@techreport{BeggEnderleinLeCacheuxetal.2008, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Begg, Iain and Enderlein, Henrik and Le Cacheux, Jacques and Mrak, Mojmir}, title = {Financing of the European Union budget : study for European Commissions, Directorate General for Budget ; final report}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39}, year = {2008}, abstract = {"A review of both the expenditure and revenue sides of the EU budget - with no taboos - was agreed as part of the 2005 settlement of the EU budget for the period 2007-13. This study is intended to inform debate on the revenue side. It investigates two main questions: how well does the current system for raising revenue for the EU budget function; and how could it be improved. [...]"}, language = {en} } @misc{EnderleinWaeltiZuern2010, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and W{\"a}lti, Sonja and Z{\"u}rn, Michael}, title = {Handbook on multi-level governance}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {9781849806299}, pages = {512}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors - an international group of highly renowned scholars - report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @article{EnderleinVerdun2009, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Verdun, Amy}, title = {EMU's teenage challenge: what have we learned and can we predict from political science?}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, issn = {1466-4429}, doi = {10.1080/13501760902872106}, pages = {490 -- 507}, year = {2009}, abstract = {We review the initial predictions and claims regarding economic and monetary union (EMU) in Europe against the evidence of its first ten years of existence. We argue that pessimistic views on the creation of EMU have proved to be wrong. Yet EMU's success is rather puzzling, since it is based on a peculiar institutional structure not thought to lead to success. EMU has generated redistributive effects and may have increased business-cycle synchronization. Those effects have not translated into the expected decrease of legitimacy or a widespread democratic deficit of EMU. At the institutional level, EMU has coped well with an asymmetric framework, largely decoupling EMU from political union. There have been neither major spill-over effects pushing for further political integration nor conflict and disintegration. The main question for the future is whether this institutional structure will stay the same in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.}, language = {en} } @misc{DawsonEnderleinJoerges, author = {Dawson, Mark and Enderlein, Henrik and Joerges, Christian}, title = {The governance report 2015 : Eurozone crisis ; economic governance ; institutional dilemmas ; constitutionalism ; indicators}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-873431-4}, pages = {146 S.}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinPisaniFerry, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Pisani-Ferry, Jean}, title = {"Reforms and Investment and Growth: An Agenda for France, Germany and Europe". Report to the French Minister for the Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs and to the German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Towards an Ever Closer Economic and Monetary Union? The Politics and Economics of Exploratory Governance}, series = {Beyond the Crisis The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation}, booktitle = {Beyond the Crisis The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198752868}, doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198752868.003.0002}, pages = {13 -- 23}, language = {en} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {The Euro as a Showcase for Exploratory Governance: Why There Are No Simple Answers}, series = {The Governance Report}, booktitle = {The Governance Report}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, pages = {25 -- 40}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinFritzVannahmeHaas, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Fritz-Vannahme, Joachim and Haas, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Repair and Prepare: Strenghening Europe's Economies after the Crisis. Joint Report Jacques Delors Institut - Berlin and Bertelsmann Stiftung}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinRubio, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Rubio, Eulalia}, title = {25 years after the Delors-Report: Which lessons for Economic and Monetary Union. Policy Paper No. 109 Notre Europe and Jacques Delors Institut - Berlin.}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinSchumacherTrebesch, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Schumacher, Julian and Trebesch, Christoph}, title = {Sovereign Defaults in Court: The Rise of Creditor Litigation 1976-2010}, language = {en} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Outlook: Where Do the EU and the EMU Go from Here?}, series = {The Governance Report 2015}, booktitle = {The Governance Report 2015}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinBertonciniFernandesetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Bertoncini, Yves and Fernandes, Sofia and Haas, J{\"o}rg and Rubio, Eulalia}, title = {Weiterentwicklung der WWU}, language = {de} } @incollection{DawsonEnderleinJoerges, author = {Dawson, Mark and Enderlein, Henrik and Joerges, Christian}, title = {Introduction: The Governance of the Transformation of Europe's Economic, Political, and constitutional Constellation since the Euro Crisis}, series = {Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation}, booktitle = {Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {9780198752868}, doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198752868.003.0001}, language = {en} } @article{EnderleinTrebeschSchumacher, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Trebesch, Christoph and Schumacher, Julian}, title = {What explains sovereign debt litigation?}, series = {The Journal of Law and Economics}, volume = {58}, journal = {The Journal of Law and Economics}, number = {3}, publisher = {University of Chicago Press}, address = {Chicago}, issn = {1537-5285}, doi = {10.1086/684228}, pages = {585 -- 623}, abstract = {We study the occurrence of holdout litigation in the context of sovereign defaults. The number of creditor lawsuits against foreign governments has strongly increased over the past decades, but there is a large variation across crisis events. Why are some defaults followed by litigation and others not? What explains the general increase in lawsuits? We address these questions using an economic model of litigation and a new data set capturing the near universe of cases filed against defaulting sovereigns. We find that creditors are more likely to litigate when debt restructurings are large, when governments impose high losses (haircuts), and when the defaulting country is more vulnerable to litigation (open economies and those with a low legal capacity). We conclude that sovereign debt lawsuits can be predicted reasonably well with a simple framework from the law and economics literature.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Time to move on: The discussion about EMU deepening needs to change}, series = {Strengthening the Institutional Architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union}, booktitle = {Strengthening the Institutional Architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union}, editor = {Buti, Marco and Giudice, Gabriele and Leandro, Jos{\´e}}, publisher = {CEPR Press}, address = {London}, isbn = {978-1-912179-36-7}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {6 -- 11}, abstract = {The crisis generated by the Covid-19 pandemic has required rapid and strong action. It also entails key choices, including on how the EU could help mitigate the impact of Covid-19, foster the economic recovery and support the dual green and digital transitions. In September 2019, before the crisis, the Directorate General for Economy and Finance of the European Commission organised a workshop on strengthening the institutional architecture of the EMU. This eBook presents the main ideas discussed at the workshop.}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinHaas, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Haas, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Structural Policies for Growth and Jobs: Best Practices, Benchmarking and the Role of the Eurogroup}, doi = {10.2861/96059}, pages = {31}, abstract = {This briefing paper analyses the role of the Eurogroup in European economic governance. It assesses the effectiveness of thematic discussions, proposes improvements to the process, and suggests how the legitimacy of Eurogroup actions and decisions could be strengthened.}, language = {en} } @incollection{EnderleinGnathHaas, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Gnath, Katharina and Haas, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Deutschland und die Stabilit{\"a}t der Wirtschafts- und W{\"a}hrungsunion}, series = {Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik}, booktitle = {Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik}, editor = {B{\"o}ttger, Katrin and Jopp, Mathias}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8452-7412-6}, doi = {10.5771/9783845274126-246}, publisher = {Hertie School}, pages = {246 -- 259}, abstract = {In der Gr{\"u}ndungsphase der W{\"a}hrungsunion konzentrierten sich die deutschen Forderungen auf niedrige Inflationsraten und geringe Staatsverschuldung. Mit Beginn der Krise wurde jedoch deutlich, dass der deutsche Stabilit{\"a}tsgedanke sehr eng gefasst war. Neben der fehlenden Haushaltsdisziplin trugen andere Faktoren maßgeblich zur Instabilit{\"a}t der Eurozone bei: Sowohl Leistungsbilanzungleichgewichte, als auch das Fehlen von Instrumenten zum Krisenmanagement und die gef{\"a}hrlichen selbstverst{\"a}rkenden Dynamiken zwischen geschw{\"a}chten Banken und {\"u}berschuldeten Staaten wurden vor der Krise weitgehend ignoriert. Im Verlauf der Krise hat die deutsche Regierung an ihrer traditionellen Vorstellung von Stabilit{\"a}t durch Kontrolle und {\"U}berwachung der Mitgliedsstaaten festgehalten. Zugleich hat Deutschland auch immer wieder pragmatisch gehandelt, um die Eurozone zu erhalten. So war das Land maßgeblich an der Schaffung des Europ{\"a}ischen Stabilit{\"a}tsmechanismus und dem Aufbau einer Bankenunion beteiligt und tolerierte eine Reihe von außergew{\"o}hnlichen Maßnahmen der EZB. Trotz der Reformbem{\"u}hungen der letzten Jahre weist die Eurozone weiterhin Konstruktionsfehler auf, die die Stabilit{\"a}t der gemeinsamen W{\"a}hrung ernsthaft gef{\"a}hrden. Unter den Mitgliedsstaaten herrscht jedoch Uneinigkeit {\"u}ber die richtige Euro-Architektur: In der aktuellen Reform-Debatte prallen unterschiedliche Wahrnehmungen der Probleme und unterschiedliche politische Pr{\"a}ferenzen f{\"u}r die Zukunft der Eurozone aufeinander. Die deutsche Europapolitik sollte sich um eine konstruktive Rolle in den notwendigen anstehenden Reformen bem{\"u}hen. Hierbei gilt es auszubuchstabieren, unter welchen Umst{\"a}nden eine erh{\"o}hte Risikoteilung in der Eurozone f{\"u}r Deutschland tragbar w{\"a}re.}, language = {de} } @techreport{EnderleinBofingerPirisetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Bofinger, Peter and Piris, Jean-Claude and de Grauwe, Paul and Rodrigues, Maria Joao and Pisani-Ferry, Jean and Sapir, Andr{\´e}s and Vitorino, Antonio}, title = {Completing the Euro : A roadmap towards fiscal union in Europe ; Report of the "Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa Group}, publisher = {Notre Europe}, address = {Paris}, pages = {68}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinLeCacheuxMraketal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Le Cacheux, Jacques and Mrak, Mojmir and Begg, Iain}, title = {Financing of the EU budget. Report for the European Commission.}, pages = {130}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinFritzVannahmeHaasetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Fritz-Vannahme, Joachim and Haas, J{\"o}rg and Esche, Andreas and Petersen, Theiß}, title = {Repair and Prepare : Strengthening Europe's Economies after the Crisis}, publisher = {Verl. Bertelsmann Stiftung}, address = {G{\"u}tersloh}, pages = {40}, language = {en} }