<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>481</id>
    <completedYear>2022</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>173</pageNumber>
    <edition>1</edition>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>book</type>
    <publisherName>S. Hirzel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Das ökohumanistische Manifest : unsere Zukunft in der Natur</title>
    <identifier type="isbn">9783777630427</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-4816</identifier>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <author>Jörg Sommer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Anthropozän; Ökosystem; Umweltschaden; Gesellschaft; Entwicklung; Menschenwürde; Umweltschutz; Soziale Gerechtigkeit</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wald und Umwelt</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>539</id>
    <completedYear>2022</completedYear>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>21</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2022-05-16</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Same soil, different climate: Crop model intercomparison on translocated lysimeters</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Crop model intercomparison studies have mostly focused on the assessment of predictive capabilities for crop development using weather and basic soil data from the same location. Still challenging is the model performance when considering complex interrelations between soil and crop dynamics under a changing climate. The objective of this study was to test the agronomic crop and environmental flux-related performance of a set of crop models. The aim was to predict weighing lysimeter-based crop (i.e., agronomic) and water-related flux or state data (i.e., environmental) obtained for the same soil monoliths that were taken from their original environment and translocated to regions with different climatic conditions, after model calibration at the original site. Eleven models were deployed in the study. The lysimeter data (2014–2018) were from the Dedelow (Dd), Bad Lauchstädt (BL), and Selhausen (Se) sites of the TERENO (TERrestrial ENvironmental Observatories) SOILCan network. Soil monoliths from Dd were transferred to the drier and warmer BL site and the wetter and warmer Se site, which allowed a comparison of similar soil and crop under varying climatic conditions. The model parameters were calibrated using an identical set of crop- and soil-related data from Dd. Environmental fluxes and crop growth of Dd soil were predicted for conditions at BL and Se sites using the calibrated models. The comparison of predicted and measured data of Dd lysimeters at BL and Se revealed differences among models. At site BL, the crop models predicted agronomic and environmental components similarly well. Model performance values indicate that the environmental components at site Se were better predicted than agronomic ones. The multi-model mean was for most observations the better predictor compared with those of individual models. For Se site conditions, crop models failed to predict site-specific crop development indicating that climatic conditions (i.e., heat stress) were outside the range of variation in the data sets considered for model calibration. For improving predictive ability of crop models (i.e., productivity and fluxes), more attention should be paid to soil-related data (i.e., water fluxes and system states) when simulating soil–crop–climate interrelations in changing climatic conditions.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Vadose Zone Journal</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/vzj2.20202</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-5395</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1539-1663</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.data">@articlehttps://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20202, author = Groh, Jannis and Diamantopoulos, Efstathios and Duan, Xiaohong and Ewert, Frank and Heinlein, Florian and Herbst, Michael and Holbak, Maja and Kamali, Bahareh and Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian and Kuhnert, Matthias and Nendel, Claas and Priesack, Eckart and Steidl, Jörg and Sommer, Michael and Pütz, Thomas and Vanderborght, Jan and Vereecken, Harry and Wallor, Evelyn and Weber, Tobias K. D. and Wegehenkel, Martin and Weihermüller, Lutz and Gerke, Horst H., title = Same soil, different climate: Crop model intercomparison on translocated lysimeters, journal = Vadose Zone Journal, volume = 21, number = 4, pages = e20202, doi = https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20202, url = https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/vzj2.20202, eprint = https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/vzj2.20202, abstract = Abstract Crop model intercomparison studies have mostly focused on the assessment of predictive capabilities for crop development using weather and basic soil data from the same location. Still challenging is the model performance when considering complex interrelations between soil and crop dynamics under a changing climate. The objective of this study was to test the agronomic crop and environmental flux-related performance of a set of crop models. The aim was to predict weighing lysimeter-based crop (i.e., agronomic) and water-related flux or state data (i.e., environmental) obtained for the same soil monoliths that were taken from their original environment and translocated to regions with different climatic conditions, after model calibration at the original site. Eleven models were deployed in the study. The lysimeter data (2014–2018) were from the Dedelow (Dd), Bad Lauchstädt (BL), and Selhausen (Se) sites of the TERENO (TERrestrial ENvironmental Observatories) SOILCan network. Soil monoliths from Dd were transferred to the drier and warmer BL site and the wetter and warmer Se site, which allowed a comparison of similar soil and crop under varying climatic conditions. The model parameters were calibrated using an identical set of crop- and soil-related data from Dd. Environmental fluxes and crop growth of Dd soil were predicted for conditions at BL and Se sites using the calibrated models. The comparison of predicted and measured data of Dd lysimeters at BL and Se revealed differences among models. At site BL, the crop models predicted agronomic and environmental components similarly well. Model performance values indicate that the environmental components at site Se were better predicted than agronomic ones. The multi-model mean was for most observations the better predictor compared with those of individual models. For Se site conditions, crop models failed to predict site-specific crop development indicating that climatic conditions (i.e., heat stress) were outside the range of variation in the data sets considered for model calibration. For improving predictive ability of crop models (i.e., productivity and fluxes), more attention should be paid to soil-related data (i.e., water fluxes and system states) when simulating soil–crop–climate interrelations in changing climatic conditions., year = 2022</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.dataHash">md5:ac4484caa1316142ab9bcfb422dfbb04</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2023-05-19T14:37:02+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.file">/tmp/phpbj8tG3</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.format">bibtex</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.id">6467898ed85fe2.58828268</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Jannis Groh</author>
    <author>Efstathios Diamantopoulos</author>
    <author>Xiaohong Duan</author>
    <author>Frank Ewert</author>
    <author>Florian Heinlein</author>
    <author>Michael Herbst</author>
    <author>Maja Holbak</author>
    <author>Bahareh Kamali</author>
    <author>Kurt-Christian Kersebaum</author>
    <author>Matthias Kuhnert</author>
    <author>Claas Nendel</author>
    <author>Eckart Priesack</author>
    <author>Jörg Steidl</author>
    <author>Michael Sommer</author>
    <author>Thomas Pütz</author>
    <author>Jan Vanderborght</author>
    <author>Harry Vereecken</author>
    <author>Evelyn Wallor</author>
    <author>Tobias K. D. Weber</author>
    <author>Martin Wegehenkel</author>
    <author>Lutz Weihermüller</author>
    <author>Horst H. Gerke</author>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wald und Umwelt</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/539/Vadose_Zone_Journal_2022_Groh.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>694</id>
    <completedYear>2020</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>14</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>25</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>S. Hirzel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Heimat - Ein schwieriges Thema</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Heimat ist gerade in der deutschen Debatte ein mehrdimensionaler Begriff. Die Auseinandersetzung mit ihm erfordert ein Aushalten und vor allem ein Austragen von Differenzen und Gegensätzen, von Spannungen zwischen Sicherheit und Unsicherheit, Nähe und Ferne, Vertrauen und Misstrauen, Geborgenheit und Einsamkeit, Demokratie und Chauvinismus.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Ökologie und Heimat - gutes Leben für alle oder die Rückkehr der braunen Naturschützer?</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-7776-2864-6</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6942</identifier>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Michael Müller</author>
    <author>Jörg Sommer</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wald und Umwelt</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>695</id>
    <completedYear>2020</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>26</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>39</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>S. Hirzel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Heimaterde und Heimat Erde - Globale Verantwortung statt "Blut und Boden"</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Wir haben die identitätsstiftenden Natur- und Kulturräume im Namen des Fortschritts zerstört. Daran sind wir selbst schuld und keineswegs andere Menschen, die sich in unserer auf Raub und Zerstörung basierenden Gesellschaft vermeintlich nicht integrieren wollen. Die Antwort in Form eines "Heimatministeriums" ist verlogen, weil es sich in keinerlei Weise um die Bekämpfung der wahren Ursachen der Zerstörung unseres Lebensraum bemüht.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Ökologie und Heimat - gutes Leben für alle oder die Rückkehr der braunen Naturschützer?</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-7776-2864-6</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6950</identifier>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <author>Jörg Sommer</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wald und Umwelt</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>697</id>
    <completedYear>2020</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>231</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>244</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>S. Hirzel</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Für einen globalen Ökohumanismus - Wie wir die Grenzen von Natur- und Heimatschutz überwinden</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Die kommenden gesellschaftlichen Großkonflikte werden ganz erheblich von ökologischen Faktoren beeinflusst. Dennoch wird die ökologische Frage nicht im Zentrum stehen, da kurz- und mittelfristig soziale Spannungen in den Vordergrund drängen. Wie kann sie dennoch die nötige Berücksichtigung erfahren? Durch eine Weiterentwicklung ökologischen Denkens zu einem radikalen und globalen Ökohumanismus.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Ökologie und Heimat - gutes Leben für alle oder die Rückkehr der braunen Naturschützer?</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-7776-2864-6</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6976</identifier>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <author>Jörg Sommer</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wald und Umwelt</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
