@article{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Mehr Quereinsteiger!}, series = {Die Zeit}, journal = {Die Zeit}, number = {23/2022}, abstract = {Der neue Bundestag mag j{\"u}nger und diverser sein. Wir brauchen dennoch neue Formate f{\"u}r politisches Engagement}, language = {en} } @article{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Ampelregierung - Mehr Fehlerkultur wagen!}, series = {Spiegel}, journal = {Spiegel}, abstract = {Wenn Politik unter Hochdruck arbeitet, passieren Fehler - so wie j{\"u}ngst beim Gezerre um die Gasumlage. Leider verzeiht die Logik der Macht keine Korrekturen. Damit die Demokratie nicht auf Grundeis l{\"a}uft, sollte sich das dringend {\"a}ndern.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Bundestagswahl 2021}, series = {{\"O}sterreichisches Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Politik 2021}, booktitle = {{\"O}sterreichisches Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Politik 2021}, publisher = {B{\"o}hlau / Politische Akademie}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {978-3-205-21514-1}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {117 -- 124}, language = {de} } @article{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Wissenschaftskommunikation neu denken}, series = {Forschung \& Lehre}, journal = {Forschung \& Lehre}, number = {4/22}, issn = {0945-5604}, pages = {257 -- 257}, abstract = {In der Corona-Krise wurde die Rolle wissenschaftlicher Expertise f{\"u}r politische Entscheidungen vor unser aller Augen neu ausgehandelt.}, language = {de} } @article{KocMichalskaKlingerBennettetal., author = {Koc-Michalska, Karolina and Klinger, Ulrike and Bennett, Lance and R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {(Digital) Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres}, series = {Political Communication}, journal = {Political Communication}, doi = {10.1080/10584609.2023.2173872}, abstract = {With the advent of digital media and social media platforms, the speed of innovation and technology adoption in campaigns have increased tremendously. At the same time, the campaign environment and its rules are in constant flow, as platform logics, party operations, and voter alignments both reflect and create instability in many political systems. Additionally, disinformation, foreign interference in cam-paigns, hyper-partisan media ecologies, and hyperactive users have all created changes in opinion climates. In light of these develop-ments, and building on the theoretical concept of increasingly dis-rupted and dissonant public spheres (developed by Barbara Pfetsch and Lance Bennett), this special issue seeks to expand research on campaigning beyond assumptions of well-functioning political sys-tems, to better understand the erosion of institutional legitimacy and trust, and their effects on communication processes. The special issue is organized within two conceptual approaches. The first cluster of manuscripts observes how political candidates, organizations, and parties optimize their behaviour within the dissonant political envir-onment. The second part examines responses, perceptions, and con-sequences of the disrupted environment on the public. Finally, four integrated forum essays look into how dissonant public spheres may disturb democratic processes, discuss the role of data-driven cam-paigning, and address how limited access to platform data affects our understanding of dissonant public spheres.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Die Kompetenzkrise der Medien beginnt im Medienmanagement}, series = {Deep Journalism. Dom{\"a}nenkompetenz als redaktioneller Erfolgsfaktor}, booktitle = {Deep Journalism. Dom{\"a}nenkompetenz als redaktioneller Erfolgsfaktor}, publisher = {Herbert von Halem Verlag}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, isbn = {9783869626604}, publisher = {Hertie School}, language = {de} } @incollection{RoemmeleDarius, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea and Darius, Philipp}, title = {KI und datengesteuerte Kampagnen: Eine Diskussion der Rolle generativer KI im politischen Wahlkampf}, series = {Informationsfl{\"u}sse, Wahlen und Demokratie: Festschrift f{\"u}r R{\"u}diger Schmitt-Beck}, volume = {Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung. Band 35}, booktitle = {Informationsfl{\"u}sse, Wahlen und Demokratie: Festschrift f{\"u}r R{\"u}diger Schmitt-Beck}, editor = {Faas, Thorsten and Huber, Sascha and Krewel, Mona and Roßteutscher, Sigrid}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH \& Co. KG}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {9783756008001}, doi = {10.5771/9783748915553}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {199 -- 211}, language = {de} } @article{GibsonBonRoemmele, author = {Gibson, Rachel and Bon, Esmeralda and R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Operationalizing data-driven campaigning: designing a new tool for mapping and guiding regulatory intervention}, series = {Policy Studies}, journal = {Policy Studies}, doi = {10.1080/01442872.2023.2259333}, abstract = {Since the Cambridge Analytica scandal, governments are increasingly concerned about the way in which citizens' personal data are collected, processed and used during election campaigns To develop the appropriate tools for monitoring and controlling this new mode of "data-driven campaigning" (DDC) regulators require a clear understanding of the practices involved. This paper provides a first step toward that goal by proposing a new organizational and process-centred operational definition of DDC from which we derive a set of empirical indicators. The indicators are applied to the policy environment of a leading government in this domain - the European Union (EU) - to generate a descriptive "heat map" of current regulatory activity toward DDC. Based on the results of this exercise, we argue that regulation is likely to intensify on existing practices and extend to cover current "cold spots". Drawing on models of internet governance, we argue that this expansion is likely to occur in one of two ways. A "kaleidoscopic" approach, in which current legislation extends to absorb DDC practices and a more "designed" approach that involves more active intervention by elites, and ultimately the generation of a new regulatory regime.}, language = {en} } @techreport{RoemmeleDarius, type = {Working Paper}, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea and Darius, Philipp}, title = {Politicians don't dance? AI doesn't either!: A discussion of generative AI and political campaigning}, series = {Verfassungsblog}, journal = {Verfassungsblog}, number = {2023/6/30}, doi = {10.17176/20230630-231152-0}, language = {en} } @misc{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {What Actually Is the "New" in the New Enlightenment?}, series = {Global Perspectives}, volume = {5}, journal = {Global Perspectives}, number = {1}, publisher = {University of California Press}, doi = {10.1525/gp.2024.93039}, abstract = {A Review Essay of Towards a New Enlightenment: The Case for Future-Oriented Humanities, by Markus Gabriel, Christoph Horn, Anna Katsman, Wilhelm Krull, Anna Luisa Lippold, Corine Pelluchon, and Ingo Venzke. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2022 (published simultaneously in both German and English).}, language = {en} } @book{Roemmele, author = {R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {Demokratie neu denken: Szenarien unserer Welt von morgen}, publisher = {Campus Verlag GmbH}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, isbn = {9783593517902}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {223}, abstract = {Wir brauchen in Deutschland eine Politik, die vision{\"a}r nach vorne denkt. Denn die Vorstellungskraft r{\"u}stet uns f{\"u}r die Zukunft und macht Demokratie gestaltbar. In diesem Sinne beschreibt Andrea R{\"o}mmele die Megatrends, die unser Leben erfasst haben: Digitalisierung und KI, Urbanisierung, demografischer Wandel und Migration, Klimawandel und Globalisierung. Zu jedem Megatrend entwirft sie fiktive Szenarien, die zeigen, wie Demokratie unter großem Druck lebendig bleiben kann - oder wie sie scheitert. Wir m{\"u}ssen umdenken: von der Maximierung des Privaten zum Denken f{\"u}r die Gemeinschaft, von Zukunftsangst zu Zukunftsmut!}, language = {de} } @article{BonGibsonDariusetal., author = {Bon, Esmeralda and Gibson, Rachel and Darius, Philipp and Greffet, Fabienne and R{\"o}mmele, Andrea}, title = {What drives data-driven campaigning (DDC)? A comparative analysis of the institutional and organisational factors shaping the adoption of DDC in the French and German party systems}, series = {Swiss Political Science Review}, volume = {31}, journal = {Swiss Political Science Review}, publisher = {Wiley}, issn = {1424-7755}, doi = {10.1111/spsr.12652}, pages = {79 -- 101}, abstract = {This paper analyses the adoption of data-driven campaigning (DDC) by German and French parties in recent national elections using data from an original post-election survey of 27 parties (12 German, 15 French) and a new purpose-built DDC campaign index. Specifically, we investigate two main research questions: (1) Do countries and parties vary in the extent to which DDC is practised? (2) If so, what explains those differences? We find that while in both countries DDC adoption is limited in comparison to other campaign modes, differences exist across countries and parties based on a range of macro (systemic) and meso (organisation-level) factors. Most notably, contrary to normalisation theory, we find that minor parties with a 'netroots' base and newcomers who are digital 'natives' engage more in DDC than the 'legacy' major parties.}, language = {en} }