Refine
Year of publication
- 2011 (102) (remove)
Document Type
- Announcement (39)
- Article (18)
- Part of a Book (17)
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Workingpaper / Report (4)
- Article trade magazine (3)
- Other (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Book (1)
- Collection (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (102) (remove)
Keywords
- Amtliche Mitteilungen (39)
- Prüfungsrecht (23)
- Prüfungsordnung (22)
- Bachelor (13)
- Master (13)
- Design (8)
- Fachbereichsordnung (7)
- Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften (7)
- FHD (6)
- Wirtschaft (6)
Department/institution
- Hochschulverwaltung (39)
- Fachbereich - Medien (23)
- Fachbereich - Architektur (17)
- Fachbereich - Sozial- & Kulturwissenschaften (14)
- Fachbereich - Wirtschaftswissenschaften (12)
- Digitale Vernetzung und Informationssicherheit (10)
- Fachbereich - Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik (10)
- Fachbereich - Design (8)
- Fachbereich - Elektro- & Informationstechnik (6)
- Hochschulbibliothek (3)
The ISO 27000 is a well-established series of information security standards. The scope for applying these standards can be an organisation as a whole, single business processes or even an IT application or IT infrastructure. The context establishment and the asset identification are among the first steps to be performed. The quality of the results produced when performing these steps has a crucial influence on the subsequent steps such as identifying loss, vulnerabilities, possible attacks and defining countermeasures. Thus, a context analysis to gather all necessary information in the initial steps is important, but is not offered in the standard. In this paper, we focus on the scope of cloud computing systems and present a way to support the context establishment and the asset identification described in ISO 27005. A cloud system analysis pattern and different kinds of stakeholder templates serve to understand and describe a given cloud development problem, i.e. the envisaged IT systems and the relevant parts of the operational environment. We illustrate our support using an online banking cloud scenario.
Seit den ersten nationalen, strategischen Papieren zu Datenmanagement-Fragen in der Wissenschaft in den USA (NSF, 2005), Großbritannien (Lyon, 2007; Swan & Brown, 2008), der EU (Atkinson et al. 2008; OGF22-ET CG, 2008) und vor allem seit den Guidelines der OECD (2007) wird international intensiv über die Erfordernisse der Ausbildung von „Datenspezialisten“ diskutiert. Grundlegende Überlegungen, die einen gewissen internationalen Konsens gefunden haben, wurden im Auftrag von JISC von Swan und Brown (2008, S. 1) entwickelt (vgl. Hank & Davidson, 2009). Sie schlagen vier Rollen im Forschungsdatenmanagement vor. Neben dem Data Creator (datenproduzierender Forscher), dem Data Scientist (Wissenschaftler der bspw. bei der Datenanalyse unterstützt) und dem Data Manager (verantwortlich für alle technischen Aspekte: Lagerung, Zugriff, Aufbewahrung) wurde auch der Data Librarian benannt. Im Weiteren wird, auch unter Beachtung der Tätigkeiten die im Data Curation Lifecycle Model (s. Beitrag von Rümpel. Kap. 1.2) aufgeführt sind, neben dem Data Manager und dem Data Curator insbesondere auf den Data Librarian eingegangen.
This article deals with the cost optimal commitment of power systems. System stability is often only considered after solving the commitment problem. We show by example that a cost optimization may result in a mode of operation that, while economically optimal, is unstable or has otherwise unacceptable dynamics. As a remedy, we propose to use the so-called normal vector method, which has been developed for the optimization of nonlinear dynamical systems with stability boundaries and uncertain parameters. We apply the method to a small sample power grid, where the optimization goal is to minimize the energy production costs for a given power consumption.
Kraftwerk B
(2011)
The Security Twin Peaks
(2011)
Despite its impressive complexity the cytoskeleton succeeds to persistently organize itself and thus the cells' interior. In contrast to classical man-made machines, much of the cellular organization originates from inherent self-assembly and self-organization allowing a high degree of autonomy for various functional units. Recent experimental and theoretical studies revealed numerous examples of cytoskeleton components that arrange and organize in a self-regulative way. In the present review we want to shortly summarize some of the principle mechanisms that are able to inherently trigger and regulate the cytoskeleton organization. Although taken individually most of these regulative principles are rather simple with intuitively predictable consequences, combinations of two or more of these mechanisms can quickly give rise to very complex, unexpected behavior and might even be able to explain the formation of different functional units out of a common pool of available building blocks.