TY - CHAP A1 - Hatebur, Denis A1 - Heisel, Maritta A1 - Schmidt, Holger T1 - Analysis and Component-based Realization of Security Requirements T2 - 2008 Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security N2 - We present a process to develop secure software with an extensive pattern-based security requirements engineering phase. It supports identifying and analyzing conflicts between different security requirements. In the design phase, we proceed by selecting security software components that achieve security requirements. The process enables software developers to systematically identify, analyze, and finally realize security requirements using security software components. We illustrate our approach by a lawyer agency software example. KW - security requirement KW - requirements engineering KW - data security KW - computer science Y1 - 2008 UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4529338 SN - 978-0-7695-3102-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2008.27 N1 - Sie haben Zugriff auf den Volltext innerhalb des HSD Campus. SP - 195 EP - 203 PB - IEEE CY - Barcelona ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hatebur, Denis A1 - Heisel, Maritta A1 - Schmidt, Holger ED - Czarnecki, Krzysztof ED - Ober, Ileana ED - Bruel, Jean-Michel ED - Uhl, Axel ED - Völter, Markus T1 - A Formal Metamodel for Problem Frames T2 - Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: 11th International Conference, MoDELS 2008, Toulouse, France, September 28 - October 3, 2008. Proceedings N2 - Problem frames are patterns for analyzing, structuring, and characterizing software development problems. This paper presents a formal metamodel for problem frames expressed in UML class diagrams and using the formal specification notation OCL. That metamodel clarifies the nature of the different syntactical elements of problem frames, as well as the relations between them. It provides a framework for syntactical analysis and semantic validation of newly defined problem frames, and it prepares the ground for tool support for the problem frame approach. KW - object constraint language KW - problem frames KW - causal domain KW - eclipse modeling framework Y1 - 2008 UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-87875-9_5 SN - 978-3-540-87874-2 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87875-9_5 VL - LNCS, 5301 SP - 58 EP - 82 PB - Springer CY - Berlin, Heidelberg ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Côté, Isabelle A1 - Hatebur, Denis A1 - Heisel, Maritta A1 - Schmidt, Holger A1 - Wentzlaff, Ina T1 - A Systematic Account of Problem Frames T2 - Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP '2007), Irsee, Germany, July 4-8, 2007. N2 - We give an enumeration of possible problem frames, based on domain characteristics, and comment on the usefulness of the obtained frames. In particular, we investigate problem domains and their characteristics in detail. This leads to fine-grained criteria for describing problem domains. As a result, we identify a new type of problem domain and come up with integrity conditions for developing useful problem frames. Taking a complete enumeration of possible problem frames (with at most three problem domains, of which only one is constrained) as a basis, we find 8 new problem frames, 7 of which we consider as useful in practical software development. KW - problem frames KW - systematic account Y1 - 2008 SP - 749 EP - 767 PB - Universitätsverlag Konstanz CY - Konstanz ER -