@incollection{JachtenfuchsKraftKasackHerschinger, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kraft-Kasack, Christiane and Herschinger, Eva}, title = {Transgouvernementalisierung und die ausbleibende gesellschaftliche Politisierung der inneren Sicherheit}, series = {Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik}, booktitle = {Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik}, editor = {Z{\"u}rn, Michael and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias}, publisher = {Suhrkamp}, address = {Berlin}, pages = {190 -- 212}, language = {de} } @article{JachtenfuchsHerschinger2012, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva}, title = {Informell oder institutionalisiert? Die Internationalisierung der inneren Sicherheit}, series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {53}, journal = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, number = {3}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0720-4809}, doi = {10.5771/0032-3470-2012-3-493}, pages = {493 -- 514}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Although international police cooperation is not a new phenomenon and despite its relevance for the monopoly of force, studies applying a political science or international relations (IR) perspective are scarce. Through a 'competition of claims', this article reviews and organizes current literature on cooperation in internal security to highlight crucial points of entry for IR- and political science approaches. While both claims argue along the lines of functionalist regime theory, the 'informality claim' stresses state's interest to uphold autonomy and their accordant preference for informal cooperation. In contrast, the 'institutionalization claim' underscores the willingness of states to create formal and strong institutions as they promise effi ciency gains in light of transborder problems. By focusing on central issues in police cooperation (terrorism, drugs, money laundering, organized crime) this review highlights that internal security can become a prospering fi eld for IR- and political science theorizing.}, language = {de} } @techreport{JachtenfuchsFriedrichsHerschingeretal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Friedrichs, J{\"o}rg and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Policing Among Nations: Internationalizing the Monopoly of Force}, number = {28}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-4597}, pages = {29}, abstract = {International cooperation in the field of policing is linked to the definitional core of the state, the monopoly of the legitimate use of force (Max Weber). Whereas international cooperation in other fields has been widely analyzed, there is no systematic measure of the development and intensity of international police cooperation over time. The paper disaggregates the monopoly of force into three components (legitimation, methods and authorization) and analyzes how international police coop eration in Western Europe has developed since the 1960s and how strongly it impinges upon state sovereignty. Whereas in the 1960s, most international institutions in the field were only weak, the state monopoly of the legitimate use of force has been embedded, pooled or even delegated since the 1990s. Even in its core activity, the Western European state has become part of a multi-level system of governance.}, language = {en} } @article{JachtenfuchsHerschingerKasack, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Herschinger, Eva and Kasack, Christiane}, title = {Scratching the Heart of the Artichoke? : How International Institutions and the European Union Constrain the State Monopoly of Force.}, series = {European Political Science Review}, volume = {3}, journal = {European Political Science Review}, number = {3}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {1862-2860}, doi = {10.1017/S175577391100004X}, pages = {445 -- 468}, abstract = {In recent years, a growing literature has argued that European Union (EU) member states have undergone a profound transformation caused by international institutions and by the EU, in particular. However, the state core - the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force, embodied by the police - seemed to remain intact. The literature has argued that in this area, international institutions are weak, and cooperation has remained informal and intergovernmental. We take issue with these claims and evaluate the strength of international institutions in two core areas of policing (terrorism and drugs) over time. We find that in terms of decision-making, precision, and adjudication, international institutions have become considerably stronger over time. Even when international institutions remain intergovernmental they strongly regulate how EU member states exercise their monopoly of force. Member states are even further constrained because adjudication is delegated to the European Court of Justice. Thus, even the state core is undergoing a significant transformation.}, language = {en} }