nicht-staatlichen Governance-Akteuren einstellt, ist das Verh{\"a}ltnis in R{\"a}umen begrenzter Staatlichkeit durch Konkurrenz und fehlende Hierarchie gekennzeichnet. Drittens unterscheidet sich das Zusammenspiel staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure kaum zwischen Politikfeldern. Die Analyse m{\"u}ndet in der Unterscheidung von vier idealtypischen Governance-Konstellationen staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure. (Angabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The Monopoly of Legitimate Force : Denationalization, or Business as Usual?}, series = {European Review}, volume = {13}, journal = {European Review}, number = {Sonderheft 1}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1062-7987}, doi = {10.1017/S1062798705000189}, pages = {37 -- 52}, abstract = {As Max Weber and many others in his tradition have argued, the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force is the core of the modern state. What counts here is not the frequency of the actual use of force but the fact that only the state has the legitimate right to use such force. The military and the police are the most concrete expressions of this monopoly. In recent decades, the use of the military and the police has been subject to external challenges - 'globalization' - and new ideas about police and military intervention. Although at an operational level the state retains full control over the actions of the police and military, the conditions for their use are increasingly shaped by institutionalized legitimating ideas.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Regieren jenseits der Staatlichkeit}, series = {Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland}, booktitle = {Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-0320-6}, pages = {495 -- 518}, abstract = {Das Werk legt eine Bestandsaufnahme der Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit der politikwissenschaftlichen Teildisziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen (IB) vor. Es wird gefragt, inwieweit im deutschsprachigen Raum eigenst{\"a}ndige Forschungsakzente entwickelt wurden, zu welchen Ertr{\"a}gen diese gef{\"u}hrt haben und inwieweit das Fachgebiet in der Lage ist, die realen Ver{\"a}nderungen konzeptionell und theoretisch so zu erfassen, dass sich daraus ein besseres Verst{\"a}ndnis der sich noch immer entfaltenden Umbruchsprozesse ergibt. Es zeigt sich, dass sich so etwas wie die »neuen« IB entwickelt haben. Im Vordergrund der Analyse stehen Prozesse wie Verrechtlichung, Sozialisierung und Globalisierung und weniger Strukturen wie Machtverteilung, Abh{\"a}ngigkeit oder Interdependenz. F{\"u}hrende AutorInnen stellen die »neuen« IB vor und reflektieren diese kritisch. Der Band ist unverzichtbar f{\"u}r die wissenschaftliche Selbstreflexion im Fach und bietet f{\"u}r Studierende einen perfekten Einstieg in gegenw{\"a}rtige Debatten. Der Band enth{\"a}lt Beitr{\"a}ge von: Michael Z{\"u}rn, Peter Mayer, Thomas Risse, Antje Wiener, Christopher Daase, Harald M{\"u}ller, Detlef F. Sprinz, Joachim Betz, Sebastian Harnisch, Martin List und Bernhard Zangl, Frank Schimmelfennig, Philipp Genschel, Christoph Scherrer, Markus Jachtenfuchs, Andreas N{\"o}lke, Mathias Albert, Klaus Dieter Wolf und Gunther Hellmann. (Angabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} }