Refine
Year of publication
- 2025 (3)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Researchdata (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Lautstärke (3)
- Lautwahrnehmung (3)
- Psychoakustik (2)
- Gedächtnis (1)
Department/institution
Laboratory experiments in psychoacoustical and soundscape research indicate that participants perceive a reproduction sound level lowered by 8-10 dB as more plausible than the original level. This bias supposedly roots in an adaptation of perceptual loudness scaling to the laboratory environment, that is overall quieter than urban outdoor soundscapes. To gain further insights into the nature of such loudness bias, we conducted a listening experiment in both field and laboratory using a within-subjects design. Thirty-one participants visited a street and listened to the environmental sounds for one minute, while these sounds were also recorded using a dummy head. Thereafter, they listened to the recording in a quiet laboratory nearby and adjusted its level as they remembered it. About half of the sample did this immediately, the other half about 20 minutes after the recording. Results confirm a bias towards lower levels with a mean of about 8.9 dB, regardless of the time between the recording and the reproduction in the laboratory. Also, participants with higher musical abilities tended to select higher, more accurate levels, whereas noise-sensitive participants deemed lower levels appropriate. Results suggest that the hypothesized adaptation of perceptual scaling to the laboratory happens immediately and is affected by individual factors.
Supplemental material for https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025062
To investigate loudness biases in the lab, where outdoor sounds are perceived as being too loud if reproduced with physically accurate levels in the lab, a listening experiment was conducted, where thirty-one participants visited a street and listened to the environmental sounds for one minute. These sounds were also recorded using a dummy head. Afterwards, participants listened to the recording in a quiet laboratory and adjusted its level as they remembered it. About half of the sample did this immediately, the other half about 20 min after the recording, during which the performed another listening tests. Afterwards, previous experience with acoustics, musical sophistication and noise sensitivity were assessed. The results revealed a mean gain adjustment of 8.9 dB below the original. The data uploaded here comprises participants gain adjustment, the recording levels averaged other A) the entire recording and B) the first and last 7.5s or 15s, respecitvely and all questionnaire responses as well as aggregate scores for musical sophistication and noise sensitivity, as well as a binary categorization of the respondent into laymen and experienced, based on their previous experience with acoustics. For sociodemographic information, participants age, sex and educational degree are reported as well.
Content
- 00_Description:
- Description of the data files
- Includes a list of explanation of the columns names in "data_questionnaires_aggregateLevels.csv
- data_questionnaires_aggregateLevels.csv
- Participants' adjusted recordings levels
- Several level and loudness aggregates of each participant's recording that were analyzed in the paper
- Participants' responses to the administered questionnaires
- level_envelopes.zip
- Archive with 31 CSV files containing level envelopes of each participant's recording.
- A-weighted and unweighted level envelope for the dummy head's left and right ear
- One-minute recordings with a temporal resolution of 125ms