TY - JOUR A1 - Dabard, Caroline Hélène A1 - Gohr, Charlotte A1 - Weiss, Fabio A1 - von Wehrden, Henrik A1 - Neumann, Frederike A1 - Hordasevych, Solomiia A1 - Arieta, Bruno A1 - Hammerich, Jenny A1 - Meier, Caroline A1 - Jargow, Janine A1 - Luthardt, Vera A1 - Ibisch, Pierre L. A1 - Ferreira, Ana Filipa T1 - Biosphere Reserves as model regions for transdisciplinarity? A literature review JF - Sustainability Science N2 - Abstract The World Network of Biosphere Reserves promotes learning sites for sustainable development, designated under the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere programme (MAB). The programme aims to strengthen biodiversity conservation, economic development and capacity building. Scientific research in and about Biosphere Reserves is expected to support these objectives. In response to a strong focus on natural sciences and conservation issues, calls for transdisciplinary approaches emanated from science and the newest MAB Lima Action Plan. Yet, the extent and contributions of transdisciplinary research in Biosphere Reserves remains unexplored. This study provides a comprehensive and systematic screening of 3304 scientific publications in and about Biosphere Reserves published since 1975. Research within Biosphere Reserves spans a broad spectrum, encompassing social to political to ecological investigations, with a focus on natural sciences and studies conducted mainly in Europe and Asia. We identified an emerging field of transdisciplinary science in research, represented in 336 publications. Most transdisciplinary studies were conducted in Mexican and Indian Biosphere Reserves. While transdisciplinary research provided insights about participation, management and governance in Biosphere Reserves, its transformative potential could be enhanced, notably through stronger forms of participation of non-academic actors in research processes. Our review suggests strengthening knowledge co-creation about transformative solutions and interventions addressing deep leverage points. Scientific research could thereby enhance the role of Biosphere Reserves as model regions for sustainability transformations. KW - - KW - Systematic literature review KW - Leverage points KW - Protected areas KW - Transformative research KW - Participation Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-9497 SN - 1862-4065 SN - 1862-4057 VL - 19 IS - 6 SP - 2065 EP - 2081 PB - Springer Japan CY - Tokyo ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dabard, Caroline Hélène A1 - Gohr, Charlotte A1 - Weiss, Fabio A1 - von Wehrden, Henrik A1 - Neumann, Frederike A1 - Hordasevych, Solomiia A1 - Arieta, Bruno A1 - Hammerich, Jenny A1 - Meier, Caroline A1 - Jargow, Janine A1 - Luthardt, Vera A1 - Ibisch, Pierre L. A1 - Ferreira, Ana Filipa T1 - Correction: Biosphere Reserves as model regions for transdisciplinarity? A literature review JF - Sustainability Science KW - - Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-9506 SN - 1862-4065 SN - 1862-4057 VL - 19 IS - 6 SP - 2083 EP - 2084 PB - Springer Japan CY - Tokyo ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dabard, Caroline Hélène A1 - Mann, Carsten T1 - Sustainability innovations: a proposal for an analytical framework and its empirical application in the Schorfheide-Chorin Biosphere Reserve JF - Sustainability Science N2 - Sustainability innovations influence societal transformations through the development of new products, processes, organizations, behaviors or values. Although various research approaches have tackled technological innovations in the last few decades, the specificities and enabling conditions of individual sustainability innovations remain rather unknown. We therefore propose an analytical framework, built on learning from the social–ecological systems and transitions literature. The sustainability innovation framework features four dimensions: context, actors, process and outcomes, which are detailed in 31 variables. We use the sustainability innovation framework to analyze two case studies selected in the Schorfheide-Chorin Biosphere Reserve, Germany. The first refers to technological and organizational innovation in mobility, while the second relates to social and organizational innovation in agriculture. As a result, we highlight commonalities and differences in enabling conditions and variables between the two cases, which underpin the influence of trust, commitment, resource availability, experimenting, learning, advocating, and cooperating for innovation development. The cases further demonstrate that sustainability innovations develop as bundles of interdependent, entangled novelties, due to their disruptive character. Their specificity thereby resides in positive outcomes in terms of social–ecological integrity and equity. This study therefore contributes to transitions studies via a detailed characterization of sustainability innovations and of their outcomes, as well as through a generic synthesis of variables into an analytical framework that is applicable to a large and diverse range of individual sustainability innovations. Further empirical studies should test these findings in other contexts, to pinpoint generic innovation development patterns and to develop a typology of sustainability innovation archetypes. KW - Innovation; Sustainability transitions; Innovation systems; Social–ecological systems; Rural innovation; Biosphere reserve Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6558 SN - 1862-4057 VL - 18 IS - 3 SP - 1085 EP - 1098 PB - Springer Nature ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dabard, Caroline Hélène A1 - Mann, Carsten T1 - Sustainability innovations: a proposal for an analytical framework and its empirical application in the Schorfheide-Chorin Biosphere Reserve JF - Sustainability Science N2 - A bstract Sustainability innovations influence societal transformations through the development of new products, processes, organizations, behaviors or values. Although various research approaches have tackled technological innovations in the last few decades, the specificities and enabling conditions of individual sustainability innovations remain rather unknown. We therefore propose an analytical framework, built on learning from the social–ecological systems and transitions literature. The sustainability innovation framework features four dimensions: context, actors, process and outcomes, which are detailed in 31 variables. We use the sustainability innovation framework to analyze two case studies selected in the Schorfheide-Chorin Biosphere Reserve, Germany. The first refers to technological and organizational innovation in mobility, while the second relates to social and organizational innovation in agriculture. As a result, we highlight commonalities and differences in enabling conditions and variables between the two cases, which underpin the influence of trust, commitment, resource availability, experimenting, learning, advocating, and cooperating for innovation development. The cases further demonstrate that sustainability innovations develop as bundles of interdependent, entangled novelties, due to their disruptive character. Their specificity thereby resides in positive outcomes in terms of social–ecological integrity and equity. This study therefore contributes to transitions studies via a detailed characterization of sustainability innovations and of their outcomes, as well as through a generic synthesis of variables into an analytical framework that is applicable to a large and diverse range of individual sustainability innovations. Further empirical studies should test these findings in other contexts, to pinpoint generic innovation development patterns and to develop a typology of sustainability innovation archetypes. KW - - KW - Innovation KW - Sustainability transitions KW - Innovation systems KW - Social–ecological systems KW - Rural innovation KW - Biosphere reserve KW - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services KW - Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-9239 SN - 1862-4065 SN - 1862-4057 VL - 18 IS - 3 SP - 1085 EP - 1098 PB - Springer Japan ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dabard, Caroline Hélène A1 - Mann, Carsten A1 - Martín-López, Berta T1 - Enhancing the transformative potential of sustainability innovations: An application of the values-rules-knowledge framework JF - Ambio N2 - Abstract To respond to global sustainability challenges with transformative solutions, there is a need to pinpoint the necessary and sufficient conditions that enhance the transformative potential of sustainability innovations. To this end, we examined 129 sustainability innovations in two European Biosphere Reserves, and analysed (1) their transformative potential, assessed based on a leverage points perspective, and (2) their supportive conditions (i.e. decision contexts, or constellations of values, rules and knowledge). Specifically, we used social network analyses to characterise different rules, or governance arrangements in the two Biosphere Reserves. By comparing the decision contexts of transformative and incremental innovations, we provide empirical evidence that plural values, coproduction and networks that are diverse, collaborative and influential, enable transformative innovations. Shallow leverage points seem insufficient but necessary to operationalise transformative change. Future research should explore the co-evolution of decision contexts and transformative potential, to better understand how to shift incremental to transformative innovations. KW - - KW - Amplification KW - Decision contexts KW - Leverage points KW - Social innovation KW - Sustainability transformations KW - Values Y1 - 2025 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-10041 SN - 0044-7447 SN - 1654-7209 VL - 54 IS - 7 SP - 1250 EP - 1266 PB - Springer Netherlands CY - Dordrecht ER -