Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (6)
- Article (4)
- Article trade magazine (1)
- Workingpaper / Report (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (12)
Keywords
- FBSK_Webseite (6)
- Forena (5)
- Rechtsradikalismus (4)
- Kollektives Gedächtnis (3)
- Politische Gewaltanwendung (3)
- Rostock-Lichtenhagen (2)
- Architektur (1)
- Bauwesen (1)
- Empowerment (1)
- Erzählforschung (1)
Department/institution
The present study describes the development and validation of a German questionnaire assessing motivation to change in individuals with eating disorders (Stages of Change Questionnaire-Eating Disorders, SOCQ-ED). The SOCQ-ED measures stages of change separately for each eating disorder symptom domain. Psychometric properties were assessed in a sample of N=63 women with Anorexia Nervosa or Bulimia Nervosa. Test-retest reliability ranged from rtt=0.42 to 0.78 (Mdn=0.56), correlations with the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment were between r=0.21 and 0.32 and correlations with measurements of eating pathology ranged from r=0.19 to 0.46. The results provide initial support for the reliability and validity of the SOCQ-ED.
The first section of this chapter illustrates that the pogrom in Rostock-Lichtenhagen in 1992 has not been categorized sufficiently as a substantial milestone of right-wing violence in postwar Germany. This pogrom led to historically significant limitations in the right to asylum, ultimately resulting in a change to the German constitution. We propose to look at Rostock-Lichtenhagen as an example to explain that practices of remembering right-wing violence, a process that we describe with the term ‘Doing Memory on right-wing violence’, is a central part of creating a society’s basic story. This basic story, in turn, contributes to how a society understands itself. In this chapter’s second section, we argue first that analyzing practices of memory of right-wing violence, be they acknowledging, forgetting or suppressing those practices, actually make it possible to even expose the persistence of the basic story as a central element of political culture. Second, we want to uncover how potential and publicly effective interventions of and changes to the basic story might look like. Here, we build on Habermas’ model of democracy, utilize Susan Bickford’s work on listening as an important element in her political philosophy and refer to Benjamin Barber, who articulates that a participatory democracy requires political listening. As a result, our chapter’s third section demonstrates how listening can be conceptualized from a supra-individual perspective and how questions that are critical of existing hegemonic structures can prioritize a focus on hegemonic (non)listening. Lastly, we will sketch out strategies to intervene in hegemonic (non)listening. These strategies connect theoretically with concepts of ‘counter publics’ and ‘opinion forming publics’ and reference, among others, the work of Seyla Benhabib and Iris Marion Young, thus enabling the creation and execution of resistance practices of Doing Memory on right-wing violence.
Der Blick auf die derzeitige Situation im Bauwesen, die das Ergebnis jahrzehntelanger Fehlplanung darstellt, fordert auch die Hochschullehre heraus. Was können, was müssen Institutionen und Institute, Lehrerinnen und Studenten anders machen, damit ihre Arbeit – die Lehre und das daraus resultierende Tun – Erfolg verspricht im Erreichen ganz anderer Ziele als die Produktion von Raum mit herkömmlichen Mitteln? Reallabore spielen hier ein zentrale, impulsive Rolle.