@article{MusallVoss2011, author = {Musall, Eike and Voss, Karsten}, title = {Ziel Klimaneutrale Geb{\"a}ude - von der Bilanzierung zur Umsetzung}, series = {HLH}, volume = {62}, journal = {HLH}, number = {12}, publisher = {Wiley}, pages = {114 -- 117}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Bilanzprinzip {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft anhand bekannter Geb{\"a}ude sowie technische Strategien dargestellt}, language = {de} } @article{MarszalHeiselbergBourelleetal.2011, author = {Marszal, Anna Joanna and Heiselberg, Per and Bourelle, Julien S. and Musall, Eike and Voss, Karsten and Sartori, Igor and Napolitano, Assunta}, title = {Zero Energy Building - A Review of definitions and calculation methodologies}, series = {Energy and Buildings}, volume = {43}, journal = {Energy and Buildings}, number = {4}, publisher = {Elsevier}, pages = {971 -- 979}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The concept of Zero Energy Building (ZEB) has gained wide international attention during last few years and is now seen as the future target for the design of buildings. However, before being fully implemented in the national building codes and international standards, the ZEB concept requires clear and consistent definition and a commonly agreed energy calculation methodology. The most important issues that should be given special attention before developing anewZEB definition are: (1) the metric of the balance, (2) the balancing period, (3) the type of energy use included in the balance, (4) the type of energy balance, (5) the accepted renewable energy supply options, (6) the connection to the energy infrastructure and (7) the requirements for the energy efficiency, the indoor climate and in case of gird connected ZEB for the building-grid interaction. This paper focuses on the review of the most of the existing ZEB definitions and the various approaches towards possible ZEB calculation methodologies. It presents and discusses possible answers to the abovementioned issues in order to facilitate the development of a consistent ZEB definition and a robust energy calculation methodology.}, language = {en} } @incollection{SkodaSteffensBuechel2011, author = {Skoda, Sabrina and Steffens, Jochen and B{\"u}chel, Joachim}, title = {Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Beschleunigungskr{\"a}ften auf die Ger{\"a}uschbewertung im Fahrzeuginnenraum}, series = {5. DEGA-Symposium "E-Mobilit{\"a}t \& Akustik"}, booktitle = {5. DEGA-Symposium "E-Mobilit{\"a}t \& Akustik"}, address = {Stuttgart}, organization = {Deutsche Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Akustik e.V.}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @techreport{SchmidtJuerjens2011, author = {Schmidt, Holger and J{\"u}rjens, Jan}, title = {UMLsec4UML2 - Adopting UMLsec to Support UML2}, series = {LS 14 Software Engineering mit dem Schwerpunkt Entwicklung evolutionsf{\"a}higer Software und Systeme}, journal = {LS 14 Software Engineering mit dem Schwerpunkt Entwicklung evolutionsf{\"a}higer Software und Systeme}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Dortmund}, address = {Dortmund}, doi = {10.17877/DE290R-990}, pages = {17}, year = {2011}, abstract = {In this paper, we present an approach to adopt UMLsec, which is defined for UML 1.5, to support the current UML version 2.3. The new profile UMLsec4UML2 is technically constructed as a UML profile diagram, which is equipped with a number of integrity conditions expressed using OCL. Consequently, the UMLsec4UML2-profile can be loaded in any Eclipse-based EMF- and MDT-compatible UML editing tool to develop and analyze different kinds of security models. The OCL constraints replace the static checks of the tool support for the old UMLsec defined for UML 1.5. Thus, the UMLsec4UML2-profile not only provides the whole expresiveness of UML2.3 for security modeling, it also brings considerably more freedom in selecting a basic UML editing tool, and it integrates modeling and analyzing security models. Since UML2.3 comprises new diagram types, as well as new model elements and new semantics of diagram types already contained in UML1.5, we consider a number of these changes in detail. More specifically, we consider composite structure and sequence diagrams with respect to modeling security properties according to the original version of UMLsec. The goal is to use UMLsec4UML2 to specify architectural security patterns.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{CoteHeiselSchmidtetal.2011, author = {C{\^o}t{\´e}, Isabelle and Heisel, Maritta and Schmidt, Holger and Hatebur, Denis}, title = {UML4PF — A tool for problem-oriented requirements analysis}, series = {2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference}, booktitle = {2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {Trento}, isbn = {978-1-4577-0924-1}, doi = {10.1109/RE.2011.6051670}, pages = {349 -- 350}, year = {2011}, abstract = {We present UML4PF, a tool for requirements analysis based on problem frames. It consists of a UML profile and an Eclipse-Plugin to model and analyze problem diagrams, derive specifications, and develop architectures.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SchwittekSchmidtEickeretal.2011, author = {Schwittek, Widura and Schmidt, Holger and Eicker, Stefan and Heisel, Maritta}, title = {Towards a Common Body of Knowledge for Engineering Secure Software and Services}, series = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing}, editor = {Filipe, Joaquim and Liu, Kecheng}, publisher = {SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications}, address = {Paris}, pages = {369 -- 374}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Interdisciplinary communities involve people and knowledge from different disciplines in addressing a common challenge. Differing perspectives, processes, methods, tools, vocabularies, and standards are problems that arise in this context. We present an approach to support bringing together disciplines based on a common body of knowledge (CBK), in which knowledge from different disciplines is collected, integrated, and structured. The novelty of our approach is twofold: first, it introduces a CBK ontology, which allows one to semantically enrich contents in order to be able to query the CBK in a more elaborate way afterwards. Second, it heavily relies on user participation in building up a CBK, making use of the Semantic MediaWiki as a platform to support collaborative writing. The CBK ontology is backed by a conceptual framework, consisting of concepts to structure the knowledge, to provide access options to it, and to build up a common terminology. To ensure a high quality of the provided contents and to sustain the community's commitment, we further present organizational means as part of our approach. We demonstrate our work using the example of a Network of Excellence EU project, which aims at bringing together researchers and practitioners from services computing, security and software engineering.}, language = {en} } @article{Schmidt2011, author = {Schmidt, Holger}, title = {Threat and Risk-Driven Security Requirements Engineering}, series = {International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications}, volume = {3}, journal = {International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications}, number = {1}, publisher = {IGI Global}, issn = {1937-9412}, doi = {10.4018/jmcmc.2011010103}, pages = {35 -- 50}, year = {2011}, abstract = {In this paper, the author aim to present a threat and risk-driven methodology to security requirements engineering. The chosen approach has a strong focus on gathering, modeling, and analyzing the environment in which a secure ICT-system to be built is located. The knowledge about the environment comprises threat and risk models. As presented in the paper, this security-relevant knowledge is used to assess the adequacy of security mechanisms, which are then selected to establish security requirements.}, language = {en} } @article{MeiSanchezReineckeetal.2011, author = {Mei, Bastian and S{\´a}nchez, Miguel D. and Reinecke, Thomas and Kaluza, Stefan and Xia, Wei and Muhler, Martin}, title = {The synthesis of Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles by spray drying: an efficient and scalable method}, series = {Journal of Materials Chemistry}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of Materials Chemistry}, number = {32}, publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)}, issn = {1364-5501}, doi = {10.1039/c1jm11431j}, pages = {11781 -- 11790}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HeymanYskoutScandariatoetal.2011, author = {Heyman, Thomas and Yskout, Koen and Scandariato, Riccardo and Schmidt, Holger and Yu, Yijun}, title = {The Security Twin Peaks}, series = {Engineering Secure Software and Systems: Third International Symposium, ESSoS 2011, Madrid, Spain, February 9-10, 2011. Proceedings}, volume = {LNCS}, booktitle = {Engineering Secure Software and Systems: Third International Symposium, ESSoS 2011, Madrid, Spain, February 9-10, 2011. Proceedings}, number = {6542}, editor = {Erlingsson, {\´U}lfar and Wieringa, Roel and Zannone, Nicola}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-642-19124-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-19125-1_13}, pages = {167 -- 180}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @incollection{FranzTroncyVacura2011, author = {Franz, Thomas and Troncy, Rapha{\"e}l and Vacura, Miroslav}, title = {The Core Ontology for Multimedia}, series = {Multimedia semantics: Metadata, analysis and interaction}, booktitle = {Multimedia semantics: Metadata, analysis and interaction}, editor = {Troncy, Rapha{\"e}l and Huet, Benoit and Schenk, Simon}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Chichester}, isbn = {9781119970231}, doi = {10.1002/9781119970231.ch9}, pages = {145 -- 161}, year = {2011}, language = {de} }