Trunzer, Stefanie
Refine
Document Type
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Publication reviewed
- begutachtet (2)
Keywords
- Driver behavior (1)
- Driving simulator (1)
- Validation Study (1)
- Vehicle dynamics (1)
Driving simulators are used to test under reproducible conditions, however, they must be validated for each application. This guarantees that the gathered data on the simulator is representative of real vehicle data. This paper examines and compares objective data from 20 drivers that are recorded on a six degrees of freedom (DOF) high dynamic driving simulator and a passenger vehicle in the compact class on a proving ground. The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparability of the behavior of the subjects in their driving task on the driving simulator compared to the real driving test. The driving maneuvers include the 18 m slalom and an ISO double lane change (ISO 3888-2). The real car’s measurement setup is composed of an inertial measurement unit and access to the chassis CAN messages. The driving simulator is equipped with the same real electrical power steering as the test vehicle. Furthermore, a fully validated vehicle model is used in the simulation. Objective key performance indicators such as maximum steering wheel angle, steering wheel torque, lateral acceleration, yaw rate, and yaw gain deviate from around -18% to 10% in the slalom, with the majority of parameters not showing significant differences. Bigger differences are found for the double lane change. Overall, the results demonstrate a satisfactory degree of correlation between the driver behavior on the driving simulator and the real vehicle, even up to achieving absolute validity.
A major concern about advanced motion-based simulators is their level of fidelity i.e., how close the motion sensation in a simulator is to the one perceived in a real vehicle. In this study, we collect the assessment from an exceptional sample composed by n = 33 automotive industry experts who were asked to evaluate the fidelity in terms of steering, braking and speed. Given the subjective nature of our measure, we propose a censored-data Tobit regression model that accounts for this issue, thus providing more accurate estimations. Our results show that, on average, experts evaluated the steering actions close to the maximum level of fidelity. However, braking and speed were evaluated lower in realism, and in fact both diminished the overall fidelity judgement by up to 50%. Moreover, coefficients indicate that steering contributes more to the judgement of fidelity than braking and speed actions. Heterogeneity in the experts' responses and general implications are discussed.