@book{BachFleischerHustedt, author = {Bach, Tobias and Fleischer, Julia and Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Organisation und Steuerung zentralstaatlicher Beh{\"o}rden. Agenturen im westeurop{\"a}ischen Vergleich}, publisher = {Edition Sigma}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-8360-7234-2}, pages = {95}, abstract = {Organisation und Steuerung nachgeordneter Beh{\"o}rden - mittlerweile auch Agenturen genannt - z{\"a}hlen in der internationalen Verwaltungsforschung wie auch der Verwaltungspraxis seit einigen Jahren zu den vieldiskutierten Themen. Dieser Band res{\"u}miert die neueren Forschungserkenntnisse zu nachgeordneten Beh{\"o}rden in Deutschland, Großbritannien, den Niederlanden und Schweden. Die AutorInnen diskutieren zentrale Argumente der Reformdebatten sowie die Errichtung, das institutionelle Design und die Aufgaben dieser Beh{\"o}rden. Rechtstraditionen, Politikstile sowie aufgabenspezifische Merkmale liefern wichtige Erkl{\"a}rungsbeitr{\"a}ge f{\"u}r die Entwicklung und Position nachgeordneter Beh{\"o}rden in diesen L{\"a}ndern. Ebenso wird ergebnisorientierte Steuerung {\"u}ber Leistungsvereinbarungen, Leistungsindikatoren und Berichtswesen in den Untersuchungsl{\"a}ndern unterschiedlich umgesetzt. Im Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass auch in Deutschland erste Schritte sichtbar werden, sich vorsichtig einer »neuen Steuerung« zu n{\"a}hern. Der internationale Vergleich bietet zahlreiche Anhaltspunkte, welche Probleme und M{\"o}glichkeiten mit der Organisation und Steuerung moderner Beh{\"o}rden verbunden sein k{\"o}nnen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{HustedtSalomonsen, author = {Hustedt, Thurid and Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg}, title = {From Neutral Competence to Competent Neutrality? Revisiting Neutral Competence as the Core Normative Foundation of the Western Bureaucracy}, series = {Bureaucracy in Transition}, booktitle = {Bureaucracy in Transition}, editor = {Byrkjeflot, Haldor and Engelstad, Fredrick}, edition = {Comparative Social Research (Yearbook Series) 33 (2018)}, publisher = {Emerald}, address = {Bingley}, isbn = {9781787432840}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {69 -- 88}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hustedt, author = {Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Verwaltung und der Umgang mit Krisen und Katastrophen}, series = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, booktitle = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, editor = {Veit, Sylvia and Reichard, Christoph and Wewer, G{\"o}ttrik}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-21563-7}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-21571-2_17-1}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {de} } @article{Hustedt, author = {Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias?}, series = {Policy Studies}, journal = {Policy Studies}, doi = {10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627}, abstract = {Research on policy advisory systems has rapidly proliferated over the last decade and now focuses on advisory system change dynamics. Yet, empirical studies predominantly focus on the study of policy advisory systems in Westminster systems and it is those studies upon which theorization relies. This paper argues that this Westminster-prevalence resulted in a Westminster-bias of our understanding of policy advisory systems and directs attention to more abstract or general analytical dimensions that may be relevant for the comparative study of policy advisory systems and research on advice systems in transitional and developing countries.}, language = {en} } @incollection{HustedtRadtke, author = {Hustedt, Thurid and Radtke, Ina}, title = {Die Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise als Herausforderung f{\"u}r die interministerielle Koordination in den Bundesl{\"a}ndern - das Fallbeispiel Rheinland-Pfalz}, series = {Verwaltungshandeln in der Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise}, booktitle = {Verwaltungshandeln in der Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise}, editor = {Bogumil, J{\"o}rg and Kuhlmann, Sabine and Proeller, Isabella}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {9783848755271}, doi = {10.5771/9783845296500-49}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {49 -- 64}, language = {de} } @incollection{HustedtTrein, author = {Hustedt, Thurid and Trein, Phillipp}, title = {Koordination und Integration im E-Government}, series = {Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung}, booktitle = {Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung}, editor = {Klenk, Tanja and Nullmeier, Frank and Wewer, G{\"o}ttrik}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-23669-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_53-1}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {Der f{\"o}derale Staatsaufbau und die konsensorientierten Institutionen des deutschen Regierungssystems schaffen einen hohen Koordinationsbedarf und erschweren die Integration neuer Technologien und Politiken in bestehende Strukturen. Dies zeigt sich auch beim E-Government, also der Digitalisierung der Verwaltung. Besonders die f{\"o}derale Organisation von Verwaltungszust{\"a}ndigkeiten verkompliziert die Koordination beim E-Government, w{\"a}hrend beispielsweise im Gesundheitsbereich die konsensorientierten Institutionen die Einf{\"u}hrung technischer Innovationen verlangsamen. Gewisse Fortschritte Deutschlands sind im internationalen Vergleich gleichwohl zu erkennen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{HustedtRandmaLiivSavi, author = {Hustedt, Thurid and Randma-Liiv, Tiina and Savi, Riin}, title = {Public Administration and Disciplines}, series = {European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward}, booktitle = {European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward}, editor = {Bouckaert, Geert and Jann, Werner}, publisher = {Leuven University Press}, address = {Leuven}, isbn = {978-94-6166-307-8}, doi = {10.2307/j.ctvv417th.11}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {129 -- 146}, abstract = {The public sector in our society has over the past two decades undergone substantial changes, as has the academic field studying Public Administration (PA). In the next twenty years major shifts are further expected to occur in the way futures are anticipated and different cultures are integrated. Practice will be handled in a relevant way, and more disciplines will be engaging in the field of Public Administration. The prominent scholars contributing to this book put forward research strategies and focus on priorities in the field of Public Administration. The volume will also give guidance on how to redesign teaching programmes in the field. This book will provide useful insights to compare and contrast European PA with PA in Europe, and with developments in other parts of the world.}, language = {en} } @article{RackwitzHustedtHammerschmid, author = {Rackwitz, Maike and Hustedt, Thurid and Hammerschmid, Gerhard}, title = {Digital transformation: From hierarchy to network-based collaboration? The case of the German "Online Access Act".}, series = {dms - der moderne staat - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Public Policy, Recht und Management}, volume = {14}, journal = {dms - der moderne staat - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Public Policy, Recht und Management}, number = {1}, doi = {10.3224/dms.v14i1.05}, pages = {101 -- 120}, abstract = {To unlock the full potential of ICT-related public sector innovation and digital transformation, governments must embrace collaborative working structures and leadership, is commonly argued. However, little is known about the dynamics of such collaborations in contexts of hierarchy, silo cultures, and procedural accountability. A widely voiced but empirically insufficiently substantiated claim is that bringing cross-cutting digital endeavours forward requires more lateral, network-based approaches to governance beyond traditional Weberian ideals. We test this claim by shedding light on three distinct challenges (complexity, risk, and power imbalance) encountered when implementing the specific collaborative case of the German Online Access Act (OAA) and by examining how they have been addressed in institutional design and leadership. Our analysis, which combines desk research and semi-structured expert interviews, reveals that flexible, horizontal approaches are on the rise. Taking a closer look, however, vertical coordination continues to serve as complementary means to problem-solving capability.}, language = {en} } @techreport{HammerschmidHustedt, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and Hustedt, Thurid}, title = {Querwechsler als Impulsgeber f{\"u}r die Verwaltung von morgen}, pages = {28}, language = {de} } @article{TreinBiesbroekBolognesietal., author = {Trein, Phillip and Biesbroek, Robbert and Bolognesi, Thomas and Cejudo, Guillermo M. and Duffy, Robert and Hustedt, Thurid and Meyer, Iris}, title = {Policy Coordination and Integration: A Research Agenda}, series = {Public Administration Review}, journal = {Public Administration Review}, issn = {1540-6210}, doi = {10.1111/puar.13180}, abstract = {Coordinating and integrating different policies and public sector organizations is a major challenge for practitioners and a continuing topic of interest for researchers. We argue that existing research on this topic needs reorientation to provide better insights for practice and theory of policymaking as well as policy implementation. We offer four suggestions on how future research could advance: (1) combining existing conceptual and epistemological approaches more systematically; (2) complementing case studies and surveys with large-N analyses and novel research tools and methods; (3) more systematic analysis of the causal mechanisms in policy coordination and integration; (4) more thorough study of the real-world impact of policy coordination and integration.}, language = {en} } @article{HustedtSeyfried, author = {Hustedt, Thurid and Seyfried, Markus}, title = {Inside the EU Commission: Evidence on the perceived relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy-Making}, series = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {56}, journal = {JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {2}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/jcms.12605}, pages = {368 -- 384}, abstract = {This article studies the perception of the EU Commission's Secretariat General in policy-making. Recently, research on EU institutions devotes increasing attention to analyzing structures and procedures of decision-making in EU institutions, most notably the EU Commission. Conventionally, the EU Commission is portrayed as a fragmented organization, divided along the lines of staff nationality, sectoral responsibilities and cabinets and General Directorates (DGs). The Secretariat General has long been viewed a weak actor that is hardly able or motivated to steer internal decision-making. However, recent research indicates a changing role of the Secretariat General as a pro-active broker and last arbiter. This article studies how the Secretariat General is perceived by the DGs in policy coordination and argues that this perception depends on the pattern of political authority, bureaucratic roles and the relevance and the alternatives prevailing in the policy field. The article is based on data from a survey among Commission officials.}, language = {en} }