<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>226</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>15</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Frontiers</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-03-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2021-11-19</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Adapting a Participatory and Ecosystem-Based Assessment Impacted by the Pandemic: Lessons Learned With Farmers in Tajikistan</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The paper presents a systemic and participatory assessment approach and scrutinizes how methodological changes necessitated during the Covid-19 pandemic implicated the process and its outcomes. The approach was applied in rural Tajikistan to evaluate changes effected by a development project that promoted the enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agrarian landscapes. The central building block of the assessment consisted of participatory workshops in 2018 and 2020 with farmers and other stakeholders to develop a systemic knowledge map and to evaluate the promoted strategies based on local expertise. The methodological basis was MARISCO (adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites), a holistic and participatory approach to ecosystem-based assessment and management that requires well-trained facilitators. While the activities in 2018 could be implemented as planned, major changes in the work plan were necessary in 2020 due to severe travel restrictions and social distancing rules. Conducting virtual workshops was not possible, as it would have excluded key stakeholders from the process. Instead of conducting a comprehensive assessment workshop guided by two German MARISCO facilitators as originally planned, a series of short and small workshops could be realized. These workshops were facilitated by Tajik scientists after receiving virtual training from their German colleagues. Although it was possible to bring the assessment to a satisfactory conclusion, the methodological changes revealed significant drawbacks. Radical simplifications of the methods were necessary that led to reduced depth of the assessment and missed learning opportunities for participants. Limited experience in workshop guidance by the new facilitators posed challenges to the participatory process and the quality of its outcomes. While the adapted method created training effects that would otherwise have been missed, it also put additional pressure on the capacities of local partners. Our experience during the pandemic offers valuable lessons learned for future applications of systemic-participatory approaches. Whereas, a complete shift to remote applications is problematic, there is a need to put greater emphasis on capacitating local partners. Methodological trade-offs are necessary for partially remote working processes, but principles of participation and systemic thinking should not be compromised.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Frontiers in sustainable Food Systems</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2021.750252</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2571-581X</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-2263</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Michael Spies</author>
    <author>Axel Schick</author>
    <author>Sharofiddin Karomatov</author>
    <author>Bobozoda Bakokhoja</author>
    <author>Khaidarov Zikriyokhon</author>
    <author>Shonazar Jobirov</author>
    <author>Ralf Bloch</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Eco-system-based sustainable development</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>MARISCO</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Participatory methods</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Biodiversity and ecosystem service assessment</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sustainable agriculture</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Tajikistan</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Ökologische Landwirtschaft und Ernährungssysteme M.Sc.</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/226/fsufs-05-750252.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>241</id>
    <completedYear>2020</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>9</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>SpringerOpen</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-06-17</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2020-02-14</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Clearcuts and related secondary dieback undermine the ecological effectiveness of FSC certification in a boreal forest</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background: Over the last 25 years, the prominent forest certification system established by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) has used by many companies worldwide for claiming responsible forest management. The objectives of the Russian National FSC standard to decrease the size of clearcuts and the retention of forest elements such as residual seed trees need on-site validation to proof the effectiveness of FSC. To assess the ecological impacts of harvesting practices and benefits of FSC certification, we geospatially compared logging activities with and without FSC certification. Within a sample area covering approximately 3,000 km 2 in the east of the Russian Arkhangelsk Region, we used available data on tree cover loss and satellite images to assess secondary impacts of clearcuttings&#13;
on adjacent remnant forests and to quantify the logging intensity. Additionally, the size and structure as well as the density of skidding trails of ten specific clearcuttings located within the sample area were surveyed using satellite images and in the field observation to delineate the boundaries of clearcuts and forested remnants within the clearcuts.&#13;
Results: We found a significant increase of small-scale tree cover loss in the proximity of the clearcuts. Patchy dieback is possibly linked to the scale and intensity of logging in the surroundings. On the investigated clearcuts, FSC failed to reduce the size, to increase the retention of forest remnants including seed trees on logged areas, and to maintain larger tracts of undisturbed ground and soil compared to clearcuts that were logged before they received FSC-certification.&#13;
Conclusions: Trees and forest remnants remaining inside an increasingly stressed forest ecosystem matrix may not resist further harvesting-related and climate change-induced stresses and disturbances. Large-scale clearcuttings seem to have negative impacts even in adjacent forests and undermine the ecological effectiveness of FSC certification in the study area. The Russian FSC standard is not clearly setting effective guidelines that induce a change in clearcutting practices in order to reduce ecological risks.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Ecological Process</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1186/s13717-020-0214-4</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2192-1709</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-2414</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Jeanette Silvin Blumröder</author>
    <author>Monika T. Hoffmann</author>
    <author>Olga Ilina</author>
    <author>Susanne Winter</author>
    <author>Peter R. Hobson</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Ecological efectiveness</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Impact assessment</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Forest certification</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sustainable forestry</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="634">Obstanlagen, Früchte, Forstwirtschaft</collection>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/241/s13717-020-0214-4.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>199</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>14</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-09-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2021-07-13</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Forestry contributed to warming of forest ecosystems in northern Germany during the extreme summers of 2018 and 2019</title>
    <abstract language="eng">1. Forest management influences a variety of ecosystem structures and processes relevant to meso- and microclimatic regulation, but little research has been done on how forest management can mitigate the negative effects of climate change on forest ecosystems.&#13;
&#13;
2. We studied the temperature regulation capacity during the two Central European extreme summers in 2018 and 2019 in Scots pine plantations and European beech forests with different management-related structural characteristics.&#13;
&#13;
3. We found that the maximum temperature was higher when more trees were cut and canopy was more open. Logging 100 trees per hectare increased maximum temperature by 0.21–0.34 K at ground level and by 0.09–0.17 K in 1.3 m above ground. Opening the forest canopy by 10% significantly increased Tmax, measured 1.3 m above ground by 0.46 K (including pine and beech stands) and 0.35 K (only pine stands). At ground level, Tmax increased by 0.53 K for the model including pine and beech stands and by 0.41 K in pure pine stands. Relative temperature cooling capacity decreased with increasing wood harvest activities, with below average values in 2018 (and 2019) when more than 656 (and 867) trees per hectare were felled. In the pine forests studied, the relative temperature buffering capacity 1.3 m above ground was lower than average values for all sample plots when canopy cover was below 82%. In both study years, mean maximum temperature measured at ground level and in 1.3 m was highest in a pine-dominated sample plots with relatively low stand volume (177 m3 ha−1) and 9 K lower in a sample plot with relatively high stock volumes of Fagus sylvatica (&gt;565 m3 ha−1). During the hottest day in 2019, the difference in temperature peaks was more than 13 K for pine-dominated sample plots with relatively dense (72%) and low (46%) canopy cover.&#13;
&#13;
4. Structural forest characteristics influenced by forest management significantly affect microclimatic conditions and therefore ecosystem vulnerability to climate change. We advocate keeping the canopy as dense as possible (at least 80%) by maintaining sufficient overgrowth and by supporting deciduous trees that provide effective shade.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Ecological Solutions and Evidence</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/2688-8319.12087</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-1992</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2688-8319</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Jeanette Silvin Blumröder</author>
    <author>Felix May</author>
    <author>Werner Härdtle</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>climate change</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>forest functionality</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>regulating ecosystem services</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>cooling</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>drought events</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>forest canopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>temperature regulation</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="551">Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="634">Obstanlagen, Früchte, Forstwirtschaft</collection>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="Finanzierung" number="">Projekt DEAL</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/199/Blumroder-2021-Forestry-contributed-to-warming.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>390</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>12</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2023-01-20</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Does fragmentation contribute to the forest crisis in Germany?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Intact forests contribute to the ecosystem functionality of landscapes by storing and sequestering carbon, buffering and cooling the microclimate, and providing a range of related ecosystem functions. Forest fragmentation not only poses a threat to many organisms but also reduces the resistance and resilience of the ecosystem, which is especially relevant to the ongoing climate crisis. The effects of recent extreme heat years on forests in Germany have not been studied in detail for the influence of fragmentation. We investigate the relation of forest fragmentation with temperature and vitality in Germany per ecoregion at the canopy level using satellite imagery at 1-km and 30-m resolution. We compiled and correlated forest maps for connectivity based on Thiessen polygons, canopy temperatures on the hottest days based on land surface temperature, and forest vitality based on the maximum normalized difference vegetation index per growing season. We differentiated between ecoregions and main forest types. In 2022, larger intact tree-covered areas that are less fragmented have relatively low temperatures on hot days and higher overall vitality. Nearly 98% of the almost 1.95 million forest fragments at 30-m resolution in Germany are smaller than 1 km2, which cover nearly 30% of the total forest area. To counteract the forest crisis, forest and landscape management should aim to reduce fragmentation and maintain tree biomass and forest cover in the landscape. Increasing the size of continuous forest fragments contributes to ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2624-893X</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2023.1099460</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-3909</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2023-02-03T06:48:19+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">deep</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.file">attachment; filename=deposit.zip</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.checksum">8b239e9e88ee1a55bd2d8c9d7716b0a3</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Deepika Mann</author>
    <author>Charlotte Gohr</author>
    <author>Jeanette Silvin Blumröder</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>land surface temperature (LST)</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Thiessen connectivity</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>forest fragmentation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>forest cover</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="Import" number="import">Import</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Biosphere Reserves Institute</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/390/ffgc-06-1099460.pdf</file>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/390/Data_Sheet_1_Does_fragmentation_contribute.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>720</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>97</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>other</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Ukraine based on three UNESCO Biosphere Reserves : Toolbox</title>
    <identifier type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.2.30597.01768</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-7205</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Kevin Mack</author>
    <author>Axel Schick</author>
    <author>Juliane Geyer</author>
    <author>Ivan Kruhlov</author>
    <author>Angela Dichte</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/720/Toolbox-Ecosystem-basedAdaptation2021-12.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>818</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>119</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>123</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>172</volume>
    <type>contributiontoperiodical</type>
    <publisherName>oekom Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2023-03-20</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Natürlicher Klimaschutz als strategische Ökosystementwicklungsplanung&#13;
Land und Raum in der Multikrise</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Politische Ökologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-8187</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2625-543X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Transferbeiträge</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>819</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>32</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>18</volume>
    <type>other</type>
    <publisherName>IOP Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2023-10-17</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Policy narratives in forest fire management</title>
    <abstract language="eng">As the risk of forest fires increases around the globe, the issues of how to control, suppress, and prevent them are the subjects of growing public and political attention. This study focuses on the political debate in Germany regarding forest fires and provides insights into the conceptualization of forest fires and forest fire management at the federal and state policymaking levels. By examining forest fire narratives through the policy lens, this case study takes an exemplary extreme weather event exacerbated by climate change as an opportunity to examine the policy response to this problem. In this way, we examine the role of policy narratives in civil and environmental protection and disaster management. The findings reveal that all politicians examined in this study agree that forest fire management is an urgent matter that needs to be supported. In the prevailing human-centered narrative, policymakers see active forest management and use as tools to improve forest resilience to fire and other calamities. Those who advocate a nature-based narrative assert that it is natural processes in protected forest areas that most effectively enhance resilience. The policy solutions derived from these views include financial support, recognition of the work of foresters, forest fire managers, and civil protection agencies as well as, depending on the type of narrative argument favored, either increased forest management or improved protection of forest ecologies. This suggests that narrative analysis may illuminate the rationales underlying previous policy decisions and the framework for future ones. This contribution throws light on how narratives shape policymaking and, by extension, disaster management. Future studies should therefore take into account the influence of prevailing narratives when it comes to evaluating the potential that policymaking can offer for disaster management in the future.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Environmental Research Letters</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/acf6d2</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-8193</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1748-9326</identifier>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Nikola Tietze</author>
    <author>Lars Gerhold</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>policymaking; forest fire management; narratives; decision-making; forest fire</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Referiert</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/819/Tietze_2023_Environ._Res._Lett._18_114023.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>820</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>5</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>11</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>contributiontoperiodical</type>
    <publisherName>Westermann Bildungsmedien Verlag GmbH</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Wald- und Forstbrände im Klimawandel</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Regelmäßige Landschaftsbrände sind ein wesentlicher Bestandteil vieler Ökosysteme wie Savannen oder Trockenwäldern. In vielen Regionen der Welt sind die Brände größer und häufiger geworden. Brände in den Wäldern der Gebiete mit gemäßigtem Klima wie Deutschland sind eigentlich nicht ökosystemtypisch. Aktuell nehmen allerdings die Häufigkeit und Anzahl sowie die Größe von Waldbränden zu, ohne dass Gesellschaft und Politik darauf angemessen vorbereitet sind.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Gegraphische Rundschau</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-8205</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">0016-7460</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Jeanette Silvin Blumröder</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Klimawandel; Forstbrand; Waldbrand; Deutschland</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Transferbeiträge</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>691</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>67</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>other</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Climate Change and Land Use Impacts on Ecosystems and Human Well-being in Roztochya Biosphere Reserve : Situation Analysis for Ecosystem-based Adaptation</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This document provides a summary of the situation analysis and the diagnosis. It is the cumulative result of the findings, discussions, and excursions during a. the citizen workshops b. GIS-based analysis and mapping c. MARISCO (adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites) expert workshops d. EbA training3 and recent developments since these events.</abstract>
    <identifier type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.2.28919.29600</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6916</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Kevin Mack</author>
    <author>Galyna Stryamets</author>
    <author>Ivan Kruhlov</author>
    <author>Axel Schick</author>
    <author>Angela Dichte</author>
    <author>Anatoliy Smaliychuk</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/691/SituationAnalysisforEbA-RoztochyaBR_Dec2021.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>692</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>65</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>other</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Climate Change and Land Use Impacts on Ecosystems and Human Well-being in Desnianskyi Biosphere Reserve : Situation Analysis for Ecosystem-based Adaptation</title>
    <abstract language="deu">This document provides a summary of the situation analysis and the diagnosis. It is the cumulative result of the findings, discussions, and excursions during a. the citizen workshops b. GIS-based analysis and mapping c. MARISCO (adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites) expert workshops d. EbA training3 and recent developments since these events.</abstract>
    <identifier type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.2.35630.18244</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6928</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Kevin Mack</author>
    <author>Sergiy Kubrakov</author>
    <author>Ivan Kruhlov</author>
    <author>Axel Schick</author>
    <author>Angela Dichte</author>
    <author>Anatoliy Smaliychuk</author>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hnee/files/692/SituationAnalysisforEbA-DesnianskyiBR_Dec2021.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>625</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>236</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>240</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>ABL Bauernblatt Verlags-GmbH</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Waldwende in der Wald- und Klimakrise? - Warum viele Forstakteure das Ökosystem vor lauter Bäumen nicht sehen (wollen)</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Dem Wald in Deutschland geht es schlecht. Seit 2018 machen außergewöhnliche Wärme und Trockenheit vielen Bäumen zu schaffen. Von einem »Waldsterben 2.0« ist die Rede. Die Interpretationen der Genese der aktuellen Waldkrise sowie die strategischen Ideen zu ihrer Bekämpfung gehen zwar weit auseinander - aber die Einschätzung, dass die aktuelle Verkettung von extremen Witterungen und die entsprechenden Konsequenzen in den Wäldern eine Zäsur darstellt, ist weitgehend Konsens. Die zentrale Frage ist, ob die Krise Anlass zu einer tiefgreifenden Reflektion über das vorherrschende Management der Waldökosysteme und eine entsprechende »Waldwende« gibt oder ob die aktuellen Reaktionen von Politik und Forstwirtschaft sogar zur Verschärfung der Situation beigetragen.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Der kritische Agrarbericht 2021</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-930413-69-0</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:eb1-opus-6252</identifier>
    <licence>Urheberrechtsschutz</licence>
    <author>Pierre L. Ibisch</author>
    <author>Jeanette Silvin Blumröder</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number=""/>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Transferbeiträge</collection>
    <collection role="Hochschulbibliographie" number="">Nicht ermittelbar</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
