@article{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {Ireland's Nice Referenda}, series = {European Constitutional Law Review}, volume = {1}, journal = {European Constitutional Law Review}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1017/S1574019605003573}, pages = {357 -- 382}, abstract = {Part One: Referenda required to amend Irish Constitution. Referenda on accession to EEC, the Single European Act, Maastricht and Amsterdam. Development by courts of rules for fairness of referendum campaigns. Referendum Acts and Referendum Commission. Part Two: First Nice Referendum dominated by euro-anxiety, Irish neutrality and enlargement. Second referendum on same subject not unusual and acceptable according to domestic criteria. Concessions and clarifications. Effect on the Convention on the Future of Europe. Part Three: implications for the Constitutional Treaty.}, language = {en} } @article{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation of Safe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling of International Protection}, series = {European Journal of Migration Law}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Journal of Migration Law}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1163/1571816054396842}, pages = {35 -- 69}, language = {en} } @article{CostelloDrake, author = {Costello, Cathryn and Drake, Sara}, title = {State liability in damages in the Irish and UK Courts}, series = {European Public Law}, volume = {9}, journal = {European Public Law}, pages = {366 -- 389}, language = {en} } @article{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {The Preliminary Reference Procedure and the 2000 Intergovernmental Conference}, series = {Dublin University Law Journal}, volume = {21}, journal = {Dublin University Law Journal}, pages = {40 -- 66}, language = {en} } @article{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {Market Access All Areas - The Treatment of Non-discriminatory Barriers to the Free Movement of Workers}, series = {Legal Issues on Economic Integration}, volume = {27}, journal = {Legal Issues on Economic Integration}, number = {3}, pages = {267 -- 277}, language = {en} } @incollection{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {Victim or Perpetrator? The Criminalised Migrant and the Idea of 'Harm' in the Labour Market Context}, series = {Criminality at Work}, booktitle = {Criminality at Work}, editor = {Blogg, Alan and Collins, Jennifer and Freedland, Mark and Herring, Jennifer}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198836995}, doi = {10.1093/oso/9780198836995.003.0016}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {309 -- 326}, abstract = {This chapter provides powerful arguments against the criminalization of irregular migration. It does so by testing the extensive criminalization of irregular migrants against standard liberal principles of criminalization. The chapter argues that it is very difficult to identify any direct wrongs or harms to others that arise in virtue of 'irregular' migration. Furthermore, a malum prohibitum offence cannot be justified. Against these weak arguments in favour of criminalization, this chapter identifies compelling reasons against criminalization. Criminalization leads to further criminalization, which ultimately undermines both migrants' and local workers' fundamental rights. It also blocks discussion of one particularly worker-protective regulatory response to irregular migration, namely regularization. In truth, the criminalization of migrants represents a context where there has been a decisive rupture with liberal principles of criminalization.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {On Refugeehood and Citizenship}, series = {Oxford Handbook of Citizenship}, booktitle = {Oxford Handbook of Citizenship}, editor = {Shachar, Ayelet and Baub{\"o}ck, Rainer and Bloemraad, Irene and Vink, Maarten}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198805854}, doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.31}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {This chapter explores the relationship between citizenship and refugeehood. In particular, it examines the extent to which loss of meaningful citizenship defines the predicament of the refugee. It then examines the status of refugee and refugee rights. Thirdly, it considers how refugeehood comes to an end, in particular the role of citizenship (new or restored) in ending refugeehood. Citizenship is formally viewed as bringing refugeehood to an end, whether that emerges as return to the home country or naturalisation in a new state. However, in practice, a new citizenship for many refugees remains out of reach, and the status of refugee often becomes an intergenerational carrier of civic and social exclusion. The reflects the realities of refugee containment, in contrast to the vision of shared responsibility that underpins the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees and the refugee regime.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Costello, author = {Costello, Cathryn}, title = {EU Migration and Asylum Law: A Labour Law Perspective}, series = {Research Handbook on EU Labour Law}, booktitle = {Research Handbook on EU Labour Law}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA}, doi = {10.4337/9781783471126.00020}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {299 -- 335}, abstract = {The purpose of this chapter is survey EU migration and asylum law from a labour law perspective. A labour law perspective is concerned with the work relationship, and focuses not only on the worker, but also the employing organisation and any intermediary involved in labour supply. Examining EU migration and asylum law using this multifaceted prism of labour law reveals that EU migration and asylum law has a profound impact on labour law. That impact may be understood has having three different dimensions. (1) It affects the supply and demand for migrant workers. In this sense, migration law can be a form of labour market regulation. (2) migration and asylum law create different migration statuses that in turn determine, at least in part, labour rights. The move to re-introduce status over contract as a determinant of workers' rights divides the subjects of labour law. (3) Migration status and the fact of migration may be risk factors for labour exploitation. In order to examine these three facets, the particular role of the EU in this field must be explained. Part 1 provides a sketch of the role of states and markets in the regulation of migration. It sets the scene to understand the profound but limited role of the EU in this context. Part 2 examines the status of EU Citizenship, and the forms of liberalised free movement in the EU's internal market, that principally benefit those who hold the nationality of an EU Member State. I also consider two important derivative statuses for so-called third country nationals (TCNs), who gain EU rights as family members of EU Citizens and so-called 'posted workers'. Part 3 concerns those TCNs who require permission to live and work in the EU, and provides an overview of some of the different statuses created by EU law, and their labour rights content. Part 4 explores the notion of 'irregular status', and the EU Employer Sanctions Directive and the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in T{\"u}mer contrasted. In the final part, Part 6, I briefly highlight some features of migration status that are risk factors for labour exploitation. A recent EU Fundamental Rights Agency Report details the links between migration and extreme labour exploitation. Current responses focus unhelpfully on trafficking, or on forced labour, and look in particular to criminal law for solutions. This chapter recalls some responses from within labour law. It is suggested that further research is required into the question of which regulatory approaches and combinations thereof work best to protect migrant workers from exploitation.}, language = {en} } @incollection{CostelloMouzourakis, author = {Costello, Cathryn and Mouzourakis, Minos}, title = {The Common European Asylum System - Where did it all go wrong?}, series = {The European Union as an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice}, booktitle = {The European Union as an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice}, editor = {Fletcher, Maria and Herlin-Karnell, Ester and Matera, Claudio}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {Abingdon, Oxford}, isbn = {9780367193454}, doi = {10.4324/9781315738284}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {263 -- 300}, language = {en} } @incollection{CostelloFreedland, author = {Costello, Cathryn and Freedland, Mark}, title = {Seasonal Workers and Intra-Corporate Transferees in EU Law: Capital's Handmaidens?}, series = {Temporary Labour Migration in the Global Era: The Regulatory Challenges}, booktitle = {Temporary Labour Migration in the Global Era: The Regulatory Challenges}, editor = {Howe, Joanna and Owens, Rosemary}, publisher = {Hart Publishing}, address = {Oxford and Portland, Oregon}, isbn = {9781509906291}, doi = {10.5040/9781509906307.ch-002}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {43 -- 64}, abstract = {This chapter compares and contrasts two recent European enactments on particular forms of temporary labour migration: seasonal work and intra-corporate transfers (ICTs). Both the Seasonal Workers Directive (SWD)1 and the ICT Directive (ICTD)2 were adopted in 2014. They are typical of the EU's piecemeal approach to labour migration, which creates a multiplicity of distinct statuses.3 We frame the comparison in light of our previous work examining the impact of migration law on labour law (section II). By way of general contribution to this collection's themes, we also offer some observations on the challenges of regulating temporary labour migration under current conditions of globalisation (section III), and seek to explain some of the specificities of the EU's role in regulating immigration (section IV)}, language = {en} } @incollection{CostelloTsourdi, author = {Costello, Cathryn and Tsourdi, Lilian}, title = {The Evolution of EU Law on Refugees and Asylum}, series = {The Evolution of EU Law}, booktitle = {The Evolution of EU Law}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, publisher = {Hertie School}, abstract = {In this contribution, we explore evolution and stasis in EU asylum law and policy. We identify two tensions at the heart of the CEAS, between the commitment to protection and deflection of protection obligations, and between internal mobility within the EU and the immobilization of asylum seekers and refugees. We note the role of these foundational tensions in generating and exacerbating the 'refugee crisis' of 2015/16. This chapter is premised on a widely-shared understanding of the role of EU asylum policy in that crisis, namely that by illegalizing the travel of asylum seekers and refugees in search of protection, it contributes to the dangerous mass flight, which in turn generates humanitarian and political crises. We then analyse four key dimensions of EU asylum policy in light of these tensions: access to asylum, responsibility-allocation, legislative harmonisation, and institutionalised practical co-operation. Across these four fields, we identify the limits of EU law, and its general stasis, in spite of changes in Treaty telos, law-making processes, and EU enlargement. We briefly consider the role of the CJEU, still very much in the shadow of the ECtHR in asylum, in spite of its numerous rulings on the CEAS. Overall, we demonstrate its fairly minimalist approach in this area, avoidance of controversial cases by dubious use of inadmissibility findings, and failure to catalyse policy changes. Against this backdrop of legislative, political and judicial caution and inertia, we identify two key trends: a move towards greater institutional cooperation, including through the creation of a dedicated agency, the European Asylum Support Office (EASO), and a general flight from law in this policy field. We conclude by considering the likely impact of these trends on EU asylum law.}, language = {en} } @incollection{MouzourakisCostello, author = {Mouzourakis, Minos and Costello, Cathryn}, title = {Effective judicial protection of migrants and refugees? The role of Europes supranational courts in protecting and generating rights}, series = {Research Handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law}, booktitle = {Research Handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law}, editor = {Tsourdi, Evangelia and De Bruycker, Philippe}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham, UK}, isbn = {9781786439628}, doi = {10.4337/9781786439635.00010}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {79 -- 97}, abstract = {This chapter examines the caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on access to protection, the Dublin system and presumptions of 'safety', and detention, in order to provide critical insights into the concept of effective judicial protection in Europe since the so-called 'refugee crisis' of 2015. The two courts have not provided effective protection in a transformative sense, in that they have not adopted progressive rulings to overcome the crisis-inducing elements of European asylum and migration law. Instead, they have deferred to governmental accounts of 'crisis' and accepted dubious factual and legal arguments. Against this backdrop, we note that the need for effective judicial protection in even a minimal sense, to hold the line on the most basic of rights in this field - protection against refoulement and arbitrary detention - is more acute than ever, and may also be in decline.}, language = {en} } @techreport{SherwoodCostelloMcDonnell, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Sherwood, Angela and Costello, Cathryn and McDonnell, Emilie}, title = {The Displacement Regime Complex: Reform for Protection}, edition = {No. 09}, doi = {10.48462/opus4-5320}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-53209}, pages = {32}, abstract = {This working paper aims to examine the 'displacement regime complex', displacement referring to both internally and externally displaced persons, taking into account the competing roles of UNHCR and IOM in both spheres of activity. The title of the paper 'Reform for protection', aims to outline institutional reforms that aim to increase protection for the displaced, informed by binding universal human rights standards, and institutional principles relating to accountability and participation of most affected populations.}, language = {en} } @incollection{SherwoodLemayCostello, author = {Sherwood, Angela and Lemay, Isabelle and Costello, Cathryn}, title = {IOM's Immigration Detention Practices and Policies: Human Rights, Positive Obligations and Humanitarian Duties}, series = {IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion}, booktitle = {IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion}, editor = {Bradley, Megan and Costello, Cathryn and Sherwood, Angela}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, isbn = {9781009184175}, doi = {10.1017/9781009184175.016}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {360 -- 396}, abstract = {This chapter analyses IOM's practices and policies on immigration detention from the 1990s to date, spanning a period of significant change in its approaches to detention. The chapter first distills pertinent international human rights law (IHRL) on migration-related detention, and then examines IOM's normative statements concerning detention. It shows that while IOM generally emphasises international legal standards, it also tends to stress states' 'prerogative' to detain, frame alternatives to detention (ATDs) as a desirable option rather than a legal obligation, and weave an operational role for itself, notably through assisted voluntary returns (AVRs). The chapter then interrogates IOM's involvement in detention through four case studies. These reveal not only IOM's changing role regarding detention, but its enduring part in a global system whereby powerful states and regions seek to contain protection seekers 'elsewhere.' The chapter concludes that, without constitutional and institutional change to ensure it meets its positive human rights obligations, and deeper critical reflection on its humanitarian duties, IOM's practice risks expanding and legitimating detention.}, language = {en} } @article{RomanelloWalawenderHsuetal., author = {Romanello, Marina and Walawender, Maria and Hsu, Shih-Che and Moskeland, Annalyse and Palmeiro-Silva, Yasna and Scamman, Daniel and Ali, Zakari and Ameli, Nadia and Angelova, Denitsa and Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja and Basart, Sara and Beagley, Jessica and Beggs, Paul J and Blanco-Villafuerte, Luciana and Cai, Wenjia and Callaghan, Max and Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid and Chambers, Jonathan D and Chicmana-Zapata, Victoria and Chu, Lingzhi and Cross, Troy J and van Daalen, Kim R and Dalin, Carole and Dasandi, Niheer and Dasgupta, Shouro and Davies, Michael and Dubrow, Robert and Eckelman, Matthew J and Ford, James D and Freyberg, Chris and Gasparyan, Olga and Gordon-Strachan, Georgiana and Grubb, Michael and Gunther, Samuel H and Hamilton, Ian and Hang, Yun and H{\"a}nninen, Risto and Hartinger, Stella and He, Kehan and Heidecke, Julian and Hess, Jeremy J and Jamart, Louis and Jankin, Slava and Jatkar, Harshavardhan and Jay, Ollie and Kelman, Ilan and Kennard, Harry and Kiesewetter, Gregor and Kinney, Patrick and Kniveton, Dominic and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Lampard, Pete and Lee, Jason K W and Lemke, Bruno and Li, Bo and Liu, Yang and Liu, Zhao and Llabr{\´e}s-Brustenga, Alba and Lott, Melissa and Lowe, Rachel and Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime and Maslin, Mark and McAllister, Lucy and McMichael, Celia and Mi, Zhifu and Milner, James and Minor, Kelton and Minx, Jan and Mohajeri, Nahid and Momen, Natalie C and Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar and Morrisey, Karyn and Munzert, Simon and Murray, Kris A and Obradovich, Nick and O'Hare, Megan B and Oliveira, Camile and Oreszczyn, Tadj and Otto, Matthias and Owfi, Fereidoon and Pearman, Olivia L and Pega, Frank and Perishing, Andrew J and Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina and Ponmattam, Jamie and Rabbaniha, Mahnaz and Rickman, Jamie and Robinson, Elizabeth and Rockl{\"o}v, Joacim and Rojas-Rueda, David and Salas, Renee N and Semenza, Jan C and Sherman, Jodi D and Shumake-Guillemot, Joy and Singh, Pratik and Sj{\"o}din, Henrik and Slater, Jessica and Sofiev, Mikhail and Sorensen, Cecilia and Springmann, Marco and Stalhandske, Z{\´e}lie and Stowell, Jennifer D and Tabatabaei, Meisam and Taylor, Jonathon and Tong, Daniel and Tonne, Cathryn and Treskova, Marina and Trinanes, Joaquin A and Uppstu, Andreas and Wagner, Fabian and Warnecke, Laura and Whitcombe, Hannah and Xian, Peng and Zavaleta-Cortijo, Carol and Zhang, Chi and Zhang, Ran and Zhang, Shihui and Zhang, Ying and Zhu, Qiao and Gong, Peng and Montgomery, Hugh and Costello, Anthony}, title = {The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: facing record-breaking threats from delayed action}, series = {The Lancet}, volume = {404}, journal = {The Lancet}, number = {10465}, publisher = {Elsevier BV}, issn = {0140-6736}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01822-1}, pages = {1847 -- 1896}, language = {en} } @techreport{BriddickCostello, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Briddick, Catherine and Costello, Cathryn}, title = {Supreme Judgecraft: Non-Refoulement and the end of the UK-Rwanda 'deal'?}, series = {Verfassungsblog}, journal = {Verfassungsblog}, number = {2023/11/20}, doi = {10.59704/6ac71ea278f0af98}, language = {en} } @article{RomanelloNapoliGreenetal., author = {Romanello, Marina and Napoli, Claudia di and Green, Carole and Kennard, Harry and Lampard, Pete and Scamman, Daniel and Walawender, Maria and Ali, Zakari and Ameli, Nadia and Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja and Beggs, Paul J and Belesova, Kristine and Berrang Ford, Lea and Bowen, Kathryn and Cai, Wenjia and Callaghan, Max and Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid and Chambers, Jonathan and Cross, Troy J and van Daalen, Kim R and Dalin, Carole and Dasandi, Niheer and Dasgupta, Shouro and Davies, Michael and Dominguez-Salas, Paula and Dubrow, Robert and Ebi, Kristie L and Eckelman, Matthew and Ekins, Paul and Freyberg, Chris and Gasparyan, Olga and Gordon-Strachan, Georgiana and Graham, Hilary and Gunther, Samuel H and Hamilton, Ian and Hang, Yun and H{\"a}nninen, Risto and Hartinger, Stella and He, Kehan and Heidecke, Julian and Hess, Jeremy J and Hsu, Shih-Che and Jamart, Louis and Jankin, Slava and Jay, Ollie and Kelman, Ilan and Kiesewetter, Gregor and Kinney, Patrick and Kniveton, Dominic and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Larosa, Francesca and Lee, Jason K W and Lemke, Bruno and Liu, Yang and Liu, Zhao and Lott, Melissa and Lotto Batista, Mart{\´i}n and Lowe, Rachel and Odhiambo Sewe, Maquins and Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime and Maslin, Mark and McAllister, Lucy and McMichael, Celia and Mi, Zhifu and Milner, James and Minor, Kelton and Minx, Jan C and Mohajeri, Nahid and Momen, Natalie C and Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar and Morrissey, Karyn and Munzert, Simon and Murray, Kris A and Neville, Tara and Nilsson, Maria and Obradovich, Nick and O'Hare, Megan B and Oliveira, Camile and Oreszczyn, Tadj and Otto, Matthias and Owfi, Fereidoon and Pearman, Olivia and Pega, Frank and Pershing, Andrew and Rabbaniha, Mahnaz and Rickman, Jamie and Robinson, Elizabeth J Z and Rockl{\"o}v, Joacim and Salas, Renee N and Semenza, Jan C and Sherman, Jodi D and Shumake-Guillemot, Joy and Silbert, Grant and Sofiev, Mikhail and Springmann, Marco and Stowell, Jennifer D and Tabatabaei, Meisam and Taylor, Jonathon and Thompson, Ross and Tonne, Cathryn and Treskova, Marina and Trinanes, Joaquin A and Wagner, Fabian and Warnecke, Laura and Whitcombe, Hannah and Winning, Matthew and Wyns, Arthur and Yglesias-Gonz{\´a}lez, Marisol and Zhang, Shihui and Zhang, Ying and Zhu, Qiao and Gong, Peng and Montgomery, Hugh and Costello, Anthony}, title = {The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms}, series = {The Lancet}, volume = {402}, journal = {The Lancet}, number = {10419}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7}, pages = {2346 -- 2394}, language = {en} } @article{RomanelloWalawenderHsuetal., author = {Romanello, Marina and Walawender, Maria and Hsu, Shih-Che and Moskeland, Annalyse and Palmeiro-Silva, Yasna and Scamman, Daniel and Smallcombe, James W and Abdullah, Sabah and Ades, Melanie and Al-Maruf, Abdullah and Ameli, Nadia and Angelova, Denitsa and Ayeb-Karlsson, Sonja and Ballester, Joan and Basaga{\~n}a, Xavier and Bechara, Hannah and Beggs, Paul J and Cai, Wenjia and Campbell-Lendrum, Diarmid and Charnley, Gina E C and Courtenay, Orin and Cross, Troy J and Dalin, Carole and Dasandi, Niheer and Dasgupta, Shouro and Davies, Michael and Eckelman, Matthew and Freyberg, Chris and Garcia Corral, Paulina and Gasparyan, Olga and Giguere, Joseph and Gordon-Strachan, Georgiana and Gumy, Sophie and Gunther, Samuel H and Hamilton, Ian and Hang, Yun and H{\"a}nninen, Risto and Hartinger, Stella and He, Kehan and Heidecke, Julian and Hess, Jeremy J and Jankin, Slava and Jay, Ollie and Pantera, Dafni Kalatzi and Kelman, Ilan and Kennard, Harry and Kiesewetter, Gregor and Kinney, Patrick and Kniveton, Dominic and Koubi, Vally and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Lampard, Pete and Lee, Jason K W and Lemke, Bruno and Li, Bo and Linke, Andrew and Liu, Yang and Liu, Zhao and Lowe, Rachel and Ma, Siqi and Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe and Maia, Carla and Markandya, Anil and Martin, Greta and Martinez-Urtaza, Jaime and Maslin, Mark and McAllister, Lucy and McMichael, Celia and Mi, Zhifu and Milner, James and Minor, Kelton and Minx, Jan and Mohajeri, Nahid and Momen, Natalie C and Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar and Morrisey, Karyn and Munzert, Simon and Murray, Kris A and Obradovich, Nick and Orgen, Papa and Otto, Matthias and Owfi, Fereidoon and Pearman, Olivia L and Pega, Frank and Pershing, Andrew J and Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina and Ponmattam, Jamie and Rabbaniha, Mahnaz and Repke, Tim and Roa, Jorge and Robinson, Elizabeth and Rockl{\"o}v, Joacim and Rojas-Rueda, David and Ruiz-Cabrejos, Jorge and Rusticucci, Matilde and Salas, Renee N and San Jos{\´e} Plana, Adri{\`a} and Semenza, Jan C and Sherman, Jodi D and Shumake-Guillemot, Joy and Singh, Pratik and Sj{\"o}din, Henrik and Smith, Matthew R and Sofiev, Mikhail and Sorensen, Cecilia and Springmann, Marco and Stowell, Jennifer D and Tabatabaei, Meisam and Tartarini, Federico and Taylor, Jonathon and Tonne, Cathryn and Treskova, Marina and Trinanes, Joaquin A and Uppstu, Andreas and Valdes-Ortega, Nicolas and Wagner, Fabian and Watts, Nick and Whitcombe, Hannah and Wood, Richard and Yang, Pu and Zhang, Ying and Zhang, Shaohui and Zhang, Chi and Zhang, Shihui and Zhu, Qiao and Gong, Peng and Montgomery, Hugh and Costello, Anthony}, title = {The 2025 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: climate change action offers a lifeline}, series = {The Lancet}, volume = {406}, journal = {The Lancet}, number = {10521}, publisher = {Elsevier BV}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01919-1}, pages = {2804 -- 2857}, language = {en} } @incollection{CostelloWriedt, author = {Costello, Cathryn and Wriedt, Vera}, title = {Regional Human Rights Courts}, series = {Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Migration and Asylum Law}, booktitle = {Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Migration and Asylum Law}, editor = {Chetail, Vincent}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, doi = {10.4337/9781802204155.00085}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {461 -- 467}, language = {en} }