@incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Der Dritte Sektor in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich}, series = {{\"O}konomisierung und Europ{\"a}isierung als Herausforderung f{\"u}r die Betriebe der Gesundheits- und Sozialwirtschaft}, booktitle = {{\"O}konomisierung und Europ{\"a}isierung als Herausforderung f{\"u}r die Betriebe der Gesundheits- und Sozialwirtschaft}, publisher = {IKO Verlag}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, isbn = {978-3889394187}, pages = {13 -- 32}, language = {de} } @incollection{AnheierArchambaultSalamon, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Archambault, Edith and Salamon, Lester M.}, title = {International Comparison of Giving Behavior}, series = {Dimensions of the Voluntary Sector}, booktitle = {Dimensions of the Voluntary Sector}, publisher = {Charities Aid Foundation}, address = {West Malling}, isbn = {978-1-85934-019-6}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierToepler, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Toepler, Stefan}, title = {Kommerzialisierungstendenzen amerikanischer Museen}, series = {Die Finanzen des Museums: Schriften des Freilichtmuseums Kiekeberg}, booktitle = {Die Finanzen des Museums: Schriften des Freilichtmuseums Kiekeberg}, publisher = {Freilichtmuseum am Kiekeberg}, address = {Rosengarten-Ehestorf}, isbn = {978-3927521261}, pages = {155 -- 170}, language = {de} } @incollection{AnheierRomo, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Romo, Frank P.}, title = {Democratic Organizational Development: Elite Control, Free Riders and the Social Infrastructure}, series = {Politics, Society and Democracy: Comparative Studies; Essays in Honor of Juan Linz}, booktitle = {Politics, Society and Democracy: Comparative Studies; Essays in Honor of Juan Linz}, publisher = {Westview Press}, address = {Boulder, CO}, isbn = {978-0813385495}, pages = {89 -- 110}, language = {en} } @incollection{SalamonAnheier, author = {Salamon, Lester M. and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Caring Sector or Caring Society: A Comparative Study}, series = {The Future of Caring and Service to the Community}, booktitle = {The Future of Caring and Service to the Community}, publisher = {Jossey-Bass}, address = {San Francisco}, pages = {373 -- 398}, language = {en} } @incollection{SalamonAnheier, author = {Salamon, Lester M. and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {The Emerging Sector: The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective; An Overview}, series = {Dimensions of the Voluntary Sector}, booktitle = {Dimensions of the Voluntary Sector}, publisher = {Charities Aid Foundation}, address = {London}, isbn = {9781859340141}, pages = {71 -- 88}, language = {en} } @incollection{SalamonAnheier, author = {Salamon, Lester M. and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {The Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally: Types and Patterns}, series = {Researching the Voluntary Sector}, booktitle = {Researching the Voluntary Sector}, publisher = {Charities Aid Foundation}, address = {Tonbridge}, pages = {147 -- 163}, language = {en} } @incollection{SalamonAnheier, author = {Salamon, Lester M. and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {A Comparative Study of the Nonprofit Sector: Purpose, Methodology, Definition, Classification}, series = {Researching the Voluntary Sector: A National, Local and International Perspective}, booktitle = {Researching the Voluntary Sector: A National, Local and International Perspective}, publisher = {Charities Aid Foundation}, address = {Tonbridge}, pages = {179 -- 196}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {West Germany: The Ambiguities of Peak Associations}, series = {Between States and Markets: The Public Sphere in Advanced Industrial Societies}, booktitle = {Between States and Markets: The Public Sphere in Advanced Industrial Societies}, publisher = {Princeton University Press}, address = {Princeton, NJ}, isbn = {0-691-02861-3}, pages = {64 -- 93}, language = {en} } @incollection{SeibelAnheier, author = {Seibel, Wolfgang and Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Sociological and Political Science Approaches to the Nonprofit Sector}, series = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, booktitle = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-3110117134}, pages = {7 -- 20}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Institutional Choice and Organizational Behavior in the Third Sector}, series = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, booktitle = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin [u.a.]}, pages = {47 -- 52}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {A Profile of the Third Sector in West Germany}, series = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, booktitle = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York, NY}, isbn = {978-0899254869}, pages = {313 -- 331}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Private Voluntary Organizations and the Third World: The Case of Africa}, series = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, booktitle = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York, NY}, isbn = {3-11-011713-4}, pages = {361 -- 376}, language = {en} } @incollection{AnheierSeibel, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Seibel, Wolfgang}, title = {The Third Sector in Comparative Perspective: Four Propositions}, series = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, booktitle = {The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin [u.a.]}, isbn = {978-3110117134}, pages = {379 -- 387}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Private Voluntary Organizations and Development in West Africa: Comparative Perspective}, series = {The nonprofit sector in international perspective : studies in comparative culture and policy}, booktitle = {The nonprofit sector in international perspective : studies in comparative culture and policy}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {New York u.a.}, isbn = {0195056299}, pages = {339 -- 357}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Indigenous Voluntary Associations, Non-Profits and Development in Africa}, series = {The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook}, booktitle = {The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook}, publisher = {Yale Univ. Press}, address = {New Haven, CT}, isbn = {9780300109030}, pages = {416 -- 433}, language = {en} } @incollection{Anheier, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {"Mittelschichten: Afrika"}, series = {Pipers W{\"o}rterbuch zur Politik 6}, booktitle = {Pipers W{\"o}rterbuch zur Politik 6}, publisher = {Piper Verlag}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, pages = {352 -- 353}, language = {de} } @article{AnheierNeidhardt, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Neidhardt, Friedhelm}, title = {The Nazi Party and its Capital: An Analysis of the NSDAP Membership in Munich, 1925-1930}, series = {American Behavioral Scientist}, volume = {41}, journal = {American Behavioral Scientist}, number = {9}, publisher = {Sage Publications}, address = {Los Angeles [u.a.]}, issn = {1552-3381}, doi = {10.1177/0002764298041009004}, pages = {1219 -- 1236}, abstract = {This article examines the membership profile of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) in Munich, the party's birthplace and political, administrative, and financial center of power. On the basis of an analysis of more than 4,000 members listed in the local NSDAP Membership Register between 1925 and 1930, the authors arrive at four major findings: (a) Party membership expanded slowly but more or less continuously; (b) membership was dispersed fairly evenly across city districts, with no major concentrations of Nazi members; (c) membership was distributed widely and relatively evenly across occupational groups and social statuses, although some occupations showed a higher percentage of Nazi memberships; (d) the proportion of female members in 1925 was relatively high but falls to much lower levels by 1930. These findings are discussed in the context of current scholarship of the changing class, age, and gender composition of the Nazi Party before 1933.}, language = {en} } @article{AnheierRudney, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Rudney, Gabriel}, title = {An Input-Output Analysis of the Nonprofit Sector in the USA and Germany}, series = {Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics}, volume = {69}, journal = {Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Hoboken (N.J.)}, issn = {1467-8292}, doi = {10.1111/1467-8292.00071}, pages = {5 -- 31}, abstract = {This paper presents an exploratory input-output analysis of the nonprofit sectors in former West Germany and the USA based on the conceptual and data structure provided by the System of National Accounts. When compared with the USA, the West German nonprofit sector catered more to government demands. A higher proportion of West German nonprofit services went to government and a smaller proportion went to households. In terms of the multiplier effect of nonprofit output, we find that an additional dollar of nonprofit services delivered to households and/or government induced indirectly an additional 83 cents of business output in the USA. By comparison, West Germany's nonprofit sector had a lower multiplier effect, with 43 Pfennig per DM1. We also find that businesses have a much larger stake in nonprofit production as intermediate suppliers when compared to their role as intermediate consumers. The economic position the nonprofit sector occupies in both countries is that of a producing sector, taking inputs from businesses and providing outputs for households and governments. This general structural characteristic suggests that the nonprofit sector is particularly sensitive to changes in government policies as well as to shifts in private household incomes, yet relatively insensitive to demand changes in other industries.}, language = {en} } @article{AnheierSalamon, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Salamon, Lester M.}, title = {Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally}, series = {Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations}, volume = {9}, journal = {Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations}, number = {3}, publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0957-8765}, doi = {10.1023/A:1022058200985}, pages = {213 -- 248}, abstract = {Recent research has usefully documented the contribution that nonprofit organizations make to "social capital" and to the economic and political development it seems to foster. Because of a gross lack of basic comparative data, however, the question of what it is that allows such organizations to develop remains far from settled. This article seeks to remedy this by testing five existing theories of the nonprofit sector against data assembled on eight countries as part of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. The five theories are: (a) government failure/market failure theory; (b) supply-side theory; (c) trust theories; (d) welfare state theory; and (e) interdependence theory. The article finds none of these theories adequate to explain the variations among countries in either the size, the composition, or the financing of the nonprofit sector. On this basis it suggests a new theoretical approach to explaining patterns of nonprofit development among countries—the "social origins" approach—which focuses on broader social, political, and economic relationships. Using this theory, the article identifies four "routes" of third-sector development (the liberal, the social democratic, the corporatist, and the statist), each associated with a particular constellation of class relationships and pattern of state-society relations. The article then tests this theory against the eight-country data and finds that it helps make sense of anomalies left unexplained by the prevailing theories.}, language = {en} } @article{AnheierSalamon, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Salamon, Lester M.}, title = {On Developing Comparative Nonprofit-Sector Theory: A Reply to Steinberg and Young, and Ragin}, series = {Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations}, volume = {9}, journal = {Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations}, number = {3}, publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0957-8765}, doi = {10.1023/A:1022014418732}, pages = {271 -- 281}, abstract = {Responding to comments on "Social Origins of Civil Society," an article published in this issue of Voluntas, this article focuses on three critical issues that underlie cross-national theory building and theory testing in the field of nonprofit studies: the issue of definitions, the challenge of operationalizing key theoretical concepts, and the nature of the tests available to verify results. Regarding the first, the article defends the structural-operational definition used in The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project against suggestions by the commentators that it either be expanded or narrowed, arguing that the alternative is either to broaden the focus beyond what is manageable or to make the basic yardstick vulnerable to changing political and policy shifts—a sure prescription for confusion. Regarding the question of operationalization, the article concedes that better measures of some key features of prevailing theories might be imaginable, but, since few of these are available, it cautions against letting the best become the enemy of the good in cross-national nonprofit theory testing. Finally, the article finds, in suggestions that multivariate techniques be used in testing various nonprofit theories, confirmation of its central argument that a contextual analysis of the sort embodied in the authors' "social origins" approach is needed to come to terms with the reality of the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Taken together these comments underline the need to continue the kind of systematic data gathering and theory testing that the authors have undertaken, to utilize an interdisciplinary approach, and to link the study of the nonprofit sector to social analysis more generally.}, language = {en} }