Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (18) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Innovation (4)
- Business Case (3)
- Entrepreneurship (3)
- Corporate Creativity (2)
- Creativity (2)
- DOAJ (2)
- Logistik (2)
- Arbeitsplatz (1)
- Components of Creativity (1)
- Cultural Dimensions (1)
Fachbereich/Einrichtung
- Fachbereich - Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik (18) (entfernen)
There is a popular saying in German: Innovation is when the market shouts “Hooray!”. Thus, a new idea is only as good as its diffusion into the addressed social system. The question is what affects the adoption or rejection of a new idea. Carsten Deckert shares his experience on the main innovation resistances and on ways to increase the acceptance of new ideas. He talks about which perceived attributes of innovations are conducive to the rate of adoption of an innovation and which are characteristics of failed innovations.
This paper explores the tensions in team creativity. The tensions in team creativity are based on a tension between originality and effectiveness in the standard definition of creativity. To display the tensions in team creativity, the value square (“Wertequadrat”) developed by Schulz von Thun (1998) is used which balances a value with its countervalue. The author identifies tensions for cohesion, consensus and conformity. Cohesion is described as a tension between team diversity and team safety, consensus as a tension between constructive controversy and participatory decision-making and conformity as a tension between support for innovation and task orientation. Finally, the connection of individual and team creativity is described as an interplay between solitary and interactive components.
The definition of individual creativity is based on a tension between novelty on the one side and usefulness respectively appropriateness on the other side. The paper explores how this tension pervades the stage and componential theories of creativity. To achieve this, the so called value square (“Wertequadrat”) developed by Helwig (1967) and Schulz von Thun (1998)is used which balances a value with its countervalue to analyze creativity. The author identifies tensions of action and inaction, expertise and mindfulness, precision and ambiguity as well as immersion and detachment permeating the creative process and the components of creativity. As a conclusion a morphological box for creativity is presented which allows one to show which combination of characteristics of the tensions support different stages of creativity. Furthermore implications for development and time management are discussed.
The standard definition of creativity is based on a tension between originality and effectiveness. Borrowing from the wave-particle duality in physics one could say that there is an originality-effectiveness duality at work for creativity. The paper explores how this tension pervades Amabile's (1997) componential theory of organizational creativity with the components organizational motivation, management practices (including work assignment and work control) and resources. As a method the so called value square (" Wertequadrat ") developed by Helwig (1967) and Schulz von Thun (1998) is used which balances a value with its countervalue. The author identifies a tension of corporate tradition and corporate change for organizational motivation, a tension of skills and challenges for work assignment, a tension of management by control and management by loss of control for work control as well as a tension of organizational efficiency and organizational slack for resources. Additionally different implications of these tensions for the resistance of a company to creativity, for an organizational climate conducive to creativity as well as for resource allocation in creative endeavours are discussed.
Von Maschinenbau-Ingenieur*innen wird oft erwartet, innovative Produkte, Dienstleistungen oder Prozesse zu entwickeln und zu vermarkten. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es herauszufinden, inwiefern sie bereits im Masterstudium Maschinenbau durch die Förderung von Kreativität und Entrepreneurship darauf vorbereitet werden. Um die Forschungsfrage zu beantworten, wurden die Modulhandbücher der zehn größten Universitäten sowie Fachhochschulen mithilfe einer Schlagwortsuche auf einschlägige Begriffe analysiert. Die Studie zeigt, dass deutsche Ingenieur*innen sowohl an Fachhochschulen als auch an Universitäten hinsichtlich Kreativität und Entrepreneurship eher unzureichend ausgebildet werden.