@article{Schmidt2011, author = {Schmidt, Holger}, title = {Threat and Risk-Driven Security Requirements Engineering}, series = {International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications}, volume = {3}, journal = {International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications}, number = {1}, publisher = {IGI Global}, issn = {1937-9412}, doi = {10.4018/jmcmc.2011010103}, pages = {35 -- 50}, year = {2011}, abstract = {In this paper, the author aim to present a threat and risk-driven methodology to security requirements engineering. The chosen approach has a strong focus on gathering, modeling, and analyzing the environment in which a secure ICT-system to be built is located. The knowledge about the environment comprises threat and risk models. As presented in the paper, this security-relevant knowledge is used to assess the adequacy of security mechanisms, which are then selected to establish security requirements.}, language = {en} } @article{FabianGuersesHeiseletal.2010, author = {Fabian, Benjamin and G{\"u}rses, Seda and Heisel, Maritta and Santen, Thomas and Schmidt, Holger}, title = {A comparison of security requirements engineering methods}, series = {Requirements Engineering}, volume = {15}, journal = {Requirements Engineering}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0947-3602}, doi = {10.1007/s00766-009-0092-x}, pages = {7 -- 40}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This paper presents a conceptual framework for security engineering, with a strong focus on security requirements elicitation and analysis. This conceptual framework establishes a clear-cut vocabulary and makes explicit the interrelations between the different concepts and notions used in security engineering. Further, we apply our conceptual framework to compare and evaluate current security requirements engineering approaches, such as the Common Criteria, Secure Tropos, SREP, MSRA, as well as methods based on UML and problem frames. We review these methods and assess them according to different criteria, such as the general approach and scope of the method, its validation, and quality assurance capabilities. Finally, we discuss how these methods are related to the conceptual framework and to one another.}, language = {en} }