@misc{JoergesFalke, author = {Joerges, Christian and Falke, Josef}, title = {Handelsliberalisierung und Sozialregulierung in transnationalen Konstellationen}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-1088-1}, pages = {455}, abstract = {Das Buch untersucht vergleichend f{\"u}r den europ{\"a}ischen Binnenmarkt und den internationalen Handel die Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen der Liberalisierung des Handels und seiner Regulierung zum Zwecke des Arbeits-, Gesundheits- und Umweltschutzes an den Beispielen Produkt- und Lebensmittelsicherheit in der EU, Telekommunikations- und Gesundheitsdienstleistungen, Verminderung von CO2-Emissionen von Pkw, Arbeits- und Sozialstandards im internationalen Handel, private Standards zum Schutz {\"o}ffentlicher G{\"u}ter im Welthandel. Als normativer Maßstab f{\"u}r die empirische Politikwissenschaft dient das Konzept der „Sozialregulierungsf{\"a}higkeit". F{\"u}r die rechtliche Kontrolle der externen Effekte staatlichen Handelns, der transnationalen Verwaltungskooperationen und der Aufgabenverlagerungen auf private Akteure wird das Konzept eines dreidimensionalen Kollisionsrechts entwickelt. Mit Beitr{\"a}gen von: Olga Batura, Henning Deters, Josef Falke, Carola Glinski, Thorsten H{\"u}ller, Christian Joerges und Markus Krajewski}, language = {de} } @periodical{JoergesGuibboni2013, author = {Joerges, Christian and Guibboni, Stefano}, title = {Recht und Politik in der Krise Europas}, series = {Deutsch-Italienische Studien (Studi Italo-Tedeschi)}, volume = {6}, journal = {Deutsch-Italienische Studien (Studi Italo-Tedeschi)}, publisher = {ZERP (Zentrum f{\"u}r europ{\"a}ische Rechtspolitik)}, address = {Bremen}, pages = {23}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Although international police cooperation is not a new phenomenon and despite its relevance for the monopoly of force, studies applying a political science or international relations (IR) perspective are scarce. Through a 'competition of claims', this article reviews and organizes current literature on cooperation in internal security to highlight crucial points of entry for IR- and political science approaches. While both claims argue along the lines of functionalist regime theory, the 'informality claim' stresses state's interest to uphold autonomy and their accordant preference for informal cooperation. In contrast, the 'institutionalization claim' underscores the willingness of states to create formal and strong institutions as they promise efficiency gains in light of transborder problems. By focusing on central issues in police cooperation (terrorism, drugs, money laundering, organized crime)this review highlights that internal security can become a prospering field for IR- and political science theorizing.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Joerges, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {Zum Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 12 September 2012 {\"u}ber den ESM- und den Fiskalvertrag}, series = {Jahrbuch der Juristischen Gesellschaft Bremen 2013}, volume = {14}, booktitle = {Jahrbuch der Juristischen Gesellschaft Bremen 2013}, publisher = {Ed. Temmen}, address = {Bremen}, isbn = {978-3837812046}, pages = {27 -- 31}, language = {de} } @article{Joerges, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {De la integrarea prin drept la criza financiară: Ce a mai rămas din constituţia economică europeană?}, series = {Revista Rom{\^a}nă de Drept European (Romanian Review of European Law)}, volume = {2013}, journal = {Revista Rom{\^a}nă de Drept European (Romanian Review of European Law)}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wolters Kluwer Romania}, address = {Bukarest}, issn = {2068-8083}, pages = {23 -- 43}, abstract = {This paper will defend the 'conflicts-law approach' and develop a step further an approach to European law which I call "conflicts-law constitutionalism". The argument will proceed in three distinct steps. I will first recall very briefly the legacy of the 'integration through law' project and submit that the conflicts-law approach can be understood as an effort to rewrite and to re-conceptualise the project of Europe's 'integration trough law' (II). The main section of the paper will confront the legacy of 'integration through law' with Karl Polanyi's economic sociology and its warnings against the commod if ication of land, labour and money (III). On that basis the potential of the conflicts-law approach will be explored in three scenarios which the commod if ication of these goods have provoked (IV). The concluding part will contrast the approach with J{\"u}rgen Habermas' renewed plea for a demoaatisation of the European project on the one hand and the Großraum theory of Habermas' favourite enemy on the other (V).}, language = {mul} } @article{Joerges, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {European Democracy and Conflicts-Law Constitutionalism: Affinities, Differences, Concerns}, publisher = {NYU School of Law}, address = {New York}, pages = {5}, language = {en} } @techreport{Joerges2013, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {Unity in Diversity as Europe's Vocation and Conflicts Law as Europe's Constitutional Form}, series = {LSE : Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series (No. 28)}, volume = {28}, journal = {LSE : Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series (No. 28)}, publisher = {LEQS}, address = {London}, pages = {45}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Unity in Diversity" was the fortunate motto of the otherwise unfortunate Draft Constitutional Treaty. The motto did not make it in to the Treaty of Lisbon. It deserves to be kept alive in a new constitutional perspective, namely the re-conceptualisation of European law as new type of conflicts law. The new type of conflicts law which the paper advocates is not concerned with selecting the proper legal system in cases with connections to various jurisdictions. It is instead meant to respond to the increasing interdependence of formerly more autonomous legal orders and to the democracy failure of constitutional states which result from the external effects of their laws and legal decisions on non-nationals. European has many means to compensate these shortcomings. It can derive its legitimacy from that compensatory potential without developing federal aspirations. The paper illustrates this approach with the help of a topical example, namely the conflict between European economic freedoms and national industrial relations (collective labour)law. The recent jurisprudence of the ECJ in Viking, Laval, and R{\"u}ffert in which the Court established the supremacy of the freedoms over national labour law is criticised as a counterproductive deepening of Europe's constitutional asymmetry and its social deficit. The introductory and the concluding sections generalise the perspectives of the conflicts-law approach. The introductory section takes issue with max Weber's national state. The concluding section suggests a three-dimensional differentiation of the approach which seeks to respond to the need for transnational regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @article{Joerges2013, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {Ernstnehmen des Anderen. Und zwar als Rechtsgebot! Darum geht es in Europa}, series = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional}, journal = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional}, editor = {Steinbeis, Maximilian}, address = {Berlin}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{JoergesRoedl, author = {Joerges, Christian and R{\"o}dl, Florian}, title = {{\`A} propos de l'{\´e}volution fonctionnelle du droit des conflits de lois II : une constitution l{\´e}gitime pour la constellation post-nationale}, series = {Revue Internationale de Droit {\´E}conomique}, volume = {27}, journal = {Revue Internationale de Droit {\´E}conomique}, number = {1-2}, pages = {79 -- 93}, language = {fr} } @misc{JoergesGlinski, author = {Joerges, Christian and Glinski, Carola}, title = {The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance}, publisher = {Hart}, address = {Oxford [u.a.]}, isbn = {9781849466325}, pages = {405}, abstract = {The debate on law, governance and constitutionalism beyond the state is confronted with new challenges. In the EU, confidence in democratic transnational governance has been shaken by the authoritarian and unsocial practices of crisis management. The ambition of this book, which builds upon many years of close co-operation between its contributors, is to promote a viable interdisciplinary alternative to these developments. "Conflicts-law constitutionalism" is a concept of transnational governance which derives democratic legitimacy from the supranational control of the external impact of national decision-making, on the one hand, and the co-operative responses to problem interdependencies on the other. The first section of the book contrasts Europe's new modes of economic governance crisis management with the conditionality of international investments, and reflects upon the communalities and differences between emergency Europe and global exceptionalism. Subsequent sections substantiate the probl{\´e}matique of executive and technocratic rule, explore conflict constellations of prime importance in the fields of environmental and labour law, and discuss the impact and limits of liberalisation strategies. Throughout the book, European and transnational developments are compared and evaluated.}, language = {en} } @article{Joerges, author = {Joerges, Christian}, title = {Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a new Constitutional Constellation}, series = {German Law Journal}, volume = {15}, journal = {German Law Journal}, number = {5}, issn = {1566-6573}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.2179595}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-5740}, pages = {985 -- 1027}, abstract = {The European Union rides through troubled waters. Its original reliance on law as the object and agent of the integration project and on the "economic constitution," which the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)—as accomplished by the Treaty of Maastricht—expected to complete, have proven unsustainable. Following the financial and sovereign debt crises, individuals perceive the EMU, with its commitments to price stability and monetary politics, as a failed construction precisely because of its reliance on inflexible rules. The European crisis management seeks to compensate for these failures by means of regulatory machinery which disregards the European order of competences, takes power from national institutions, and burdens—in particular—Southern Europe with austerity measures; it establishes pan-European commitments to budgetary discipline and macroeconomic balancing. This abolishes the ideal of a legal ordering of the European economy, while the economic and social prospects of these efforts appear gloomy and the Union's political legitimacy becomes precarious. A fictitious debate between Carl Schmitt and J{\"u}rgen Habermas addresses the present critical constellation, where a number of Schmittian notions seem alarmingly realistic. This essay pleads for a more modest Europe committing itself to "unity in diversity," the motto of the ill-fated Constitutional Treaty of 2003.}, language = {en} }