Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Publication reviewed
- begutachtet (2)
Keywords
Institute
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) have been shown to provide improved performance over traditional heuristic algorithms for the detection of arrhythmias from ambulatory ECG recordings. However, these DCNNs have primarily been trained and tested on device-specific databases with standardized electrode positions and uniform sampling frequencies. This work explores the possibility of training a DCNN for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) detection on a database of single‑lead ECG rhythm strips extracted from resting 12‑lead ECGs. We then test the performance of the DCNN on recordings from ambulatory ECG devices with different recording leads and sampling frequencies.
We developed an extensive proprietary resting 12‑lead ECG dataset of 549,211 patients. This dataset was randomly split into a training set of 494,289 patients and a testing set of the remaining 54,922 patients. We trained a 34-layer convolutional DCNN to detect AF and other arrhythmias on this dataset. The DCNN was then validated on two Physionet databases commonly used to benchmark automated ECG algorithms (1) MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database and (2) MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database. Validation was performed following the EC57 guidelines, with performance assessed by gross episode and duration sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Finally, validation was also performed on a selection of rhythm strips from an ambulatory ECG patch that a committee of board-certified cardiologists annotated.
On MIT-BIH, The DCNN achieved a sensitivity of 100% and 84% PPV in detecting episodes of AF. and 100% sensitivity and 94% PPV in quantifying AF episode duration. On AFDB, The DCNN achieved a sensitivity of 94% and PPV of 98% in detecting episodes of AF, and 98% sensitivity and 100% PPV in quantifying AF episode duration. On the patch database, the DCNN demonstrated performance that was closely comparable to that of a cardiologist.
The results indicate that DCNN models can learn features that generalize between resting 12‑lead and ambulatory ECG recordings, allowing DCNNs to be device agnostic for detecting arrhythmias from single‑lead ECG recordings and enabling a range of clinical applications.
Automated interpretation of the 12-lead ECG has remained an underpinning interest in decades of research that has seen a diversity of computing applications in cardiology.
The application of computers in cardiology began in the 1960s with early research focusing on the conversion of analogue ECG signals (voltages) to digital samples. Alongside this, software techniques that automated the extraction of wave measurements and provided basic diagnostic statements, began to emerge. In the years since then there have been many significant milestones which include the widespread commercialisation of 12-lead ECG interpretation software, associated clinical utility and the development of the related regulatory frameworks to promote standardised development.
In the past few years, the research community has seen a significant rejuvenation in the development of ECG interpretation programs. This is evident in the research literature where a large number of studies have emerged tackling a variety of automated ECG interpretation problems. This is largely due to two factors. Specifically, the technical advances, both software and hardware, that have facilitated the broad adoption of modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and, the increasing availability of large datasets that support modern AI approaches.
In this article we provide a very high-level overview of the operation of and approach to the development of early 12-lead ECG interpretation programs and we contrast this to the approaches that are now seen in emerging AI approaches. Our overview is mainly focused on highlighting differences in how input data are handled prior to generation of the diagnostic statement.