@article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Investitionen in die Vergangenheit}, series = {Berliner Republik}, volume = {2008}, journal = {Berliner Republik}, number = {4}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Kann man Bildung kaufen?}, series = {Berliner Republik}, volume = {2008}, journal = {Berliner Republik}, number = {3}, language = {de} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {A "Family Friendly" Welfare State - Addressing the Gender Equality Paradox}, series = {The Predistribution Agenda: Tackling Inequality and Supporting Sustainable Growth}, booktitle = {The Predistribution Agenda: Tackling Inequality and Supporting Sustainable Growth}, publisher = {I.B. Tauris}, address = {London}, pages = {209 -- 222}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Die Modernisierung des deutschen Modells}, series = {Berliner Republik: das Debattenmagazin}, volume = {2006}, journal = {Berliner Republik: das Debattenmagazin}, number = {1}, edition = {Welche Gerechtigkeit braucht Deutschland}, publisher = {Berliner Vorw{\"a}rts-Verlagsges.}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1616-4903}, language = {de} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {A Family Friendly Welfare State}, series = {The Predistribution Agenda: Tackling Inequality and Supporting Sustainable Growth}, booktitle = {The Predistribution Agenda: Tackling Inequality and Supporting Sustainable Growth}, publisher = {I.B. Tauris}, address = {London}, isbn = {978-1-78453-441-7}, pages = {209 -- 222}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {L{\"o}hne aus Warschau?}, series = {Berliner Republik: das Debattenmagazin}, volume = {2006}, journal = {Berliner Republik: das Debattenmagazin}, number = {4}, edition = {Wach auf, Mann!}, publisher = {Berliner Vorw{\"a}rts-Verlagsges.}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1616-4903}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Wer w{\"u}rde noch zweifeln? Ein erfrischend n{\"u}chterner Wind weht durch das Land}, series = {Berliner Republik}, volume = {2004}, journal = {Berliner Republik}, number = {6}, language = {de} } @techreport{HasselEichhorst, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hassel, Anke and Eichhorst, Werner}, title = {Are There Austerity Related Policy Changes in Germany?}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Trade Unions and the Future of Democratic Capitalism}, series = {The Politics of Advanced Capitalism}, booktitle = {The Politics of Advanced Capitalism}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The German model in transition}, series = {The German Model - seen by its neighbours}, booktitle = {The German Model - seen by its neighbours}, publisher = {SE Publishing}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Wie weiter mit der Mitbestimmung?}, series = {Berliner Republik}, volume = {2005}, journal = {Berliner Republik}, number = {1}, language = {de} } @book{HasselWegrich, author = {Hassel, Anke and Wegrich, Kai}, title = {How to do Public Policy}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198747000}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {400}, abstract = {How to Do Public Policy offers a guide to students and practitioners on how to improve problem-solving with policies in a political world. It integrates insights from applied policy analysis and studies of the policy process to develop a framework that conceives policy-making as structured by two spheres of action - the 'engine room' of specialists and experts in government agencies, NGOs, research organizations etc., on the one hand, and the political 'superstructure' of politicians, key public stakeholders and the public, on the other hand. Understanding the different logics of the engine room and the superstructure is key for successful policy-making. The dual structure of policy-making provides a perspective on policy-analysis (interactive policy analysis) and policy-making (actor-centred policy-making) that moves from the focus on individual and specific measures, towards understanding and shaping the relation and interaction between policy interventions, the institutional context and the stakeholders involved or affected. Part I of the book presents the basic analytical concepts needed to understand the policy process and the structures and dynamics involved in it, as well as to understand how and why actors behave the way they do-and how to engage with different types of actors. Part II moves further into the nuts and bolts of policy-making, including policy design, implementation, and evaluation. Part III introduces and explores three key aspects of the capacity to make good policies: engagement with stakeholders, the process of policy coordination in a context of interdependence, and the role of institutions.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {No Way to Escape Imbalances in the Eurozone? Three Sources for Germany's Export Dependency: Industrial Relations, Social Insurance and Fiscal Federalism}, series = {German Politics}, volume = {26}, journal = {German Politics}, number = {3}, issn = {0964-4008}, doi = {10.1080/09644008.2017.1342813}, pages = {360 -- 379}, abstract = {Over the last two decades, the German political economy has increasingly relied on export specialisation as a strategy for economic recovery. This export-led development strategy turned out to be a mixed blessing. While, on the one hand, specialisation in high-quality manufactured goods has preserved Germany's competitive edge vis-{\`a}-vis many other industrialised countries, it has, on the other hand, led to an increasing dependency on exports as the engine for growth. There has been no equally strong evolution of a domestic service economy beyond manufacturing-related services. The issue of export dependency becomes increasingly important in light of the financial crisis and global imbalances, vis-{\`a}-vis Greece and the Eurozone but also globally. Weak aggregate demand depresses both domestic employment and endangers the still fragile construction of the Eurozone. The paper argues that Germany finds itself in an export-dependency trap due to imbalances between domestic services and export-driven manufacturing. It analyses three sources for the over-reliance on export-oriented manufacturing and weak employment in domestic services: firstly, the industrial relations system, secondly, the social insurance financing of the welfare state and thirdly, fiscal federalism. All three are fundamental pillars of the German political economy and locked into political coalitions that are not easily changed.}, language = {en} } @book{HasselPalier, author = {Hassel, Anke and Palier, Bruno}, title = {Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, isbn = {9780198866176}, doi = {10.1093/oso/9780198866176.001.0001}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {480}, abstract = {Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies takes stock of the major economic challenges that advanced industrial democracies have faced since the early 1990s and the responses by governments to them. It has three goals: firstly, to further our understanding of how political economies have transformed over the past decades; secondly, to analyse the contribution of governments to these changes, by looking at their growth strategies and thirdly, to highlight and analyse the role of the reforms of welfare systems in this transformative change. In a nutshell, this book maps and provides general understanding of the evolution of growth regimes in advanced capitalist countries. It identifies five main growth regimes in contemporary advanced capitalist economies (three export-led and two domestic demand-led ones). To do so the book combines a supply side approach to economic growth as advocated by the Varieties of Capitalism Literature (OUP, 2001) with a demand side perspective as the recent discussion on growth models has exemplified. It argues that all political economies consist of growth regimes, which are based on a set of institutions that shape the supply side of the economy as well as on demand drivers such as government spending and private consumption. Both supply and demand are heavily shaped by the welfare state which provides for skills through education systems and stimulates demand through high social spending and private pension funds. The book focuses on the analysis of welfare reforms as growth strategies pursued by governments in an era characterised by financialization and the rise of the knowledge economy.}, language = {en} } @article{NaczykHassel, author = {Naczyk, Marek and Hassel, Anke}, title = {Insuring individuals … and politicians: financial services providers, stock market risk and the politics of private pension guarantees in Germany}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {26}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2019.1574873}, pages = {579 -- 598}, abstract = {Studies of the rise of private defined-contribution pensions traditionally focus on social policy concerns about the allocation of risks and costs for beneficiaries and employers. There is, however, another - low-salience, financial - dimension of pension privatisation. Regulations introducing minimum return guarantees in private pensions impact financial markets because they incentivise fund managers to invest plan portfolios in fixed-income securities rather than in equities. While different segments of the financial industry have divergent preferences over such guarantees, policy-makers are caught in a dilemma: Should they prioritise predictable benefit levels or equity market development? Using the case of the introduction of Germany's 'Riester-Rente', we argue that, as politicians linked the introduction of private defined-contribution plans with cuts in statutory pensions, the re-emergence of a high-salience, social policy image of pensions helped insurance firms' and some trade unionists' case for minimum guarantees to prevail, thereby hindering equity market development in Germany.}, language = {en} } @article{HasselNaczyk, author = {Hassel, Anke and Naczyk, Marek}, title = {Warum es kaum Pensionsfonds in Deutschland gibt. Kapitalmarktrisiken, Finanzindustrie und die Politik der Mindestverzinsung}, series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, volume = {70}, journal = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, doi = {10.1007/s11577-018-0538-6}, pages = {65 -- 88}, abstract = {Die Literatur zur Entwicklung privater Renten konzentriert sich traditionsgem{\"a}ß auf die sozialpolitischen Effekte im Hinblick auf die Verteilung von Risiken und Kosten auf Anspruchsberechtigte und Arbeitgeber. Es gibt jedoch noch eine weitere Dimension der Privatisierung der Altersvorsorge, die diese im Kontext der Finanzm{\"a}rkte und - im weiteren Sinn - des Wirtschaftssystems betrachtet. Hier spielen insbesondere Mindestverzinsungen eine große Rolle, weil sie f{\"u}r Fondsmanager einen Anreiz daf{\"u}r setzen, gr{\"o}ßere Tranchen der Portfolios in festverzinsliche Wertpapiere statt in Aktien zu investieren. W{\"a}hrend in den verschiedenen Segmenten der Finanzindustrie unterschiedliche Pr{\"a}ferenzen im Hinblick auf garantierte Mindestverzinsungen vorherrschen, befindet sich die Politik in einem Dilemma: Sollte man kalkulierbaren Renditen oder aber der Entwicklung der Aktienm{\"a}rkte Priorit{\"a}t einr{\"a}umen? Das Beispiel der Riester-Rente in Deutschland zeigt, dass die Verkn{\"u}pfung der Einf{\"u}hrung privater Rentenpl{\"a}ne mit Einschnitten bei der staatlichen Rente durch die Politik dazu f{\"u}hrte, dass Versicherungsunternehmen im Verbund mit Gewerkschaften auf Mindestleistungen bestanden und dadurch die Expansion der Aktienm{\"a}rkte in Deutschland eingeschr{\"a}nkt wurde.}, language = {de} } @book{HasselSchiller, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schiller, Christof}, title = {Der Fall Hartz IV. Wie es zur Agenda 2010 kam und wie es weiter geht}, publisher = {campus}, isbn = {9783593393360}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {348}, abstract = {2010 feiert Hartz IV seinen f{\"u}nften Geburtstag. Die fast t{\"a}glichen Debatten zeigen, dass das "Herzst{\"u}ck" der Agenda 2010 die Bundesrepublik grundlegender ver{\"a}ndert hat als jede andere Reform der letzten Jahrzehnte. Basierend auf Gespr{\"a}chen mit damaligen Akteuren untersuchen Anke Hassel und Christof Schiller die Hintergr{\"u}nde der Hartz-Reformen: Wer waren die zentralen Entscheidungstr{\"a}ger? Wurde der Reformstau {\"u}berwunden und ist das deutsche Regierungssystem heute besser in der Lage, auf die derzeitigen Herausforderungen zu reagieren? Dieses Buch liefert erstmals eine l{\"u}ckenlose Analyse der Entscheidungsprozesse, die zu Hartz IV gef{\"u}hrt haben, und gibt einen Ausblick auf die aktuellen Herausforderungen der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Die Autoren r{\"a}umen mit g{\"a}ngigen Vorurteilen {\"u}ber die rot-gr{\"u}nen Reformen auf und zeichnen ein kenntnisreiches Bild der wirtschaftlichen und politischen Zusammenh{\"a}nge in der deutschen Politik. Sie kommen zu dem Schluss, dass die Hartz-IV-Reform, obgleich extrem, durchaus typisch f{\"u}r Reformpolitik in Deutschland ist und dass durch das Zusammenspiel von F{\"o}deralismus, Parteienwettbewerb und Sozialpartnern auch in Zukunft {\"a}hnliche Maßnahmen zu erwarten sind.}, language = {de} } @book{HasselWagner, author = {Hassel, Anke and Wagner, Bettina}, title = {Europ{\"a}ische Arbeitskr{\"a}ftemobilit{\"a}t nach Deutschland - Ein {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber Entsendung, Arbeitnehmerfreiz{\"u}gigkeit, Saisonarbeit und Niederlassungsfreiheit von EU-B{\"u}rgern in Deutschland}, publisher = {Hans-B{\"o}ckler-Stiftung}, address = {D{\"u}sseldorf}, isbn = {978-3-86593-209-9}, language = {de} } @techreport{HasselSchroeder, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schroeder, Wolfgang}, title = {Gewerkschaften 2030. Rekrutierungsdefizite, Repr{\"a}sentationsl{\"u}cken und neue Strategien der Mitgliederpolitik}, series = {WSI Report}, journal = {WSI Report}, edition = {44}, issn = {2366-7079}, pages = {20}, language = {de} } @incollection{HasselHelmerich, author = {Hassel, Anke and Helmerich, Nicole}, title = {Institutional change in transnational labor governance: implementing social standards in public procurement and export credit guarantees}, series = {Global Justice and International Labour Rights}, booktitle = {Global Justice and International Labour Rights}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {9781107087873}, pages = {239 -- 259}, language = {en} } @techreport{HasselHelmerich, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hassel, Anke and Helmerich, Nicole}, title = {Workers' Voice in the 100 largest European companies}, series = {MBF-Report}, journal = {MBF-Report}, edition = {Nr. 31}, issn = {2364-0413}, pages = {9}, abstract = {-Workers’ Voice is widely present among the largest 100 firms in Europe. 90 \% of the largest firms participate in collective bargaining (CBA), 73 \% have a European Works Council (EWC) and 44 \% have Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER). 27 \% have a European Company Agreement (ECA), and 23 \% an International Framework Agreement (IFA). The data set allows three broad conclusions: - First, Workers’ Voice is mostly cumulative. Companieswith BLER always participate in collective bargaining and generally have a higher percentage of other forms of Workers’ Voice in place than companies without BLER. Companies with BLER and CBA in place also almost always have at least one European Works Council in place and, in 40.9 \% of the firms, also at least one European Company Agreement.- Second, Board-Level Employee Representation and collective bargaining seem to strengthen good corporate governance. Companies with BLER offered considerably lower remuneration packages within the company than companies without BLER. Companies without BLER as well as companies without CBA spent, on average, significantly more money on the highest remuneration packages than companies with BLER andCBA present and companies with only CBA present. Companies with BLER are associated with a lower influence of a single biggest owner.- Third, companies with strong Workers’ Voice show better performance compared to those without. Companies with both BLER and CBA have higher market value as well as higher net sales.}, language = {en} } @article{HasselvonVerschuer, author = {Hassel, Anke and von Verschuer, Sophia}, title = {Ein europ{\"a}ischer Rechtsrahmen f{\"u}r Arbeitnehmerbeteiligung in transnationalen Unternehmen}, series = {WSI-MITTEILUNGEN}, volume = {2/2019}, journal = {WSI-MITTEILUNGEN}, pages = {96 -- 105}, abstract = {In Anbetracht der Machtf{\"u}lle transnationaler Unternehmen und der sozialen Auswirkungen zunehmender Globalisierung sind neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Einbettung von Unternehmen n{\"o}tig. Arbeitnehmerbeteiligung an strategischen Unternehmensentscheidungen ist ein wichtiges Instrument zur Korrektur unternehmerischer Entscheidungen und sie ist insbesondere ein Kernbestandteil des europ{\"a}ischen Sozialmodells. Die Arbeitnehmerbeteiligung bleibt jedoch derzeit unterentwickelt und den gegenw{\"a}rtigen Herausforderungen nicht angemessen. Ein wichtiger Ansatz zu ihrer St{\"a}rkung basiert auf der Vergewisserung ihrer Funktionen in einem institutionell heterogenen Umfeld. Verbindliche Formen der Arbeitnehmerbeteiligung m{\"u}ssen eine aktive Rolle bei der Formulierung von Arbeitnehmerinteressen und in der Unternehmensaufsicht spielen. Im Europarecht gibt es durchaus positive Ans{\"a}tze zur Verankerung von Beteiligungsrechten von Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmern, die jedoch durch weitere Integration des Gesellschafsrechts unterminiert werden. Eine L{\"o}sung besteht in der Formulierung von Bereichsausnahmen in den Regelungen zum EU-Binnenmarkt und einer aktiveren politischen Gestaltung eines arbeitnehmerfreundlichen europ{\"a}ischen Gesellschafsrechts.}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Innovationen d{\"u}rfen nicht nur technisch gesehen werden}, series = {Zeitschrift Handelsblatt}, journal = {Zeitschrift Handelsblatt}, edition = {02.02.2020}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Wor{\"u}ber die SPD mal dringend nachdenken sollte}, series = {Tagesspiegel}, journal = {Tagesspiegel}, edition = {04.11.2018}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Die Wirklichkeit nicht ignorieren. Die Linke muss verhindern, dass die Arbeiterklasse unter Zuwanderung leidet}, series = {IPG Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft Journal}, journal = {IPG Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft Journal}, edition = {09.11.2018}, language = {de} } @techreport{Hassel, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Workers' Voice and Good Corporate Governance in Transnational Firms in Europe}, pages = {23}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Kann das weg? Optionen der Reform der Grundsicherung f{\"u}r Langzeitarbeitslose}, series = {ifo Schnelldienst}, journal = {ifo Schnelldienst}, number = {6/2019}, issn = {2199-4455 ; 0018-974 X}, pages = {7 -- 9}, language = {de} } @incollection{HasselEichhorst, author = {Hassel, Anke and Eichhorst, Werner}, title = {Are There Austerity-Related Policy Changes in Germany?}, series = {Labour Market Policies in the Era of Pervasive Austerity: A European Perspective}, booktitle = {Labour Market Policies in the Era of Pervasive Austerity: A European Perspective}, editor = {Theodoropoulou, Sotiria}, publisher = {Policy Press}, address = {Bristol}, isbn = {9781447335863}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Hoch die Eurosolidarit{\"a}t}, series = {der Freitag}, journal = {der Freitag}, number = {43/2018}, language = {de} } @article{HasselHoepnerKurdelbuschetal., author = {Hassel, Anke and H{\"o}pner, Martin and Kurdelbusch, Antje and Rehder, Britta and Zugeh{\"o}r, Rainer}, title = {Zwei Dimensionen der Internationalisierung: Eine empirische Analyse deutscher Grossunternehmen}, series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, volume = {52}, journal = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1007/s11577-000-0070-2}, pages = {500 -- 519}, abstract = {Um den Einfluß wirtschaftlicher Internationalisierung auf nationale Institutionengef{\"u}ge zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen, werden geeignete Messverfahren zur Messung von Internationalisierung ben{\"o}tigt. Der Beitrag stellt ein Verfahren zur Messung der Internationalisierung von Unternehmen vor. Dabei wird davon ausgegangen, dass die Internationalisierung von Unternehmen mehrere unterscheidbare Dimensionen hat. Die realwirtschaftliche Dimension beschreibt die g{\"u}ter- und produktionswirtschaftliche grenz{\"u}berschreitende Expansion der Unternehmen, w{\"a}hrend die kapitalmarktbezogene Dimension die Orientierung der Unternehmen an internationalen Kapitalm{\"a}rkten abbildet. Anhand einer Untersuchung {\"u}ber den Internationalisierungsgrad der 100 gr{\"o}ßten deutschen Unternehmen werden beide Internationalisierungsdimensionen empirisch {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. Die Faktorenanalyse unterst{\"u}tzt die Annahme, dass sich beide Dimensionen empirisch deutlich voneinander unterscheiden lassen. Anhand der vorgestellten Messmethoden lassen sich die Unternehmen eindeutig in stark und schwach internationalisierte Unternehmen einteilen.}, language = {de} } @article{HasselKnudsenWagner, author = {Hassel, Anke and Knudsen, Jette Steen and Wagner, Bettina}, title = {Winning the battle or losing the war: the impact of European integration on labour market institutions in Germany and Denmark}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {23}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1080/13501763.2016.1186209}, pages = {1218 -- 1239}, abstract = {The European Union (EU) literature sees increasing market liberalization as a challenge for models of national capitalism. EU liberalization, it is argued, erodes national employment regimes and social protection. However, other scholars highlight the ability of national institutions to reinvent themselves. This contribution assesses these claims by exploring an extreme case of labour market pressure driven by EU liberalization. Focusing on the meat production sector, it shows that low-wage labour migration has affected employment conditions in the meat production sector in Germany and Denmark in different ways: dualization has made Germany a destination country for low-wage work; in contrast, union solidarity in Denmark has kept wages high and Danish meat producers have outsourced work to Germany. The underlying industrial relations systems have shaped actors' responses to the use of migrant labour.}, language = {en} } @article{HasselHoepnerKurdelbuschetal., author = {Hassel, Anke and H{\"o}pner, Martin and Kurdelbusch, Antje and Rehder, Britta and Zugeh{\"o}r, Rainer}, title = {Two Dimensions of the Internationalization of Firms}, series = {Journal of Management Studies}, volume = {40}, journal = {Journal of Management Studies}, number = {3}, editor = {Morgan, Glenn}, doi = {10.1111/1467-6486.00357}, pages = {705 -- 723}, abstract = {The paper argues that there are two dimensions of internationalization: one which refers to the production activities of firms abroad and one which focuses on the corporate governance dimension of firms. While the first one is well known in the literature on internationalization, the financial dimension has not yet been addressed empirically. At the same time there are indicators that financial internationalization is gaining importance. Using a sample of the 100 largest German companies it shows that both dimensions, the real and the financial dimension, do not co-vary and therefore cannot be combined into one index.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The Politics of Social Pacts}, series = {British Journal of Industrial Relations Industrial Relations}, volume = {41}, journal = {British Journal of Industrial Relations Industrial Relations}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1046/j.1467-8543.2003.00295.x}, pages = {707 -- 726}, abstract = {The paper develops an analytical framework for the politics of negotiated voluntary wage restraint in the context of social pacts. It argues that, in contrast to earlier political exchanges, tripartite negotiations on wage restraint under restrictive economic policies are not based on a political exchange whereby governments had to compensate trade unions for wage restraint. Rather, governments can threaten trade unions with tight monetary policy and trade unions can either engage in negotiated adjustment or suffer restrictions. Social pacts are therefore an instrument of adjustment by governments to a new economic environment, and not a tool of economic policy.}, language = {en} } @article{HasselBeyer, author = {Hassel, Anke and Beyer, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {The effects of convergence: internationalization and the changing distribution of net value added in large German firms}, series = {Economy and Society}, volume = {31}, journal = {Economy and Society}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1080/03085140220151837}, pages = {309 -- 332}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The Problem of Political Exchange in Complex Governance Systems: The Case of Germany's Alliance for Jobs}, series = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1177\%2F095968010173005}, pages = {305 -- 323}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {B{\"u}ndnisse f{\"u}r Arbeit: Nationale Handlungsf{\"a}higkeit im europ{\"a}ischen Regimewettbewerb}, series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {41}, journal = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1007/s11615-000-0077-3}, pages = {498 -- 524}, language = {de} } @article{HasselSchulten, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schulten, Thorsten}, title = {Globalization and the future of central collective bargaining: the example of the German metal industry}, series = {Economy and Society}, volume = {27}, journal = {Economy and Society}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1080/03085149800000031}, pages = {484 -- 522}, abstract = {The paper deals with the relationship of the German model of capitalism and the role of centralized collective bargaining within it. It is assumed that the system of central wage bargaining - leading to a relatively egalitarian wage structure and the absence of a non-union wage sector - is one of the major pillars of the national institutional framework of the German economy. Pressures towards the decentralization of collective bargaining will therefore not onlyy affect the distribution of wages and the patterns of social equality, but also have a profound impact on the functioning of the German model of capitalism. The first part of Paper links the system of collective bargaining and industrial relations with the wider macro-economic and political features of German capitalism. It defines three major challengers to the institutional framework of the German economy: structural challenges since the early 1970s, the impact of unification since 1989 and the impact of European integration and globalization since the mid-1980s. It concludes that not globalization as such but a complexity of different pressures might lead to drastic institutional changes. The second part of the paper analyses collective bargaining development in the metal industry in the early 1990s. It looks at the conduct of the bargaining rounds, the institutional set-up and the position of the collective bargaining actors respectively. It will be argued that collective bargaining in the German metal industry has become extremely pressurized in the early 1990s. We argue that pressure on collective bargaining stems from two sides: first, from thhe membership problem of trade unions and employers' associations and, second, from the narrowing scope of flexibility within the give system of wage determination. We will define three ways of achieving wage differentiation within and outside centralized bargaining structures and look at their changing role during that period. Finally, the paper presents two scenarios of collective bargaining in the future and discusses their implications for the German ecnomic model.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The Erosion of the German System of Industrial Relations}, series = {British Journal of Industrial Relations}, volume = {37}, journal = {British Journal of Industrial Relations}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1111/1467-8543.00138}, pages = {483 -- 505}, abstract = {The paper assesses current trajectories of change in the German system of industrial relations by analysing the co-determination and collective bargaining systems. It argues that two parallel developments undermine the institutional stability of the German model. First, the institutional base of the German industrial relations system, which has served as the pre-condition of its past success, has been shrinking during the last two decades. This is due to a decline in coverage by the two major industrial relations institutions: the works council system and wage agreements. Today fewer than 15 per cent of German plants are covered by both a valid collective agreement and a works council. Second, increasing decentralization pressures within collective bargaining tend to undermine the division of labour between co-determination and collective bargaining. The dynamics of an institutional erosion of the German industrial relations institutions and the decentralization of collective bargaining disturbs the fine-tuning of the mediating process between macroeconomic steering capacity and co-operative workplace industrial relations. This tendency has been aggravated by the effects of German unification. The current institutional developments of the German industrial relations system leave serious doubts about the future of a successful model of co-operative modernization.}, language = {en} } @article{EbbinghausHassel, author = {Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Hassel, Anke}, title = {Striking deals: concertation in the reform of continental European welfare states}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {7}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1080/135017600343269}, pages = {44 -- 62}, abstract = {The reform of the welfare state entails changes in interdependent policy fields stretching from social policies to employment and wage policies. These linked policy fields are often governed by varying sets of corporate actors and involve different decision-making procedures. Adaptation in one policy field is often unco-ordinated with other policies, and can work at cross-purposes, produce negative externalities, or fail owing to the lack of supporting conditions. The article has two objectives. First, it argues that the renewed emergence of tripartite concertation is due to the need to co-ordinate policies across policy fields. Second, it evaluates the institutional factors which have facilitated concertation in some cases, but not in others. Using a similar country design, the article compares four continental European countries with similar reform pressures but different reform trajectories: France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands.}, language = {en} } @incollection{SchulzeBuschoffHassel, author = {Schulze Buschoff, Karin and Hassel, Anke}, title = {Besch{\"a}ftigungsrekorde bei zunehmender Ungleichheit auf dem Arbeitsmarkt Arbeitsmarktentwicklung und -politik in der dritten Regierung Merkel (2013 bis 2017)}, series = {Zwischen Stillstand, Politikwandel und Krisenmanagement: Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2013-2017}, booktitle = {Zwischen Stillstand, Politikwandel und Krisenmanagement: Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2013-2017}, editor = {Zohlnh{\"o}fer, Reimut and Saalfeld, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {397 -- 414}, language = {de} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Die Zukunft der Sozialpartnerschaft: Individualisierung versus Arbeitnehmerschutz?}, series = {Zeitenwende auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Wie der demografische Wandel die Erwerbsgesellschaft ver{\"a}ndert}, booktitle = {Zeitenwende auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Wie der demografische Wandel die Erwerbsgesellschaft ver{\"a}ndert}, editor = {Hinte, Klaus and Zimmermann, Klaus}, publisher = {Bundeszentrale f{\"u}r Politische Bildung}, address = {Bonn}, isbn = {978-3-8389-0292-0}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {213 -- 230}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The 'Culture-free' Organisation? Industrial Relations in European Authorities}, series = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, volume = {4}, journal = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1177/095968019841004}, pages = {57 -- 79}, language = {en} } @article{StreeckHassel, author = {Streeck, Wolfgang and Hassel, Anke}, title = {The Crumbling Pillars of Social Partnership}, series = {West European Politics}, volume = {26}, journal = {West European Politics}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1080/01402380312331280708}, pages = {103 -- 124}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Die linke Antwort: Migration regulieren}, series = {Bl{\"a}tter f{\"u}r deutsche und internationale Politik}, journal = {Bl{\"a}tter f{\"u}r deutsche und internationale Politik}, number = {10/2018}, pages = {33 -- 36}, language = {de} } @article{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {The Erosion Continues: Reply}, series = {British Journal of Industrial Relations}, volume = {40}, journal = {British Journal of Industrial Relations}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1111/1467-8543.00234}, pages = {309 -- 317}, language = {en} } @techreport{HasselSchroeder, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schroeder, Wolfgang}, title = {Gewerkschaftliche Mitgliederpolitik: Schl{\"u}ssel f{\"u}r eine starke Sozialpartnerschaft}, series = {WSI-Mitteilungen}, volume = {71}, journal = {WSI-Mitteilungen}, number = {6}, pages = {485 -- 496}, language = {de} } @techreport{BohneHasselBlaschke, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Bohne, Maik and Hassel, Anke and Blaschke, Daniela}, title = {Innovation als Schl{\"u}ssel zur gerechten Transformation: Acht Impulse f{\"u}r die Zukunftsf{\"a}higkeit des deutschen Innovationsmodells}, publisher = {Das Progressive Zentrum}, address = {Berlin}, abstract = {Wie kommt das Neue in die Welt? Die Suche nach Antworten auf diese Frage ist angesichts der Herausforderungen, vor denen Deutschland bei der Dekarbonisierung und Digitalisierung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft steht, keine philosophische {\"U}bung, sondern eine der dringlichsten Aufgaben unserer Zeit. Denn ob es der Bundesrepublik gelingt, Vorreiter einer digitalen Nachhaltigkeits{\"o}konomie zu werden und wettbewerbsf{\"a}hig zu bleiben, h{\"a}ngt in hohem Maße von der technologischen und gesellschaftlichen Innovationskraft des Landes ab. Eine repr{\"a}sentative Civey-Umfrage im Auftrag des Progressiven Zentrums zeigt: {\"U}ber drei Viertel der Befragten sind der Meinung, dass die deutsche Regierung nicht genug f{\"u}r die Innovationsf{\"a}higkeit der deutschen Wirtschaft tut (78 \%). Mehr als 80 Prozent stimmen der Aussage zu, die Bundesregierung solle klare Ziele f{\"u}r die F{\"o}rderung von technologischen Innovationen setzen. Den Befragten zufolge sollten technische Innovationen vor allem der Wettbewerbsf{\"a}higkeit dienen (44 \%), gefolgt von der nationalen Sicherheit (30 \%), sozialer Gerechtigkeit (29 \%) und Klimaschutz (28 \%). Im direkten Vergleich mit China und den USA sagten nur 13 Prozent der Befragten, die EU sei der innovativste Wirtschaftsstandort. Knapp 40 Prozent halten die chinesische Wirtschaft f{\"u}r die innovativste, etwa 30 Prozent finden die USA als Wirtschaftsstandort am innovativsten. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersucht die Studie die Zukunftsf{\"a}higkeit des deutschen Innovationsmodells und begibt sich auf die Suche nach konkreten Reformvorschl{\"a}gen f{\"u}r dessen politische Steuerung.}, language = {de} } @article{HasselPalier, author = {Hassel, Anke and Palier, Bruno}, title = {Same Trend, Different Paths: Growth and Welfare Regimes Across Time and Space}, series = {Annual Review of Political Science}, volume = {26}, journal = {Annual Review of Political Science}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-103030}, abstract = {The article reviews the recent advances in comparative political economy. It reconnects knowledge on growth regimes and welfare regimes by analyzing how growth and welfare regimes covary over both time and space. It underlines the fact that governments pursue different growth strategies to adjust to new economic environments, focusing in particular on welfare state reforms. Synthesizing the literature, we propose a definition of growth and welfare regimes that integrates different engines of growth as a way to track general trends in the evolution of capitalism. We analyze the main trends of three eras of capitalism: Fordism, neoliberal financialization, and the digitalized knowledge-based economy. We trace the various paths of change by identifying the five growth strategies governments have pursued to adapt their growth and welfare regimes to the new capitalist era. The result is not a typology of fixed types of capitalist models but a dynamic process of adjustment. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Political Science, Volume 26 is June 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.}, language = {en} } @incollection{HasselSchroeder, author = {Hassel, Anke and Schr{\"o}der, Wolfgang}, title = {Auswirkungen der Transformation auf die deutsche Sozialpartnerschaft}, series = {Perspektiven eines Industriemodells der Zukunft}, booktitle = {Perspektiven eines Industriemodells der Zukunft}, editor = {Lemb, Wolfgang}, publisher = {Metropolis}, address = {Marburg}, isbn = {978-3-7316-1475-3}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {15}, abstract = {Die Sozialpartnerschaft begleitete sowohl den {\"o}konomischen Wiederaufstieg Deutschlands nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg als auch die permanent notwendigen Anpassungsprozesse an ver{\"a}nderte wirtschaftliche, soziale und gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen. In vielen Sektoren hat die Sozialpartnerschaft ihre Pr{\"a}ge- und Gestaltungskraft jedoch eingeb{\"u}ßt. Mitgliederr{\"u}ckgang, Arbeitgeberverb{\"a}nde ohne Tarifbindung und neue Gesch{\"a}ftsmodelle sind taktgebende Treiber dieses Wandels. (...) Ist die Sozialpartnerschaft nur noch der Rahmen f{\"u}r einen etablierten, gleichwohl kleiner werdenden Club von Unternehmen und Besch{\"a}ftigten, oder gelingt es, die Reichweite wieder zu erh{\"o}hen? Werden das Prinzip der Sozialpartnerschaft und die konkrete Praxis des FTV als Rahmen revitalisiert, um die Interessenskonflikte der Dekarbonisierung und Digitalisierung im fairen Ausgleich zu bew{\"a}ltigen? Daf{\"u}r werden wir zun{\"a}chst die Fragen der Organisationsmacht auf Arbeitnehmer- und Arbeitgeberseite kl{\"a}ren, anschließend L{\"o}sungsperspektiven aufzeigen und zuletzt die Relevanz der Sozialpartner im Kontext der Transformation beleuchten.}, language = {de} } @article{HasselOezkiziltan, author = {Hassel, Anke and {\"O}zkiziltan, Didem}, title = {Governing the work-related risks of AI: implications for the German government and trade unions}, series = {Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research}, journal = {Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research}, doi = {10.1177/10242589221147228}, abstract = {This article discusses the risks that artificial intelligence (AI) poses for work. It classifies risks into two types, direct and indirect. Direct risks are AI-induced forms of discrimination, surveillance and information asymmetries at work. Indirect risks are enhanced workplace automation and the increasing 'fissurisation' of work. Direct and indirect risks are illustrated using the example of the transport and logistics sector. We discuss policy responses to both types of risk in the context of the German economy and argue that the policy solutions need to differ according to the type of risk. Direct risks can be addressed by European and national regulation against discrimination, surveillance and information asymmetries. As for indirect risks, the first step is to monitor the risks so as to gain an understanding of sector-specific transformations and establish relevant expertise and competence. This way of addressing AI-induced risks at work will help to improve the prospects of decent work, fair remuneration and adequate social protection for all.}, language = {en} } @article{HasselSieker, author = {Hassel, Anke and Sieker, Felix}, title = {The platform effect: How Amazon changed work in logistics in Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom}, series = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, volume = {28}, journal = {European Journal of Industrial Relations}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1177/09596801221082456}, pages = {363 -- 382}, abstract = {While the effects of the platform economy on work are mainly studied through the lens of gig or cloud workers, many more employees are likely to be affected in non-platform firms or sectors. We discuss the mechanisms of platform economy's impact on the employment relationships and indirect effect on employment trends. Platform firms enter the service economy with business models that put existing service providers under pressure and advance a platform model of employment relationship. However, their transformative force is limited by three factors: employment regulations, access to welfare provisions and the employment relations at legacy firms. We examine the case of Amazon logistics in the US, Germany and the UK and find that the employment contract, as a legal institution, prevents the dissemination of independent contracting as the preferred employment model. Moreover, the welfare state has a paradoxical effect on platform work: universal welfare and liberal employment law facilitate the rise of precarious work.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassel, author = {Hassel, Anke}, title = {Employment relations, welfare and politics}, series = {Comparative Employment Relations in the Global Economy}, booktitle = {Comparative Employment Relations in the Global Economy}, editor = {Frege, Carola and Kelly, John}, edition = {2}, publisher = {Routledge}, isbn = {9781138683020}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {169 -- 187}, abstract = {Employment Relations is widely taught in business schools around the world. However, an increasing emphasis is being placed on the comparative and international dimensions of the relationships between employers and workers. It is becoming crucial to consider today's work and employment issues alongside the dynamics between global financial and product markets, global production chains, national and international employment actors and institutions, and the ways in which these relationships play out in different national contexts. Comparative Employment Relations in the Global Economy addresses this need by presenting a cross-section of country studies - including the UK, Germany, USA, Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa - alongside integrative thematic chapters covering essential topics such as theoretical approaches, collective representation and employment regulation.}, language = {en} }