@techreport{BeggEnderleinLeCacheuxetal.2008, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Begg, Iain and Enderlein, Henrik and Le Cacheux, Jacques and Mrak, Mojmir}, title = {Financing of the European Union budget : study for European Commissions, Directorate General for Budget ; final report}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-39}, year = {2008}, abstract = {"A review of both the expenditure and revenue sides of the EU budget - with no taboos - was agreed as part of the 2005 settlement of the EU budget for the period 2007-13. This study is intended to inform debate on the revenue side. It investigates two main questions: how well does the current system for raising revenue for the EU budget function; and how could it be improved. [...]"}, language = {en} } @misc{EnderleinWaeltiZuern2010, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and W{\"a}lti, Sonja and Z{\"u}rn, Michael}, title = {Handbook on multi-level governance}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {9781849806299}, pages = {512}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts. The importance of multi-level governance in specific policy areas is highlighted, and the contributors - an international group of highly renowned scholars - report on the ways in which their field of specialization is or may be affected by multi-level governance and how developments could affect its conceptualization. European integration is considered from its unique standpoint as the key catalyst in the development of multi-level approaches, and the use of multi-level governance in other parts of the world, at both domestic and regional levels, is also considered in detail before focus is shifted towards global governance. The Handbook concludes with a presentation of six policy fields and instruments affected by multi-level governance, including: social policy, environmental policy, economic policy, international taxation, standard-setting and policing. This comprehensive Handbook takes stock of the vast array of multi-level governance theory and research developed in subfields of political science and public policy, and as such will provide an invaluable reference tool for scholars, researchers and students with a special interest in public policy, regulation and governance.}, language = {en} } @article{EnderleinVerdun2009, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Verdun, Amy}, title = {EMU's teenage challenge: what have we learned and can we predict from political science?}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, issn = {1466-4429}, doi = {10.1080/13501760902872106}, pages = {490 -- 507}, year = {2009}, abstract = {We review the initial predictions and claims regarding economic and monetary union (EMU) in Europe against the evidence of its first ten years of existence. We argue that pessimistic views on the creation of EMU have proved to be wrong. Yet EMU's success is rather puzzling, since it is based on a peculiar institutional structure not thought to lead to success. EMU has generated redistributive effects and may have increased business-cycle synchronization. Those effects have not translated into the expected decrease of legitimacy or a widespread democratic deficit of EMU. At the institutional level, EMU has coped well with an asymmetric framework, largely decoupling EMU from political union. There have been neither major spill-over effects pushing for further political integration nor conflict and disintegration. The main question for the future is whether this institutional structure will stay the same in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinBofingerPirisetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Bofinger, Peter and Piris, Jean-Claude and de Grauwe, Paul and Rodrigues, Maria Joao and Pisani-Ferry, Jean and Sapir, Andr{\´e}s and Vitorino, Antonio}, title = {Completing the Euro : A roadmap towards fiscal union in Europe ; Report of the "Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa Group}, publisher = {Notre Europe}, address = {Paris}, pages = {68}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinLeCacheuxMraketal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Le Cacheux, Jacques and Mrak, Mojmir and Begg, Iain}, title = {Financing of the EU budget. Report for the European Commission.}, pages = {130}, language = {en} } @techreport{EnderleinFritzVannahmeHaasetal., type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Fritz-Vannahme, Joachim and Haas, J{\"o}rg and Esche, Andreas and Petersen, Theiß}, title = {Repair and Prepare : Strengthening Europe's Economies after the Crisis}, publisher = {Verl. Bertelsmann Stiftung}, address = {G{\"u}tersloh}, pages = {40}, language = {en} } @techreport{Enderlein, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {The Economic Impact of the Deutsche-B{\"o}rse-NYSE Euronext Merger on the European Financial Markets}, publisher = {Hertie School of Governance}, address = {Berlin}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-12722}, pages = {66}, abstract = {This study examines the impact of the merger between Deutsche B{\"o}rse Group (DBG) and the New York Stock Exchange Euronext (NYX) on the European financial markets. It takes the view that from a policy-making perspective the impact of the merger on the European financial markets should be assessed beyond the mere realm of economies of scale, market share and competition. The study therefore presents a broader framework, looking at (i) financial market stability and regulation, (ii) financial centre competitiveness, in particular of the euro area as a whole, and (iii) the inter-related goals of financial integration, cost-efficiency and harmonisation.}, language = {en} } @article{EnderleinHabermasFischeretal., author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen and Fischer, Joschka and Calliess, Christian}, title = {Kurzgefasst : Europa und die neue deutsche Frage; Ein Gespr{\"a}ch mit J{\"u}rgen Habermas, Joschka Fischer, Henrik Enderlein und Christian Calliess}, series = {Bl{\"a}tter f{\"u}r deutsche und internationale Politik}, journal = {Bl{\"a}tter f{\"u}r deutsche und internationale Politik}, number = {5}, publisher = {Bl{\"a}tter-Gesel.}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0006-4416}, pages = {45 -- 63}, language = {de} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Warum wir mehr Europa brauchen}, series = {Lehren aus der Finanzmarktkrise : Ein Comeback der sozialen Marktwirtschaft ; BAND III ; Verflochtene Krisen; Von der Finanzmarkt- zur Eurokrise}, booktitle = {Lehren aus der Finanzmarktkrise : Ein Comeback der sozialen Marktwirtschaft ; BAND III ; Verflochtene Krisen; Von der Finanzmarkt- zur Eurokrise}, publisher = {Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung}, address = {Sankt-Augustin ; Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-924755-00-7}, pages = {9 -- 14}, language = {de} } @article{EnderleinGnathJunkeretal., author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Gnath, Katharina and Junker, Detlef and Mildner, Stormy and Braml, Josef}, title = {USA nach der Wahl : Welche Folgen sind f{\"u}r Europa zu erwarten?}, series = {ifo Schnelldienst}, volume = {61}, journal = {ifo Schnelldienst}, number = {23}, publisher = {ifo Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsforschung}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, pages = {3 -- 15}, language = {de} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {The Stability and Growth Pact is Broken? Don't Fix it!}, series = {EUSA Review}, volume = {18}, journal = {EUSA Review}, number = {1}, publisher = {University of Pittsburgh}, address = {Pittsburgh}, pages = {5 -- 7}, language = {en} } @incollection{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Solidarit{\"a}t in der Europ{\"a}ischen Union: Die {\"o}konomische Perspektive}, series = {Europ{\"a}ische Solidarit{\"a}t und nationale Identit{\"a}t}, booktitle = {Europ{\"a}ische Solidarit{\"a}t und nationale Identit{\"a}t}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {978-3-16-152814-9}, pages = {83 -- 97}, language = {de} } @book{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Nationale Wirtschaftspolitik in der europ{\"a}ischen W{\"a}hrungsunion}, series = {Schriften des Max-Planck-Instituts f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsforschung}, volume = {49}, journal = {Schriften des Max-Planck-Instituts f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsforschung}, publisher = {Campus}, address = {Frankfurt/Main [u.a.]}, isbn = {3-593-37474-9}, pages = {228}, language = {de} } @article{EnderleinVerdun, author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Verdun, Amy}, title = {EMU's teenage challenge : what have we learned and can we predict from political science?}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {4}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {Jarfalla}, issn = {1350-1763}, doi = {10.1080/13501760902872106}, pages = {490 -- 507}, abstract = {We review the initial predictions and claims regarding economic and monetary union (EMU) in Europe against the evidence of its first ten years of existence. We argue that pessimistic views on the creation of EMU have proved to be wrong. Yet EMU's success is rather puzzling, since it is based on a peculiar institutional structure not thought to lead to success. EMU has generated redistributive effects and may have increased business-cycle synchronization. Those effects have not translated into the expected decrease of legitimacy or a widespread democratic deficit of EMU. At the institutional level, EMU has coped well with an asymmetric framework, largely decoupling EMU from political union. There have been neither major spill-over effects pushing for further political integration nor conflict and disintegration. The main question for the future is whether this institutional structure will stay the same in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.}, language = {en} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Desiderat Weltwirtschaftsregierung: Global Governance der Finanzm{\"a}rkte}, series = {Leviathan: Berliner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaft}, volume = {37}, journal = {Leviathan: Berliner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaft}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0340-0425}, doi = {10.1007/s11578-009-0021-x}, pages = {211 -- 218}, language = {de} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {The euro and political union : do economic spillovers from monetary integration affect the legitimacy of EMU?}, series = {Journal of European Public Policy}, volume = {13}, journal = {Journal of European Public Policy}, number = {7}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London [u.a.]}, issn = {1350-1763}, doi = {10.1080/13501760600924266}, pages = {1133 -- 1146}, abstract = {The technical and institutional achievements of Economic and Monetary Union in Europe (EMU) are just the necessary condition for its overall success: the sufficient condition implies a widespread acceptance of the spillover effects triggered by EMU for other areas of economic policy-making, such as possible redistributive effects across euro-area member states. The article notes that much of the recent academic debate on EMU's legitimacy can be reduced to differences in assumptions on those effects. It thus calls for resuming the debate with a specific emphasis on analysing data that would provide information on observable spillover effects from EMU and allow for more solid arguments in that debate.}, language = {en} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Adjusting to EMU: The Impact of Supranational Monetary Policy on Domestic Fiscal and Wage-Setting Institutions}, series = {European Union Politics}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Union Politics}, number = {1}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London [u.a.]}, issn = {1465-1165}, doi = {10.1177/1465116506060914}, pages = {113 -- 140}, abstract = {The article suggests an explanation for seemingly diverse patterns of change in domestic economic institutions following the establishment of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). It argues that EMU participants redesigned ill-fitting domestic fiscal and wage-setting institutions in order to counter the anticipated destabilizing effects of the 'one size fits all' monetary policy of the European Central Bank (ECB). After outlining the argument, the article identifies general economic and institutional conditions that are required for the use of fiscal and wage-setting institutions as effective stabilizers in a monetary union. It then undertakes a comparative assessment to detect country-specific mismatches between anticipated needs and the available domestic economic institutions. Finally, the article surveys institutional changes in 10 member states between the mid 1990s and 2002 and shows that the observed institutional adjustments largely correspond to the expected correction of initial mismatches.}, language = {en} } @misc{EnderleinLindnerCalvoGonzalesetal., author = {Enderlein, Henrik and Lindner, Johannes and Calvo-Gonz{\´a}les, Oscar and Ritter, Raymond}, title = {The EU budget: how much scope for institutional reform?}, series = {ECB Occasional Paper Series}, journal = {ECB Occasional Paper Series}, number = {27}, publisher = {Europ{\"a}ische Zentralbank}, address = {Frankfurt a.M. [u.a.]}, issn = {1607-1484}, doi = {10.1016/S0573-8555(06)79005-8}, pages = {1 -- 31}, language = {en} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Break it, Don't Fix it!}, series = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, volume = {42}, journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1468-5965}, doi = {10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.539_3.x}, pages = {1039 -- 1046}, language = {en} } @article{Enderlein, author = {Enderlein, Henrik}, title = {Adapt a Winning Team!: Die Auswirkungen der Europ{\"a}ischen Wirtschafts- und W{\"a}hrungsunion auf Konjunkturzyklen und die wirtschaftspolitischen Institutionen; {\"O}sterreich im europ{\"a}ischen Vergleich}, series = {{\"O}sterreichische Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {30}, journal = {{\"O}sterreichische Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, number = {3}, publisher = {{\"O}sterreichische Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft}, address = {Wien}, issn = {1615-5548}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-12302}, pages = {257 -- 274}, abstract = {Welchen wirtschaftspolitischen Anpassungsdruck ruft der Beitritt zur Europ{\"a}ischen Wirtschafts- und W{\"a}hrungsunion (EWWU) in {\"O}sterreich hervor? Dieser Frage wird anhand einer vergleichenden Untersuchung stabilit{\"a}tsorientierter Wirtschaftspolitiken nachgegangen. Im ersten Teil wird eine quantitative Untersuchung zur Interaktion von Geld-, Finanz- und Lohnpolitik in 14 europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern f{\"u}r die Zeit vor der W{\"a}hrungsunion entwickelt und {\"O}sterreich vergleichend eingeordnet. Der Aufsatz argumentiert, dass der aus dem EWWU-Beitritt resultierende Anpassungsdruck asymmetrisch auf die Mitgliedsl{\"a}nder wirkt und abh{\"a}ngig von der stabilit{\"a}tspolitischen Aufgabenverteilung zwischen Geld-, Lohn- und Finanzpolitik ist, wie sie vor dem EWWU-Beitritt bestand. Die Untersuchung zeigt ein wirtschaftspolitisches Regime in {\"O}sterreich, das schon vor dem EWWU-Beitritt Mitglied einer de facto W{\"a}hrungsunion mit Deutschland war und dennoch (dank hoher struktureller {\"A}hnlichkeiten mit Deutschland) bis zur Mitte der 1990er Jahre eine antizyklische Geldpolitik zur Stabilisierung einsetzen konnte. Aus dem Analyserahmen l{\"a}sst sich ableiten, dass der Anpassungsdruck auf die {\"o}sterreichischen wirtschaftspolitischen Institutionen zwar geringer als in vielen anderen EWWU-L{\"a}ndern ist, dennoch aber nicht untersch{\"a}tzt werden sollte. Mit dem Beitritt zur W{\"a}hrungsunion nahm der Druck auf die Finanzpolitik zu, die antizyklischen Aufgaben der Geldpolitik zu {\"u}bernehmen und deshalb aus dem „political exchange" mit den Gewerkschaften auszuscheren. Der Aufsatz illustriert qualitativ die neue Interaktion von Finanz- und Lohnpolitik seit 1994 und zeigt, warum das korporatistische System {\"O}sterreichs diesen Wandel in der Finanzpolitik problemlos gemeistert hat, w{\"a}hrend er anderen Staaten weitaus gr{\"o}ßere Probleme bereitete.}, language = {de} }