@article{HurrelmannAlbertQuenzeletal.2011, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Albert, Mathias and Quenzel, Gudrun and Schneekloth, Ulrich}, title = {Jugend 2010: Die 16. Shell Jugendstudie}, series = {Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung}, volume = {6}, journal = {Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung}, number = {2}, publisher = {Budrich}, address = {Leverkusen}, issn = {1862-5002}, pages = {199 -- 205}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @misc{HurrelmannKlotzHaisch2014, author = {Hurrelmann, Klaus and Klotz, Theodor and Haisch, Jochen}, title = {Lehrbuch Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, publisher = {Hogrefe, Huber}, address = {Bern}, isbn = {9783456948669}, pages = {457}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Die Gesundheitssysteme der meisten westlichen L{\"a}nder sind haupts{\"a}chlich auf die kurative Versorgung ausgerichtet. Sie funktionierten solange gut, wie die zu behandelnden Krankheiten tats{\"a}chlich geheilt werden konnten. Das ist heute wegen des Vorherrschens von chronischen Krankheiten, wegen individueller und sozialer Einfl{\"u}sse auf Gesundheit und Krankheit nicht mehr der Fall. Deswegen gewinnen vorbeugende Strategien ebenso an Bedeutung wie krankheitsbegleitende F{\"o}rderstrategien. Nur wenn sie st{\"a}rker eingesetzt werden, kann auch der Wettlauf mit den steigenden Kosten der Versorgung gewonnen werden. Dieses Lehrbuch hat sich in den ersten beiden Auflagen bereits bei der Ausbildung von angehenden Medizinern, Gesundheitswissenschaftlern, Pflegefachleuten und vielen anderen Gesundheitsprofessionen bew{\"a}hrt. Die dritte Auflage wurde gr{\"u}ndlich {\"u}berarbeitet, aktualisiert und erg{\"a}nzt.}, language = {de} } @article{HammerschmidvandeWalle2011, author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and van de Walle, Steven}, title = {The impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sectors}, series = {Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture}, volume = {12}, journal = {Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture}, number = {2}, pages = {190 -- 209}, year = {2011}, abstract = {New Public Management has been around for a quarter of a century in European public sectors, yet despite the movement's emphasis on indicators and evidence, there have been surprisingly few encompassing evaluations. In this paper, we provide an overview of academic evaluation and impact studies of entire NPM-style reform programmes. We distinguish between two sets of NPM-style changes and reforms. One is that of specific managerial innovations within public organisations. The other consists of changes to the role of government and citizens as a result of NPM ideas. We conclude that a majority of academic research has focused on the first set of changes, while approaches to the second set has been mainly of a critical nature with relatively limited attention for empirical studies.}, language = {en} } @book{HammerschmidDemmkeMeyer2008, author = {Hammerschmid, Gerhard and Demmke, Christoph and Meyer, Renate E.}, title = {Measuring Individual and Organisational Performance in the Public Services of EU Member States}, publisher = {EIPA}, address = {Maastricht [u.a.]}, isbn = {9789067792080}, pages = {121}, year = {2008}, abstract = {This study compares and analyses the different individual and organisational performance assessment systems used by the public administrations of the Member States of the European Union (and Norway). This publication presents an analysis and comparison of the various performance assessment systems in place, their objectives, working procedures, challenges and effects. The focus, therefore, is less on concepts and more on the actual practices of managers doing performance assessments. The overall goal is to explore the main management challenges and success factors of implementing individual appraisal systems in public services in Europe. Based on deepening insights and practical experiences, the study intends to: - make available up-to-date information on experiences across European public administrations; - identify the main leadership challenges in successfully conducting individual assessments and linking them to organisational performance; - present and discuss good practices in the field; - provide practical guidance, by identifying the factors that will assist organisations in the design, implementation and revaluation of their systems in order to make performance assessments run more smoothly and contribute to improved organisational performance. Another purpose of this comparative study is to present more empirical evidence on the relationship between the assessment of individual and organisational performance. What are the criteria used? What is the relationship between organisational performance and individual performance? How can organisational and individual performance be measured? What are the main challenges in measuring organisational performance and individual performance? Are recent reforms in the field of individual performance assessment enhancing organisational performance?}, language = {en} } @article{HallerbergYlaeoutinen2010, author = {Hallerberg, Mark and Yl{\"a}outinen, Sami}, title = {Political Power, Fiscal Institutions and Budgetary Outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe}, series = {Journal of Public Policy}, volume = {30}, journal = {Journal of Public Policy}, number = {1}, issn = {0143-814X}, doi = {10.1017/S0143814X09990213}, pages = {45 -- 62}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This paper considers the effects of fiscal governance in Central and East European countries 1998-2008. The first part makes predictions about which form of fiscal governance fits which form of government. Under multi-party coalition governments, fiscal contracts where governments make political commitments to multi-annual fiscal plans work well. In countries where two political blocks face off against one another, delegation based around a strong finance ministry should be most effective. The second part examines electoral and party systems, which affect the form of government in place. The third part documents norms, rules, and institutions in place. The final section considers the joint effects of fiscal governance on fiscal outcomes. On balance, the underlying political climate is crucial for determining what types of fiscal norms, institutions, and rules function best. The more countries diverge from their expected form of fiscal governance, the greater the increase in a country's debt burden.}, language = {en} } @book{HallerbergStrauchvonHagen2009, author = {Hallerberg, Mark and Strauch, Rolf Rainer and von Hagen, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Fiscal Governance in Europe}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge [u.a.]}, isbn = {9780521138260}, pages = {230}, year = {2009}, abstract = {This book presents a theoretical framework to discuss how governments coordinate budgeting decisions. There are two modes of fiscal governance conducive to greater fiscal discipline, a mode of delegation and a mode of contracts. These modes contrast with a fiefdom form of governance, in which the decision-making process is decentralized. An important insight is that the effectiveness of a given form of fiscal governance depends crucially upon the underlying political system. Delegation functions well when there few, or no, ideological differences among government parties, whereas contracts are effective when there are many such differences. Based on original research, the book classifies European Union countries from 1985 to 2004. Empirically, delegation and contract states perform better than fiefdom states if they match the underlying political system. Additional chapters consider why countries have the fiscal institutions that they do, fiscal governance in Central and Eastern Europe, and the role of such institutions in the European Union.}, language = {en} } @article{HallerbergWolff2008, author = {Hallerberg, Mark and Wolff, Guntram B.}, title = {Fiscal institutions, fiscal policy and sovereign risk premia in EMU}, series = {Public Choice}, volume = {136}, journal = {Public Choice}, number = {3-4}, pages = {379 -- 396}, year = {2008}, abstract = {We investigate the effect of fiscal institutions such as the strength of the finance minister in the budget process and deficits on interest rate spreads of Eurozone countries. Deficits significantly increase risk premia measured by relative swap spreads. The effect of deficits is significantly lower under EMU. This effect partly results from neglecting the role of fiscal institutions. After controlling for institutional changes, fiscal policy remains a significant determinant of risk premia in EMU. Better institutions are connected with lower risk premia. Furthermore deficits matter less for risk premia in countries with better institutions. Markets acknowledge that better institutions reduce fiscal difficulties rendering the monitoring of annual developments less important.}, language = {en} } @misc{AnheierSpengler2009, author = {Anheier, Helmut K. and Spengler, Norman}, title = {Auf dem Weg zu einem Informationssystem Zivilgesellschaft : Anspruch, Potentiale, Verkn{\"u}pfungen}, publisher = {Ed. Stifterverb.}, address = {Heidelberg; Essen}, isbn = {9783000295805}, pages = {86}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Ver{\"o}ffentlichung ist der erste Band aus der Reihe »Zivilgesellschaft in Zahlen«, in welcher Fortschritte und Ergebnisse des gleichnamigen Projekts ver{\"o}ffentlicht werden. »Zivilgesellschaft in Zahlen« ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt des Stifterverbandes f{\"u}r die Deutsche Wissenschaft, der Bertelsmann Stiftung und der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung. Ziel ist es, in Kooperation mit dem Statistischen Bundesamt und dem Centrum f{\"u}r soziale Investitionen und Innovationen, die Grundlagen f{\"u}r eine Berichterstattung zu schaffen, die regelm{\"a}ßig aktuelle Zahlen zu Entwicklungen und Trends in der Zivilgesellschaft in Deutschland liefert. Im Rahmen des Workshops »Informationssystem Zivilgesellschaft« wurden Anforderungen und Potentiale f{\"u}r eine praxis- und politikrelevante Berichterstattung zur Zivilgesellschaft in Deutschland systematisch beleuchtet. Die Inhalte und Ergebnisse werden mit diesem Band dokumentiert. An Beispielen wird gezeigt, welche Beitr{\"a}ge thematisch relevante und angrenzende Daten- und Informationssysteme f{\"u}r ein umfassendes »Informationssystem Zivilgesellschaft« leisten k{\"o}nnen und welche Anspr{\"u}che aus Sicht der Politik, der Wissenschaft und der Zivilgesellschaft an ein solches Informationssystem gerichtet werden.}, language = {de} } @article{Anheier2014, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Institutional Voids and the Role of Civil Society : the Case of Global Finance}, series = {Global Policy}, volume = {5}, journal = {Global Policy}, number = {1}, issn = {1758-5899}, doi = {10.1111/1758-5899.12061}, pages = {23 -- 35}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Globalizing policy fields can contain institutional voids in which effective regulatory frameworks and the corrective counterbalance of civil society are equally absent. With the inherently incomplete regulation of global finance on the one hand and the evident dearth of civil society institutions on the other, a central governance question emerges: under what conditions could civil society help to recapture the financial system by embedding it in a wider social and economic policy, and thereby reversing the erosion of confidence in market capitalism and liberal democracy? For this purpose, this article proposes the systematic development of a transnational civil society infrastructure in terms of organizational capacity and expertise for accountability enforcement, policy review, performance oversight and advocacy. The goal of this infrastructure is to fill the institutional void and form a counterveiling force against the unchecked might of global finance.}, language = {en} } @article{Anheier2012, author = {Anheier, Helmut K.}, title = {Zivilgesellschaft und Krisen: Dahrendorf'sche Reflektionen}, series = {Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaft}, volume = {40}, journal = {Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaft}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nomos Verl.-Ges.}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {0340-0425}, doi = {10.5771/0340-0425-2012-3-421}, pages = {421 -- 440}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Aus dem Werk Dahrendorfs und der neueren Institutionentheorie sch{\"o}pfend, soll hier am Beispiel der gegenw{\"a}rtigen Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise eine These verfolgt werden, die in ihrer Gesamtheit eine recht kritische Diagnose impliziert, aber dennoch auf Optionen im Sinne kreativer Politikgestaltung hinweist: »Die organisierte Zivilgesellschaft wird die transnationalen Konflikte des beginnenden 21. Jahrhunderts moderieren m{\"u}ssen, um der {\"U}berforderung von Staat und Markt in einer globalisierten Welt entgegenzuwirken«. Hierbei wird das globale Governance-Problem zentral angesprochen und die entscheidende Frage gestellt: Unter welchen Bedingungen k{\"o}nnte die Zivilgesellschaft ein ordnungspolitisches Korrigendum »von unten« werden, um die bruchst{\"u}ckhafte Struktur uniformer und universaler Regeln sinnhafter, tragf{\"a}higer und handlungswirksamer zu machen?}, language = {de} }