@article{HurrelmannRathmannOttovaetal., author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Rathmann, Katharina and Ottova, Veronika and de Looze, Margarethe and Levin, Kate and Molcho, Michael and Elgar, Frank and Nic Gabhainn, Saoirse and van Dijk, Jitse P. and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Macro-level determinants of young people's subjective health and health inequalities: A multilevel analysis in 27 welfare states}, series = {Maturitas}, volume = {80}, journal = {Maturitas}, number = {4}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]}, issn = {0378-5122}, doi = {10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.01.008}, pages = {414 -- 420}, abstract = {Objectives Cross-national studies have rarely focused on young people. The aim of this study is to investigate whether macro-level determinants are associated with health and socioeconomic inequalities in young people's health. Study design Data were collected from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in 2006, which included 11- to 15-year old adolescents from 27 European and North American countries (n = 134,632). This study includes national income, health expenditure, income inequality, and welfare regime dummy-variables as macro-level determinants, using hierarchical regression modelling. Main outcome measure Psychosomatic health complaints and socioeconomic inequalities in psychosomatic health complaints. Results Adolescents in countries with higher income inequality and with liberal welfare tradition were associated with more health complaints and a stronger relationship between socioeconomic status and macro-level determinants compared to adolescents from countries with lower income inequality or the Social Democratic regime. National income and health expenditure were not related to health complaints. Countries with higher national income, public health expenditure and income inequality showed stronger associations between socioeconomic status and psychosomatic health complaints. Conclusion Results showed that macro-level characteristics are relevant determinants of health and health inequalities in adolescence.}, language = {en} } @article{HurrelmannQuenzel2013, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Quenzel, Gudrun}, title = {Lost in transition: status insecurity and inconsistency as hallmarks of modern adolescence}, series = {International Journal of Adolescence and Youth}, volume = {20}, journal = {International Journal of Adolescence and Youth}, number = {3}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London [u.a.]}, issn = {0267-3843}, doi = {10.1080/02673843.2013.785440}, pages = {261 -- 270}, year = {2013}, abstract = {In highly developed countries, the adolescent phase of life is expanding more and more. The consequences are status insecurity and inconsistency. A side effect is that adolescence is no longer clearly separable as demarcated biographical stage from adulthood. In this paper, we argue that the developmental tasks of a typical adolescent and a typical adult can only be partially differentiated, and the exact point in time when adolescents become adults can no longer be clearly identified. We find evidence that adolescence is becoming more 'adult' and adulthood is correspondingly becoming more 'juvenile'. In almost all important social areas of life, the behavioral patterns of adults and of adolescents are coalescing. Living with insecurity in the working life and in social relations, experiencing limitations of personal autonomy, and the continuous need to work on social status inconsistencies today are characteristic features of the life of adolescents and adults. As many adolescents meet these demands skillfully and flexibly, they have in many respects become 'social models' for the adult life phase.}, language = {en} } @article{HurrelmannBauer, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Bauer, Ullrich}, title = {Das Modell der produktiven Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung in der aktuellen Diskussion}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, volume = {35}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, number = {2}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {1436-1957}, pages = {155 -- 170}, abstract = {Das Modell der produktiven Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung (MpR) ist ein stabiler Anker der sozialisationstheoretischen Diskussion der vergangenen Jahrzehnte. Dabei ist der metatheoretische Bezugspunkt der Interaktion zwischen der aktiven Pers{\"o}nlichkeit und einer sich wandelnden gesellschaftlichen Umwelt offenbar unver{\"a}ndert an - schlussf{\"a}hig. Gleichzeitig hat es fortlaufend Ver{\"a}nderungen im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs gegeben, die sowohl die Operationalisierung der individuellen Handlungsf{\"a}higkeit und ihrer Bedingtheit, als auch die Differenzierung von Kontext- und Umweltmerkmalen betreffen. In diesem Beitrag wird daher die Frage aufgeworfen, welche Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit und Erkenntniskraft das MpR unter ver{\"a}nderten gesellschaftlichen und wissenschaftlichen Bedingungen nach {\"u}ber drei Jahrzehnten f{\"u}r die Sozialisationstheorie und -forschung hat. Daf{\"u}r wird (1) einleitend das Modell in seinen Grundz{\"u}gen vorgestellt und in Thesenform erl{\"a}utert. Die vier Arbeitsschwerpunkte, (2) er - kenntnistheoretische und konzeptionelle Grundannahmen, (3) Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung im Lebenslauf, (4) sozialr{\"a}umliche Kontexte der Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung und (5) Diversit{\"a}ten der Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung werden mit aktuellen Ans{\"a}tzen und Befunden in Beziehung gesetzt. Abschließend (6) werden theorie- und forschungssystematische Herausforderungen der Sozialisationsforschung aufgelistet, die sich aus dem Verst{\"a}ndnis von Sozialisation als produktive Realit{\"a}tsverarbeitung ergeben.}, language = {de} }