@incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Vorwort}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, publisher = {Leske \& Budrich / UTB}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {3825218538}, pages = {9 -- 14}, abstract = {In der gegenwlirtigen politikwissenschaftiichen Europadiskussion ist es schon fast ein Gemeinplatz geworden, darauf zu verweisen, daB zur Erfassung des "ganzen Elefanten" (Puchala 1971) EU eine neue theo­ retische Anstrengung auf breiter Basis notwendig sei. Nachdem je­ doch das einzige umfassende und ausgearbeitete Theorieangebot, der Neofunktionalismus, von seinen Hauptvertretem vor nunmehr zwan­ zig Jahren fUr zunehmend inadtiquat erkllirt worden war, hat sich die ursprunglich stark interdisziplinlir orientierte Integrationsforschung wieder den durch die einzelnen Disziplinen bestimmten Fragestellun­ gen zugewandt, sofem sie sich nicht auf reine Deskription oder Ein­ zelfallstudien beschrlinkte. Theoretisch interessierte Arbeiten kniipfen daher immer wieder an tatslichliche oder vermeintliche Postulate des Neofunktionalismus an. Die einzige emsthafte Konkurrenz auf dem Feld der Integrationstheorie scheint in Form des "neoliberalen Institu­ tionalismus" oder des ,,Neorealismus" von der Theorie der intematio­ nalen Beziehungen zu kommen. Die Kontrastierung des Neofunktio­ nalismus mit den genannten Spielarten der Theorie der intemationalen Beziehungen reproduziert jedoch nur eine Debatte, die bereits in den sechziger Jahren gefUhrt wurde, und die sich letztlich darum drehte, ob die damaligen Europliischen Gemeinschaften eine neue politische Institution tiber den Nationalstaaten darstellten, die diese in den Hin­ tergrund zu drlingen drohte oder ob sie nichts anderes als ein Vehikel der nach wie vor tiberwliltigend einfluBreichen Staaten seien, urn ihre Herrschaftsanspruche und Gestaltungsspielrliume im Innem auch un­ ter den Bedingungen intemationaler Interdependenz zu sichem. Das bruchlose Ankniipfen an die auf hohem theoretischen Niveau geftihrte Debatte der sechziger und fruhen siebziger Jahre bringt je­ doch forschungsstrategisch mehr Nachteile als Vorteile.}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsKohlerKoch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate}, title = {Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, publisher = {Leske \& Budrich / UTB}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3825218539}, pages = {15 -- 44}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Regieren durch {\"U}berzeugen. Die Europ{\"a}ische Gemeinschaft und der Treibhauseffekt}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, publisher = {Leske \& Budrich / UTB}, address = {Wiesbaden}, pages = {427 -- 452}, language = {de} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsDiezKohlerKoch, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Diez, Thomas and Kohler-Koch, Beate}, title = {Regieren jenseits der Staatlichkeit? Legitimit{\"a}tsideen in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Conceptualizing European Governance}, series = {Reflecting Approaches to European Governance}, booktitle = {Reflecting Approaches to European Governance}, publisher = {Macmillan}, address = {London}, pages = {39 -- 50}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsKohlerKoch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate}, title = {The Transformation of Governance in the European Union}, series = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, volume = {11}, journal = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, publisher = {Univ. Mannheim}, address = {Mannheim}, issn = {0948-0099}, abstract = {The transfer of political competencies to the European level proceeds in small steps in the daily practice of governance and of adjudication. In large intervals, the results of these processes are codified in treaty form by intergovernmental conferences. It therefore seems fruitful to have a closer look at "governance in a dynamic multi-level system". The first part of this paper recalls the political and legal controversy about the nature of the political order of the Union with the aim of justifying the use of the term "governance" with reference to the EU. More or less isolated from the discussion on the nature of the EU and its possible or desirable future development, scholars increasingly deal with the effects of the integration process on responsible and effective governance within the member states. This debate is linked to a broader concern about the problems and prospects of governance under the conditions of increasing internationalization which finds its expression in the transnational expansion of functional subsystems of society, increasing interdependence and the globalization of problems. Policy analysis has started to deal with the changes in institutional structures and political processes caused by the Europeanization of policies. These questions are discussed in the second part which draws on the contributions to a forthcoming book edited by the authors. The third part focuses on the meaning and the possibility of legitimate and efficient governance beyond the state flamework. The fourth part discusses different institutional models for dealing with the problems of governance in a dynamic multi-level system resulting from the integration process. In the light of the perspective developed in this paper, the final part puts forward some general empirical, theoretical and normative questions for further research.}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsHuber, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Huber, Michael}, title = {Institutional Learning in the European Community : The Response to the Greenhouse Effect}, series = {European Integration and Environmental Policy}, booktitle = {European Integration and Environmental Policy}, publisher = {Belhaven Press}, address = {London}, pages = {36 -- 58}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Ideen und Interessen : Weltbilder als Kategorien der politischen Analyse}, series = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, volume = {2}, journal = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, publisher = {Univ.Mannheim}, address = {Mannheim}, issn = {0948-0099}, pages = {33}, abstract = {Eine weitverbreitete Meinung in der Politikwissenschaft besagt, daß politisches Handeln durch Interessen bestimmt wird. Dies gilt vor allem f{\"u}r den Bereich der internationalen Politik, wo Staaten als der Prototyp des rationalen, nutzenmaximierenden Akteurs betrachtet werden. Ideen, sofern sie {\"u}berhaupt Gegenstand der Analyse sind, werden in dieser Perspektive zu Oberfl{\"a}chenph{\"a}nomenen der grundlegenden Logik von Macht und Interesse. Im Gegensatz dazu wird hier die These vertreten, daß Ideen zentrale Kategorien der Analyse von Politik im allgemeinen und von internationaler Politik im besonderen sein k{\"o}nnen und nicht lediglich als Rationalisierungen von Machtverh{\"a}ltnissen betrachtet werden m{\"u}ssen. Die Vernachl{\"a}ssigung von Ideen, so die erste These, liegt im Handlungsbegriff rationalistischer Ans{\"a}tze begr{\"u}ndet, denen ein konstruktivistischer Ansatz gegen{\"u}bergestellt wird. Der zweite Abschnitt f{\"u}hrt aus, wie sich Ideen mit Hilfe des Konzepts der Weltbilder systematisch analysieren lassen. Danach wird gezeigt, wie sich mit Hilfe dieses Konzepts Lernprozesse theoretisch und empirisch gehaltvoll konzeptualisieren lassen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsHeyStruebel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Hey, Christian and Str{\"u}bel, Michael}, title = {Umweltpolitik in der Europ{\"a}ischen Gemeinschaft}, series = {Umweltpolitik als Modernisierungsprozeß : Politikwissenschaftliche Umweltforschung und -lehre in der Bundesrepublik}, booktitle = {Umweltpolitik als Modernisierungsprozeß : Politikwissenschaftliche Umweltforschung und -lehre in der Bundesrepublik}, publisher = {Leske \& Budrich}, address = {Opladen}, isbn = {3-8100-1030-8}, pages = {137 -- 162}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EG nach Maastricht. Das Subsidiarit{\"a}tsprinzip und die Zukunft der Integration}, series = {Europa-Archiv : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Politik}, volume = {47}, journal = {Europa-Archiv : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Politik}, number = {10}, issn = {1430-175X}, pages = {279 -- 287}, abstract = {Der Beitrag untersucht die Frage, ob die zunehmende wirtschaftliche und politische Internationalisierung mit einer zunehmenden Verlagerung staatlicher Handlungskompetenzen auf h{\"o}heren Ebenen beantwortet werden kann. Der Artikel st{\"u}tzt sich bei seiner Analyse auf die Ergebnisse von Maastricht und vergleicht die britische und deutsche Verhandlungsposition sowie Form und Inhalt des Subsidiarit{\"a}tsprinzips}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsStruebel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Str{\"u}bel, Michael}, title = {EC Foreign Environmental Policy and Eastern Europe}, series = {Environmental Policy in Europe}, booktitle = {Environmental Policy in Europe}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {3-7890-2635-2}, pages = {17 -- 42}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Versuche von Sinnstiftung in der Europ{\"a}ischen Gemeinschaft : oder Wie die EG versucht, sich durch Abgrenzung als selbst{\"a}ndige Einheit zu etablieren}, series = {Les nations europ{\´e}ennes devant leur histoire (Les Cahiers de Fontenay n° 61/62)}, booktitle = {Les nations europ{\´e}ennes devant leur histoire (Les Cahiers de Fontenay n° 61/62)}, number = {61-62}, publisher = {E.N.S}, address = {Fontenay (u.a.)}, issn = {03958418}, pages = {155 -- 167}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsKiersch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kiersch, Gerhard}, title = {"French Studies". Schlaglichter amerikanischer Frankreichforschung}, series = {Frankreich-Jahrbuch 1988}, booktitle = {Frankreich-Jahrbuch 1988}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-8100-0647-9}, pages = {255 -- 267}, abstract = {Die amerikanische Frankreichforschung ist außerordentlich vielf{\"a}ltig, umfangreich und kreativ. Einen systematischen {\"U}berblick dar{\"u}ber zu geben, bed{\"u}rfte eines l{\"a}ngerfristigen Forschungsprojektes. In diesem Artikel kann es nur darum gehen, schlaglichtartig einige Aspekte aufzuzeigen, einige Zentren und Schwerpunkte zu benennen und vielleicht ein wenig Problembewußtsein f{\"u}r die Notwendigkeit zu schaffen, sich st{\"a}rker als bisher bei uns damit zu besch{\"a}ftigen. Die Beleuchtung der internationalen Dimension der Frankreichforschung ist eine unter vielen Aufgaben dieses Frankreich-Jahrbuchs.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Versuch {\"u}ber das Gemeinwohl in der postnationalen Konstellation}, series = {Gemeinwohl: Auf der Suche nach Substanz}, booktitle = {Gemeinwohl: Auf der Suche nach Substanz}, publisher = {Sigma}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3894042981}, pages = {367 -- 385}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Deutschland, Frankreich und die Zukunft der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, series = {Die Zukunft von Nationalstaaten in der europ{\"a}ischen Integration : deutsche und franz{\"o}sische Perspektiven}, booktitle = {Die Zukunft von Nationalstaaten in der europ{\"a}ischen Integration : deutsche und franz{\"o}sische Perspektiven}, publisher = {Leske + Budrich}, address = {Opladen}, isbn = {3-8100-3033-3}, pages = {279 -- 294}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Einleitung: Regieren in interntionalen Institutionen}, series = {Regieren in internationalen Institutionen}, booktitle = {Regieren in internationalen Institutionen}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {3663112721}, pages = {7 -- 26}, abstract = {Das Buch betrachtet die Charakteristika der Herbeif{\"u}hrung kollektiver und verbindlicher Entscheidungen im internationalen System. Untersucht werden unterschiedliche Typen, die von regionalen Zusammenschl{\"u}ssen, {\"u}ber internationale Regime bis zu internationalen Organisationen reichen. Es werden dabei Fragen nach der Entstehung, Funktionsweise und Wirkung internationaler Institutionen gestellt. Dabei wird ein in der bisherigen Forschung kaum beachtetes Charakteristikum deutlich: Regieren in internationalen Institutionen ist durch die zunehmende Vernetzung der einzelnen Institutionen gekennzeichnet, die {\"u}ber die bisherige Konkurrenz, Arbeitsteilung oder Koexistenz weit hinausgeht.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Verfassung, Parlamentarismus, Deliberation: Legitimation und politischer Konflikt in der EU}, series = {Politik in einer entgrenzten Welt}, booktitle = {Politik in einer entgrenzten Welt}, edition = {DVPW Kongressband 2002}, publisher = {Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, isbn = {3-8046-8873-X}, pages = {71 -- 90}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Deutsche Europapolitik: Vom abstrakten zum konkreten F{\"o}deralismus}, series = {Deutschland zwischen Europ{\"a}isierung und Selbstbehauptung}, volume = {5}, booktitle = {Deutschland zwischen Europ{\"a}isierung und Selbstbehauptung}, edition = {Mannheimer Jahrbuch f{\"u}r europ{\"a}ische Sozialforschung}, publisher = {Campus}, address = {Frankfurt a.M.; New York}, isbn = {3-593-36618-5}, pages = {85 -- 109}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die Probleml{\"o}sungsf{\"a}higkeit der EU?: Begriffe, Befunde, Erkl{\"a}rungen}, series = {Wie probleml{\"o}sungsf{\"a}hig ist die EU? : Regieren im europ{\"a}ischen Mehrebenensystem}, booktitle = {Wie probleml{\"o}sungsf{\"a}hig ist die EU? : Regieren im europ{\"a}ischen Mehrebenensystem}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3789067723}, pages = {345 -- 360}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die Zukunft der Demokratie im Rahmen der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, series = {Eine lernende Demokratie: 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland}, booktitle = {Eine lernende Demokratie: 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland}, edition = {WZB-Jahrbuch 1999}, publisher = {Sigma}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {3-89404-295-8}, pages = {263 -- 281}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die Europ{\"a}ische Union - ein Gebilde sui generis?}, series = {Projekt Europa im {\"U}bergang?: Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, booktitle = {Projekt Europa im {\"U}bergang?: Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3789049460}, pages = {15 -- 35}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Democracy and Governance in the European Union}, series = {Democracy and the European Union}, booktitle = {Democracy and the European Union}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-662-03622-8}, pages = {37 -- 64}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsKohlerKoch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate}, title = {Regieren in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union. Fragestellungen f{\"u}r eine interdisziplin{\"a}re Europaforschung}, series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {37}, journal = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {1862-2860}, pages = {537 -- 556}, abstract = {Der Prozeß der europ{\"a}ischen Integration wurde in den letzten Jahren wieder verst{\"a}rkt zum Gegenstand sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung. Theoretische Entw{\"u}rfe waren mit diesem erneuten Interesse jedoch nur selten verbunden oder sie waren disziplin{\"a}r begrenzt, so daß der Gesamtzusammenhang des Integrationsprozesses aus dem Blick geriet. Gleichzeitig bedeutet die zunehmende Wirkungstiefe des Integrationsprozesses f{\"u}r eine Reihe von gemeinhin nicht zur Integrationsforschung z{\"a}hlenden Bereichen (vor allem im Bereich der international vergleichenden Forschung), daß diese in zunehmendem Maße empirisch und konzeptionell mit den Auswirkungen des Integrationsprozesses konfrontiert werden. Es bedarf deshalb einer Zugangsweise auf den Integrationsprozeß, die eine Kommunikation sowohl innerhalb der Politikwissenschaft als auch mit benachbarten Disziplinen {\"u}berhaupt erm{\"o}glicht, ohne durch theoretische Vorentscheidungen die Erforschung einer gemeinsamen Problematik schon im Keim zu ersticken. Es geht also nicht um eine Theorie, sondern um eine Fragestellung mit allerdings weitreichenden theoretischen Implikationen. Eine solche Fragestellung k{\"o}nnte sein, wie, durch wen und mit welchen Auswirkungen Regieren in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union erfolgt. Wir glauben, daß sich hierdurch ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zum Verst{\"a}ndnis der M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen handlungsf{\"a}higer und demokratischer Politik unter den Bedingungen von Verflechtung und Interdependenz leisten l{\"a}ßt, der {\"u}ber die eigentliche Europaforschung weit hinausgeht.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Governance and Institutional Development}, series = {European Integration Theory}, booktitle = {European Integration Theory}, publisher = {Oxford Univ.Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0199252480}, pages = {97 -- 115}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Entgrenzung und politische Steuerung (Kommentar)}, series = {PVS: Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {29}, booktitle = {PVS: Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, edition = {Sonderheft}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0032-3470}, pages = {235 -- 245}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Umweltpolitik}, series = {Die Europ{\"a}ische Union: Lexikon der Politik}, booktitle = {Die Europ{\"a}ische Union: Lexikon der Politik}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3406369094}, pages = {254 -- 258}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Politikwissenschaftliche Europaforschung}, series = {Die Europ{\"a}ische Union: Lexikon der Politik}, booktitle = {Die Europ{\"a}ische Union: Lexikon der Politik}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, pages = {214 -- 219}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Europ{\"a}ische Umweltpolitik - Transnationale Umweltpolitik}, series = {Umwelt-Handw{\"o}rterbuch: Umweltmanagement in der Praxis f{\"u}r F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte in Wirtschaft, Politik und Verwaltung}, booktitle = {Umwelt-Handw{\"o}rterbuch: Umweltmanagement in der Praxis f{\"u}r F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte in Wirtschaft, Politik und Verwaltung}, publisher = {Walhalla}, address = {Berlin [u.a.]}, isbn = {3802986830}, pages = {218 -- 221}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Governance in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, series = {Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: eine Einf{\"u}hrung}, booktitle = {Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: eine Einf{\"u}hrung}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {3-8100-3946-2}, pages = {77 -- 101}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Regieren und Institutionenbildung}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}ische Integration}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3810038456}, pages = {11 -- 46}, abstract = {Das Buch liefert eine breit angelegte und theoretisch reflektierte Behandlung von Institutionen, Politikbereichen und Problemfeldern der Europ{\"a}ischen Integration. Die Beitr{\"a}ge orientieren sich an der Leitfrage, wie Regieren in diesem dynamischen Mehrebenensystem sowohl demokratisch als auch effizient erfolgen kann.(Verlagsangabe)}, language = {de} } @misc{JoergesChalmersJachtenfuchs, author = {Joerges, Christian and Chalmers, Damian and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The End of the Eurocrats' Dream: Adjusting to European Diversity}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {978-1-107-10718-2}, pages = {X, 353}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsKraftKasackHerschinger, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kraft-Kasack, Christiane and Herschinger, Eva}, title = {Transgouvernementalisierung und die ausbleibende gesellschaftliche Politisierung der inneren Sicherheit}, series = {Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik}, booktitle = {Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik}, editor = {Z{\"u}rn, Michael and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias}, publisher = {Suhrkamp}, address = {Berlin}, pages = {190 -- 212}, language = {de} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {From Market Integration to Core State Powers. The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory}, series = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {56}, journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/jcms.12654}, pages = {178 -- 196}, abstract = {The Eurozone crisis and the refugee crisis are showcases of the problems associated with the EU's shift from market integration to the integration of core state powers. The integration of core state powers responds to similar demand factors as market integration (interdependence, externalities and spillover) but its supply is more tightly constrained by a high propensity for zero-sum conflict, a functional requirement for centralized fiscal, coercive and administrative capacities, and high political salience. We show how these constraints structured the initial design of Economic and Monetary Union and of Schengen, made them vulnerable to crisis, and shaped policy options during the crises: they made horizontal differentiation unattractive, re-regulation ineffective, centralized risk and burden-sharing unfeasible, and the externalization of adjustment burdens to non-EU actors necessary by default. In conclusion, we explore possible escape routes from the trap.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsFossum, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Fossum, John Erik}, title = {Federal Challenges and Challenges to Federalism. Insights from the EU and Federal States}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {27}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2016.1273965}, pages = {467 -- 485}, abstract = {The purpose of this collection is to discuss what we may learn from thinking about the EU in federal terms. Our point of departure is that this represents a two-fold challenge. It is on the one hand a matter of establishing 'how federal' the EU is (the EU's federal challenge). On the other, the EU has federal features but is not a state; thus raises the question of whether federal theory and practice may have to be adapted to take proper account of the EU (the EU's challenge to federalism). The contributions to this collection supplement and extend existing scholarship through focusing on two important lines of inquiry. The first focuses on the relationship between federalism and democracy, with particular emphasis on how federal systems respond to and deal with citizens' interests and concerns, within and outside the political system. Particular emphasis is placed on representation, in the process of federalization, and as a feature of established systems. The second line of inquiry places the emphasis on the relationship among the governments of federal systems. The focus is on intergovernmental relations, and the particular merits that emanate from studying these from a federal perspective.}, language = {en} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {More integration, less federation: the European integration of core state powers}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {23}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2015.1055782}, pages = {42 -- 59}, abstract = {We map the pattern and extent of the European integration of core state powers (coercive force, public finance and public administration) and analyse causes and consequences. We highlight two findings: First, in contrast to historical examples of federal state-building, where the nationalization of core state powers precipitated the institutional, territorial and political consolidation of the emerging state, the European integration of core state powers is associated with the institutional, territorial and political fragmentation of the European Union. Second, in contrast to European market integration, state {\´e}lites and mass publics, not organized business interests, are the prime drivers of integration.}, language = {en} } @incollection{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Conflict-minimising integration: how the EU achieves massive integration despite massive protest}, series = {The End of the Eurocrats' Dream}, booktitle = {The End of the Eurocrats' Dream}, editor = {Chalmers (et al.), Damian}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316227510.008}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {166 -- 189}, language = {en} } @incollection{ChalmersJachtenfuchsJoerges, author = {Chalmers, Damian and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Joerges, Christian}, title = {The Retransformation of Europe}, series = {The End of the Eurocrats' Dream}, booktitle = {The End of the Eurocrats' Dream}, editor = {Chalmers (et al.), Damian}, isbn = {978-1-107-10718-2}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {1 -- 28}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsKrisch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Krisch, Nico}, title = {Subsidiarity and Global Governance}, series = {Law and Contemporary problems}, volume = {79}, journal = {Law and Contemporary problems}, number = {2}, pages = {1 -- 26}, abstract = {Subsidiarity has become increasingly prominent in the theory and practice of global governance and international law. It responds to a need for a principled distribution of tasks between different layers of governance and expresses a general commitment to lower-level decisionmaking at a time when many fear that international authority might be expanding too fast. The symposium which this paper introduces interrogates the prospect and limits of the subsidiarity principle in the global context, focusing on different issue areas - regional economic integration, trade and investment, human rights, and international security, as well as cross-cutting empirical and normative aspects. This framing paper situates subsidiarity among competing principles, evaluates its appeal from a normative perspective and develops a number of conjectures about its prevalence, potential and limitations based on insights from comparative politics as well as the case studies of the project. The picture that emerges from this inquiry is not a homogeneous one. Subsidiarity is not present or desirable in all contexts, and empirically we find significant variation across issue areas and institutional settings. But the principle is beginning to shape different areas and institutional contexts, and it holds significant promise as normative and legal guidance for institutional design and the exercise of authority in the global realm. The landscape of subsidiarity is bound to remain variegated, but the concept is gaining ground and for many actors holds much appeal as a principled way of balancing the need for strong global cooperation with a continuing emphasis on the value of local self-government.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Balancing sub-unit autonomy and collective problem-solving by varying exit and voice. An analytical framework}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {27}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2016.1273376}, pages = {598 -- 614}, abstract = {We argue that there is a commonality between federal states and the EU: both face a dilemma between sub-unit autonomy and collective problem-solving. We develop the structure of this dilemma, which is pervasive in multilevel systems with a strong element of shared policy-making and most pronounced in the EU. While a substantial part of the federalism literature considers this relationship as precarious and discusses ways to stabilize it, we propose an analytical perspective which focuses on actor dynamics, i.e., on the attempts of sub-units to change the balance between sub-unit autonomy and collective problem-solving by changing their position in two distinct dimensions: exit and voice. Exit measures the degree to which sub-units want to be subject to collective policies, voice measures the influence sub-units seek in collective decisions. We illustrate this framework with examples, mainly from the EU, and conclude that this perspective can shed new light on differentiated integration in the EU and open comparative inquiries.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Is there a Compliance Trilemma in International Law? Comment on Jeffrey L. Dunoff'}, series = {The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Foundational challenges}, booktitle = {The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Foundational challenges}, editor = {Krieger, Heike and Nolte, Georg and Zimmermann, Andreas}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, doi = {10.1093/oso/9780198843603.003.0013}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {204 -- 210}, abstract = {This chapter is a comment on Jeffrey L Dunoff's discussion of the compliance trilemma. It emphasizes that one needs to continue studying fuzzy concepts even if they are difficult to measure. Moreover, it argues that the compliance trilemma is a parsimonious tool for understanding tensions in global governance but not an inescapable structural constraint in an anarchic international system. Its tensions can be mediated or overcome by the clever design of international agreements or institutions.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsHerschinger2012, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva}, title = {Informell oder institutionalisiert? Die Internationalisierung der inneren Sicherheit}, series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {53}, journal = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, number = {3}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0720-4809}, doi = {10.5771/0032-3470-2012-3-493}, pages = {493 -- 514}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Although international police cooperation is not a new phenomenon and despite its relevance for the monopoly of force, studies applying a political science or international relations (IR) perspective are scarce. Through a 'competition of claims', this article reviews and organizes current literature on cooperation in internal security to highlight crucial points of entry for IR- and political science approaches. While both claims argue along the lines of functionalist regime theory, the 'informality claim' stresses state's interest to uphold autonomy and their accordant preference for informal cooperation. In contrast, the 'institutionalization claim' underscores the willingness of states to create formal and strong institutions as they promise effi ciency gains in light of transborder problems. By focusing on central issues in police cooperation (terrorism, drugs, money laundering, organized crime) this review highlights that internal security can become a prospering fi eld for IR- and political science theorizing.}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs2010, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Der Wandel des regulativen Mehrebenensystems in der EU}, series = {dms - der moderne staat}, volume = {3}, journal = {dms - der moderne staat}, number = {1}, publisher = {Budrich}, address = {Leverkusen}, issn = {1865-7192}, pages = {109 -- 124}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Das europ{\"a}ische Mehrebenensystem wird weithin durch eine spezifische Arbeitsteilung charakterisiert, wonach die europ{\"a}ische Ebene stark im Bereich Pareto-optimierender und eher unpolitischer Marktregulierung sei, den Mitgliedstaaten dagegen die klassischen Staatsaufgaben wie Sicherheit, Besteuerung oder Bildung vorbehalten blieben, die tief in individuelle Belange eingreifen. Der Beitrag zeigt anhand der inneren Sicherheit und der Steuerpolitik, dass sich die EU im Gegensatz zu diesem Standardmodell nicht auf Marktregulierung beschr{\"a}nkt, sondern auch staatliche Kernaufgaben intensiv reguliert. Ursache hierf{\"u}r sind externe Effekte der Schaffung des gemeinsamen Binnenmarktes und das Fehlen eigenst{\"a}ndiger Handlungsmittel in diesen Bereichen, das durch Regulierung kompensiert wird. Durch den vorherrschenden Modus der Regulierung bleiben die Eingriffe der EU aber weithin unsichtbar.}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Unity in Diversity : The European Union After the Fall of the Wall}, series = {IP - Global Edition}, volume = {10}, journal = {IP - Global Edition}, number = {11/12}, publisher = {BVA Bielefelder Verl.}, address = {Bielefeld}, issn = {1439-8443}, pages = {28 -- 31}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschel2009, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {The Fiscal Anatomy of a Regulatory Polity : Tax Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EU}, number = {43}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4580}, pages = {28}, year = {2009}, abstract = {The paper analyzes the common assumption that the EU has little power over taxation. We find that the EU's own taxing power is indeed narrowly circumscribed: Its revenues have evolved from rather supranational beginnings in the 1950s towards an increasingly intergovernmental system. Based on a comprehe nsive analysis of EU tax legislation and ECJ tax jurisprudence from 1958 to 2007, we show that at the same time, the EU exerts considerable regulatory control over the member states' taxing power and imposes tighter constraints on member state taxes than the US federal government imposes on state taxation. These findings contradict the standard account of the EU as a regulatory polity which specializes in apolitical issues of market creation and leaves political issues to the member states: Despite strong safeguards, the EU massively regulates the highly salient issue of member state taxation.}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The European Community and the Protection of the Zone Layer}, series = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {28}, journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/j.1468-5965.1990.tb00367.x}, pages = {261 -- 277}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EG-Umweltpolitik nach dem vierten Aktionsprogramm}, series = {Ars Aequi}, volume = {39}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, publisher = {Tjeenk Willink}, address = {Zwolle}, issn = {0004-2870}, pages = {493 -- 498}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The Institutional Framework of the EU}, series = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, booktitle = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, publisher = {Elgar}, address = {Cheltenham [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-1-84980-629-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4376}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {203 -- 213}, abstract = {The Handbook provides an authoritative overview of the MLG literature. . . it has the potential to be widely used as a source of reference. The book is systematically structured, and most chapters are of high quality. . .' Achim Hurrelmann, Environment and Planning C 'The editors have produced an authoritative and comprehensive guide to multi-level governance. The book ranges across the domestic context, supraregionalism and global governance all filtered through a sophisticated analytical framework and attention to policy detail. There is no better place to go than this book for a guide to the topic. An outstanding accomplishment.' David Held, London School of Economics, UK Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors an international group of highly renowned scholars report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsHerschingerKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {International Policing : Embedding the Monopoly of Force}, series = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, booktitle = {Handbook of Multi-level Governance}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4388}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {477 -- 486}, abstract = {The Handbook provides an authoritative overview of the MLG literature. . . it has the potential to be widely used as a source of reference. The book is systematically structured, and most chapters are of high quality. . .' Achim Hurrelmann, Environment and Planning C 'The editors have produced an authoritative and comprehensive guide to multi-level governance. The book ranges across the domestic context, supraregionalism and global governance all filtered through a sophisticated analytical framework and attention to policy detail. There is no better place to go than this book for a guide to the topic. An outstanding accomplishment.' David Held, London School of Economics, UK Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors an international group of highly renowned scholars report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsFriedrichsHerschingeretal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Friedrichs, J{\"o}rg and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Policing Among Nations: Internationalizing the Monopoly of Force}, number = {28}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4597}, pages = {29}, abstract = {International cooperation in the field of policing is linked to the definitional core of the state, the monopoly of the legitimate use of force (Max Weber). Whereas international cooperation in other fields has been widely analyzed, there is no systematic measure of the development and intensity of international police cooperation over time. The paper disaggregates the monopoly of force into three components (legitimation, methods and authorization) and analyzes how international police coop eration in Western Europe has developed since the 1960s and how strongly it impinges upon state sovereignty. Whereas in the 1960s, most international institutions in the field were only weak, the state monopoly of the legitimate use of force has been embedded, pooled or even delegated since the 1990s. Even in its core activity, the Western European state has become part of a multi-level system of governance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Germany and Relaunching Europe}, series = {The Strategic Triangle : France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe}, booktitle = {The Strategic Triangle : France, Germany, and the United States in the Shaping of the New Europe}, publisher = {J. Hopkins Univ. Press,}, address = {Baltimore}, isbn = {978-0-8018-8564-8}, pages = {309 -- 324}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Das Gewaltmonopol : Denationalisierung oder Fortbestand?}, series = {Transformationen des Staates}, booktitle = {Transformationen des Staates}, publisher = {Suhrkamp}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, isbn = {978-3-518-41743-0}, pages = {69 -- 91}, abstract = {Reform, Zur{\"u}ckdr{\"a}ngung, Abschaffung, Aufl{\"o}sung - wie geht es weiter mit dem Staat? Wie ist es um seine demokratische Legitimation, die Rechtsstaatlichkeit in Zukunft bestellt? Kann er seine klassischen Aufgaben, Sicherheit im Innern und nach außen, Garantie sozialer Gerechtigkeit, noch erf{\"u}llen? Diese Fragen machen deutlich: Angelegenheiten des angeblich b{\"u}rgerfernen Staates treffen in das Zentrum des Alltags des einzelnen. Von A wie Abfall bis Z wie Zulassung von Fahrzeugen, von {\"a}ußerer Sicherheit und Krieg {\"u}ber Verbrechensbek{\"a}mpfung und Terrorabwehr zu Nahverkehr und Autobahn und Verbraucher- oder Umweltschutz - der Staat gilt als all- und endverantwortlich. In seinem »Goldenen Zeitalter« in den sechziger Jahren des 20.Jahrhunderts vermochte er diese Aufgaben als souver{\"a}ner Nationalstaat mit unangetasteter Legitimit{\"a}t zu bew{\"a}ltigen. Das ist heute nicht mehr der Fall. Es entsteht zwar weder ein Weltstaat, noch wird das Gewaltmonopol zum Privateigentum. Aber der Staat zerfasert un{\"u}bersehbar: Einzelne Funktionen werden an internationale Organisationen abgegeben, wieder andere an Unternehmen. Die Diagnose der Gegenwart und eine empirisch fundierte Prognose der Zukunft des Staates sind das Anliegen der neun Untersuchungen, die zu der Schlußfolgerung gelangen: Wir werden eine Vielzahl von einschneidenden Transformationen erleben, und es stellt sich die Frage, ob man den Staat der Zukunft {\"u}berhaupt noch Staat nennen kann. (Inhaltsangabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Institutionelle Struktur und Governance in der EU}, series = {Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (PVS - Sonderheft 41)}, booktitle = {Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (PVS - Sonderheft 41)}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-531-91066-6}, pages = {600}, abstract = {Der Begriff Governance ist ein Erfolgsbegriff und zwar nicht nur in der Politikwissenschaft, sondern auch in anderen Disziplinen, selbst in der eher begriffskonservativen Rechtswissenschaft. Der Preis dieses Erfolges ist die Uneindeutigkeit des Governancebegriffs, was die Governance-Forschung dazu zwingt, sich {\"u}ber die Begriffsverwendung von Governance zu verst{\"a}ndigen und die Verwendungskontexte des Governancebegriffs analytisch sorgf{\"a}ltig auszudifferenzieren. Zu beidem will dieses PVS-Sonderheft einen weiterf{\"u}hrenden Beitrag leisten. In den Beitr{\"a}gen der Herausgeber und im ersten Teil des Bandes geht es um erste Konturen einer Theorie von Governance und die Pr{\"a}zisierung des Governancebegriffs. Der Abgrenzung und Sch{\"a}rfung des Governancebegriffs dienen ferner die Beitr{\"a}ge, die sich mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis zum historisch so dominanten Organisationsprinzip der Hierarchie auseinandersetzen. Mit dem Teil „Governance und Recht" wird gezielt ein multidisziplin{\"a}rer Dialog {\"u}ber das Governance-Konzept er{\"o}ffnet, und zwar in der Hoffnung, daraus gerade f{\"u}r ein Verst{\"a}ndnis von Governance als Koordination von Akteurshandeln in Regelungsstrukturen zu lernen. Die den Governanceebenen gewidmeten Teile - von „National" zu „Transnational" Governance - besch{\"a}ftigen sich mit unterschiedlichen Governance-Kontexten und unterschiedlichen Governance-Modi wie etwa Netzwerken und Public Private Partnerships. Sinn des Bandes ist also weniger eine Bestandsaufnahme der Governance-Forschung, sondern eine Verortung von Governancestrukturen und Governanceprozessen vor dem Hintergrund sich wandelnder Staatlichkeit. (Inhaltsangabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Entparlamentarisierung ; Denationalisierung ; Europ{\"a}isierung ; Intergouvernementalismus ; Komitologie (Lexika-Eintr{\"a}ge)}, series = {Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {1}, booktitle = {Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft}, edition = {3}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {3-406-51126-0}, pages = {567}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The European Union as a Polity (II)}, series = {Handbook of European Union Politics}, booktitle = {Handbook of European Union Politics}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London [u.a.]}, isbn = {9781412908757}, pages = {159 -- 173}, language = {en} } @misc{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity? : The European Integration of Core State Powers.}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {278}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Alles ganz normal! Eine institutionelle Analyse der Euro-Krise}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, volume = {20}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, number = {1}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0946-7165}, doi = {10.5771/0946-7165-2013-1-75}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4173}, pages = {75 -- 88}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EU als Dauerreformprojekt : Politische Ordnungsmodelle und ihre Implikationen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {1430-6387}, doi = {10.5771/1430-6387-2013-3-437}, pages = {437 -- 444}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {The European Integration of Core State Powers. Patterns and Causes}, series = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, booktitle = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {249 -- 270}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsGenschel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {Beyond Market Integration. Analysing the European Integration of Core State Powers}, series = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, booktitle = {Beyond the Regulatory Polity}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-966282-1}, pages = {1 -- 23}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsHerschingerKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Scratching the Heart of the Artichoke? : How International Institutions and the European Union Constrain the State Monopoly of Force.}, series = {European Political Science Review}, volume = {3}, journal = {European Political Science Review}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1862-2860}, doi = {10.1017/S175577391100004X}, pages = {445 -- 468}, abstract = {In recent years, a growing literature has argued that European Union (EU) member states have undergone a profound transformation caused by international institutions and by the EU, in particular. However, the state core - the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force, embodied by the police - seemed to remain intact. The literature has argued that in this area, international institutions are weak, and cooperation has remained informal and intergovernmental. We take issue with these claims and evaluate the strength of international institutions in two core areas of policing (terrorism and drugs) over time. We find that in terms of decision-making, precision, and adjudication, international institutions have become considerably stronger over time. Even when international institutions remain intergovernmental they strongly regulate how EU member states exercise their monopoly of force. Member states are even further constrained because adjudication is delegated to the European Court of Justice. Thus, even the state core is undergoing a significant transformation.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsGenschel2010, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp}, title = {How the European Union Constrains the State : Multilevel Governance of Taxation}, series = {European Journal of Political Research}, volume = {50}, journal = {European Journal of Political Research}, number = {3}, publisher = {Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0304-4130}, doi = {10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01939.x}, pages = {293 -- 314}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This article challenges the common assumption that the European Union (EU) has little power over taxation. Based on a comprehensive analysis of EU tax legislation and European Court of Justice (ECJ) tax jurisprudence from 1958 to 2007, the article shows that the EU exerts considerable regulatory control over the Member States' taxing power and imposes tighter constraints on Member State taxes than the American federal government imposes on American state taxation. These findings contradict the standard account of the EU as a regulatory polity that specialises in apolitical issues of market creation and leaves control of highly politicised core functions of government (defence, taxation, social security, education, etc.) to the Member States; despite strong treaty safeguards, national tax autonomy is undermined by EU regulation.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die internationale Regulierung des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, series = {Wozu Staat? Governance in R{\"a}umen begrenzter und konsolidierter begrenzter Staatlichkeit}, booktitle = {Wozu Staat? Governance in R{\"a}umen begrenzter und konsolidierter begrenzter Staatlichkeit}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-6971-4}, pages = {35 -- 53}, abstract = {Aufbauend auf den Arbeiten der Bremer und Berliner Sonderforschungsbereiche fragt der Band, was der Staat in R{\"a}umen konsolidierter und begrenzter Staatlichkeit zu effektiver und legitimer Governance beitr{\"a}gt: Welche Governance-Leistungen erbringt er in den Politikfeldern Sicherheit, Gesundheit, Umwelt und Finanzm{\"a}rkte? Welche Governance-Beitr{\"a}ge kommen von nicht-staatlichen Akteuren? Welche Beziehungs- und Konfliktmuster dominieren? Der Band zeigt, erstens, dass der Staat in keinem der untersuchten F{\"a}lle das Governance-Monopol h{\"a}lt, sondern immer auch nicht-staatliche Akteure Governance-Funktionen aus{\"u}ben. Zweitens finden wir ausgepr{\"a}gte Unterschiede zwischen den R{\"a}umen: W{\"a}hrend sich in R{\"a}umen konsolidierter Staatlichkeit tendenziell eine vom Staat moderierte Arbeitsteilung mit nicht-staatlichen Governance-Akteuren einstellt, ist das Verh{\"a}ltnis in R{\"a}umen begrenzter Staatlichkeit durch Konkurrenz und fehlende Hierarchie gekennzeichnet. Drittens unterscheidet sich das Zusammenspiel staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure kaum zwischen Politikfeldern. Die Analyse m{\"u}ndet in der Unterscheidung von vier idealtypischen Governance-Konstellationen staatlicher und nicht-staatlicher Akteure. (Angabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The Monopoly of Legitimate Force : Denationalization, or Business as Usual?}, series = {European Review}, volume = {13}, journal = {European Review}, number = {Sonderheft 1}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1062-7987}, doi = {10.1017/S1062798705000189}, pages = {37 -- 52}, abstract = {As Max Weber and many others in his tradition have argued, the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force is the core of the modern state. What counts here is not the frequency of the actual use of force but the fact that only the state has the legitimate right to use such force. The military and the police are the most concrete expressions of this monopoly. In recent decades, the use of the military and the police has been subject to external challenges - 'globalization' - and new ideas about police and military intervention. Although at an operational level the state retains full control over the actions of the police and military, the conditions for their use are increasingly shaped by institutionalized legitimating ideas.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Regieren jenseits der Staatlichkeit}, series = {Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland}, booktitle = {Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8329-0320-6}, pages = {495 -- 518}, abstract = {Das Werk legt eine Bestandsaufnahme der Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit der politikwissenschaftlichen Teildisziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen (IB) vor. Es wird gefragt, inwieweit im deutschsprachigen Raum eigenst{\"a}ndige Forschungsakzente entwickelt wurden, zu welchen Ertr{\"a}gen diese gef{\"u}hrt haben und inwieweit das Fachgebiet in der Lage ist, die realen Ver{\"a}nderungen konzeptionell und theoretisch so zu erfassen, dass sich daraus ein besseres Verst{\"a}ndnis der sich noch immer entfaltenden Umbruchsprozesse ergibt. Es zeigt sich, dass sich so etwas wie die »neuen« IB entwickelt haben. Im Vordergrund der Analyse stehen Prozesse wie Verrechtlichung, Sozialisierung und Globalisierung und weniger Strukturen wie Machtverteilung, Abh{\"a}ngigkeit oder Interdependenz. F{\"u}hrende AutorInnen stellen die »neuen« IB vor und reflektieren diese kritisch. Der Band ist unverzichtbar f{\"u}r die wissenschaftliche Selbstreflexion im Fach und bietet f{\"u}r Studierende einen perfekten Einstieg in gegenw{\"a}rtige Debatten. Der Band enth{\"a}lt Beitr{\"a}ge von: Michael Z{\"u}rn, Peter Mayer, Thomas Risse, Antje Wiener, Christopher Daase, Harald M{\"u}ller, Detlef F. Sprinz, Joachim Betz, Sebastian Harnisch, Martin List und Bernhard Zangl, Frank Schimmelfennig, Philipp Genschel, Christoph Scherrer, Markus Jachtenfuchs, Andreas N{\"o}lke, Mathias Albert, Klaus Dieter Wolf und Gunther Hellmann. (Angabe zum Buch)}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs2011, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Deepening and Widening Integration Theory}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, issn = {1466-4429}, doi = {10.1080/13501760210152475}, pages = {650 -- 657}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Theories of European integration have traditionally been inwardoriented and presented difficulties in coping with the issue of whether the EU constitutes only a single case. Theoretically oriented research on enlargement offers the possibility of helping us to arrive at generalizable knowledge. However, traditional dichotomies of scientific discourse tend to favour the mutual ignorance of empirical facts and prevent the establishment of better theories and cumulative knowledge.}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The Governance Approach to European Integration}, series = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {39}, journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/1468-5965.00287}, pages = {245 -- 264}, abstract = {This article argues that the study of European integration is divided into two distinct approaches: classical integration theory for which the shape of the Euro-polity is the dependent variable; and the governance approach for which it is the independent variable. An historical and conceptual overview of the approach focuses on the efficiency side of governance and excludes issues of democracy and legitimacy. From a sociology of knowledge perspective, the first part traces the roots of the present discussion back to three bodies of literature, namely studies on Europeanization, regulatory policy-making and network concepts. The second part presents the achievements of the approach: putting EU studies in a comparative perspective, directing attention towards democratic governance and bypassing old dichotomies on the future of the nation-state. The final section evaluates present shortcomings, most notably a bias toward problem-solving, the proliferation of case studies and the lack of a coherent theoretical perspective.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsDiezJung, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Diez, Thomas and Jung, Sabine}, title = {Which Europe? : Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order}, series = {European Journal of International Relations}, volume = {4}, journal = {European Journal of International Relations}, number = {4}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London [u.a.]}, issn = {1354-0661}, doi = {10.1177/1354066198004004002}, pages = {409 -- 445}, abstract = {Conflicts over the shape of the European Union are usually modelled as conflicts of interests. This article argues that the development of a polity depends not only on interests but also on normative ideas about a legitimate political order (`polity-ideas'). These polity-ideas are extremely stable over time and resistant to change because they are linked to the identity and basic normative orientations of the actors involved. The article has four parts: (1) a theoretical argument how to link ideas and polity development in the EU, (2) a methodological discussion containing four ideal-typical polity-ideas about the EU, (3) a comparative analysis of the development of these ideas in France, Germany and the United Kingdom from 1950 to 1995, and (4) a summary of the empirical findings and a discussion of areas of research for which the theoretical approach and the empirical results presented here might be useful.}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Theoretical Perspectives on European Governance}, series = {European Law Journal}, volume = {1}, journal = {European Law Journal}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, issn = {1468-0386}, doi = {10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00010.x}, pages = {115 -- 133}, abstract = {The paper reviews some theories of social science which could contribute to the development of a concept of European governance going beyond traditional notions, such as federal states' or 'international organisation'. The theoretical argument is based on the culturalist version of neo-institutionalism, which stresses the role of ideas in the functioning and transformation of a political order. It is claimed that both globalisation and functional differentiation transform existing nation-states and shape the emerging European polity. European governance is characterised as poly-centric and non-hierarchical. Finally, different approaches to the legitimation of such a polity are discussed. The paper comes to the conclusion that the emergence of a European political order is part of a process which could require a rethinking of basic social scientific concepts.}, language = {en} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Ideen und internationale Beziehungen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, volume = {2}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Beziehungen}, number = {2}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, pages = {417 -- 442}, language = {de} } @article{JachtenfuchsGehring, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Gehring, Thomas}, title = {Liability for Transboundary Environmental Damage : Towards a General Liability Regime?}, series = {European Journal of International Law}, volume = {4}, journal = {European Journal of International Law}, number = {1}, publisher = {Oxford Univ.Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0938-5428}, pages = {92 -- 106}, abstract = {Since 1980, the International Law Commission (ILQ has been engaged in drafting a comprehensive convention on liability for damage arising out of acts not prohibited by international law. During its work, the TLC has increasingly focused on transboundary environmental damage. Thus, the project may have considerable impact on the further development of this area of international law. This article analyzes the bask concepts of the project which have emerged so far. It assesses the political feasibility of the project in the light of the current state of international law concerning liability for environmental damage, given that a number of specific ultra-hazardous activities are already regulated by multilateral liability regimes. It concludes that the international community has increasingly accepted the obligation to regulate liability issues, which has improved the chances for victims to mount successful claims. However, this does not mean that states were prepared to compensate for transboundary environmental damage.}, language = {en} } @book{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die Konstruktion Europas. Verfassungsideen und institutionelle Entwicklung}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {3-7890-7906-5}, pages = {302}, abstract = {Ist der Verlauf der europ{\"a}ischen Integration nur von materiellen Interessen bestimmt oder spielen auch Ideen eine Rolle? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage wird zun{\"a}chst eine konstruktivistische Theorie der Bildung staatlicher Pr{\"a}ferenzen entwickelt. Der zweite Teil bietet eine methodisch reflektierte, systematisch vergleichende Untersuchung europapolitischer Vorstellungen ("Verfassungsideen") in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien seit 1950. Der dritte Teil analysiert ihre politische Wirksamkeit anhand der Verhandlungen zum Amsterdamer Vertrag. Ergebnis ist, daß in Bereichen, wo objektive Interessenlagen unklar sind, Ideen auch in zwischenstaatlichen Verfassungskonferenzen eine wesentliche Rolle spielen.}, language = {de} } @book{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {International Policy-Making as a Learning Process? : The European Union and the Greenhouse Effect}, publisher = {Avebury}, address = {Aldershot [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-1859721735}, pages = {222}, language = {en} } @book{JachtenfuchsGehring, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Gehring, Thomas}, title = {Haftung und Umwelt : Interessenkonflikte im internationalen Weltraum-, Atom- und Seerecht.}, publisher = {Peter Lang}, address = {Frankfurt am Main [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-3-631-40341-9}, pages = {296}, abstract = {Multilaterale Regelungen zur Haftung f{\"u}r Umweltsch{\"a}den im Weltraum-, Atom- und Seerecht sind nicht nur statische V{\"o}lkerrechtsnormen, sondern auch Produkte eines Prozesses der Interessendurchsetzung. Dieser dynamische Rechtserzeugungsprozeß wird mittels eines interdisziplin{\"a}ren Ansatzes untersucht, der die politischen Grundlagen des V{\"o}lkerrechts unterstreicht. Bislang {\"u}bernehmen Staaten nur dann v{\"o}lkerrechtliche Haftpflicht, wenn dies zur Durchsetzung eigener Interessen dient (Raumfahrt,Atomenergie). Im Regelfall versuchen sie dagegen, die risikoschaffende Industrie zur Haftung heranzuziehen. Sie haben daf{\"u}r wegweisende Modelle entwickelt ({\"O}lhaftungsfonds). Diese Untersuchung des Entstehungsprozesses der wichtigsten Umwelthaftungskonventionen bildet schließlich die Grundlage f{\"u}r die Beurteilung des Vorhabens der ILC zur Haftung f{\"u}r Sch{\"a}den durch v{\"o}lkerrechtlich nicht verbotene Aktivit{\"a}ten.}, language = {de} } @misc{ChalmersJachtenfuchsJoerges, author = {Chalmers, Damian and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Joerges, Christian}, title = {Adjusting to European Diversity : The End of the Eurocrats' Dream?}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press.}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {978-1-107-10718-2}, pages = {364}, language = {en} } @article{FlonkJachtenfuchsObendiek, author = {Flonk, Danielle and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Obendiek, Anke S.}, title = {Authority conflicts in internet governance: Liberals vs. sovereigntists?}, series = {Global Constitutionalism}, volume = {9}, journal = {Global Constitutionalism}, number = {2}, issn = {2045-3817}, doi = {10.1017/S2045381720000167}, pages = {364 -- 386}, abstract = {We analyse conflicts over norms and institutions in internet governance. In this emerging field, dispute settlement is less institutionalised and conflicts take place at a foundational level. Internet governance features two competing spheres of authority characterised by fundamentally diverging social purposes: A more consolidated liberal sphere emphasises a limited role of the state, private and multistakeholder governance and freedom of speech. A sovereigntist challenger sphere emphasises state control, intergovernmentalism and push against the preponderance of Western institutions and private actors. We trace the activation and evolution of conflict between these spheres with regard to norms and institutions in four instances: the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12), the fifth session of the United Nations Group of Governmental Experts (UNGGE) and the Budapest Convention of the Council of Europe. We observe intense norm collisions, and strategic attempts at competitive regime creation and regime shifting towards intergovernmental structures by the sovereigntist sphere. Despite these aggressive attempts at creating new institutions and norms, the existing internet governance order is still in place. Hence, authority conflicts in global internet governance do not necessarily lead to fragmentation.}, language = {en} } @article{BremerGenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Bremer, Bj{\"o}rn and Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Juncker's Curse? Identity, Interest, and Public Support for the Integration of Core State Powers†}, series = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {58}, journal = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {1}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/jcms.12980}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-36077}, pages = {56 -- 75}, abstract = {Abstract In this study we analysed the patterns and covariates of public support for the European integration of core state powers based on an original new survey. We found considerable variation across integration instruments, member states and policy issues. Horizontal transfers are supported more than vertical capacity building; member states from the EU's South-East are more supportive than states from the North-West; and support increases from debt relief to unemployment assistance, sharing the burdens of refugees, and military defence to disaster aid. Identity is a strong and fairly consistent predictor for individual variations in support. The association with respondents' interest is less consistent, but can be quite strong with respect to specific policy issues such as debt and unemployment. Overall, support for the integration of core state powers is higher and more variable than expected. This suggests there is considerable room for political agency rather than a general constraining dissensus.}, subject = {-}, language = {en} } @article{FreudlspergerJachtenfuchs, author = {Freudlsperger, Christian and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {A member state like any other? Germany and the European integration of core state powers}, series = {Journal of European Integration}, volume = {43}, journal = {Journal of European Integration}, number = {2}, issn = {Print ISSN: 0703-6337, Online ISSN: 1477-2280}, doi = {10.1080/07036337.2021.1877695}, pages = {117 -- 135}, abstract = {The EU has integrated core state powers in a largely unsustainable manner. Why is this? In this introduction to a special issue on Germany, we take an in-depth look at national preference-formation. We trace the impact of state elites, as emphasised by functionalist theories, and mass publics and political parties, as stressed by postfunctionalism. We find that across policy fields and with striking continuity over time, Germany acts as a normal member state. The country prefers the regulation of national capacities over the creation of European capacities, and (increasingly) the intergovernmental rather than supranational control of those capacities. Only in existential crises, Germany supports European capacity-building under intergovernmental control. This leads to unstable integration but is not an indicator of hegemonic dominance. Crucial from both a practical and theoretical perspective, there exists no major gap between state elites and political parties or public opinion on German preferences.}, language = {en} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Capacity-Building and the New Intergovernmentalism}, series = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {63}, journal = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {S1}, doi = {10.1111/jcms.13755}, pages = {65 -- 76}, language = {en} } @misc{DawsonJachtenfuchs, author = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Autonomy without collapse in a Better European Union}, editor = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780192897541}, pages = {208}, abstract = {The European Union's history exhibits numerous episodes in which Member States have sought to re-enforce their national autonomy in the face of deepening integration. Efforts to re-gain autonomy, however, are often accompanied by legitimate concerns that autonomy will lead to dis-integration or will have wider destructive consequences. The EU thus faces a dilemma. Calls for autonomy cannot all be dismissed as mere populist rhetoric or national egoism but instead represent a legitimate questioning of the degree of uniformity that EU law and politics presently carry. At the same time, the fear that greater autonomy may carry dis-integrative effects is also legitimate -uniformity is not an accidental by-product of the EU's construction but intrinsically related to its policy goals. Giving too much room for autonomy might create an opportunity structure for the loss of collective goods, deficits in problem-solving, and perhaps even to self-destruction. The EU requires autonomy, but in doing so, it must also avoid collapse. Can it achieve it, and if so, how? Autonomy without Collapse is devoted to exploring innovative answers to this question. It draws together scholars in law and political science interested in exploring how to overcome the central dilemma of preserving sustainable yet real autonomy in the future European Union.}, language = {en} } @incollection{DawsonJachtenfuchs, author = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Autonomy without Collapse? Towards a Better European Union.}, series = {Autonomy without Collapse in a Better European Union}, booktitle = {Autonomy without Collapse in a Better European Union}, editor = {Dawson, Mark and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780192897541}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {3 -- 20}, language = {en} } @article{FreudlspergerJachtenfuchs, author = {Freudlsperger, Christian and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Wendepunkt Corona-Krise? Deutsche Pr{\"a}ferenzen zur europ{\"a}ischen Integration staatlicher Kerngewalten seit Maastricht}, series = {integration}, volume = {44}, journal = {integration}, number = {2}, doi = {10.5771/0720-5120-2021-2-81}, pages = {81 -- 96}, abstract = {Did the Covid-19 crisis prompt a turn in German EU policy? Investigating the long-term development of German preferences on the European integration of core state powers, we find striking continuity. German governments persistently seek to minimise their costs from and maximise their control over integration. Consequently, they back supranational capacity-building primarily as a last resort in existential systemic crises. The Corona recovery fund, which is temporary and placed under intergovernmental control, is in line with this general long-term preference and does little to alleviate the structural flaws of the Euro area.}, language = {de} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Postfunctionalism reversed: solidarity and rebordering during the COVID-19 pandemic}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {28}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {3}, issn = {Print ISSN: 1350-1763, Online ISSN: 1466-4429}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2021.1881588}, pages = {350 -- 369}, abstract = {Postfunctionalism posits a tradeoff between the functional scale of governance and the territorial scope of community: functional scale is large and transnational for efficiency reasons; community is small-scale and (sub-)national for reasons of social trust and collective identification. COVID-19 has turned this tradeoff upside down: it has shrunk functional scale to the (sub-)national level in the name of security, while lifting expectations of community to the grand transnational scale in the name of solidarity. This reversal of scales has resulted in a rapid rebordering of the Single Market and the Schengen area on the one hand, and a significant debordering of fiscal risk and burden sharing on the other. We reconstruct the evolution of this double-movement from January to August 2020, contrast it to historical trends in the scale-community tradeoff of European integration, and discuss implications for postfunctionalist theory.}, language = {en} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchsMigliorati, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Migliorati, Marta}, title = {Differentiated integration as symbolic politics? Constitutional differentiation and policy reintegration in core state powers}, series = {European Union Politics}, journal = {European Union Politics}, doi = {10.1177/14651165221128291}, abstract = {What are the policy consequences of constitutional differentiation in core state powers? We argue that the most important consequence is not necessarily the exclusion of the constitutional outs from the policies of the ins, but their reintegration by different means. The outs often have strong functional and political incentives to re-join the policies they opted out from, and the ins have good reasons to help them back in. We develop a theoretical framework that derives the incentives for reintegration from the costs of a policy exclusion. We use a novel dataset of reintegration opportunities to map trends and patterns of reintegration across policy fields and member states. We analyze selected cases of reintegration to probe the plausibility of our theoretical argument.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschelMiglioratietal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp and Migliorati, Marta and Loschert, Franziska}, title = {Differentiated integration and core state powers: the EU budget and Justice and Home Affairs}, edition = {Working Paper, EUI RSC, 2022/47, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU)}, abstract = {This paper studies two areas of Core State Powers (CSP), i.e. the EU budget and Justice and Home Affairs. The two cases have the aim to reconstruct how Differentiated Integration (DI) has developed over time in these two specific domains. While the aim is the same for both cases, the way the cases are structured is substantially different. This is due to various reasons. First, the politics of the EU budget go back to the early days of the EU, while JHA is a post-Maastricht feature. This implies that the budget case study concentrates on a much longer time span. Second, DI in the budget interests several member states, while in JHA it is a phenomenon circumscribed to fewer members. Finally, the politics of the budget are decided through intergovernmental negotiations, while JHA is a rather supranationalised policy that relies a lot on secondary legislation and EU executive bodies such as EU agencies.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschelMigliorati, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp and Migliorati, Marta}, title = {Report on the expanded EUDIFF 1 dataset}, edition = {EUI RSC; 2022/40; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) }, pages = {57}, abstract = {This report provides a general overview of the dataset under construction for WP5, EUDIFF-RES, focusing on differentiated integration in core state powers (CSP) in the European Union (EU). The report explains the rationale behind the data collection and provides an outline of the information gathered so far. The aim of the report is to make the dataset easily accessible to anyone who wishes to utlise it for further research.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschelMigliorati, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp and Migliorati, Marta}, title = {Report on the expansion of the EUDIFF 1 dataset}, edition = {EUI RSC; 2022/38; Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) }, pages = {22}, abstract = {The present report makes an overview of the progresses made so far in Work Package 5. At this initial stage, the main aim was to develop a new coding for core state powers in EU legislation. Such coding serves the purpose of expanding EUDIFF1 through new information on core state powers integration. The report is structured as follows: after a brief introduction, Section I presents a tripartite categorization of core state powers modes of integration. Section II tests the plausibility of the proposed categorisations through an empirical analysis that explores primary legislation from 1952 to 2016. Section III discusses the possibility of a more fine-grained distinction.}, language = {en} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsGenschelMigliorati, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Genschel, Philipp and Migliorati, Marta}, title = {Report on patterns of variation in DI across areas of core state power and instruments of integration}, edition = {Working Paper, EUI RSC, 2022/39, Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) }, pages = {22}, abstract = {The paper summarises different patterns of differentiation and reintegration in core state powers during the post-Maastricht period, based on the EUDIFF-RES dataset. Moreover, it offers a theoretical framework able to explain the observed variation. The framework is further tested by means of short empirical illustrations taken from different policy areas. Overall, the EUDIFF-RES dataset substantially contributes to our understanding of CSP differentiated integration by revealing that the behaviour of states vis-a-vis core state powers varies greatly according to the kind of resource, as well as the costs and opportunities attached to it.}, language = {en} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchs, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {The security state in Europe: regulatory or positive?}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2023.2174580}, pages = {1447 -- 1457}, abstract = {We challenge Kruck and Weiss' argument about the regulatory security state on two counts. First, we contest the notion that the regulatory state is a viable alternative to the positive security state. While regulation and epistemic authority are increasingly important means of security provision, they remain critically dependent power resources and political authority that only the positive state provides. The regulatory security state is premised on the positive state and unviable without it. Second, the rise of the regulatory security state over the past three decades reflects highly specific historical conditions rather than a general trend. These conditions include unusually low geopolitical tensions in Europe and the strong regulatory bias of EU integration. Concepts matter: The wider the notion of security, the more relevant the regulatory security state becomes. It is an important reality but the war in Ukraine reminds us of the enduring centrality of the positive state.}, language = {en} } @article{FlonkJachtenfuchsObendiek, author = {Flonk, Dani{\"e}lle and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Obendiek, Anke}, title = {Controlling internet content in the EU: towards digital sovereignty}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {31}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2024.2309179}, pages = {2316 -- 2342}, abstract = {We analyse the rhetoric and reality of EU digital sovereignty by looking at content control. The control of online content is central to sovereignty because it relates to fundamental freedoms and democratic competition. Our main data source is the unique International Organizations in Global Internet Governance (IO-GIG) dataset which contains internet policy output documents across international institutions and issue areas between 1995 and 2021. By assessing policy output, we show structural trends in content control output in volume, bindingness, and orientation. By analysing policy discourse, we show the evolution of frames on content control over time. We find evidence for a comprehensive but still ongoing trend towards digital sovereignty in policy output and a shift from prioritising free access to the public order in discourse.}, language = {en} } @article{GenschelJachtenfuchsMigliorati, author = {Genschel, Philipp and Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Migliorati, Marta}, title = {Nur Symbolpolitik? Differenzierung und Reintegration staatlicher Kerngewalten}, series = {integration}, volume = {46}, journal = {integration}, number = {2}, doi = {10.5771/0720-5120-2023-2-146}, pages = {146 -- 161}, abstract = {Constitutional differentiation is often assumed to match perfectly with reality. We argue, however, that this is often not the case in core state powers. Constitutional differentiation often does not lead to the exclusion of the non-integrated member states ("outs") from the policies of the integrated member states ("ins") but to their reintegration by different means. We present a cost-benefit-model which argues that both "outs" and "ins" often have strong functional and political incentives to seek reintegration after an earlier decision for differentiation because the costs of exclusion are too high. We use a novel dataset of reintegration opportunities to map trends and patterns of reintegration across policy fields, reintegration instruments and member states in core state powers. We conclude by arguing that reintegration is a frequent but fragile phenomenon through which "ins" and "outs" cope with the costs of exclusion.}, language = {de} }