@article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Ideen und Interessen : Weltbilder als Kategorien der politischen Analyse}, series = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, volume = {2}, journal = {MZES Arbeitspapier AB III}, publisher = {Univ.Mannheim}, address = {Mannheim}, issn = {0948-0099}, pages = {33}, abstract = {Eine weitverbreitete Meinung in der Politikwissenschaft besagt, daß politisches Handeln durch Interessen bestimmt wird. Dies gilt vor allem f{\"u}r den Bereich der internationalen Politik, wo Staaten als der Prototyp des rationalen, nutzenmaximierenden Akteurs betrachtet werden. Ideen, sofern sie {\"u}berhaupt Gegenstand der Analyse sind, werden in dieser Perspektive zu Oberfl{\"a}chenph{\"a}nomenen der grundlegenden Logik von Macht und Interesse. Im Gegensatz dazu wird hier die These vertreten, daß Ideen zentrale Kategorien der Analyse von Politik im allgemeinen und von internationaler Politik im besonderen sein k{\"o}nnen und nicht lediglich als Rationalisierungen von Machtverh{\"a}ltnissen betrachtet werden m{\"u}ssen. Die Vernachl{\"a}ssigung von Ideen, so die erste These, liegt im Handlungsbegriff rationalistischer Ans{\"a}tze begr{\"u}ndet, denen ein konstruktivistischer Ansatz gegen{\"u}bergestellt wird. Der zweite Abschnitt f{\"u}hrt aus, wie sich Ideen mit Hilfe des Konzepts der Weltbilder systematisch analysieren lassen. Danach wird gezeigt, wie sich mit Hilfe dieses Konzepts Lernprozesse theoretisch und empirisch gehaltvoll konzeptualisieren lassen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsHeyStruebel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Hey, Christian and Str{\"u}bel, Michael}, title = {Umweltpolitik in der Europ{\"a}ischen Gemeinschaft}, series = {Umweltpolitik als Modernisierungsprozeß : Politikwissenschaftliche Umweltforschung und -lehre in der Bundesrepublik}, booktitle = {Umweltpolitik als Modernisierungsprozeß : Politikwissenschaftliche Umweltforschung und -lehre in der Bundesrepublik}, publisher = {Leske \& Budrich}, address = {Opladen}, isbn = {3-8100-1030-8}, pages = {137 -- 162}, language = {de} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsStruebel, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Str{\"u}bel, Michael}, title = {EC Foreign Environmental Policy and Eastern Europe}, series = {Environmental Policy in Europe}, booktitle = {Environmental Policy in Europe}, publisher = {Nomos-Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {3-7890-2635-2}, pages = {17 -- 42}, language = {en} } @incollection{JachtenfuchsKiersch, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kiersch, Gerhard}, title = {"French Studies". Schlaglichter amerikanischer Frankreichforschung}, series = {Frankreich-Jahrbuch 1988}, booktitle = {Frankreich-Jahrbuch 1988}, publisher = {VS-Verl.}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-8100-0647-9}, pages = {255 -- 267}, abstract = {Die amerikanische Frankreichforschung ist außerordentlich vielf{\"a}ltig, umfangreich und kreativ. Einen systematischen {\"U}berblick dar{\"u}ber zu geben, bed{\"u}rfte eines l{\"a}ngerfristigen Forschungsprojektes. In diesem Artikel kann es nur darum gehen, schlaglichtartig einige Aspekte aufzuzeigen, einige Zentren und Schwerpunkte zu benennen und vielleicht ein wenig Problembewußtsein f{\"u}r die Notwendigkeit zu schaffen, sich st{\"a}rker als bisher bei uns damit zu besch{\"a}ftigen. Die Beleuchtung der internationalen Dimension der Frankreichforschung ist eine unter vielen Aufgaben dieses Frankreich-Jahrbuchs.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Versuche von Sinnstiftung in der Europ{\"a}ischen Gemeinschaft : oder Wie die EG versucht, sich durch Abgrenzung als selbst{\"a}ndige Einheit zu etablieren}, series = {Les nations europ{\´e}ennes devant leur histoire (Les Cahiers de Fontenay n° 61/62)}, booktitle = {Les nations europ{\´e}ennes devant leur histoire (Les Cahiers de Fontenay n° 61/62)}, number = {61-62}, publisher = {E.N.S}, address = {Fontenay (u.a.)}, issn = {03958418}, pages = {155 -- 167}, language = {de} } @article{Jachtenfuchs, author = {Jachtenfuchs, Markus}, title = {Die EG nach Maastricht. Das Subsidiarit{\"a}tsprinzip und die Zukunft der Integration}, series = {Europa-Archiv : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Politik}, volume = {47}, journal = {Europa-Archiv : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Politik}, number = {10}, issn = {1430-175X}, pages = {279 -- 287}, abstract = {Der Beitrag untersucht die Frage, ob die zunehmende wirtschaftliche und politische Internationalisierung mit einer zunehmenden Verlagerung staatlicher Handlungskompetenzen auf h{\"o}heren Ebenen beantwortet werden kann. Der Artikel st{\"u}tzt sich bei seiner Analyse auf die Ergebnisse von Maastricht und vergleicht die britische und deutsche Verhandlungsposition sowie Form und Inhalt des Subsidiarit{\"a}tsprinzips}, language = {de} } @article{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {Constitutional Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures in the European Union: Prospects and Limits}, series = {European Public Law}, volume = {19}, journal = {European Public Law}, number = {2}, publisher = {Kluwer Law International}, address = {Den Haag}, issn = {1354-3725}, pages = {369 -- 396}, abstract = {The concept of 'constitutional dialogue' has become a focal point of US and Canadian public law scholarship. This concept sees judicial review not as a check on majority preferences but instead as part of a deliberation between the legislative and judicial branches over how constitutional commitments and general political objectives can be integrated. This article will explore the prospects and limits of developing the dialogue concept in the context of the present-day European Union (EU). The article will present a two-part argument: While the EU's political and legal diversity make the idea of a 'shared responsibility' for constitutional interpretation between judges and policy-makers normatively attractive, the existing institutional structure of the Union limits the incentives necessary for legal and political actors to constitutionally engage.}, language = {en} } @article{DawsonDeWitte, author = {Dawson, Mark and De Witte, Floris}, title = {Constitutional Balance in the European Union After the Euro Crisis}, series = {Modern Law Review}, volume = {76}, journal = {Modern Law Review}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1468-2230}, doi = {10.1111/1468-2230.12037}, pages = {817 -- 844}, abstract = {This article analyses how the European Union's response to the euro-crisis has altered the constitutional balance upon which its stability is based. It argues that the stability and legitimacy of any political system requires the structural incorporation of individual and political self-determination. In the context of the EU, this requirement is met through the idea of constitutional balance, with 'substantive', 'institutional' and 'spatial' dimensions. Analysing reforms to EU law and institutional structure in the wake of the crisis - such as the establishment of the ESM, the growing influence of the European Council and the creation of a stand-alone Fiscal Compact - it is argued that recent reforms are likely to have a lasting impact on the ability of the EU to mediate conflicting interests in all three areas. By undermining its constitutional balance, the response to the crisis is likely to dampen the long-term stability and legitimacy of the EU project.}, language = {en} } @book{Dawson, author = {Dawson, Mark}, title = {New Governance and the Transformation of European Law: Coordinating EU Social Law and Policy}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge}, isbn = {9781107006324}, pages = {351}, language = {en} } @article{DawsonMuir, author = {Dawson, Mark and Muir, Elise}, title = {One for All and All for One? The Collective Enforcement of European Law}, series = {Legal Issues of Economic Integration}, volume = {41}, journal = {Legal Issues of Economic Integration}, number = {3}, publisher = {Kluwer Law International}, address = {London [u.a.]}, issn = {1566-6573}, pages = {215 -- 224}, abstract = {The failure of individual and institutional remedies to ensure the effective enforcement of European Union (EU) law has increasingly focused attention on collective routes to ensuring adherance to EU policies and rights. How comprehensive, however, should collective remedies under EU law be? This introductory article - as well as the other articles of this volume - explores the feasibility of a horizontal approach to the collective enforcement of EU law. While the hope for such an approach has been bolstered by the engagement of the EU institutions, the Commission's most recent 2013 Recommendation fails to significantly advance the development of collective remedies at EU level. The article will conclude by exploring some further, non-legislative, alternatives to furthering the collective enforcement of EU law.}, language = {en} } @misc{DawsonDeWitteMuir, author = {Dawson, Mark and De Witte, Bruno and Muir, Elise}, title = {Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice}, publisher = {Elgar Publ.}, address = {Cheltenham [u.a.]}, isbn = {9780857939395}, pages = {304}, abstract = {This book delves into the rationale, components of, and responses to accusations of judicial activism at the European Court of Justice. Detailed chapters from academics, practitioners and stakeholders bring diverse perspectives on a range of factors - from access rules to institutional design and to substantive functions - influencing the European Court's political role. Each of the contributing authors invites the reader to approach the debate on the role of the Court in terms of a constantly evolving set of interactions between the EU judiciary, the European and national political spheres, as well as a multitude of other actors vested in competing legitimacy claims. The book questions the political role of the Court as much as it stresses the opportunities - and corresponding responsibilities - that the Court's case law offers to independent observers, political institutions and civil society organisations.}, language = {en} }